Mladen Turk wrote: > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: jean-frederic clere >> >>I have always supported the use of APR. We should use it every where! >> >>I have just a question what happends with jni (we have to use >>the same threads >>for JVM and Apache)? >> > > > Nothing cannot use the JNI without APR even right now. > We are attaching threads (that's the only way how it can be done).
While speaking JNI via APR, do you know if we could APR to hide the JNI complexity ? It's really a pain for example when using JNI from EBCDIC systems like AS400 and BS2000 which need to have translation of strings. BTW, the latest release of APR is 0.9.1 but Apache 2.0.42 use APR 0.9.2, are they compatible ? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
