Re: [OT] Apache and Tomcat together

2004-01-15 Thread Christopher Schultz
Mike, Apache is faster for static content. Don't get Yoav started... :) I have gotton him started on this, before. It's funny, though... last time I looked at the Tomcat Connector FAQ, it actually says flat out Apache is faster than Tomcat at serving static content:

RE: [OT] Apache and Tomcat together

2004-01-15 Thread Green, Jeffrey
mod_proxy and mod_jk2, I can safely say that mod_proxy was much easier for me. -Original Message- From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2004 10:36 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: [OT] Apache and Tomcat together Mike, Apache is faster

Re: [OT] Apache and Tomcat together

2004-01-15 Thread Nikola Milutinovic
Apache is faster for static content. Don't get Yoav started... :) I have gotton him started on this, before. It's funny, though... last time I looked at the Tomcat Connector FAQ, it actually says flat out Apache is faster than Tomcat at serving static content:

RE: [OT] Apache and Tomcat together

2004-01-15 Thread Ralph Einfeldt
insights? Having set up both mod_proxy and mod_jk2, I can safely say that mod_proxy was much easier for me. -Original Message- From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2004 10:36 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: [OT] Apache and Tomcat together

[OT] Apache and Tomcat together

2004-01-14 Thread Graham Reeds
Something that has puzzled me for a few weeks now, and that is why use Tomcat and Apache together? Tomcat serves up HTML pages as well JSP so where is the benefit in running both? Even if Apache was faster at serving regular html pages than Tomcat surely the milliseconds gained would be eaten

Re: [OT] Apache and Tomcat together

2004-01-14 Thread achana
Security! Many-to-many configuration! Graham Reeds wrote: Something that has puzzled me for a few weeks now, and that is why use Tomcat and Apache together? Tomcat serves up HTML pages as well JSP so where is the benefit in running both? Even if Apache was faster at serving regular html

Re: [OT] Apache and Tomcat together

2004-01-14 Thread Nikola Milutinovic
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Security! Many-to-many configuration! Graham Reeds wrote: Something that has puzzled me for a few weeks now, and that is why use Tomcat and Apache together? Tomcat serves up HTML pages as well JSP so where is the benefit in running both? Even if Apache was faster at

Re: [OT] Apache and Tomcat together

2004-01-14 Thread Olve S. Hansen
14.01.2004 09:55 : Security! Many-to-many configuration! Graham Reeds wrote: Something that has puzzled me for a few weeks now, and that is why use Tomcat and Apache together? Tomcat serves up HTML pages as well JSP so where is the benefit in running both? Even if Apache was faster at

Re: [OT] Apache and Tomcat together

2004-01-14 Thread Jeff Tulley
I always think of the security of Apache not in terms of features provided, but number of eyeballs scrutinizing. Apache is SO widely used that I would think it is safe to say that exploits would be found sooner. Not enough people using Tomcat use the built-in HTTP stack, and so I wouldn't rely

RE: [OT] Apache and Tomcat together

2004-01-14 Thread Mike Curwen
-Original Message- From: Nikola Milutinovic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 4:42 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: [OT] Apache and Tomcat together Apache is faster for static content. Don't get Yoav started... It is much nicer to access your