RE: [POLL] Tomcat 3.x RPMS : Which XML Parser to be put in ? : WAS : XML parser: old version

>I do not know whether it is JAXP-compatible and native but some MS XML >parser does exist... I'm not sure we will ever saw a MS XML parser on Linux and may never a MS Java XML Parser >> I started think at this that's why my latest xerces-j RPM have a : >> >> Provides jaxp 1.1 >Great! This

Re: [POLL] Tomcat 3.x RPMS : Which XML Parser to be put in ? : WAS : XML parser: old version

GOMEZ Henri wrote: > IBM xml4j is at 99% xerces-j > Did MS got a jav parser ? I do not know whether it is JAXP-compatible and native but some MS XML parser does exist... > I started think at this that's why my latest xerces-j RPM have a : > > Provides jaxp 1.1 Great! This is a way! > May be ne

RE: [POLL] Tomcat 3.x RPMS : Which XML Parser to be put in ? : WAS : XML parser: old version

>> The XML parser should be included in the distro since new and average >> users MAY never use XML in their apps. >OK. My vote is for xerces (it is good and has same licence). >Also, it would be good to have the list of tomcat-compatible parsers. >At the moment, I tried jaxp 1.1 and latest xerce

Re: [POLL] Tomcat 3.x RPMS : Which XML Parser to be put in ? : WAS : XML parser: old version

> The XML parser should be included in the distro since new and average > users MAY never use XML in their apps. OK. My vote is for xerces (it is good and has same licence). Also, it would be good to have the list of tomcat-compatible parsers. At the moment, I tried jaxp 1.1 and latest xerces -

Re: XML parser: old version

Correct. Putting xerces.jar and xalan.jar at the start of the class path seems to work fine. Stan D. - Original Message - From: "Sam Newman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, June 22, 2001 4:43 AM Subject: Re: XML parser: old versi

RE: [POLL] Tomcat 3.x RPMS : Which XML Parser to be put in ? : WAS : XML parser: old version

>> I launch that poll to see if which XML parser RPMS users want to >> see included by default. >Probably no XML parser should be included. . Just document the >fact that >admin should synlink necessary jars to the tomcat lib >directory. IMHO it >is wrong idea to include parser with any java app w

Re: [POLL] Tomcat 3.x RPMS : Which XML Parser to be put in ? : WAS : XML parser: old version

> I launch that poll to see if which XML parser RPMS users want to > see included by default. Probably no XML parser should be included. . Just document the fact that admin should synlink necessary jars to the tomcat lib directory. IMHO it is wrong idea to include parser with any java app which re

Re: XML parser: old version

Suns reference implementation? sam - Original Message - From: "Sergey V. Udaltsov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, June 22, 2001 9:31 AM Subject: XML parser: old version > Hi all > > With Tomcat 3.2.2 RPMS, I got some XML parser. > I

[POLL] Tomcat 3.x RPMS : Which XML Parser to be put in ? : WAS : XML parser: old version

Hi Sergey, >With Tomcat 3.2.2 RPMS, I got some XML parser. >I suspect it is sun's JAXP implementation 1.0. It DOES NOT support >namespaces (I found it from the error messages:) so it is not possible >to use XSL in JSPs/Beans/servlets. That's a known problem. I package these RPMs and asked previo

XML parser: old version

Hi all With Tomcat 3.2.2 RPMS, I got some XML parser. I suspect it is sun's JAXP implementation 1.0. It DOES NOT support namespaces (I found it from the error messages:) so it is not possible to use XSL in JSPs/Beans/servlets. Will it be any problem to use JAXP 1.1? Or Xerces? What is the curre