Hello ayuda,
You should seriously consider upgrading from Tomcat 3.1.1. It is
ancient and you won't find a whole lot of support for it. Move to
tomcat 3.3.x or 4.x.x. If you have questions when using those
products, you will probably get some useful response from other users.
Jake
Tu
Hi guys! I'm pretty new to this environment, so be gentle. My server runs
on Apache 1.3.22 with Tomcat 3.1.1 to handle jsp. The problem is that every
other day, sometimes every day, it gets "hung" or "frozen". The user trying
to access my pages will only get the st
2
> that won't ever be fixed. (Some of them can be
> real show stoppers)
>
> > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> > Von: Anagha Mudigonda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Gesendet: Freitag, 7. Dezember 2001 11:15
> > An: tomcat
> > Betreff: tomcat 3.1.1
>
Dezember 2001 11:15
> An: tomcat
> Betreff: tomcat 3.1.1
>
>
> hi,
> i have a problem with tomcat 3.1.1
> we have a product depot of tomcat 3.1.1 for HP-UX. So unless I build
> from source i cant use a later version. So, I'de like to know if there
> any real disdv
hi,
i have a problem with tomcat 3.1.1
we have a product depot of tomcat 3.1.1 for HP-UX. So unless I build
from source i cant use a later version. So, I'de like to know if there
any real disdvantages to using 3.1.1
and besides the build process described in the documentation doesnt seem
to
again me ;-) but for another question.
I would like to know if someone have a compiled version of the mod_jserv.so
or mod_jk.so for Apache 1.3.12 with Tomcat 3.1.1 under a HPUX 11.00.
thanks in advance
arno
Arnaud HERITIER
Ingénieur d'études
SOPRA. Group
EAI Consulting
Tel : +33-1-53-
Hi,
We have a server looking after a number of virtual hosts.
Each virtual host has its own server.xml file as was required
in the config for tomcat 3.1.1, as a result of this, each virtual
host has its own tomcat process to handle requests for servlets and
jsps. With this configuration it is
OTECTED]
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: upgrade from Tomcat 3.1.1 to 3.2.1 with IIS not working
>Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2001 18:11:31 -0600
>
>I setup Tomcat 3.1.1 to run with Windows 2000 Server & IIS. I am running
>JDK 1.3. All worked fine with IIS and tomcat with 3.1.1. I ha
I setup Tomcat 3.1.1 to run with Windows 2000 Server & IIS. I am running
JDK 1.3. All worked fine with IIS and tomcat with 3.1.1. I have attempted
to upgrade to Tomcat 3.2.1. Now, I get 404's when i try to display the
http://localhost/examples/jsp/index.html page. When I run it di
agbortarh_d wrote:
My name
is Dominique.I am a beginner
in java, but already fascinated with servlets and jsp technologies.My
problem now is: I have tried to download tomcat 3.1.1 or 3.2.1, but each
time i get confuse on exactly what i have to download. After many trials,
i found myself on
EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Downloading & using tomcat
3.1.1 or 3.2.1
My name is Dominique.
I am a beginner in java, but already
fascinated with servlets and jsp technologies.
My problem now is: I have tried to download
tomcat 3.1.1 or 3.2.1, but each time i get confuse on exactly what i
> My problem now is: I have tried to download tomcat 3.1.1 or 3.2.1, but
each time
> i get confuse on exactly what i have to download. After many trials, i
found myself
> on this site: [...]
I'd recommend downloading the 3.2 binaries and reading the documentation
(including
the r
My name is Dominique.
I am a beginner in java, but already fascinated
with servlets and jsp technologies.
My problem now is: I have tried to download
tomcat 3.1.1 or 3.2.1, but each time i get confuse on exactly what i have to
download. After many trials, i found myself on this site:
http
Gomez Henri wrote:
> I've asked some days ago about the 'Attic ?'...
>
Sorry, I thought that got answered.
The "attic" is CVS's way of dealing with files that are on one branch of a
repository, but not another -- or cases where you deleted a file, but you might
want to go back to a previously t
> This raises an interesting policy issue that should be discussed.
> In short, I think that packaging additional docs and fixes with your
> 3.2.1 RPMs
> is very misleading to Tomcat users, because what you get is *not* the
> same as
> what the "official" packages contain.
I've added ajp13 multi
GOMEZ Henri wrote:
> >* This release fixes ***only*** the identified security
> >vulnerabilities.
> > It does not address any of the other bugs, or feature
> >requests, related
> > to Tomcat 3.2 final. These issues will be dealt with in future
> > maintenance releases of Tomcat 3.2 as appropr
>* This release fixes ***only*** the identified security
>vulnerabilities.
> It does not address any of the other bugs, or feature
>requests, related
> to Tomcat 3.2 final. These issues will be dealt with in future
> maintenance releases of Tomcat 3.2 as appropriate.
>
Not totally true sinc
het Craig - sorry to be dense - but what are the "appropriate contents"
that should be replaced by 3.2.1? Is this just the various jar's in /lib?
--
Wishing you an "OOBA OOBA" Y2K
Horace...once known as "Kicker" :-)
=
these vulnerabilities
that will be fixed in the upcoming milestone 5 release, which is imminent.)
TOMCAT 3.1 USERS
* There are seven identified vulnerabilities that are documented in the
Release Notes for Tomcat 3.1.1 (file "doc/readme" in the distribution).
* To deal with these problems
19 matches
Mail list logo
