Expected date for 4.1.28?

Hi All, Anyone got an expected date (roughly) for the above? Ta. Greg Cope GCS Ltd Assign to: CIT, Sandwich - ISG Phone: (44) 01304 642040 Fax: (44) 01304 652118 LEGAL NOTICE Unless expressly stated otherwise, this message is confidential and may be privileged. It is intended for the addr

RE: Expected date for 4.1.28?

Thanks :-) I know about "when its ready", but some people in the know have a feeling for when it is nearly ready as opposed to not quite. I am presently facing issues with posted xml data in 4.1.24, and am considering moving to 4.1.27, but the hotfix is apparently in the future 4.1.28. As I have

RE: Expected date for 4.1.28?

Thanks Tim, Just what I wanted! If it is this close, then I will wait a while to see if it does come out soon, and then assuming it is not a brown paper bag release I have to arrange change control, and install qualification docs etc ... so we tend to do this infrequently if we can. Thanks

RE: Expected date for 4.1.28?

> > Howdy, > Also keep in mind that 4.1.28, like any other release, could have > regression bugs ;) You'd have to test on it anyhow before going to > production and finishing documentation. Unless you really need a fix > from 4.1.27, you could just stick to 4.1.24 without a hotfix. I can apprec

Loadballacing with Apache 1.3.2x, mod_jk2 on solaris FAQ

Hi All, Can anyone recommend an FAQ or quide for this on mod_jk2? Many thanks, Greg Cope GCS Ltd Assign to: CIT, Sandwich - ISG Phone: (44) 01304 642040 Fax: (44) 01304 652118 LEGAL NOTICE Unless expressly stated otherwise, this message is confidential and may be privileged. It is intende

RE: Loadballacing with Apache 1.3.2x, mod_jk2 on solaris FAQ

Thanks Nathan, Already found that - and it's for mod_jk not jk2 and the 2 are slightly different. Greg > -Original Message- > From: Nathan Christiansen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 09 October 2003 17:06 > To: Tomcat Users List > Subject: RE: Loadballacing with Apache 1.3.2x, mod_jk2

RE: Loadballacing with Apache 1.3.2x, mod_jk2 on solaris FAQ

Thanks Tim, Seen those - We've got it working, but I was looking for more info about the jkstatus output and the jk log output when the logging level is turned up. I'll need to dig out the source code and have a read Thanks, Greg > -Original Message- > From: Tim Funk [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: jk2 connector with apache 1.3 ?

Yes it can! Greg > -Original Message- > From: Javier Sanchez Monzon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 21 October 2003 10:12 > To: Tomcat Users List > Subject: jk2 connector with apache 1.3 ? > > > Hi there, > > i have only one question, > do you know if the jk2 connector can also be

RE: cannot build jk on solaris

You need to autoconf tools etc.. to make a configure script (it is not there by default). I think one of the README's or other files explain this. Probably best to download a binary from the apache site. Greg > -Original Message- > From: Javier Sanchez Monzon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >

RE: building mod_jk from source

Jusy a thought; What varients of automake/cc/make are you using? Was apache complied with sun's cc/make/automake and you are using GNU's? Greg > > Hi , dear community > > i am fixing slowly my bugs with your help!. This mailing > list works fine. > > I want to build my own mod_jk from sou

RE: building mod_jk from source - TO GREG -

Hiya tino, Sorry do not recognise the error. You need to dig deeper to see if you can spot the syntax error. Did you complie apache as the same user (and hence probably the same path). Although I cannot help much as I have not seen this problem I have had many problems compling BSD/GNU/Free Sof

RE: Tomcat 5 & JBoss

Remy, I know this is off topic for this list, but: Does it need to be this complex to bundle them both - the instructions seem to have disappeared off the Jbos site - do I have to buy a book to find out? The reason I/we have issues is that we have to do extensive documentation and qualification

RE: Tomcat 5 & JBoss

> From: Wade Chandler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 29 October 2003 12:55 > To: 'Tomcat Users List' > Subject: RE: Tomcat 5 & JBoss > > > Actualy Jboss specifically doesn't give out much info for the > purpose of > making money. That is how they are funded. You don't have > to pay squat >

RE: Tomcat 5 & JBoss

s'okay :-) I can understand their motives and good luck to them. I also whole heartedly support open source software, and promote it where I can. Greg > -Original Message- > From: Wade Chandler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 29 October 2003 18:03 > To: 'Tomcat Users List' > Subject: