commons-fileupload memory problem

2005-03-24 Thread Elihu Smails
I am trying to use the commons-fileupload classes and cannot figure out how to keep my uploads from getting stored in memory. I am using the following methods: DefaultFileItemFactory fileItemFactory = new DefaultFileItemFactory( 10, new File("/tmp") ); DiskFileUpload upload = new DiskFileUpload(

Re: [Slightly OT] MVC approach when JSP are not allowed

2005-03-19 Thread Elihu Smails
rvlets; and if you know your > deployment target server then they can be precompiled. > > Elihu Smails wrote: > > >I am working on a project that uses servlets exclusively. I would > >like to take advantage of a Model-View-Controller system in order to > >develop my

[Slightly OT] MVC approach when JSP are not allowed

2005-03-18 Thread Elihu Smails
I am working on a project that uses servlets exclusively. I would like to take advantage of a Model-View-Controller system in order to develop my servlets. For the last servlet project I worked on, I was in charge of the "back-end" data processing and did not have to mess with HTML. This time I

Re: choice of JVM

2005-03-16 Thread Elihu Smails
J2EE is just the enterprise pack for Java. Think of it as an add on to the JDK. You need to get, or should get the JDK 1.5. On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 17:43:12 +0100 (CET), Christoph Kukulies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm in the process of installing tomcat (5.0.28) under Windows (XP). > Installed a

Re: [OT]shared memory

2005-01-13 Thread Elihu Smails
--- Wade Chandler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Elihu Smails wrote: > > I have a C based application running on the same > box > > as tomcat, and I want to know if I would be able > to > > access the shared memory segment using Java. The > C > > pro

[OT]shared memory

2005-01-12 Thread Elihu Smails
I have a C based application running on the same box as tomcat, and I want to know if I would be able to access the shared memory segment using Java. The C program is setting up the shared memory using shmctl, and not using memory mapped files. I know that Java can support reading memory mapped

prevent multiple form posts using only servlets

2004-12-09 Thread Elihu Smails
Is there a way to prevent multiple form posts from the same page/user/session using only servlets? I have a page where users can upload files, but I do not want them to keep smashing the upload button if their files are large, and the user becomes impatient. thank you.

Re: compiling mod_proxy_ajp

2004-12-01 Thread Elihu Smails
ancer://mycluster --- Filip Hanik - Dev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > how about you correct the spelling :) > > Filip > > - Original Message ----- > From: "Elihu Smails" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Tomcat Users List" > <[EMAIL PROTEC

Re: compiling mod_proxy_ajp

2004-12-01 Thread Elihu Smails
jp://xxx.xxx.xxx.yyy:8009 max=2 lbfactor=1 ProxyPassReverse /servlets-examples balacer://mycluster/servlets-examples --- --- Mladen Turk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Elihu Smails wrote: > > 2 questions... > > > > 1. Is there anything that must be

Re: Fedora Core 3

2004-12-01 Thread Elihu Smails
as I've seen no > mention of FC3 yet. > >> > >>If tomcat 5.0.x has problems in FC3 it wouldn't be > a huge > >>deal, because > >>once I upgraded to the new OS I would have to > retest the app > >>anyway, so > >>a To

Re: Fedora Core 3

2004-12-01 Thread Elihu Smails
what version of tomcat? --- Matt Bathje <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hey all - > > I searched around on mail-archive and google for a > bit and couldn't find > anybody mentioning that they upgraded their Tomcat > machines to use > Fedora Core 3 yet. > > Has anybody done so? Any issues with J

Re: compiling mod_proxy_ajp

2004-11-30 Thread Elihu Smails
got it. I put the proxy directives in the SSL virtual host. --- Elihu Smails <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Cool, I don't quite have Apache and Tomcat talking, > but I think I am close. My next question. I have > Apache communicating with the browser via dual SSL. >

Re: compiling mod_proxy_ajp

2004-11-30 Thread Elihu Smails
order to make that happen? --- Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 30 Nov 2004 19:55:21 +0100, Mladen Turk > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Elihu Smails wrote: > > > 2 questions... > > > > > > 1. Is there anything that must

Re: compiling mod_proxy_ajp

2004-11-30 Thread Elihu Smails
Turk > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >>Elihu Smails wrote: > >> > >>You will have to add --enable-proxy to configure. > >>I also suggest that you add --enable-proxy-http > and > >>--enable-proxy-balancer too. > > > > >

Re: compiling mod_proxy_ajp

2004-11-30 Thread Elihu Smails
Thanksthat worked !! > > You will have to add --enable-proxy to configure. > I also suggest that you add --enable-proxy-http and > --enable-proxy-balancer too. > > MT. > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] >

Re: compiling mod_proxy_ajp

2004-11-30 Thread Elihu Smails
isable-userdir --disable-alias --disable-status --disable-include --disable-asis --disable-env --disable-mime --disable-dir --with-mpm=worker Any help would be greatly appreciated. --- Mladen Turk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Elihu Smails wrote: > > So as I plow through thi

Re: compiling mod_proxy_ajp

2004-11-29 Thread Elihu Smails
So as I plow through this process of getting mod_proxy_ajp working with Apache/Tomcat, should I be talking to the Apache developers or the Tomcat developers? --- Mladen Turk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Elihu Smails wrote: > > OK, now after following the thread this morning

compiling mod_proxy_ajp

2004-11-29 Thread Elihu Smails
OK, now after following the thread this morning concerning mod_jk2, I have decided to give mod_proxy_ajp a try. I have downloaded the connectors source and do not see the mod_proxy_ajp source code there, but do see it in the tomcat 5.5.4 source tarball. I have tried a few different things and

Re: No more JK2 ?

2004-11-29 Thread Elihu Smails
Where can I find more information on not only the official announcement, but the latest on the connector development. I have also been using JK2 for some time, and was really happy with it. Thank you. --- Mladen Turk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Boulay Arnaud wrote: > > Looking for some more