Re: VIRUS ALERT! Re: using SSL on standalone Tomcat - Urgent !

2000-11-18 Thread Kurt Bernhard Pruenner
"Mark G. Franz" wrote: > In response; > > Antigen virus protection for Exchange found secure-only.war infected with > CorruptedCompressedFile virus. The file is currently Deleted. The message, > "Re: using SSL on standalone Tomcat - Urgent !", was > sent

Re: VIRUS ALERT! Re: using SSL on standalone Tomcat - Urgent !

2000-11-18 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
"Mark G. Franz" wrote: > In response; > > Antigen virus protection for Exchange found secure-only.war infected with > CorruptedCompressedFile virus. The file is currently Deleted. The message, > "Re: using SSL on standalone Tomcat - Urgent !", was > sen

Re: VIRUS ALERT! Re: using SSL on standalone Tomcat - Urgent !

2000-11-18 Thread Mark G. Franz
In response; Antigen virus protection for Exchange found secure-only.war infected with CorruptedCompressedFile virus. The file is currently Deleted. The message, "Re: using SSL on standalone Tomcat - Urgent !", was sent from Craig R. McClanahan. Do you really want

Re: VIRUS ALERT! Re: using SSL on standalone Tomcat - Urgent !

2000-11-18 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
"Mark G. Franz" wrote: > DO NOT OPEN THIS ATTACHMENT! > The "Antigen for Exchange" virus scanner is broken, as you will discover if you scan this file with any other virus scanner. Apparently it does not know what a Java JAR file looks like. Craig McClanahan

Re: VIRUS ALERT! Re: using SSL on standalone Tomcat - Urgent !

2000-11-18 Thread Kurt Bernhard Pruenner
ou're gonna fit a JavaScript-Virus into 163 bytes of HTML, think about it, much less find an XML-virus... Just to cite some other paranoid firewall... Antigen virus protection for Exchange found secure-only.war infected with CorruptedCompressedFile virus. The file is currently Deleted

VIRUS ALERT! Re: using SSL on standalone Tomcat - Urgent !

2000-11-18 Thread Mark G. Franz
DO NOT OPEN THIS ATTACHMENT! -Original Message- From: Craig R. McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Friday, November 17, 2000 10:26 PM Subject: Re: using SSL on standalone Tomcat - Urgent ! >"Lacerda, Wellington (AFIS

Re: using SSL on standalone Tomcat - Urgent !

2000-11-17 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
"Lacerda, Wellington (AFIS)" wrote: > Craig, > > Can you send me a piece of example of the configuration ? I can't see what > I'm doing wrong. I've already tested both suggestions and I didn't get that > message back in any case. > > Thanks, > > Wellington > Attached is the simplest web-app I ca

RE: using SSL on standalone Tomcat - Urgent !

2000-11-17 Thread Lacerda, Wellington (AFIS)
Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 November 2000 19:06 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: using SSL on standalone Tomcat - Urgent ! Kurt Bernhard Pruenner wrote: > "Lacer

Re: using SSL on standalone Tomcat - Urgent !

2000-11-16 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
"Lacerda, Wellington (AFIS)" wrote: > No, I'm sorry, it failed again. (thanks anyway) > Maybe I found a bug ? > Can you send me (or re-send if you've already done so and I missed it) a simple test webapp that illustrates this? It worked for me in every test scenario I can come up with, so there

Re: using SSL on standalone Tomcat - Urgent !

2000-11-16 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
Kurt Bernhard Pruenner wrote: > "Lacerda, Wellington (AFIS)" wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > >a > > >/wlss1/* > > > > Change this to "/*". The setting is relative > > to your context, not to the server root. > > AFAIK, the spec says to use "/" instead of "/*" - give that a try, I'd s

RE: using SSL on standalone Tomcat - Urgent !

2000-11-16 Thread Lacerda, Wellington (AFIS)
ECTED] Subject: Re: using SSL on standalone Tomcat - Urgent ! "Lacerda, Wellington (AFIS)" wrote: > > > > > > > >a > >/wlss1/*

Re: using SSL on standalone Tomcat - Urgent !

2000-11-16 Thread Kurt Bernhard Pruenner
"Lacerda, Wellington (AFIS)" wrote: > > > > > > > >a > >/wlss1/* > > Change this to "/*". The setting is relative > to your context, not to the server root. AFAIK, the spec says to use "/" instead of "/*" - give that a try, I'd say. -- Kurt Pruenner - Haendelstrasse 17, 4020 Li

RE: using SSL on standalone Tomcat - Urgent !

2000-11-16 Thread Lacerda, Wellington (AFIS)
Sent: 16 November 2000 04:19 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: using SSL on standalone Tomcat - Urgent ! "Lacerda, Wellington (AFIS)" wrote: > Hi All, > > I've set

Re: using SSL on standalone Tomcat - Urgent !

2000-11-15 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
"Lacerda, Wellington (AFIS)" wrote: > Hi All, > > I've set up SSL on a 3.2b7 instance. Also I defined a context, say /wlss, > with a directory and a resource, say /wlss1/index.htm inside that context. > > I want to configure that context in such a way that the access to > /wlss1/index.htm is only

using SSL on standalone Tomcat - Urgent !

2000-11-15 Thread Lacerda, Wellington (AFIS)
Hi All, I've set up SSL on a 3.2b7 instance. Also I defined a context, say /wlss, with a directory and a resource, say /wlss1/index.htm inside that context. I want to configure that context in such a way that the access to /wlss1/index.htm is only allowed if the transport is guaranteed at confid

using SSL on standalone Tomcat - Urgent !

2000-11-15 Thread Lacerda, Wellington (AFIS)
Hi All, I've set up SSL on a 3.2b7 instance. Also I defined a context, say /wlss, with a directory and a resource, say /wlss1/index.htm inside that context. I want to configure that context in such a way that the access to /wlss1/index.htm is only allowed if the transport is guaranteed at confid