Re: JK 1.2.15 Release plan?

+0 go for 1.2.15 2005/9/27, Rainer Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I encourage you for voting 1.2.15 as stable. > > Mladen Turk wrote: > > > Anyhow, I would like that we vote this (1.2.15) version as stable, > > because it's a bug-fix release over the 1.2.14 stable. > > > -

Re: [VOTE] JK 1.2.15

Well the build on iSeries failed : /home/apache/jk/native/apache-2.0/mod_jk.c, 86.10: CZM0296(30) £include file "unixd.h" not found. /home/apache/jk/native/apache-2.0/mod_jk.c, 2437.10: CZM0304(10) No function prototype given for "unixd_set_global_mutex_perms". Should add in mod_jk.c line 78

Re: [VOTE] JK 1.2.15

BTW, after I added the && !defined(AS400), jk builded and works right now. So it's stable for me - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [VOTE] 5.5.12 Stability

Stable for me 2005/10/3, Yoav Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi, > Tomcat v5.5.12 has been out for a little more than a week now, so hopefully > we've had time to test it. Please let us know what you think of its stability > below. If anyone with the proper license could run the Servlet (v2.4) a

Re: [VOTE] JK 1.2.15

well unixd.h is not on the iSeries, at least V5R3 (the latest) 2005/10/1, Jean-frederic Clere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Henri Gomez wrote: > > >Well the build on iSeries failed : > > > >/home/apache/jk/native/apache-2.0/mod_jk.c, 86.10: CZM0296(30) £include > >

Tomcat 5.5.12 / Jasper2 -> showstoppers ?

Hi to all, I don't know if they should be considered showstopper but while playing with 5.5.12 for some of our new applications, I see these problems : When using Jasper2 in JSP precompilation step, it load needed taglibs jars defined in web.xml, but didn't release all of them after build (here i

Re: Tomcat 5.5.12 / Jasper2 -> showstoppers ?

> > When using Jasper2 in JSP precompilation step, it load needed taglibs > > jars defined in web.xml, but didn't release all of them after build > > (here is how it's invoked) > > Does this mean JARs are locked ? yes, and since ant is running on the eclipse JVM, no other way to release the jar th

Re: [VOTE] 5.5.12 Stability

Should we post-pone to 5.5.13 the fixes to Jasper2 ? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Tomcat 4.0 Milestone 3

> I found a bug at the last minute (while constructing the "m3" > distribution > bundles) that Tomcat 4.0 croaks (with the error you quote below) if you > place a > WAR file of the application into the webapps directory, *and* you > mention this > application in a element in server.xml. This com

Re: No revolution today

> It is important that tomcat3 has a design that allows support for > future > versions of the servlet API, but if tomcat developers don't want to see > it > happen - so be it. When Servlet2.3 will be final and in wide use, there > is > nothing that can stop someone from providing the module that

RE: No revolution today

En réponse à Paulo Gaspar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > But at the moment, for me, my company and people/companies I know, the > ONE > main priority is having a fast and robust Servlet Engine - with robust > being the priority. +1 > Your focus on a modular architecture keeps all doors open for the > d

Re: [MY_OPINION] Tomcat 3.x

> Ok, so you are going to stop at 3.3 and then what? Abandon things? Hope > that > others pick things up? Move to Catalina? What are you going to do? Costin said he will continue to maintain the 3.3 base. But I think is that after such objections, he will not start a 3.4 tree (at least not under

Re: FW: mod_jk2

Quoting Pier Fumagalli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Fyi... Not acked... Just replied to this gentleman :) Asked to stay tuned and watch announcement on tomcat-dev for mod_jk 1.2.0 and 2.0.0 alpha. Henri > > -- Forwarded Message > From: Mark Howell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2002 0

Re: [VOTE] Apache Tomcat 5.0 Proposal

> As long as the interfaces don't change too much (especially, Container and > Component, all the rest I don't care). We started out process of stripping > out "for good" all the stuff distributed with TC4x, working on some new > startup classes and so on (and looking over at the excellent work m

jspc - more patch

Hi to all, A coworker found some more problems with jspc encoding and provided the attached patch for 3.3.1. Thanks to take a look and apply (didn't have access to cvs via ssh for now). Regards -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: jspc - more patch

Quoting Henri Gomez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Oups, attachment missing : > Hi to all, > > A coworker found some more problems with jspc encoding and > provided the attached patch for 3.3.1. > > Thanks to take a look and apply (didn't have access to > cv

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Tomcat 4.1.7 Beta

RPM are currently in works, stay tuned :) > Tomcat 4.1.7 Beta has been released. It includes major bugfixes and > improvements over the previous Tomcat 4.1.3 Beta (please refer to the > release notes for the complete list). -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additiona

Re: Jetty and mod_jk2

> > I agree with Remy the jetty-specific docs should go with jetty. > > Fair enough. Perhaps a pointer to where to find these docs might not > go amiss, though? We could add an URL in documentation to jetty HOW-TO. > > For the native code - I think we can add specific instructions or > > dire

Re: [5.0] [VOTE] New branches and repositories

Quoting Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > A) Servlet 2.4 & JSP 2.0 API > 1. [X] Use new jakarta-servletapi-5 > 2. [ ] Use the HEAD of jakarta-servletapi > 3. [ ] Other: > B) Catalina 2.0 > 1. [X] Use new jakarta-tomcat-catalina > 2. [ ] Use new jakarta-tomcat-5.0 > 3. [ ] Use the HEAD

TC 4.1.7 write access on config dir

While packaging tomcat 4.1.7 rpm, and trying to make it as secure as possible with tomcat running as tomcat4:tomcat4 and owning log/work/temp dir), I see that it tries to write on conf/tomcat-users.xml.new or conf/jk2.properties, and to mimic apache httpd server conf is owned by root and in read-o

RE: [PROPOSAL] Split the repo's

Quoting "Ignacio J. Ortega" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > De: Jon Scott Stevens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Enviado el: 18 de julio de 2002 1:34 > > > > > [X] I don't want the API's split into separate repo's > > [ ] I don't care > > [ ] I want the API's split into separate repo's. > > > > I do

Re: [VOTE]: Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/apache-2.0 mod_jk.c

Quoting Bojan Smojver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > And I answer (to myself :-) > > On Tue, 2002-07-23 at 14:47, Bojan Smojver wrote: > > So, the unsolved questions for me are: > > > > 1. What is it then that jk_handler() does that makes it actually serve the > > request when DIR_MAGIC_TYPE is include

Re: mod_jk2

Quoting Dev Zero G Ltd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hello and thanks for reading! > > Trying to build mod_jk2 for Tomcat4 and Apache2... with huge problems :( > Having gotten this far, I have this compile problem: > > apache 2.0.39; freebsd 4.4 i386; conne4ctors 4.0.4 > > snip > [so] In f

Re: [VOTE]: Re: cvs commit:jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/apache-2.0 mod_jk.c

> > I can live with any but the first. It would be nice to have it as a > config > > option however. JkOptions is probably fine for 1.2. Not sure where it > > should be set in Jk2. > > Thanks. I'm not sure about mod_jk2 either. The latest reports show that > the code still doesn't work. Great

Re: mod_jk2.so compiled (after patching), but won't install

Quoting Dev Zero G Ltd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > First of all - many many thanks to everybody who has helped so far - we > really appreciate it.. Just one last push required. :) > > We finally got mod_jk2.so and libjkjni.so to compile (see patch history > at the bottom of the mail), but can't ins

Re: mod_jk2.so compiled (after patching), but won't install

Quoting Dev Zero G Ltd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Which version of Apache 2.0 did you have ? > > We are running Apache 2.0.39 on FreeBSD 4.4 good > >>--- patch history start --- > >>Filename: jk\native2\include\jk_mutex.h > >> > >>Line #:75 > >>Old line : > >>#ifdef HAS_APR > >>New line: >

Re: [OT] Leaving Sun

Quoting Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi all, > > Warning: Off topic ! > > I'd like to post a quick notice about my current job situation. > As of today, I am no longer an employee of Sun Microsystems, and I am > relocating in France. Welcome back home Remy ;) Hope to meet you one da

Re: Mod_jk for Apache2.

Quoting Bojan Smojver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Sat, 2002-07-27 at 02:36, Mike Anderson wrote: > > Now that Apache 2.0 has been released, when/how should we deliver the > > mod_jk plugin (the 1.2.0 version from jtc) for Apache 2.0. Since the > > magic number changes between builds, we can't put

Re: Mod_jk for Apache2.

Quoting Bill Barker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Should we update all > > > of the possible tomcat releases (currently 3.2.4, 3.3.1, 4.0.4, 4.1.7 > > > Beta) when Apache updates? Oups, forgot to say that mod_jk will be release in the jtc builds dir, (http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomc

Re: [VOTE] New committer: Jean-Francois Arcand

Quoting Patrick Luby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I would like to propose that we add Jean-François Arcand as a Tomcat > committer. I believe he has submitted enough patches to show that he > will be a positive contributor to Tomcat 5. > > Thanks, Back from vacations (still 1100 mails to review on

jtc rpms

Hi to all, Many rpms users ask me for mod_jk/mod_jk2/mod_webapp rpms. Up to now they were released in tomcat4 release rpm subdir (against the jtc source tarball available at that time). What about putting the mod_jk/mod_jk2/mod_webapp rpms into another location to be sure they will not be dropp

Re: tomcat-committers mailing list

Martin Algesten wrote: Just for our non-committers peace of mind, what is the purpose of this list? What kind of "information" is it that we are to be denied or have delayed? Discussing for example possible security issues and resolve them before making a public announce ! -- To unsubscribe,

Re: tomcat-committers mailing list

Res* : 5267150 http://www.sonata-software.com Coming together is the beginning, staying together is progress and working together is Success What lies behind us and what lies before us are tiny matters compared to what lies within us - Emerson -Original Message----- From: Henri Gom

JTC will be tagged JK_1_2_1 within minutes ....

And just after being tagger, jk 1.2 will be moved to jk 1.2.2-dev (to follow the httpd way) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

JTC release 1.2.1 just tagged JK_1_2_1

Henri Gomez wrote: And just after being tagger, jk 1.2 will be moved to mod_jk 1.2.2-dev (to follow the httpd way) BTW, do you agree to change the version from jk-1.2.2-beta-1 to mod_jk-1.2.2-dev, to follow the way Apache 1.3/2.0 numbering ? I don't think will make ever beta-1, beta-2

[Announce] JK 1.2.1 released

Hi to all, mod_jk 1.2.1 has been released and is available at : http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/release/v1.2.1/ For now binaries are available for : - Linux i386 (Apache 1.3 with/without SSL, Apache 2.0 with SSL) - iSeries (Apache 2.0.39 for OS/400 V5R1/V5R2) Othe

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] JK2-2.0.2 released

Mladen Turk wrote: Hi to all, JK2 2.0.2 has been released and is available at : http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk2/release/v 2.0.2/ For now binaries are available for WIN32 only: linux binaries and rpms to be released tomorrow ;) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/include jk_global.h

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: mturk 2002/11/27 09:12:05 Modified:jk/native2/include jk_global.h Log: Change the version number to the 2.0.3 and mark as not nonreleased. The exposed version will be mod_jk2/2.0.3-beta-1. Perhaps we should change the beta to dev? +1 to switch jk/jk2

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] JK2-2.0.2 released

Henri Gomez wrote: Mladen Turk wrote: Hi to all, JK2 2.0.2 has been released and is available at : http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk2/release/v 2.0.2/ For now binaries are available for WIN32 only: linux binaries and rpms to be released tomorrow ;) While

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] JK2-2.0.2 released

Probably libtool. The one of the Apache 2.0.43 you are using. What's the heck with libtool again ? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: mod_jk-2.0.42.so

Pedro Igor Craveiro e Silva wrote: I trying to configure the Apache + JServ, but a have a problem. When the apache is started it return a error message like this: Cannot load /usr/local/www/apache/libexec/mod_jk-2.0.42.so into server: /usr/local/www/apache/libexec/mod_jk-2.0.42.so: Undefined symb

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] JK2-2.0.2 released

jean-frederic clere wrote: Henri Gomez wrote: Probably libtool. The one of the Apache 2.0.43 you are using. What's the heck with libtool again ? Look in the build/jk2/apache2/jkjni.la Probably there is a jkjni.a instead jkjni.so there. Yes jkjni.la and jkjni.a May be you only

Re: mod_jk-2.0.42.so

Pedro Igor Craveiro e Silva wrote: Thakns. ... but just one more, i don´t find this mod, do you have a clue ?? It's next to the other one ! http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/release/v1.2.1/bin/linux/i386/mod_jk-1.3-eapi.so -- To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] JK2-2.0.2 released

jean-frederic clere wrote: Clere, Jean-Frederic wrote: While building with Apache-1.3 I have the problem that it only builds with apxs: cd jk/native2/server/apache13; gmake -f Makefile.apxs The next problem is that this mod_jk2.so is not ok: +++ bash-2.03$ bin/apachectl start Syntax error on

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] JK2-2.0.2 released

Very weird. Send me the complete output of make. here it is : httpd2/lib -lcrypt -lapr-0 -lpcre -lpcreposix ../../../build/jk2/apache2/jk_jni_aprImpl.lo ../../../build/jk2/apache2/jk_channel_apr_socket.lo ../../../build/jk2/apache2/jk_channel.lo ../../../build/jk2/apache2/jk_channel_jni.lo

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] JK2-2.0.2 released

jean-frederic clere wrote: Henri Gomez wrote: Very weird. Send me the complete output of make. here it is : httpd2/lib -lcrypt -lapr-0 -lpcre -lpcreposix ../../../build/jk2/apache2/jk_jni_aprImpl.lo ../../../build/jk2/apache2/jk_channel_apr_socket.lo ../../../build/jk2/apache2

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] JK2-2.0.2 released

BTW: How did you build the mod_jk2.so for Apache-2.0? mod_jk2.so didn't link against libapr, since apache2 allready provideit, but jkjni need it, that's why the build work for mod_jk2. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: mod_jk-2.0.42.so

Pedro Igor Craveiro e Silva wrote: Thanks, Henri ... You came from the sky heuu, no from Lyon, France ;) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: mod_jk-2.0.42.so

Pedro Igor Craveiro e Silva wrote: Do you know what for is this libc.so.6 ? When i run the httpd, he return that this shared lib could not be found. Which release of Linux are you using ? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: mod_jk-2.0.42.so

Pedro Igor Craveiro e Silva wrote: I´m not using Linux, but FreeBSD. Hum, that's why !!! BTW, the is no Apache 1.3 binary for FreeBSD, I only built one for Apache 2.0 ;( -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: mod_jk-2.0.42.so

Pier Fumagalli wrote: On 28/11/02 7:37 pm, in article 000701c2970d$2d408f90$[EMAIL PROTECTED], "Pedro Igor Craveiro e Silva" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Ok. But, with that first module(mod_jk2.(etc)) the i was using i can put the apache e tomcat together? FreeBSD contains a Linux "emulator",

Re: Double Version

Laxmikanth M.S. wrote: Hi , A question for tomcat-user list please. I have installed two versions of Tomcat and apache running together on the same Machine Apache1.3.27 - Tomcat3.3.1 Apache1.3.27 - Tomcat4.1.12 Make Apaches and Tomcats listens on differents ports: Apache1.3.27 (80) - Tomcat

Bad version used for jk 1.2.1

Bad windows binaries present at : http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/release/v1.2.1/bin/win32/ They report as mod_jk-1.2.2-beta-1 instead of jk 1.2.1. Could someone get the source code and make a new build ? Thanks -- To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: Apache Tomcat 4.1.16 AJP not working

M wrote: Looking at the netstat on the machine I can see tomcat is bound to the port 8009 and can connect to it with telnet, apache works if I go back to tomcat 4.1.14. From the apache logs: [Tue Dec 03 16:04:22 2002] [jk_connect.c (143)]: jk_open_socket, connect() failed errno = 111 [Tue Dec

Re: [5.0] Cluster features

Remy Maucherat wrote: Hi, I think the clustering features in Tomcat 5 should get an overhaul. Despite some licensing dicrepancies, I plan to use JavaGroups for the task (LGPL license), as well as some code which was donated a while ago by Filip Hanik. Based on what is already done, the amount of

Re: [5.0] Cluster features

Filip Hanik wrote: we have a project on sourceforge to continue development of this. but we would love to integrate this into Tomcat where it really belongs. http://sourceforge.net/projects/tomcat-jg It seems JavaGroup could be a great candidate as jakarta project, you even got the right look :)

Re: [VOTE] Tomcat modules

Remy Maucherat wrote: Hi, I plan to reorganize the jakarta-tomcat-catalina repository as follows: - catalina folder: Catalina core; this depends on the servlet API - modules folders: Optional functionality and modules (one example is clustering), but which depends on the Catalina API; this does

Re: [VOTE] minimal JSR 154 only distribution

Jon Scott Stevens wrote: on 2002/12/7 9:37 AM, "Glenn Nielsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I will consider voting +1 if any of the other tomcat devs who want this will volunteer to be the release manager for the servlet only distribution. I would find this handy when using Tomcat as a SOAP serv

Re: [VOTE] minimal JSR 154 only distribution

Pier Fumagalli wrote: On 8/12/02 0:43 "Jon Scott Stevens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: on 2002/12/7 4:25 PM, "Pier Fumagalli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Jon, I'm very sorry mate, you're 4 months too late :-( I lost my fight about this very same topic back then... Maybe to late for your opini

adding content-type for Apache 2.0 jk/jk2

Hi, I'm playing currently with mod_jk + mod_deflate on Apache 2.0, and it seems it will be needed to set the content-type in response in Apache 2.0 to allow mod_deflate to compress only text/html, text/xml contents. It seems in that case will need to parse the tomcat response to set content-type

Re: [VOTE] minimal JSR 154 only distribution

Ignacio J. Ortega wrote: Jon, Create a separate minimal JSR 154 only distribution of Tomcat 4.x: +0, i could be +1 but i'm out of time to offer any help in tomcat as a whole, and of course for this particular proposal, but i dont see anything wrong in it, more i do see it as another step, i

Re: [VOTE] Minimal tomcat ( JSR154 + JSR152 )

Costin Manolache wrote: Since things may get confusing around here, I would like to have an official vote on my prior proposal. This is the list of included features: Libs: - JMX - JAAS - JNDI - digester ( and beanutils, collections it needs ). - modeler - ant ( used for startup and automation

Re: [VOTE] minimal JSR 154 only distribution

Remy Maucherat wrote: Costin Manolache wrote: Remy Maucherat wrote: If the vote actually passes, I'd like to have only one minimal Tomcat distribution, which would mean no admin and no Jasper (with separate optional Jasper binaries available). JMX can be used directly (using a MX4J connector

Re: adding content-type for Apache 2.0 jk/jk2

Henri Gomez wrote: Hi, I'm playing currently with mod_jk + mod_deflate on Apache 2.0, and it seems it will be needed to set the content-type in response in Apache 2.0 to allow mod_deflate to compress only text/html, text/xml contents. It seems in that case will need to parse the tomcat res

Re: [VOTE] minimal JSR 154 only distribution

Jon Scott Stevens wrote: on 2002/12/9 7:27 AM, "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'd really like to avoid the proliferation of too many distributions. I don't agree with that. There is nothing wrong with giving users choices. There is many things something wrong with many distrib

Re: [VOTE] minimal JSR 154 only distribution

Jon Scott Stevens wrote: on 2002/12/9 7:32 AM, "Henri Gomez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: What about using a minimal tomcat core with plugged modules to give access to jsp/jmx ? Will make both Costin, and Jon happy and let us have only one distribution with clear indication

Re: [VOTE] minimal JSR 154 only distribution

Pier Fumagalli wrote: On 9/12/02 17:14 "Jeanfrancois Arcand" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Youy don't need to learn JSP/Admin Tool if you don't use it. The actual Tomcat installation doesn't require you to learn the Admin Tool or JSP As I said 6 or so months ago... That "thing" is a securit

Minimal or Modular it's up to you

There was many noise these days about making another release of tomcat (the minimal one covering only JSR154), and another proposal to make a modular Tomcat. It may be because my mother language is french, but I still didn't understand why Tomcat commiters didn't find an arrangement on these 2 pro

Re: Minimal or Modular it's up to you

Jon Scott Stevens wrote: on 2002/12/10 1:19 AM, "Henri Gomez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: What Jon and Pier want is a minimal distribution of Tomcat 5. No. What I want is a distribution of a JSR 154 container with nothing more than the RI of JSR 154. Period. Ok, so just

Re: [VOTE] Minimal tomcat ( JSR154 + JSR152 )

Pier Fumagalli wrote: On 10/12/02 8:40 am, in article [EMAIL PROTECTED], "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Like the httpd, I'd prefer having a full distribution of all safe (yes, Jasper is safe) and generally useful modules. Experienced users can tweak the configuration to their likin

Re: [VOTE] minimal JSR 154 only distribution

Jon Scott Stevens wrote: on 2002/12/10 12:53 AM, "Henri Gomez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The idea being to provide a minimal tomcat binary and many external modules which will be linked at runtime if present, Apache 2.0 does it that way, why could we do the same. You are re

Re: [VOTE] minimal JSR 154 only distribution

Jon Scott Stevens wrote: on 2002/12/10 12:49 AM, "Henri Gomez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: - Who will be the release managers for the 'alternative distributions', may be Jon is candidate ? I already volunteered to manage the distribution that I propose. I have b

Re: [VOTE] New committer: Filip Hanik

Remy Maucherat wrote: I'd like to nominate Filip Hanik as a committer on the Tomcat project. Filip has written the clustering code that was committed recently in the Tomcat 5 CVS, and is willing to maintain it, as well as continuing to improve it (including supporting large clusters). Filip i

Re: [PATCH] mod_jk - chroot and user issues

Kurt Miller wrote: I recently created a port of mod_jk-1.2.1 for OpenBSD and needed to make some minor patches to mod_jk. OpenBSD 3.2 has Apache 1.3.26 configured as ServerType standalone, to chroot to /var/www and run as user www by default. This combination requires a few minor patches so that m

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/apache-1.3 mod_jk.c

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hgomez 2002/12/11 02:40:38 Modified:jk/native/apache-1.3 mod_jk.c Log: Allow log file use in chrooted (for now only OpenBSD) environement. You'll have to define CHROOTED_APACHE (or later will use the define added by OpenBSD if any) provided by

Re: [VOTE] minimal JSR 154 only distribution

Costin Manolache wrote: Bill Barker wrote: Urm, err, the users that can't read may include you ;-). Jon withdrew the vote above. This means that this is officially 'not getting anywhere', at least until Jon re-submits his re-worked proposal. The fact that Jon withdrew the vote doesn't chang

Re: [PATCH] mod_jk - chroot and user issues

FWIW, I like the feature based define. If other OS's or Apache incorporate OpenBSD's chroot option, then it wouldn't need to be changed. On the other hand, if the consensus is not to commit the patch into mod_jk to keep the cruft down, the OpenBSD port can apply the patch (assuming my port is commi

Re: [PATCH] mod_jk - chroot and user issues

Kurt Miller wrote: Ok, it's in jk CVS and you'll just have to add -DCHROOTED_APACHE to check it. Thanks to give some feedback. Thank you for commiting the patches. :-) I tested them and noted one problem with apache-1.3/Makefile.in. It includes ../common/list.mk which requires the JK=../comm

mod_jk to be tagged tomorrow

If nobody object, I'll tag JK 1.2.2 later todaty since it fix a major problem with content-type and it works now with mod_deflate in Apache 2.0. Regards -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: mod_jk to be tagged tomorrow

Glenn Nielsen wrote: Henri Gomez wrote: If nobody object, I'll tag JK 1.2.2 later todaty since it fix a major problem with content-type and it works now with mod_deflate in Apache 2.0. I noticed that there is no release notes or changes file either in CVS or in the distributions.

Re: [PROPOSAL][TOMCAT5] plugins directory

Costin Manolache wrote: There are several things we discussed last week, and few seem to have enough consensus. This is an initial proposal - I expect it to change quite a bit. I think it's very important and will affect almost everyone - so please send at least a numeric vote, and if possible c

JK 1.2.2

jtc cvs tagged JK_1_2_2 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

[ANNOUNCE] JK 1.2.2 released

JK 1.2.2 maintenance release is available at : http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/release/v1.2.2/ Changes with JK 1.2.2: * tomcat_trend.pl updated script to support changed logging of aborted requests * jk set correctly the content-type in Apache 2.0,

Re: [VOTE] New committer: Filip Hanik

Remy Maucherat wrote: Glenn Nielsen wrote: +1 Welcome aboard Filip A little bit late, as Filip already got his account ;-) Welcome on board Filip :) Did there is any chance to have one day javagroups as an jakarta project covered by an ASF license ? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail:

gzip-encoding in TC 4.1.x/5.x

I spent some times playing with http compression, using Apache 2.0 mod_deflate together with mod_jk, and it works great (at least with jk 1.2.2). I wonder now if someone, may be Remy, has plan to add it in Catalina 1.x/2.x (or Coyote) to make it available for both HTTP 1.1 and JK2 ? For those who

Re: gzip-encoding in TC 4.1.x/5.x

Remy Maucherat wrote: Henri Gomez wrote: I spent some times playing with http compression, using Apache 2.0 mod_deflate together with mod_jk, and it works great (at least with jk 1.2.2). I wonder now if someone, may be Remy, has plan to add it in Catalina 1.x/2.x (or Coyote) to make it

Re: gzip-encoding in TC 4.1.x/5.x

For JK 2, I think it's fair to say that you should rely on the native webserver capabilities (that's the whole point, I think). Great that you added the support (I thought it had been there from the start, actually). I didn't added support really, just corrected the way we set the content-type i

Re: gzip-encoding in TC 4.1.x/5.x

I was planning to add the feature as filters in Coyote HTTP/1.1, but never did, because I wasn't able to find efficient compression code. I suppose something could be put together using the JDK compression IS and OS in the meantime. GZIPOutputstream is quit fast today. I think I'll disagre

Re: gzip-encoding in TC 4.1.x/5.x

One of the problems is that the compressed streams from the JDK are not recyclable, cause a lot of possibly synced method calls, and so on. Plus, it's kinda ugly to fit the OS and IS models into the Coyote HTTP/1.1 filter model. Does anyone know about compression code which would use byte array

Re: gzip-encoding in TC 4.1.x/5.x

Did this ZLIB Java implementation could be what you're looking Remy ? http://www.jcraft.com/jzlib/index.html -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: gzip-encoding in TC 4.1.x/5.x

Dedicated link, you know what it means say the average IT manager : DECICATED LINK = A NEW SWITCH + NEW CABLES + NEW SUPERVISION => $/EUR++ If ever you came back to Lyon, I'll make you meet one of my IT manager ;-) He's dumb ;-) Look, you're putting together a cluster. Nothing good will come o

Re: gzip-encoding in TC 4.1.x/5.x

Actually, they are both equivalent. I'll see how we could make use ByteChunk with JDK code for now. I've already started experimenting. Thanks to send me a note when code will be available. I'll could add some code to mimic mod_deflate ie : - compress only certain type of mimes (ie only te

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/http11/src/java/org/apache/coyote/http11/filtersGzipOutputFilter.java

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: remm2002/12/18 12:36:58 Modified:http11/src/java/org/apache/coyote/http11 Constants.java Http11Processor.java Http11Protocol.java Added: http11/src/java/org/apache/coyote/http11/filters GzipOutputFilter

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/http11/src/java/org/apache/coyote/http11Http11Processor.java

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: remm2002/12/19 01:19:06 Modified:http11/src/java/org/apache/coyote/http11 Http11Processor.java Log: - Same, but without the tabs ;-) Oups, sorry. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands

Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.1.18 release

+1 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/java/org/apache/jk/commonChannelSocket.java

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: costin 2002/12/19 07:36:32 Modified:jk/java/org/apache/jk/common ChannelSocket.java Log: Change log level to debug for "Connection closed". This is a normal message that happens quite often for Apache1.3, where each child process can restart after a num

Re: j-t-c/util, 3.3 and logging

Larry Isaacs wrote: I hope to spend some cycles advancing a Tomcat 3.3.2 release over the holidays. I'm not assuming I can finish, but hopefully a Tomcat 3.3.2 release can be made in January. I'll also try to get back up to speed with Tomcat 4 & 5 and J-T-C. I can try to help with the glog fact

JK 1.2.2 need Windows binaries

I just take a look and see that jk 1.2.2 release miss a binary for Windows (Apache 1.3.x/2.0). Nacho ? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

FYI: [Fwd: documentation error]

<<< text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed: Unrecognized >>> --- Begin Message --- I wished to point out that in the jakarta/tomcat documentation, there is an error. Under server configuration reference, Host (webapps\tomcat-docs\config\host.html), it shows, under the section heading requ

Tomcat 4.1.18 rpm available

After some delay the TC 4.1.18 rpms are available at : http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/release/v4.1.18/rpms/ Regards -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >