Re: tomcat/apache with ALIASES (Was canonical names)

2002-04-29 Thread Ken Anderson
ar > loading entry: META-INF/manifest.xml > loading entry: paw/wsdl/WSDLInputCell$AsyncGet.class > loading entry: paw/wsdl/WSDLInputCell.class > loading entry: paw/wsdl/WSDLResultsCell.class > Fri Apr 26 04:02:35 : 104 : TRACE : System : wsdl: Framework Extensions., > 1.0 >

RE: tomcat/apache with ALIASES (Was canonical names)

2002-04-26 Thread Brian Bernardo
e file *** Fri Apr 26 04:02:49 : 104 : TRACE : system : targetHost :172.16.40.104 -Original Message- From: Ken Anderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 4:21 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: tomcat/apache with ALIASES (Was canonical names) What do you m

Re: tomcat/apache with ALIASES (Was canonical names)

2002-04-26 Thread Ken Anderson
t: Friday, April 26, 2002 10:46 AM > To: Tomcat Users List > Subject: Re: tomcat/apache with ALIASES (Was canonical names) > > > This works on Apache 1.3.22 on RedHat Linux, using mod_webapp with > tomcat 4.04b2. mod_webapp built from > 'jakarta-tomcat-connector

RE: tomcat/apache with ALIASES (Was canonical names)

2002-04-26 Thread Brian Bernardo
ith tomcat. WebLogic can do it, even back with 5.0!! Brian -Original Message- From: Ken Anderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 10:46 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: tomcat/apache with ALIASES (Was canonical names) This works on Apache 1.3.22 on Re

Re: tomcat/apache with ALIASES (Was canonical names)

2002-04-26 Thread Ken Anderson
at >>>>however they got there (domain prefix) be maintained throughout their >>>>session. This works fine for static content, but as soon as anyone goes >>> >>> >>>to >>> >>> >>>>http://name?.domain/webapps they get redirecte

RE: tomcat/apache with ALIASES (Was canonical names)

2002-04-26 Thread Brian Bernardo
arded to http://targetHost/webapp and you lose the >> user supplied prefix (bad thing). >> >> Any other suggestions out there? There has to be a way to restrict >> (or add) >> more than one targetHost for tomcat to allow several access methods. >> >> Bria

Re: tomcat/apache with ALIASES (Was canonical names)

2002-04-26 Thread Ken Anderson
http://targetHost/webapp and you lose the >> user supplied prefix (bad thing). >> >> Any other suggestions out there? There has to be a way to restrict >> (or add) >> more than one targetHost for tomcat to allow several access methods. >> >> Brian >> &

Re: tomcat/apache with ALIASES (Was canonical names)

2002-04-26 Thread Ken Anderson
> -Original Message- > From: Ken Anderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 2:02 PM > To: Tomcat Users List > Subject: Re: tomcat/apache with ALIASES (Was canonical names) > > Does something like this work? > > - > NameVirtualHost 1

RE: tomcat/apache with ALIASES (Was canonical names)

2002-04-26 Thread Kevin HaleBoyes
rdo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: 'Tomcat Users List' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: tomcat/apache with ALIASES (Was canonical names) > Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2002 09:50:22 -0700 > > First of all, I am very proficient with DNS; that was not the question. I &

RE: tomcat/apache with ALIASES (Was canonical names)

2002-04-25 Thread Brian Bernardo
s? > > B > > > -Original Message- > From: Joseph Molnar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 8:28 AM > To: Tomcat Users List > Subject: Re: tomcat/apache with ALIASES (Was canonical names) > > No. I use A and CNAMES depending on th

Re: tomcat/apache with ALIASES (Was canonical names)

2002-04-25 Thread Ken Anderson
s? > > B > > > -Original Message- > From: Joseph Molnar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 8:28 AM > To: Tomcat Users List > Subject: Re: tomcat/apache with ALIASES (Was canonical names) > > No. I use A and CNAMES depending on th

RE: tomcat/apache with ALIASES (Was canonical names)

2002-04-25 Thread Brian Bernardo
Subject: Re: tomcat/apache with ALIASES (Was canonical names) No. I use A and CNAMES depending on the situation. Do you have proper aliases set up in Apache? Joe - Original Message - From: "Oki DZ" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: tomcat/apache with ALIASES (Was canonical names)

2002-04-25 Thread Joseph Molnar
No. I use A and CNAMES depending on the situation. Do you have proper aliases set up in Apache? Joe - Original Message - From: "Oki DZ" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 2:28 AM Subject: Re:

Re: tomcat/apache with ALIASES (Was canonical names)

2002-04-25 Thread Hamish Marson
Oki DZ wrote: > On 04/25 15:33 Hamish Marson wrote: > > What you're using (Or trying to use) is aliases... The DNS records (CNAME > > etc > > al) are named after what they point AT (or more accurately) resolve to. Thus > > the CNAME record (Canonical name) points or resolves to the REAL name of

Re: tomcat/apache with ALIASES (Was canonical names)

2002-04-25 Thread Oki DZ
On 04/25 15:33 Hamish Marson wrote: > What you're using (Or trying to use) is aliases... The DNS records (CNAME > etc > al) are named after what they point AT (or more accurately) resolve to. Thus > the CNAME record (Canonical name) points or resolves to the REAL name of the > host. (Literally, t

Re: tomcat/apache with ALIASES (Was canonical names)

2002-04-25 Thread Hamish Marson
Brian Bernardo wrote: > I am trying to use canonical names under apache 1.3.20 to work with tomcat > 4.01. Right now when I go to http://cname1.domain/webapps Small correction... Sorry... It's the pedant in me... What you're using (Or trying to use) is aliases... The DNS records (CNAME etc al