Re: [PATCH] RE: mod_webapp and other connectors status...

2002-01-09 Thread jean-frederic clere
, January 08, 2002 15:11 To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: Re: mod_webapp and other connectors status... Martin van den Bemt wrote: Hi everyone, I probably missed a couple of threads on mod_webapp, so forgive me ;) In the release notes of v4.0.2-b1 it states : * If you restart

Re: [PATCH] RE: mod_webapp and other connectors status...

2002-01-09 Thread jean-frederic clere
Subject: Re: mod_webapp and other connectors status... Martin van den Bemt wrote: Hi everyone, I probably missed a couple of threads on mod_webapp, so forgive me ;) In the release notes of v4.0.2-b1 it states : * If you restart Tomcat, you must also restart Apache to avoid

RE: [PATCH] RE: mod_webapp and other connectors status...

2002-01-09 Thread Martin van den Bemt
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of jean-frederic clere Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 11:25 To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: Re: [PATCH] RE: mod_webapp and other connectors status... Martin van den Bemt wrote: I tried the latest mod_webapp (build from jakarta-tomcat-connectors, head branch

Re: mod_webapp and other connectors status...

2002-01-09 Thread Daniel Rall
GOMEZ Henri [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: BTW: How did we get TOMCAT 4.1 and 4.0.2 ? Which is the head ? I believe that 4.1-dev is the tip of the HEAD, 4.0.2-dev is the tip of tomcat_40_branch. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL

Re: mod_webapp and other connectors status...

2002-01-09 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Wed, 9 Jan 2002, Daniel Rall wrote: Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2002 15:23:54 -0800 From: Daniel Rall [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: mod_webapp and other connectors status... GOMEZ Henri [EMAIL

Re: mod_webapp and other connectors status...

2002-01-09 Thread Daniel Rall
Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I believe that 4.1-dev is the tip of the HEAD, 4.0.2-dev is the tip of tomcat_40_branch. That's correct. Currently I'm only building nightly distributions from the HEAD branch, but it would be fairly straightforward to do nightly builds of the

Re: mod_webapp and other connectors status...

2002-01-08 Thread jean-frederic clere
Martin van den Bemt wrote: Hi everyone, I probably missed a couple of threads on mod_webapp, so forgive me ;) In the release notes of v4.0.2-b1 it states : * If you restart Tomcat, you must also restart Apache to avoid receiving Error 400 - Bad Request errors. This will be handled

RE: mod_webapp and other connectors status...

2002-01-08 Thread GOMEZ Henri
Hi to all and Happy new year. Slowly back to mail after hollidays ,( - the stable jk1.x. We want to release it and it needs testing - the code is very close to what was released with 4.0.1 and 3.3, with few additional bug fixes, with the auto-conf generator for 4.x ( the code is there,

[PATCH] RE: mod_webapp and other connectors status...

2002-01-08 Thread Martin van den Bemt
patch, and not even a java one ;) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of jean-frederic clere Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 15:11 To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: Re: mod_webapp and other connectors status... Martin van den Bemt wrote: Hi

Re: mod_webapp and other connectors status...

2002-01-08 Thread Bojan Smojver
GOMEZ Henri wrote: I'm been using 1.2.0 on my systems for months. Seems OK. There was a bug in 1.2.0 (jtc) with post mode (search for messages about pmsg), corrected by Kevin Seguin You're right, the code is correct in tomcat 3.3 mod_jk and conform with the latest patch I

Re: mod_webapp and other connectors status...

2002-01-07 Thread costinm
On Mon, 7 Jan 2002, Martin van den Bemt wrote: * If you restart Tomcat, you must also restart Apache to avoid receiving Error 400 - Bad Request errors. This will be handled transparently in the final release. This should work fine with jk. We don't support yet 'gracefull' restart for

Re: mod_webapp and other connectors status...

2002-01-07 Thread Bojan Smojver
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - the stable jk1.x. We want to release it and it needs testing - the code is very close to what was released with 4.0.1 and 3.3, with few additional bug fixes, with the auto-conf generator for 4.x ( the code is there, but hasn't been tested too much ). I'm been