[5.0] Upcoming action items

2003-06-30 Thread Remy Maucherat
* Release plan vote (early this week) * Interim releases: in order to make the end of the month deadline for a beta, new interim releases are needed more often than before (5.0.x has been roughlty on a 2 months interval between releases); therefore, I propose making a new release every two

Re: [5.0] Upcoming action items

2003-06-30 Thread Remy Maucherat
Bill Barker wrote: Somewhat OT, but is there a plan for TC 4.1.25? There are some serious bugs in the Jk-Coyote code in TC 4.1.24. I was thinking a two week timeframe for 4.1.25. Are all the patches needed already there ? Personally, I need to port a Jasper patch. Remy

Re: [5.0] Upcoming action items

2003-06-30 Thread Jonas Anden
I was thinking a two week timeframe for 4.1.25. Are all the patches needed already there ? Mine isn't. OutOfMemoryException due to recursive calls in log() of StandardWrapperValve: http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19312 Patch was sent to mailing list April 30th. // J

Re: [5.0] Upcoming action items

2003-06-30 Thread Bill Barker
- Original Message - From: Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 4:17 AM Subject: Re: [5.0] Upcoming action items Bill Barker wrote: Somewhat OT, but is there a plan for TC 4.1.25? There are some serious bugs

Re: [5.0] Upcoming action items

2003-06-30 Thread Remy Maucherat
Bill Barker wrote: I was thinking a two week timeframe for 4.1.25. Are all the patches needed already there ? If we're still using coyote_10, then there are a few things I need to port from HEAD (e.g. the // fix for mod_jk). Yep, coyote_10 is still used there. I think it would be a big change to

Re: [5.0] Upcoming action items

2003-06-30 Thread Ronald Klop
On Monday 30 June 2003 23:25, Remy Maucherat wrote: Bill Barker wrote: I was thinking a two week timeframe for 4.1.25. Are all the patches needed already there ? If we're still using coyote_10, then there are a few things I need to port from HEAD (e.g. the // fix for mod_jk). Yep,