Having an awfull time climbing the tomcat/iis/jk2 learning curve..
Can anyone explain to me why my worker's file gives me the following error:
Error: [jk_worker_ajp13.c (871)]: ajp13.init(): No channel
localhost:8009
Workers2.properts:
[logger.file:0]
level=INFO
for all servlets to Tomcat.
context=/servlets-examples
-Original Message-
From: Moran Ben-David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 22 April 2004 16:03
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: Cannot use JK2 with Tomcat5 and IIS 5
Having an awfull time climbing the tomcat/iis/jk2 learning curve..
Can
, April 22, 2004 11:01 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Cannot use JK2 with Tomcat5 and IIS 5
the following is my workers2.properties for Tomcat 5 / IIS 5 / JK2. You seem
to have commented out the channel socket to 8009.
[shm]
file=d:\Tomcat 5.0.18\work\jk2.shm
size=1048576
i spent years trying to get my workers file going so i understand ;)
-Original Message-
From: Moran Ben-David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 22 April 2004 16:17
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: Cannot use JK2 with Tomcat5 and IIS 5
Worked.. (I commented out the channel line
if this is the right place for this type of message.. sorry to
polute your mailboxes if it isn't.
Thanks,
Moran
-Original Message-
From: Allistair Crossley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2004 11:21 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Cannot use JK2 with Tomcat5 and IIS 5
i spent
On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 11:40:37AM -0400, Moran Ben-David wrote:
: complain
: [snip]
: /complaint
I missed your original post. Is there any reason you must use JK2
instead of JK? JK2 has given many people fits and starts over the past
few months. It sounds like it's still maturing.
As always,
with.
Thanks for your isnight,
Moran
-Original Message-
From: QM [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2004 12:14 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Cannot use JK2 with Tomcat5 and IIS 5
On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 11:40:37AM -0400, Moran Ben-David wrote:
: complain
: [snip
On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 01:14:03PM -0400, Moran Ben-David wrote:
:
: Thanks for the warning.. I'm using JK2 on the assumption that JK2 would be
: better and didn't want to be left behind.
Sort-of yes, sort-of no:
JK is newer, and it's certainly going to get more development attention
for the
