Re: Rare request delay of 100 seconds

[mailto:rwatler@;finali.com] > Sent: 11 November, 2002 10:34 AM > To: Tomcat Users List > Subject: Re: Rare request delay of 100 seconds > > Jeff, > > Thanks for the response. I did want to clarify... we are seeing very rare > requests that are delayed by 100 seconds, (not 100

RE: Rare request delay of 100 seconds

] Sent: 11 November, 2002 10:34 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Rare request delay of 100 seconds Jeff, Thanks for the response. I did want to clarify... we are seeing very rare requests that are delayed by 100 seconds, (not 100ms). Anything measured in seconds seems to be very slow for

Re: Rare request delay of 100 seconds

Yeah, sorry - didn't catch that. Not the Nagle v. Delayed ack problem (Unless your delayed ack timeout is HUGE) :) Jeff Tulley ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (801)861-5322 Novell, Inc., the leading provider of Net business solutions http://www.novell.com >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/11/02 10:33:42 AM >>> Je

Re: Rare request delay of 100 seconds

Jeff, Thanks for the response. I did want to clarify... we are seeing very rare requests that are delayed by 100 seconds, (not 100ms). Anything measured in seconds seems to be very slow for protocol issues like these, no? Randy Watler Finali Corporation Jeff Tulley wrote: > Could it simply be t

Re: Rare request delay of 100 seconds

George, Oops! I was off by one on the RedHat version. Here is the whole story: RedHat 7.2 Linux version: 2.4.9-31smp gcc version: 2.96 Sorry I forgot to include this information up front! Randy Watler Finali Corporation "Sexton, George" wrote: What kernel version are you running? -- To un

RE: Rare request delay of 100 seconds

What kernel version are you running? -Original Message- From: Randy Watler [mailto:rwatler@;finali.com] Sent: 08 November, 2002 5:08 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Rare request delay of 100 seconds George, This is a non-SSL secure connector that is fronted by an SSL hardware

Re: Rare request delay of 100 seconds

:rwatler@;finali.com] > Sent: 08 November, 2002 4:41 PM > To: Tomcat Users List > Subject: Re: Rare request delay of 100 seconds > > George, > > Thanks for the query. Here is the connector configuration: > > port="8543" minProcessors="8

RE: Rare request delay of 100 seconds

If you don't use SSL do you have the same problem? -Original Message- From: Randy Watler [mailto:rwatler@;finali.com] Sent: 08 November, 2002 4:41 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Rare request delay of 100 seconds George, Thanks for the query. Here is the connector configur

Re: Rare request delay of 100 seconds

gt; From: Randy Watler [mailto:rwatler@;finali.com] > Sent: 08 November, 2002 4:22 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Rare request delay of 100 seconds > > We are using 4.1.12 standalone on RedHat Linux 7.3 servers and having > rare HTTP requests delayed on their way into the Coyo

RE: Rare request delay of 100 seconds

Do you have the connector doing reverse DNS resolution of hosts? -Original Message- From: Randy Watler [mailto:rwatler@;finali.com] Sent: 08 November, 2002 4:22 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Rare request delay of 100 seconds We are using 4.1.12 standalone on RedHat Linux 7.3 servers

Rare request delay of 100 seconds

We are using 4.1.12 standalone on RedHat Linux 7.3 servers and having rare HTTP requests delayed on their way into the Coyote HTTP/1.1 connectors. We have packet traces that indicate the request is delayed by exactly 100 seconds, but otherwise is received and responded to as one would expect. Other