CoyoteConnector

Hi, I am in the process of changing my JK connector from Ajp13Connector to CoyoteConnector. I have encountered some weird behaviors with the new Connector that never happens with the old one. Since I do a lot of Applet-Servlet communication via HttpURLConnection, I've ge

SSL Appliance and Tomcat5.0.30/CoyoteConnector

We employ an SSL appliance in front of servers running Tomcat5 stand-alone and wish to configure the CoyoteConnector as we have done previously with Tomcat4: However, since secure="true" is being specified, Http11Protocol.checkSocketfactory() in Tomcat 5.0.30 is attempting to creat

org.apache.coyote.tomcat5.CoyoteConnector?

omcat5" it says: "For Tomcat 5, the class org.apache.coyote.tomcat5.CoyoteConnector is the standard implementation of the AJP Connector, which support AJP protocol version 1.3." Is this a misquote? I don't understand. Thanks, Troy -

setting scheme in CoyoteConnector

r tomcat 4.1.31 or tomcat 5.5.4? The connector is as follows: className="org.apache.coyote.tomcat5(4).CoyoteConnector" acceptCount="100" connectionTimeout="15000" debug="6" disableUploadTimeout="false"

RE: Simple server.xml config question... AJP13 Connector vs. CoyoteConnector

Hi, >Can the CoyoteConnector handle regular HTTP and AJP13 requests? Yeah, but only one at a time. So if you want both, you need two instances of the connector, like you had in your original post. Yoav This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential business communication,

RE: Simple server.xml config question... AJP13 Connector vs. CoyoteConnector

Can the CoyoteConnector handle regular HTTP and AJP13 requests? Our current deployment uses stand alone Tomcat HTTP Server to serve servlets. We are migrating towards using mod_jk2 with apache front end. Unfortunately, I need to offer both the mod_jk2 connect, and the stand alone HTTP server

RE: Simple server.xml config question... AJP13 Connector vs. CoyoteConnector

, 2004 6:43 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Simple server.xml config question... AJP13 Connector vs. >CoyoteConnector > >Are these 2 Connector's mutually exclusive and/or redundant in the same >server.xml? >... > port="8101" minProcessors=&qu

Simple server.xml config question... AJP13 Connector vs. CoyoteConnector

mcat 4.1 using mod_jk2? Could someone explain what the differences between the different classes are (org.apache.coyote.tomcat4.CoyoteConnector, org.apache.ajp.tomcat4.Ajp13Connector)? My original understanding was that Coyote is basically a stand alone HTTP Server for Tomcat, and Ajp13Connector han

Re: CoyoteConnector Tomcat 5.5.1 Embedded

latest stable one) if you want > a more stable Tomcat version for which the tutorials and examples should > apply. > > Can you scan the jars on your classpath for the CoyoteConnector class? The issue is that the class got renamed, so it's easy to fix. -- x

RE: CoyoteConnector Tomcat 5.5.1 Embedded

. Can you scan the jars on your classpath for the CoyoteConnector class? Yoav Shapira Millennium Research Informatics >-Original Message- >From: Ben Dischinger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2004 1:34 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: CoyoteConnect

CoyoteConnector Tomcat 5.5.1 Embedded

urses apply to the Embedded API and none have been successful with this version of Tomcat. In short the problem is caused by calling Embedded:createConnector which returns a null value. I believe within createConnection the class "org.apache.coyote.tomcat5.CoyoteConnector" fail

Re: Tomcat 4.1.30 doesn't with CoyoteConnector (missing bundle for locale en_US)

<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Hello all > > I've upgraded Tomcat 4.1.12 to 4.1.30 and now I can not start the > Tomcat with CoyoteConnector. Within the previous version and the > same configuration there was no such problem. Please see the

Tomcat 4.1.30 doesn't with CoyoteConnector (missing bundle for locale en_US)

Hello all I've upgraded Tomcat 4.1.12 to 4.1.30 and now I can not start the Tomcat with CoyoteConnector. Within the previous version and the same configuration there was no such problem. Please see the dump of exception below. I found the starting process looks for LocalStrings_xx_YY.prope

CoyoteConnector startup errors

hello I have rh9, apache 2.0.49 , tomcat 4.1.30 and j2 connector, jk2-2.0.4 this is a brand new install. I appears to be working but i am getting errors when it starts CoyoteConnector Coyote can't register jmx for protocol I have seen a couple of references to this in the

CoyoteConnector startup errors

hello I have rh9, apache 2.0.49 , tomcat 4.1.30 and j2 connector, jk2-2.0.4 this is a brand new install. I appears to be working but i am getting errors when it starts CoyoteConnector Coyote can't register jmx for protocol Can someone tell me how to debug / fix this T

Can I use Ajp13Connector instead of CoyoteConnector in Tomcat5.x?

Hi, Can I use the Ajp13Connector instead of the CoyoteConnector in Tomcat5.x? I know the Ajp13Connector is available in Tomcat4, but I don't see any example of using it in Tomcat5. Is it discontinued and no longer supported? Below is two samples from 4.x and 5.x. Connect

CoyoteConnector startup warning

Hello I've got tomcat 4.1.29 Recently I changed my http connector with Coyote Connector and my server.xml fragment is . . When I start tomcat everything works fine, but there is a message in catalina_log.txt CoyoteConnector Coyote can't register jmx for protocol. What does

CoyoteConnector startup warning

Hello I've got tomcat 4.1.29 Recently I changed my http connector with Coyote Connector and my server.xml fragment is . . When I start tomcat everything works fine, but there is a message in catalina_log.txt CoyoteConnector Coyote can't register jmx for protocol. What does

RE: Problem with mod_jk and CoyoteConnector

Apache 1.3 with AJP13 connector. John -Original Message- From: Jeff Tulley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 21 August 2003 18:15 To: tomcat-user Subject: RE: Problem with mod_jk and CoyoteConnector Is it just me, or did he say he was using mod_jk? That should work with Apache 2 just

RE: Problem with mod_jk and CoyoteConnector

3 16:50 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Problem with mod_jk and CoyoteConnector Hi, I think I'm right in saying that mod_jk2 only works with Apache 2.0.43. What's your exact Apache version??? Martin -Original Message- From: J.P. Wadkin C9951627 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sen

RE: Problem with mod_jk and CoyoteConnector

MAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 21 August 2003 15:57 > To: tomcat-user > Subject: Problem with mod_jk and CoyoteConnector > > > Apache 2 > Tomcat 4.1 > JDK 1.4 > Solaris 8 > > I've configured a server to use mod_jk with the Coyote connector > (mod_jk2

RE: Problem with mod_jk and CoyoteConnector

t mod_jk2 only works with Apache 2.0.43. > > What's your exact Apache version??? > > Martin > > -Original Message- > From: J.P. Wadkin C9951627 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 21 August 2003 15:57 > To: tomcat-user > Subject: Problem with mod_jk and Coyo

RE: Problem with mod_jk and CoyoteConnector

Hi, I think I'm right in saying that mod_jk2 only works with Apache 2.0.43. What's your exact Apache version??? Martin -Original Message- From: J.P. Wadkin C9951627 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 21 August 2003 15:57 To: tomcat-user Subject: Problem with mod_jk and Coyot

Problem with mod_jk and CoyoteConnector

Apache 2 Tomcat 4.1 JDK 1.4 Solaris 8 I've configured a server to use mod_jk with the Coyote connector (mod_jk2 doesn't work for some reason): I've noticed that after about 10 page requests the server randomly starts serving either half a page or no page at all (just blank). It becomes progres

Re: CoyoteConnector vs. Ajp13Connector

Yes. John On Wed, 16 Jul 2003 17:21:32 -0300, Juan Nin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Sorry I've just ofund it Ajp13Connector is older and now deprecated, am I right? so I should use CoyoteConnector, shouldn't I? From: "Juan Nin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> What's t

Re: CoyoteConnector vs. Ajp13Connector

Sorry I've just ofund it Ajp13Connector is older and now deprecated, am I right? so I should use CoyoteConnector, shouldn't I? From: "Juan Nin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > What's the difference between CoyoteConnector and Ajp13Connector?? > > I noticed both w

CoyoteConnector vs. Ajp13Connector

What's the difference between CoyoteConnector and Ajp13Connector?? I noticed both work with Apache + mod_jk Is it because it works better, better performance? One is newer than the other one? Is it a stupid question? I have been searching around jakarta.apache.org and couldn't fin

Re: CoyoteConnector (was Re: Access Log Valve)

ED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > "Shapira, Yoav" wrote: > > > > Howdy, > > Why not just use the latest tomcat release? It has the CoyoteConnector > > by default. > > At a later date, we may. But for right now, I would like to be a

Re: CoyoteConnector (was Re: Access Log Valve)

"Shapira, Yoav" wrote: > > Howdy, > Why not just use the latest tomcat release? It has the CoyoteConnector > by default. At a later date, we may. But for right now, I would like to be able to follow a HOW-TO that refers to uncommenting the CoyoteConnector to use it, and un

RE: CoyoteConnector (was Re: Access Log Valve)

Howdy, Why not just use the latest tomcat release? It has the CoyoteConnector by default. Yoav Shapira Millennium ChemInformatics >-Original Message- >From: Geralyn M Hollerman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 10:48 AM >To: Tomcat Users L

CoyoteConnector (was Re: Access Log Valve)

"Shapira, Yoav" wrote: > > Howdy, > Just comment it in server.xml. It's commented out by default. Question about some of those things commented out...the reference to a CoyoteConnector as a element is also commented out in the server.xml I have - and I tried

Re: Bug in CoyoteConnector when using JkCoyoteHandler

> I am running into a strange problem on Tomcat 4.1.18. > > I setup a CoyoteConnector on port 8009 using the JkCoyoteHandler > protocol handler to handle AJP13 requests. This worked perfectly. > > I then needed to add a second AJP13 connector to process secure requests >

Bug in CoyoteConnector when using JkCoyoteHandler

I am running into a strange problem on Tomcat 4.1.18. I setup a CoyoteConnector on port 8009 using the JkCoyoteHandler protocol handler to handle AJP13 requests. This worked perfectly. I then needed to add a second AJP13 connector to process secure requests (though an ssl apache virtual host

Re: CoyoteConnector insecure

s:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Hello, > > the CoyoteConnector/JkCoyoteHandler for AJP13 come preconfigured > listening on port 8009 on ALL hosts. > This seems to be quite insecure. How do I configure the connector to > listen on localhost:8009 only? Relying on firewalls to secure this >

RE: configure CoyoteConnector with mod_jk in tomcat 4.1.x

gt; Subject: RE: configure CoyoteConnector with mod_jk in tomcat 4.1.x > > > > OK, I wasn't clear about the workers.properties. I was > thinking that it > was also used by tomcat. I thought that I could configure several > workers by in configuration file that a tomcat would

RE: configure CoyoteConnector with mod_jk in tomcat 4.1.x

rts on the server.xml, or should we run different processes (different JVMs) by running several "catalinas"? So, what could be wrong when I use the CoyoteConnector? The workers.properties should be the same as for the Apj13Connector, and it works with me! On Thu, 2003-01-16 at 19:29

RE: configure CoyoteConnector with mod_jk in tomcat 4.1.x

Thanks for the clarification. John > -Original Message- > From: PELOQUIN,JEFFREY (HP-Boise,ex1) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 2:55 PM > To: 'Tomcat Users List' > Subject: RE: configure CoyoteConnector with mod_jk in tomcat 4.1.

RE: configure CoyoteConnector with mod_jk in tomcat 4.1.x

If I understand correctly, the CoyoteConnector was specifically written to take advantage of the features that exist within mod_jk2. As a result it loads a file JK2.properties. However since jk2 and jk both use ajp to talk to Tomcat, the default configuration jk2.properties with everything

RE: configure CoyoteConnector with mod_jk in tomcat 4.1.x

Sorry, I'm just not clear what you are asking. Mod_jk uses workers.properties for information on how to reach Tomcat. That's all...that file is not used by CoyoteConnector in any way. Regarding mod_jk2, anything I could tell you would be a guess, as I do not use JK2. Unless you have

RE: configure CoyoteConnector with mod_jk in tomcat 4.1.x

1- About the Apache, I have no doubts that the mod_jk uses the file defined in JkWorkersFile directive. But, is that clear that Tomcat (4.1.x), I mean the CoyoteConnector, uses only and just only the workers.properties inside $TOMCAT_HOME/conf/? Or could it be in another place? I heard something

RE: configure CoyoteConnector with mod_jk in tomcat 4.1.x

bject: RE: configure CoyoteConnector with mod_jk in tomcat 4.1.x > > > Greetings, > > John, if what you said is right why is that happens: > > 1)when my tomcat starts, it logs a message saying the configuration is > the jk.properties: > 25984 [main] INFO http11.Http11Protocol -

RE: configure CoyoteConnector with mod_jk in tomcat 4.1.x

ector works just fine, but the CoyoteConnector doesn't log any message in log file! Could you figure why? thanks Pedro Salazar. PS. With my Apj13Connector (the only one I could put it to work yet), accessing the http://localhost/index.jsp (I have a mapping JkMount /*.jsp ajp13), the images do

RE: configure CoyoteConnector with mod_jk in tomcat 4.1.x

s of using Ajp13Connector or CoyoteConnector on the Tomcat side. CoyoteConnector can handle HTTP, HTTPS, JK, and JK2. John > -Original Message- > From: Pedro Salazar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 11:50 AM > To: Tomcat Users List > Subject: confi

configure CoyoteConnector with mod_jk in tomcat 4.1.x

Greetings, I would like to use the CoyoteConnector rather than the Ajp13Connector since I'm using tomcat 4.1(.17) and the listener org.apache.catalina.mbeans.GlobalResourcesLifecycleListener (to have a global database resource) is incompatible with Ajp13Connector (plus the Ajp13Connector wi

CoyoteConnector: What means the attribute 'useURIValidationHack'

as Catalina 4.1.12 shows in server.xml: ... ... Thanks in advance, Wolfgang Stein -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

CoyoteConnector and tomcatAuthentication=true

Hey all, I'm currently running IIS as the front-end to Tomcat 4.1.12 using the JK2 2.0.1 release of isapi_redirector2.dll. When I use the CoyoteConnector, it authenticates for me (creates a Principal for me) and does not pass information to my Realm implementation. When I use the Ajp13Conn

Re: CoyoteConnector not respecting 'port' attribute

On Mon, 2002-09-09 at 16:09, Remy Maucherat wrote: > You have to use the jk2.properties to configure the port for JK2. > > Some real documentation for JK 2 is coming soon. actually, i thought about that, then i noticed that the jk2.properties file had the line: # channelSocket.port=8019 which

Re: CoyoteConnector not respecting 'port' attribute

Craig Longman wrote: > hi. > > after many hours of frustration trying to get the fancy new admin tool > working, i finally tracked it down to a problem with the CoyoteConnector > not respecting the 'port' attribute in the Connector element in > serve

CoyoteConnector not respecting 'port' attribute

hi. after many hours of frustration trying to get the fancy new admin tool working, i finally tracked it down to a problem with the CoyoteConnector not respecting the 'port' attribute in the Connector element in server.xml the full entry is: this works fine, except my workers.p

RE: tomcatAuthentication="false", BASIC Auth, Apache, and CoyoteConnector?

> De: Jacob Kjome [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Enviado el: 24 de junio de 2002 21:17 Maybe is not implemented yet, you are using preAlpha Code.. Anyway, Thanks, i'll take a look.. Saludos , Ignacio J. Ortega -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mai

tomcatAuthentication="false", BASIC Auth, Apache, and CoyoteConnector?

er() would return null if the authentication was done through Apache. It looked something like this: Now I am trying to use the CoyoteConnector, but tomcatAuthentication="false" doesn't seem to apply since I still get null when doing request.getRemoteUser() when auth

Re: CoyoteConnector with SSL no longer works, was Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Tomcat 4.0.4 Beta 3 released

> Thanks, but, unless I'm overlooking something the factory is still listed as > org.apache.catalina.net.SSLServerSocketFactory (for use with HttpConnector). > There is no example for SSL with Coyote in the provided server.xml. There's no example of SSL for Coyote in 4.0.x at the moment. In the 4

Re: CoyoteConnector with SSL no longer works, was Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Tomcat 4.0.4 Beta 3 released

t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 10:36 AM Subject: Re: CoyoteConnector with SSL no longer works, was Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Tomcat 4.0.4 Beta 3 released > > I just noticed that the CoyoteConnector no longer see

Re: CoyoteConnector with SSL no longer works, was Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Tomcat 4.0.4 Beta 3 released

> I just noticed that the CoyoteConnector no longer seems to work. I'm using > the config listed below for my server.xml. This worked fine with Tomcat > 4.0.4b2-01 and Coyote 1.0b5. Now, it just hangs. The syntax changed (the factory classname you have to use with Coyote is diff

CoyoteConnector with SSL no longer works, was Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Tomcat 4.0.4 Beta 3 released

I just noticed that the CoyoteConnector no longer seems to work. I'm using the config listed below for my server.xml. This worked fine with Tomcat 4.0.4b2-01 and Coyote 1.0b5. Now, it just hangs. Jon - Original Message - From: