Hi
I've laboriously followed instructions for
linking Tomcat and Apache. When I try to run a servlet through Apache I get an
internal server error. The mod_jk log contains one record saying that Tomcat was
likely not listening for connections. But I used the default port in my
workers.prop
Hi Keith -
What's the URL you're accessing? Is it one of the examples servlets, or
one of your own?
John
On Fri, 6 Jun 2003 13:39:24 -0400, Keith Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi
I've laboriously followed instructions for linking Tomcat and Apache.
When I try to run a servlet through Apac
Users List
Subject: Re: newbie question: mod_jk not working Win 2000
Hi Keith -
What's the URL you're accessing? Is it one of the examples servlets, or
one of your own?
John
On Fri, 6 Jun 2003 13:39:24 -0400, Keith Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
> I've labor
EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June
06, 2003 11:27 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: newbie question: mod_jk not working Win 2000
Hi Keith -
What's the URL you're accessing? Is it one of the examples servlets, or
one of your own?
John
On Fri, 6 Jun 2003 13:39:24 -0400, Keith A
John
Thanks for getting back to me. The only log msg is in mod_jk.log and it reads:
[Fri Jun 06 11:35:00 2003] [jk_ajp_common.c (1198)]: Error connecting to tomcat.
Tomcat is probably not started or is listenning on the wrong port. Failed errno = 61
The error msg is below.
Internal Server Err
Can you post mod_jk.conf, server.xml, and workers.properties? Sounds to me
like Tomcat isn't starting up, or there is something goofy with
workers.properties.
John
On Fri, 6 Jun 2003 14:57:03 -0400, Keith Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
John
Thanks for getting back to me. The only log msg i
John
Tomcat seems to start fine - no error msgs.
Here's mod_jk.conf
*
## Auto generated on Wed Jul 31 12:53:26 EDT 2002##
LoadModule jk_module modules/mod_jk.dll
JkWorkersFile "D:\jakarta-tomcat-4.1.18\conf\jk\workers.p
I notice that the LoadModule line in mod_jk.conf and the modJk parameter in
server.xml are different, "mod_jk.dll" vs. "mod_jk-2.0.43.dll".
Can you verify that the mod_jk.conf file you posted is actually the
mod_jk.conf file that Apache is loading?
Also verify syntax with "apache.exe -t" from t
John
You're correct in the first point. I fixed that (using the correct name
"mod_jk-2.0.43.dll").
Yes, it's loading the mod_jk.conf, because if I run "apache.exe -t" from the command
line and deliberately introduce an error into the mod_jk.conf, Apache reports the
syntax error. When I remove
Sorry, I'm stumped. Things look OK to me. Anyone else?
John
On Fri, 6 Jun 2003 15:35:27 -0400, Keith Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
John
You're correct in the first point. I fixed that (using the correct name
"mod_jk-2.0.43.dll").
Yes, it's loading the mod_jk.conf, because if I run "apach
, there is no listener
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: John Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 1:40 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: newbie question: mod_jk not working Win 2000
Sorry, I'm stumped. Things look OK to me. Anyone else?
John
On Fri, 6 Jun
ember. Thanks ,
Keith
-Original Message-
From: PELOQUIN,JEFFREY (HP-Boise,ex1) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 12:46 PM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: newbie question: mod_jk not working Win 2000
I would suggest your answer to another user a few min
no listener? I'm a newbie, remember. Thanks ,
Keith
-Original Message-
From: PELOQUIN,JEFFREY (HP-Boise,ex1) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 12:46 PM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: newbie question: mod_jk not working Win 2000
I would suggest you
John
I'm pretty sure there's no firewall. Thanks, Keith
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
Keith Adams wrote:
*
## Auto generated on Wed Jul 31 12:53:26 EDT 2002##
LoadModule jk_module modules/mod_jk.dll
JkWorkersFile "D:\jakarta-tomcat-4.1.18\conf\jk\workers.properties"
Since this file was generated autom
Bao
Thanks. Did so, but made no diff.
Keith
-Original Message-
From: BAO RuiXian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 1:09 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: newbie question: mod_jk not working Win 2000
On Sat, 7 Jun 2003 03:09, Keith Adams wrote:
> port="8009" minProcessors="5" maxProcessors="75"
> enableLookups="true" redirectPort="8443"
> acceptCount="10" debug="0" connectionTimeout="0"
> useURIValidationHack="false"
>
>
ge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 2:28 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: newbie question: mod_jk not working Win 2000
On Sat, 7 Jun 2003 03:09, Keith Adams wrote:
> port="8009" minProcessors="5" maxProcessors="75"
>
-Original Message-
From: Jason Bainbridge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
port="8009" minProcessors="5" maxProcessors="75"
enableLookups="true" redirectPort="8443"
acceptCount="10" debug="0" connectionTimeout="0"
useURIValidationHack="fal
Bao
No, no errors. But the weird thing is that there is no Tomcat log - only a mod_jk log.
Thanks, Keith
> Also are there any cannot bind to port related errors in your log
> files when
>
> starting up, either CATALINA_HOME\logs\localhost_date.txt or
> APACHE_HOME\logs\stderr.log?
>
-
I just noticed that the Command window in which Tomcat is running says Tomcat 3.2. And
sure enough, there turned out to be Tomcat 3.2 installed also, and somehow I'd gotten
myself confused when assigning a Windows shortcut to start up Tomcat. Thanks everybody
for your help. Sorry for sending you
Glad you got it working.
John
On Fri, 6 Jun 2003 18:20:16 -0400, Keith Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I just noticed that the Command window in which Tomcat is running says
Tomcat 3.2. And sure enough, there turned out to be Tomcat 3.2 installed
also, and somehow I'd gotten myself confused w
22 matches
Mail list logo