Re: Tagging JK 1.2.9 on 3/17/2005

2005-03-20 Thread Rainer Jung
Hi, socket_timeout on Solaris: does very well during connect. Also no more erors/warning during build. I tested by adding microsecond timestamps to jk_log, adding some trace log messages to nb_connect and changing socket_timeout in nb_connect to millisecond resolution. Then I stressed to tomcat

Re: Tagging JK 1.2.9 on 3/17/2005

2005-03-17 Thread Rainer Jung
Hi, I could help with Solaris info. If you tell me, what you are interested in, I can do some tests. Regards, Rainer Mladen Turk wrote: Mark Thomas wrote: I suspect that most of them are invalid/already fixed bug would be grateful if you could take a look. Hi, Yes, most are fixed. Other I

Re: Tagging JK 1.2.9 on 3/17/2005

2005-03-17 Thread Mladen Turk
Rainer Jung wrote: Hi, I could help with Solaris info. If you tell me, what you are interested in, I can do some tests. Build, socket_timeout and JkShmFile. Regards, Mladen. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For

Re: Tagging JK 1.2.9 on 3/17/2005

2005-03-17 Thread Rainer Jung
Hi Mladen, - Build for apache 1.3 OK (but see detailed comments). - Running with apache 1.3 and JkShmFile: Looks OK - jkstatus: Looks OK - socket_timeout: Still needs to be tested (will try later) - Logging shows mod_jk initialization two times! Once for a process A, which does no longer exist

Re: Tagging JK 1.2.9 on 3/17/2005

2005-03-17 Thread Rainer Jung
Concerning socket_timeout: 1) In common/jk_connect.c there is a typo: 374 setsockopt(sock, SOL_SOCKET, SO_RCVTIMEO, 375 (const void *) tv, sizeof(tv)); 376 setsockopt(sock, SOL_SOCKET, SO_RCVTIMEO, 377 (const void *) tv,

Re: Tagging JK 1.2.9 on 3/17/2005

2005-03-17 Thread Mladen Turk
Rainer Jung wrote: Concerning socket_timeout: 1) In common/jk_connect.c there is a typo: 374 setsockopt(sock, SOL_SOCKET, SO_RCVTIMEO, 375 (const void *) tv, sizeof(tv)); 376 setsockopt(sock, SOL_SOCKET, SO_RCVTIMEO, 377 (const

Re: Tagging JK 1.2.9 on 3/17/2005

2005-03-17 Thread Henri Gomez
jk 1.2.9-dev build on iSeries without problem. Wit my admins to redeploy and test it On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 20:37:58 +0100, Mladen Turk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Rainer Jung wrote: Concerning socket_timeout: 1) In common/jk_connect.c there is a typo: 374 setsockopt(sock,

Re: Tagging JK 1.2.9 on 3/17/2005

2005-03-17 Thread Mladen Turk
Henri Gomez wrote: jk 1.2.9-dev build on iSeries without problem. Wit my admins to redeploy and test it Cool! I'll probably tag that tomorrow. Its getting late here :) Since Apache infrastructure will be unavailable over the weekend I hope the beta will be mirrored by that time. Regards, Mladen.

Re: Tagging JK 1.2.9 on 3/17/2005

2005-03-17 Thread NormW
Greetings All, Still get a clean build for NetWare against Apache 2.1 and 2.0.53. The XML pages work fine, although the HTML status pages might put the numbers under headings better if 'border=1' was enabled. AFAIK builds for Apache 1.1.3 for NetWare still has issues, since I've not seen mention

Re: Tagging JK 1.2.9 on 3/17/2005

2005-03-17 Thread Rainer Jung
2) The test in configure about functionality of the timeouts is broken. The test program does not compile under Solaris, because it needs -lsocket. Can you provide a patch for that? How about: *** configure.in.orig Thu Mar 17 17:00:36 2005 --- configure.inThu Mar 17 21:28:29 2005

Re: Tagging JK 1.2.9 on 3/17/2005

2005-03-17 Thread Jean-Jacques Clar
Greetings, As Norm did, I was able to build and test against 2.1.4 beta and 2.0.52 for NetWare. I ran load testing against 1.2.9dev today with 400 virtual clients requesting JSPs and Servlets on a dual proc p4 with HT enabled. It is looking solid. The test will run overnight. I will find time

Re: Tagging JK 1.2.9 on 3/17/2005

2005-03-16 Thread Mark Thomas
Since you went through the previous set of JK bugs for TC4 a few more have emerged. They are: 8541 15314 24628 29777 32519 32696 32998 33248 I suspect that most of them are invalid/already fixed bug would be grateful if you could take a look. Cheers, Mark Mladen Turk wrote: Hi all, My plan is

Re: Tagging JK 1.2.9 on 3/17/2005

2005-03-16 Thread Mladen Turk
Mark Thomas wrote: I suspect that most of them are invalid/already fixed bug would be grateful if you could take a look. Hi, Yes, most are fixed. Other I simply do not understand. I'll clean up fixed and invalid, and instruct the reporters to check beta version. Some problem like Solaris one are

Tagging JK 1.2.9 on 3/17/2005

2005-03-15 Thread Mladen Turk
Hi all, My plan is to tag the JK_1_2_9_BETA on March 17th. The beta release will be available for testing from that date. Regards, Mladen. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL

Re: Tagging JK 1.2.9 on 3/17/2005

2005-03-15 Thread Henri Gomez
Ok, I'll do the usual specific iSeries build to ensure everything is ok. I rebuild the current HEAD on Linux and it seems to works as expected :) On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 12:34:29 +0100, Mladen Turk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, My plan is to tag the JK_1_2_9_BETA on March 17th. The beta