Oppps... I only "work" (work is something too much for what I do... o_O )
logging into willow, that's Solaris if I'm not going wrong. . No matter,
I'll browse toolserver wiki to see as I can login into a Linux server, and
if I'll find troubles I'll ask for help.
Thanks.
Alex
2013/5/31 DaB.
>
Hello,
At Friday 31 May 2013 15:21:23 DaB. wrote:
> What about building a Lua bot framework or - at least - install Lua into
> Toolserver?
the linux hosts have already lua-packages installed AFAIS. Feel free to play
with it.
Sincerely,
DaB.
--
Userpage: [[:w:de:User:DaB.]] — PGP: 0x2d3ee2d42b
While painfully studying one more language :-( (Lua... ) I saw that it can
run into any SO and that it has CGI interface (tell me if I'm wrong).
What about building a Lua bot framework or - at least - install Lua into
Toolserver? Is it a crazy idea? Perhaps using the same language in two
settings
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 5:15 PM, River Tarnell
wrote:
>> Then again, what happens if a bus comes along and we then have admins
>> who know linux best?
>
> This is a valid concern, but if we used Linux, and our single active
> Linux admin was hit by a bus, we'd have the same problem. I hope there
On 28/12/2009 08:13 PM, Mike.lifeguard wrote:
> Which admins? I know River is very experienced with Solaris - but are
> the other sysadmins more experienced with Solaris than linux as well?
We had a long discussion about this in the admins IRC channel... we all
agree that having two separate OSs i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09-12-28 03:22 PM, Aryeh Gregor wrote:
> No. All of us except River are more experienced with Linux. However,
> River does more work than the rest of us combined, at least of the
> sort that's platform-dependent.
>
Long live the Queen lead sysad
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 3:05 PM, River Tarnell
wrote:
> On 28/12/2009 07:28 PM, Carl (CBM) wrote:
>> 1) An easy-to-use compilation environment for C and C++. I am not
>> really able to compile Perl modules on willow, despite spending quite
>> a while hacking at it.
>
> I know some people had issue
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 3:13 PM, Mike.lifeguard
wrote:
> Which admins? I know River is very experienced with Solaris - but are
> the other sysadmins more experienced with Solaris than linux as well?
No. All of us except River are more experienced with Linux. However,
River does more work than t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09-12-28 01:03 PM, Fahad Sadah wrote:
> It's easier for the admins to maintain
> Fahad Sadah
>
Which admins? I know River is very experienced with Solaris - but are
the other sysadmins more experienced with Solaris than linux as well? If
not, it m
> Am Montag 28 Dezember 2009 20:28:56 schrieb Carl (CBM):
>> On the linux server, /bin/sh is bash.
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 3:04 PM, DaB. wrote:
> that's even dangerous to suggest on the linux server.
I was not suggesting anything.
nightshade$ /bin/sh --version
GNU bash, version 3.2.39(1)-releas
On 28/12/2009 07:28 PM, Carl (CBM) wrote:
> 1) An easy-to-use compilation environment for C and C++. I am not
> really able to compile Perl modules on willow, despite spending quite
> a while hacking at it.
I know some people had issues with this but I never really saw a proper
description of the
Hello,
Am Montag 28 Dezember 2009 20:28:56 schrieb Carl (CBM):
> On the linux server, /bin/sh is bash.
that's even dangerous to suggest on the linux server. Debian made (and make)
many changes in programs in the past to allow the default sh to be dash.
So there may be a time in future, when /bin
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 12:08 PM, River Tarnell
wrote:
> So: if the Linux login server were to go away tomorrow, what (if anything)
> would you miss?
A few things come to mind right away.
1) An easy-to-use compilation environment for C and C++. I am not
really able to compile Perl modules on wil
On 28/12/2009 07:00 PM, Carl Fürstenberg wrote:
> I have a tone of local compiled (xs) perl modules which will most
> certainly break, and I really don't know if I can magically convert my
> $HOME/.cpan to solaris without much great pain
I see.
> have you installed all perl modules which where in
On 28/12/2009 06:40 PM, John Doe wrote:
Is there any particular place that we need to report these
differences that may need adjusted or things need added?
If you plan on actually using it, then file a request in JIRA.
Otherwise the mailing list is fine.
If we ever actually decide to stop us
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 18:08, River Tarnell wrote:
> Hi,
> [...]
> - river.
I have a tone of local compiled (xs) perl modules which will most
certainly break, and I really don't know if I can magically convert my
$HOME/.cpan to solaris without much great pain, also, have you
installed all
Ill take a look and log into willow tonight to see what if anything would
break if I moved to solaris. Is there any particular place that we need to
report these differences that may need adjusted or things need added?
Betacommand
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 1:36 PM, Michał wrote:
> 2009/12/28 Rive
2009/12/28 River Tarnell :
(...)
> So: if the Linux login server were to go away tomorrow, what (if anything)
> would you miss?
just VIM under "vi" command ;)
--
Michał "Hołek" Połtyn
___
Toolserver-l mailing list (Toolserver-l@lists.wikimedia.org)
ht
On 28/12/2009 06:02 PM, Pietrodn wrote:
Just a question: why is Solaris more suitable for us than Linux?
It's not really a question of "more suitable". The Toolserver has
always been Solaris, mostly because I was the first TS admin, and
Solaris is what I know.
The Linux server(s) were adde
It's easier for the admins to maintain
Fahad Sadah
2009/12/28 Pietrodn
> Il giorno 28/dic/2009, alle ore 18.08, River Tarnell ha scritto:
>
> > With this in mind, it might make sense to dispose of the Linux login
> server entirely, and convert it to Solaris. But before we consider this, I
> ne
Il giorno 28/dic/2009, alle ore 18.08, River Tarnell ha scritto:
> With this in mind, it might make sense to dispose of the Linux login server
> entirely, and convert it to Solaris. But before we consider this, I need to
> know if there's anything still missing from our Solaris environment whic
Hi,
So, currently we have two login servers, one which runs Linux and one
which runs Solaris. This greatly complicates system administration (as
everything has to be done twice), and confuses users, since things are
different between the two login servers, and between the Linux login
server
22 matches
Mail list logo
