Mike,
Apache is faster for static content.
Don't get Yoav started...
:) I have gotton him started on this, before. It's funny, though... last
time I looked at the Tomcat Connector FAQ, it actually says flat out
Apache is faster than Tomcat at serving static content:
mod_proxy and mod_jk2, I can
safely say that mod_proxy was much easier for me.
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2004 10:36 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: [OT] Apache and Tomcat together
Mike,
Apache is faster
Apache is faster for static content.
Don't get Yoav started...
:) I have gotton him started on this, before. It's funny, though... last
time I looked at the Tomcat Connector FAQ, it actually says flat out
Apache is faster than Tomcat at serving static content:
insights? Having set up both mod_proxy and
mod_jk2, I can
safely say that mod_proxy was much easier for me.
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2004 10:36 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: [OT] Apache and Tomcat together
Something that has puzzled me for a few weeks now, and that is why use
Tomcat and Apache together? Tomcat serves up HTML pages as well JSP so
where is the benefit in running both? Even if Apache was faster at serving
regular html pages than Tomcat surely the milliseconds gained would be eaten
Security!
Many-to-many configuration!
Graham Reeds wrote:
Something that has puzzled me for a few weeks now, and that is why use
Tomcat and Apache together? Tomcat serves up HTML pages as well JSP so
where is the benefit in running both? Even if Apache was faster at serving
regular html
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Security!
Many-to-many configuration!
Graham Reeds wrote:
Something that has puzzled me for a few weeks now, and that is why use
Tomcat and Apache together? Tomcat serves up HTML pages as well JSP so
where is the benefit in running both? Even if Apache was faster at
14.01.2004 09:55 :
Security!
Many-to-many configuration!
Graham Reeds wrote:
Something that has puzzled me for a few weeks now, and that is why use
Tomcat and Apache together? Tomcat serves up HTML pages as well JSP so
where is the benefit in running both? Even if Apache was faster at
I always think of the security of Apache not in terms of features
provided, but number of eyeballs scrutinizing. Apache is SO widely used
that I would think it is safe to say that exploits would be found
sooner. Not enough people using Tomcat use the built-in HTTP stack, and
so I wouldn't rely
-Original Message-
From: Nikola Milutinovic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 4:42 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: [OT] Apache and Tomcat together
Apache is faster for static content.
Don't get Yoav started...
It is much nicer to access your
10 matches
Mail list logo