Hi All,
Anyone got an expected date (roughly) for the above?
Ta.
Greg Cope
GCS Ltd
Assign to: CIT, Sandwich - ISG
Phone: (44) 01304 642040
Fax: (44) 01304 652118
LEGAL NOTICE
Unless expressly stated otherwise, this message is confidential and may be
privileged. It is intended for the addr
Thanks :-)
I know about "when its ready", but some people in the know have a feeling
for when it is nearly ready as opposed to not quite.
I am presently facing issues with posted xml data in 4.1.24, and am
considering moving to 4.1.27, but the hotfix is apparently in the future
4.1.28.
As I have
Thanks Tim,
Just what I wanted!
If it is this close, then I will wait a while to see if it does come out
soon, and then assuming it is not a brown paper bag release
I have to arrange change control, and install qualification docs etc ... so
we tend to do this infrequently if we can.
Thanks
>
> Howdy,
> Also keep in mind that 4.1.28, like any other release, could have
> regression bugs ;) You'd have to test on it anyhow before going to
> production and finishing documentation. Unless you really need a fix
> from 4.1.27, you could just stick to 4.1.24 without a hotfix.
I can apprec
Hi All,
Can anyone recommend an FAQ or quide for this on mod_jk2?
Many thanks,
Greg Cope
GCS Ltd
Assign to: CIT, Sandwich - ISG
Phone: (44) 01304 642040
Fax: (44) 01304 652118
LEGAL NOTICE
Unless expressly stated otherwise, this message is confidential and may be
privileged. It is intende
Thanks Nathan,
Already found that - and it's for mod_jk not jk2 and the 2 are slightly
different.
Greg
> -Original Message-
> From: Nathan Christiansen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 09 October 2003 17:06
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: RE: Loadballacing with Apache 1.3.2x, mod_jk2
Thanks Tim,
Seen those - We've got it working, but I was looking for more info about the
jkstatus output and the jk log output when the logging level is turned up.
I'll need to dig out the source code and have a read
Thanks,
Greg
> -Original Message-
> From: Tim Funk [mailto:[EMAIL
Yes it can!
Greg
> -Original Message-
> From: Javier Sanchez Monzon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 21 October 2003 10:12
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: jk2 connector with apache 1.3 ?
>
>
> Hi there,
>
> i have only one question,
> do you know if the jk2 connector can also be
You need to autoconf tools etc.. to make a configure script (it is not there
by default).
I think one of the README's or other files explain this.
Probably best to download a binary from the apache site.
Greg
> -Original Message-
> From: Javier Sanchez Monzon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Jusy a thought;
What varients of automake/cc/make are you using? Was apache complied with
sun's cc/make/automake and you are using GNU's?
Greg
>
> Hi , dear community
>
> i am fixing slowly my bugs with your help!. This mailing
> list works fine.
>
> I want to build my own mod_jk from sou
Hiya tino,
Sorry do not recognise the error. You need to dig deeper to see if you can
spot the syntax error.
Did you complie apache as the same user (and hence probably the same path).
Although I cannot help much as I have not seen this problem I have had many
problems compling BSD/GNU/Free Sof
Remy,
I know this is off topic for this list, but:
Does it need to be this complex to bundle them both - the instructions seem
to have disappeared off the Jbos site - do I have to buy a book to find out?
The reason I/we have issues is that we have to do extensive documentation
and qualification
> From: Wade Chandler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 29 October 2003 12:55
> To: 'Tomcat Users List'
> Subject: RE: Tomcat 5 & JBoss
>
>
> Actualy Jboss specifically doesn't give out much info for the
> purpose of
> making money. That is how they are funded. You don't have
> to pay squat
>
s'okay :-)
I can understand their motives and good luck to them. I also whole
heartedly support open source software, and promote it where I can.
Greg
> -Original Message-
> From: Wade Chandler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 29 October 2003 18:03
> To: 'Tomcat Users List'
> Subject:
14 matches
Mail list logo