Eugene Gluzberg wrote:
I am against only because many apache 1.3 users (who installed apache
from RPMs, like me) will not be able to use jk2, unless there an easy
way to install apr libs/includes, etc on top of apache1.3 Is there?
Yes, working on it ;)
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Mladen Turk wrote:
I would like to make a poll (something non-obligatory as a vote) about
using apr/apr-util inside the jk2. The reason is quite simple, we have
lots of extra code that we either duplicate or just mimic. Since the APR
is already default for Apache2 and IIS, IMO there is no
-Original Message-
From: jean-frederic clere
I have always supported the use of APR. We should use it every where!
I have just a question what happends with jni (we have to use
the same threads
for JVM and Apache)?
Nothing cannot use the JNI without APR even right now.
Mladen Turk wrote:
-Original Message-
From: jean-frederic clere
I have always supported the use of APR. We should use it every where!
I have just a question what happends with jni (we have to use
the same threads
for JVM and Apache)?
Nothing cannot use the JNI without APR
From: Henri Gomez
Nothing cannot use the JNI without APR even right now.
We are attaching threads (that's the only way how it can be done).
It's really a pain for example when using JNI from EBCDIC
systems like AS400 and BS2000 which need to have translation
of strings.
The apr
I have just a question what happends with jni (we have to use the same
threads for JVM and Apache)?
Yes. That's how the jni is designed to work - avoiding thread switching
and doing all processing in the request thread ( just like mod_perl or
mod_php would do it ) is important.
However that
I am against only because many apache 1.3 users (who installed apache
from RPMs, like me) will not be able to use jk2, unless there an easy
way to install apr libs/includes, etc on top of apache1.3 Is there?
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands,
Mladen Turk wrote:
I would like to make a poll (something non-obligatory as a vote) about
using apr/apr-util inside the jk2. The reason is quite simple, we have
lots of extra code that we either duplicate or just mimic. Since the APR
is already default for Apache2 and IIS, IMO there is no
Hi, glad to see you rised from the death :)
-Original Message-
From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Costin Manolache
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 12:35 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [POLL] aprize jk2
+1 on using apr/apr-util - but I would preffer doing
Mladen Turk wrote:
Hi, glad to see you rised from the death :)
Unfortunately - it's back from vacation. Besides
getting in the right timezone, I have to get re-adjusted with
using a computer and reading mail...
Let's tag/branch the workspace as jk2.0, with the current
code ( as beta
For (1) - it works for me :-) ( using Location ), and I did
at least once tested it with the 'normal' mapper, so it can't be
very far. If you give me more context info on what's broken -
I can try help with the fix.
It's pretty close to finish, hopefully later this day.
I'll look at
+1 on using apr/apr-util - but I would preffer doing so for jk2.1.
Let's tag/branch the workspace as jk2.0, with the current code ( as beta
level ), at the moment 4.1 is released. It is stable and works.
Imediately after we start on the main branch with the removal of the
old code, and
Costin Manolache wrote:
Mladen Turk wrote:
Hi, glad to see you rised from the death :)
Unfortunately - it's back from vacation.
Welcome back anyway :)
Besides
getting in the right timezone, I have to get re-adjusted with
using a computer and reading mail...
That sucks ;-)
Let's
Mladen Turk wrote:
I would like to make a poll (something non-obligatory as a vote) about
using apr/apr-util inside the jk2. The reason is quite simple, we have
lots of extra code that we either duplicate or just mimic. Since the APR
is already default for Apache2 and IIS, IMO there is no
14 matches
Mail list logo
