RE: jk or jk2

2003-10-31 Thread Dean Searle
l Message- From: Florian Ebeling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Fri 10/31/2003 05:40 To: Tomcat Users List Cc: Subject: Re: jk or jk2 Dean- thanks for sharing your material on your tested setup here. I wonder if you've got a distinct idea of how the syntax workers2.pr

Re: jk or jk2

2003-10-31 Thread Florian Ebeling
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thu 10/30/2003 09:42 To: Tomcat Users List Cc: Subject: Re: jk or jk2 Hi Bernhard, > Here's a great book including mod_jk2: > http://www.oreilly.de/catalog/tomcat/index.html I got this book right next to my laptop, and I also like it qui

Re: jk or jk2

2003-10-30 Thread Cary_Anderson
Ebeling To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: de> Subject: R

RE: jk or jk2

2003-10-30 Thread Dean Searle
PDF please. -Dean -Original Message- From: Florian Ebeling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thu 10/30/2003 09:42 To: Tomcat Users List Cc: Subject:Re: jk or jk2 Hi Bernhard, > Here's a great book including mod_jk2: > http://www.oreilly.de/catalog/tomcat/in

Re: jk or jk2

2003-10-30 Thread Florian Ebeling
Hi Bernhard, > Here's a great book including mod_jk2: > http://www.oreilly.de/catalog/tomcat/index.html I got this book right next to my laptop, and I also like it quite much. But I can't find it useful when it comes to using mod_jk2. It don't really understand the contents of workers2.perpertie

Re: jk or jk2

2003-10-30 Thread Bernhard Erdmann
Florian Ebeling wrote: Hi, mod_jk2 is more or less undocumented. If you dont't want to dive into the C sources, be careful. mod_jk comes with quite solid descriptions. [...] Here's a great book including mod_jk2: http://www.oreilly.de/catalog/tomcat/index.html ---

Re: jk or jk2

2003-10-30 Thread Florian Ebeling
Hi, mod_jk2 is more or less undocumented. If you dont't want to dive into the C sources, be careful. mod_jk comes with quite solid descriptions. -Florian Bernhard Erdmann wrote: Cory 'G' Watson wrote: If starting a new _production_ setup, should I be using jk or jk2? I'

Re: jk or jk2

2003-10-30 Thread Bernhard Erdmann
Cory 'G' Watson wrote: If starting a new _production_ setup, should I be using jk or jk2? I've seen conflicting information in my searches. Hi, I recommend mod_jk2 for apache2. I discovered mod_jk does not forward properly requests by their JSESSIONID to the right servlet e

jk or jk2 with Tomcat 4.1.27 : Does it Matter ?

2003-10-22 Thread Matthew Hall-Smith
We've been having some intermittent input stream reading problems with jk2 on Tomcat 4.1.27 with IIS5 and 5.1. isapi_redirector2 seems to experience a timing or buffering problem with large file uploads which manifest as corrupted servlet input stream. We have since retreated back to isapi_redire

jk or jk2

2003-10-14 Thread Cory 'G' Watson
If starting a new _production_ setup, should I be using jk or jk2? I've seen conflicting information in my searches. Cory 'G' Watson http://www.loggerithim.org "The universal aptitude for ineptitude makes any human accomplishment an incredible miracle.&qu

Help: can not build jk or jk2

2003-07-08 Thread Dumisani Nlebgwa
Hi again guys, okay so i did ./buidconf.sh hen i proceeded to do ./configure --with-apxs=/usr/sbin/apxs' Now when I go on to do 'make', i get a bunch of errors, here is a sample __ i386-redhat-linux-gcc: ../common/jk_ajp_commo

Re: can not build jk or jk2

2003-07-03 Thread Marc Muncke
done, thank you Quoting "Eric J. Pinnell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > HI, > > I'll field this again... I'm sure it's in the archives by now. And I > only know about JK2. So... > > > > BUILD FAILED > > file:/home/mm/jakarta-tomcat-connectors-jk2-2.0.2-src/build.xml:11: > > Basedir /home/mm/jakarta-

Re: can not build jk or jk2

2003-07-03 Thread Eric J. Pinnell
HI, I'll field this again... I'm sure it's in the archives by now. And I only know about JK2. So... > > BUILD FAILED > file:/home/mm/jakarta-tomcat-connectors-jk2-2.0.2-src/build.xml:11: > Basedir /home/mm/jakarta-tomcat-connectors-jk2-2.0.2-src/util does not exist I don't use ant. I use the

Re: can not build jk or jk2

2003-07-03 Thread John Turner
, 2003 8:19 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: can not build jk or jk2 Hi I am can not get jk or jk2 connector compiled (ant). I think, there are files missing in the package ? when I use jk from : http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/release/v1 .2.4/ and type >ant

RE: can not build jk or jk2

2003-07-03 Thread Marc Muncke
se configure and then make. > > > > _ > Atreya Basu > Developer, > Greenfield Research Inc. > e-mail: atreya (at) greenfieldresearch (dot) ca > > -Original Message- > From: Marc Muncke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: July 3, 2003 8:19 AM > To: [EMAI

Re: can not build jk or jk2

2003-07-03 Thread John Turner
First, don't use ant. Second: ./configure --with-apxs=/some/path/to/apxs; make; make install John On Thu, 3 Jul 2003 13:18:38 +0200, Marc Muncke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi I am can not get jk or jk2 connector compiled (ant). I think, there are files missing in the package ? wh

RE: can not build jk or jk2

2003-07-03 Thread Atreya Basu
Inc. e-mail: atreya (at) greenfieldresearch (dot) ca -Original Message- From: Marc Muncke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: July 3, 2003 8:19 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: can not build jk or jk2 Hi I am can not get jk or jk2 connector compiled (ant). I think, there are files missing in

can not build jk or jk2

2003-07-03 Thread Marc Muncke
Hi I am can not get jk or jk2 connector compiled (ant). I think, there are files missing in the package ? when I use jk from : http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/release/v1.2.4/ and type >ant i recieve this error: BUILD FAILED file:/home/mm/jakarta-tom

RE : Problem getting JK or JK2 to work on freebsd

2002-11-21 Thread Warren Roberts
With several hours of serious hacking in the ant build.xml files I was actually able to get jk2 to build on freebsd. Now my problem is that it won't load in apache2. I get the following error : (23:05:33 ) 0 # apachectl configtest Syntax error on line 276 of /usr/local/etc/apache2/httpd.conf:

Betr.: Problem getting JK or JK2 to work on freebsd

2002-11-20 Thread Jacco Braat
apache 1.3 Syntax error on line 57 of /usr/local/etc/apache/httpd.conf: Cannot load /usr/local/libexec/apache/mod_jk-2.0.42.so into server: /usr/local/libexec/apache/mod_jk-2.0.42.so: Undefined symbol "ap_hook_post_config" Since I couldn't find a 1.3 version of jk or jk2 for free

Problem getting JK or JK2 to work on freebsd

2002-11-19 Thread Warren C. Roberts
/httpd.conf: Cannot load /usr/local/libexec/apache/mod_jk-2.0.42.so into server: /usr/local/libexec/apache/mod_jk-2.0.42.so: Undefined symbol "ap_hook_post_config" Since I couldn't find a 1.3 version of jk or jk2 for freebsd I tried to download and build from source. The buildconf.sh works

Apache 2.0.39 + Tomcat 4.0.4b3 + jk or jk2 in jni mode?

2002-07-12 Thread Sullivan, Mark E
Is it possible for this (Apache 2.0.39 + Tomcat 4.0.4b3 + jk or jk2 in jni mode) combination to work, and if so, has anyone gotten it to? thanks, mark -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>