Original Message-
> From: Mathew Pole [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2002 7:39 PM
> To: 'Tomcat Users List'
> Subject: RE: BAD packet - Apache 2.0.39 + mod_jk (or mod_webapp) on
> linux
>
>
> Hi ,
>
> I tried this and found that
64 617
-Original Message-
From: Niket Anand [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, 20 August 2002 5:35 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: BAD packet - Apache 2.0.39 + mod_jk (or mod_webapp) on
linux
Hi Mathew,
Can I get same type of instructions for
Apache2.0.4,JBoss-2.4.6_Tomcat-4.0.3,j
: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: BAD packet - Apache 2.0.39 + mod_jk (or mod_webapp) on
linux
Sorry, my mistake. I misread your email. Now that i think about it some
more, i didn't use ant to build the connector. These are the steps i
followed
cd /home/mark/jakarta-to
won't post your email address, though). Thanks Mark.
John Turner
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Sullivan, Mark E [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2002 9:32 AM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: BAD packet - Apache 2.0.39 + mod_jk (or mod_weba
nal Message-
> From: Turner, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2002 8:29 AM
> To: 'Tomcat Users List'
> Subject: RE: BAD packet - Apache 2.0.39 + mod_jk (or mod_webapp) on
> linux
>
>
>
> It's true.
>
> There are tw
n [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2002 8:29 AM
> To: 'Tomcat Users List'
> Subject: RE: BAD packet - Apache 2.0.39 + mod_jk (or mod_webapp) on
> linux
>
>
>
> It's true.
>
> There are two different apache directories in the connecto
eople wasting their time by relying on my document in a scenario it
doesn't support yet.
John Turner
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Sullivan, Mark E [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2002 9:18 AM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: BAD pack
ilto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2002 8:08 AM
> To: 'Tomcat Users List'
> Subject: RE: BAD packet - Apache 2.0.39 + mod_jk (or mod_webapp) on
> linux
>
>
>
> I just built apache 2.0.40 and tried to get it working with
> mod_jk.so on RH
>
use with apache
2.0.39/40.
John Turner
-Original Message-
From: Turner, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2002 8:15 AM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: BAD packet - Apache 2.0.39 + mod_jk (or mod_webapp) on
linux
I notice you mentioned that you had
Original Message-
From: Mathew Pole [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2002 3:28 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: BAD packet - Apache 2.0.39 + mod_jk (or mod_webapp) on linux
Hi ,
At first glance the following combination sounded like a great idea
(especially
Subject: BAD packet - Apache 2.0.39 + mod_jk (or mod_webapp) on linux
Hi ,
At first glance the following combination sounded like a great idea (especially as I
had success with this on windows 2000):
a.. tomcat 4.0.4
b.. tomcat connectors 4.0.4
c.. apache 2.0.39
d.. lin
Hi ,
At first glance the following combination sounded like
a great idea (especially as I had success with this on windows
2000):
tomcat 4.0.4
tomcat connectors 4.0.4
apache 2.0.39
linux (gentoo 1.2 distribution)
In reality it has proved very challenging. I've tried
the following:
12 matches
Mail list logo