RE: BAD packet - Apache 2.0.39 + mod_jk (or mod_webapp) on linux

2002-08-21 Thread Sullivan, Mark E
Original Message- > From: Mathew Pole [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2002 7:39 PM > To: 'Tomcat Users List' > Subject: RE: BAD packet - Apache 2.0.39 + mod_jk (or mod_webapp) on > linux > > > Hi , > > I tried this and found that

RE: BAD packet - Apache 2.0.39 + mod_jk (or mod_webapp) on linux

2002-08-20 Thread Mathew Pole
64 617 -Original Message- From: Niket Anand [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 20 August 2002 5:35 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: BAD packet - Apache 2.0.39 + mod_jk (or mod_webapp) on linux Hi Mathew, Can I get same type of instructions for Apache2.0.4,JBoss-2.4.6_Tomcat-4.0.3,j

RE: BAD packet - Apache 2.0.39 + mod_jk (or mod_webapp) on linux

2002-08-20 Thread Mathew Pole
: 'Tomcat Users List' Subject: RE: BAD packet - Apache 2.0.39 + mod_jk (or mod_webapp) on linux Sorry, my mistake. I misread your email. Now that i think about it some more, i didn't use ant to build the connector. These are the steps i followed cd /home/mark/jakarta-to

RE: BAD packet - Apache 2.0.39 + mod_jk (or mod_webapp) on linux

2002-08-20 Thread Turner, John
won't post your email address, though). Thanks Mark. John Turner [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Sullivan, Mark E [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2002 9:32 AM To: 'Tomcat Users List' Subject: RE: BAD packet - Apache 2.0.39 + mod_jk (or mod_weba

RE: BAD packet - Apache 2.0.39 + mod_jk (or mod_webapp) on linux

2002-08-20 Thread Turner, John
nal Message- > From: Turner, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2002 8:29 AM > To: 'Tomcat Users List' > Subject: RE: BAD packet - Apache 2.0.39 + mod_jk (or mod_webapp) on > linux > > > > It's true. > > There are tw

RE: BAD packet - Apache 2.0.39 + mod_jk (or mod_webapp) on linux

2002-08-20 Thread Sullivan, Mark E
n [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2002 8:29 AM > To: 'Tomcat Users List' > Subject: RE: BAD packet - Apache 2.0.39 + mod_jk (or mod_webapp) on > linux > > > > It's true. > > There are two different apache directories in the connecto

RE: BAD packet - Apache 2.0.39 + mod_jk (or mod_webapp) on linux

2002-08-20 Thread Turner, John
eople wasting their time by relying on my document in a scenario it doesn't support yet. John Turner [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Sullivan, Mark E [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2002 9:18 AM To: 'Tomcat Users List' Subject: RE: BAD pack

RE: BAD packet - Apache 2.0.39 + mod_jk (or mod_webapp) on linux

2002-08-20 Thread Sullivan, Mark E
ilto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2002 8:08 AM > To: 'Tomcat Users List' > Subject: RE: BAD packet - Apache 2.0.39 + mod_jk (or mod_webapp) on > linux > > > > I just built apache 2.0.40 and tried to get it working with > mod_jk.so on RH >

RE: BAD packet - Apache 2.0.39 + mod_jk (or mod_webapp) on linux

2002-08-20 Thread Turner, John
use with apache 2.0.39/40. John Turner -Original Message- From: Turner, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2002 8:15 AM To: 'Tomcat Users List' Subject: RE: BAD packet - Apache 2.0.39 + mod_jk (or mod_webapp) on linux I notice you mentioned that you had

RE: BAD packet - Apache 2.0.39 + mod_jk (or mod_webapp) on linux

2002-08-20 Thread Turner, John
Original Message- From: Mathew Pole [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2002 3:28 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: BAD packet - Apache 2.0.39 + mod_jk (or mod_webapp) on linux Hi , At first glance the following combination sounded like a great idea (especially

Re: BAD packet - Apache 2.0.39 + mod_jk (or mod_webapp) on linux

2002-08-20 Thread Niket Anand
Subject: BAD packet - Apache 2.0.39 + mod_jk (or mod_webapp) on linux Hi , At first glance the following combination sounded like a great idea (especially as I had success with this on windows 2000): a.. tomcat 4.0.4 b.. tomcat connectors 4.0.4 c.. apache 2.0.39 d.. lin

BAD packet - Apache 2.0.39 + mod_jk (or mod_webapp) on linux

2002-08-20 Thread Mathew Pole
Hi ,   At first glance the following combination sounded like a great idea (especially as I had success with this on windows 2000): tomcat 4.0.4 tomcat connectors 4.0.4 apache 2.0.39 linux (gentoo 1.2 distribution) In reality it has proved very challenging. I've tried the following: