Il 31/12/2019 20:29, Mike Smith VE9AA ha scritto:
It's guys in EU using USA remotes that PURPORT to still be in EU.
I am interested on this argument because I know in Italy there is lots
of operators that are using remote TX everywhere. The question is: the
FCC has nothing to say if someone
I worked him in the SP (With difficulty) at 1643z so much too early for USA
into UK, perhaps he's using more than one site?
Larry via Topband wrote:
> US1Q called me during the contest and was much too loud to be in the
> Ukraine. I am quite sure that he was using a remote TX station in the US
I did work US1Q in the SP. He called me after hearing me try another Eu
who didn't copy me. This happened way after SR in the USA, so if he was
using a remote, it wasn't there. From his strength I would guess that he
probably was in Eu, although it could have been JA. I would consider
that unli
US1Q called me during the contest and was much too loud to be in the Ukraine. I
am quite sure that he was using a remote TX station in the USA.
This would be a question for the contest administrator to decide on.
HNYn7dd
Sent from AOL Mobile Mail
Get the new AOL app: mail.mobile.aol.com
On Tues
at's clear now.
Mike VE9AA
Mike, Coreen & Corey
Keswick Ridge, NB
From: Mike Smith VE9AA [mailto:ve...@nbnet.nb.ca]
Sent: December 31, 2019 3:22 PM
To: 'topband@contesting.com'
Subject: Re: Topband: 2019 STEW PERRY
Hi Nick,
I did not work US1Q during this years
Amen!
V V tor., 31. dec. 2019 ob 20:22 je oseba Mike Smith VE9AA <
ve...@nbnet.nb.ca> napisala:
> Hi Nick,
>
>
>
> I did not work US1Q during this years contest, so won't comment on that
> operator (but I understand 100% what you are saying, even though your
> English is not perfect, hi hi)
>
>
>
Hi Nick,
I did not work US1Q during this years contest, so won't comment on that
operator (but I understand 100% what you are saying, even though your
English is not perfect, hi hi)
I have in the past, "worked" an Italian station on 160m (I forget the call)
at 5NN+30dB many hours after sun
George,
My English is probably very bad ..
US1S not mentioned!
The best stations of Ukraine (UX1UA, UW2M, UX2X) almost did not hear 3
zone!
How could US1Q do this?
I have known the US8ICM operator for a long time. This is a young guy.
But he lost his conscience as a child ..
---
Nick, UY
UX2X was a solid S9 in FL during then entire evening. UW2M, UX1UA were S8.
Never heard US1S.
(TX antenna only.)
73 and HNY,
George,
AA7JV
On Tue, 31 Dec 2019 04:49:23 +0200
uy0zg wrote:
UX1UA, UR0MC, UX2X -these are stations with good real RX antennas.
---
Nick, UY0ZG
http://www.topband.in.u
UX1UA, UR0MC, UX2X -these are stations with good real RX antennas.
---
Nick, UY0ZG
http://www.topband.in.ua
Bill Weaver писал 2019-12-31 04:40:
I have him and UX2X in the log, but I'm in eastern zone 4 (central
Ky). Most of west and central EU was easily workable here.
73,
Bill WE5P
I have him and UX2X in the log, but I'm in eastern zone 4 (central Ky). Most of
west and central EU was easily workable here.
73,
Bill WE5P
>
> On Dec 30, 2019 at 21:29, uy0zgwrote:
>
>
> Hi All The US1Q station (EM2Q in ARRL 160) announced an unrealistic result
Hi All
The US1Q station (EM2Q in ARRL 160) announced an unrealistic result :
https://www.kkn.net/stew/STEWSCR.TXT
This station is located in the south-east of Ukraine. This is a very
poor geographic location for working with NA.
Compare US1Q results with UX1UA, UR0MC, UX2X results. Especial
12 matches
Mail list logo
