Re: Some JK2 ideas v.2

Henri Gomez wrote: Costin Manolache wrote: Mladen Turk wrote: Hi, All (except Costin) developers has to say something, so my conclusion is that we are not dead after all ;) I'm alive as well, and I have something to say - I spent last few weekends playing with coyote and tomcat, probably in few w

Re: Some JK2 ideas v.2

Remy Maucherat wrote: Costin Manolache wrote: Mladen Turk wrote: Hi, All (except Costin) developers has to say something, so my conclusion is that we are not dead after all ;) I'm alive as well, and I have something to say - I spent last few weekends playing with coyote and tomcat, probably in fe

Re: Some JK2 ideas v.2

Costin Manolache wrote: Mladen Turk wrote: Hi, All (except Costin) developers has to say something, so my conclusion is that we are not dead after all ;) I'm alive as well, and I have something to say - I spent last few weekends playing with coyote and tomcat, probably in few weeks I'll have som

Re: Some JK2 ideas v.2

Costin Manolache wrote: Mladen Turk wrote: Hi, All (except Costin) developers has to say something, so my conclusion is that we are not dead after all ;) I'm alive as well, and I have something to say - I spent last few weekends playing with coyote and tomcat, probably in few weeks I'll have som

Re: Some JK2 ideas v.2

Mladen Turk wrote: Hi, All (except Costin) developers has to say something, so my conclusion is that we are not dead after all ;) I'm alive as well, and I have something to say - I spent last few weekends playing with coyote and tomcat, probably in few weeks I'll have something working and I'll g

Re: Some JK2 ideas v.2

David Rees wrote: That is the reason I have stuck with mod_jk instead of moving to mod_jk2, a quick look at the mod_jk2 docs makes my eyes glaze over, and mod_jk works just fine for my usage... If it helps any the docs don't seem to be in sync with the code either... -- Andy Armstrong -

RE: Some JK2 ideas v.2

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > There is a learning cliff with mod_jk2 that many I feel try to climb, and > don't make it. They then tomcat gives them a bad taste. > > KISS - the easier it is to do a simple config (and at the same time have > flexibility to do a complicated one) the better. That is

RE: Some JK2 ideas v.2

> -Original Message- > From: Henri Gomez > > Well I'd like to see the JK3 or whatever will name the new > module to be much more simpler and with less code. > Bingo! I'm trying over and over again to 'push' something like 'zero-config', not depandant of any current container. Just im

Re: Some JK2 ideas v.2

Henri Gomez wrote: Well I'd like to see the JK3 or whatever will name the new module to be much more simpler and with less code. +1 to that. It really has the feel of something that's more complex than it should be at the moment. -- Andy Armstrong -

Re: Some JK2 ideas v.2

Mladen Turk wrote: -Original Message- From: Henri Gomez Of course all that sounds like JK3, but ... Did you see my post about a simpler module specific for now to Apache 2.x (2.0/2.1), may be something which could be included in standard Apache 2.x distribution which will save us hou

Re: Some JK2 ideas v.2

Tim Funk wrote: If this is all wishlists .. it'd be nice if we could set the worker and handler via mod_rewrite. Intead of JkMount /*.jsp loadbalancer Say: RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} *\.jsp RewriteRule ^(.+)$$1 [T=jk,E=worker:loaderbalance] [If my syntax above is correct] I was thin

Re: Some JK2 ideas v.2

Tim Funk wrote: If this is all wishlists .. it'd be nice if we could set the worker and handler via mod_rewrite. Intead of JkMount /*.jsp loadbalancer Say: RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} *\.jsp RewriteRule ^(.+)$$1 [T=jk,E=worker:loaderbalance] [If my syntax above is correct] Rewrite re

RE: Some JK2 ideas v.2

have flexibility to do a complicated one) the better. > -Original Message- > From: Tim Funk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 15 July 2004 15:25 > To: Tomcat Developers List > Subject: Re: Some JK2 ideas v.2 > > > I wasn't thinking of a dependency on mod_rewrite, but a

Re: Some JK2 ideas v.2

I wasn't thinking of a dependency on mod_rewrite, but a way to to configure JK based on common data structures that may be set by mod_rewrite. Its actually a restatement of this: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=tomcat-dev&m=108987495224170&w=2 -Tim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Would do you think a de

Re: Some JK2 ideas v.2

Jess Holle wrote: Both approaches have their advantages Just don't loose the multi-file configuration flexibility given by JkUriSet. Gack, I meant "lose". I did one of my own pet-peeve typos Also, having either XML-based configuration *or* pure .conf configuration would be more easily un

Re: Some JK2 ideas v.2

Both approaches have their advantages Just don't loose the multi-file configuration flexibility given by JkUriSet. Also, having either XML-based configuration *or* pure .conf configuration would be more easily understood than the current workers2.properties details. Mladen Turk wrote: -O

RE: Some JK2 ideas v.2

> If this is all wishlists .. it'd be nice if we could set the > worker and > handler via mod_rewrite. > > Intead of >JkMount /*.jsp loadbalancer > Say: >RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} *\.jsp >RewriteRule ^(.+)$$1 [T=jk,E=worker:loaderbalance] > > [If my syntax above is correct]

Re: Some JK2 ideas v.2

If this is all wishlists .. it'd be nice if we could set the worker and handler via mod_rewrite. Intead of JkMount /*.jsp loadbalancer Say: RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} *\.jsp RewriteRule ^(.+)$$1 [T=jk,E=worker:loaderbalance] [If my syntax above is correct] -Tim Mladen Turk wrote:

RE: Some JK2 ideas v.2

> -Original Message- > From: Henri Gomez > > > > Of course all that sounds like JK3, but ... > > Did you see my post about a simpler module specific for now > to Apache 2.x (2.0/2.1), may be something which could be > included in standard Apache 2.x distribution which will save > us

Re: Some JK2 ideas v.2

Mladen Turk wrote: Hi, All (except Costin) developers has to say something, so my conclusion is that we are not dead after all ;) Seems that the major obstacle is the configuration, so I propose that we forget that for a while, and make a 'generalized' environment that will sattisfy all the 'needs'