On Dec 7, 2016 1:28 AM, "Univibe" wrote:
If I want to include a reference to my public PGP key on Atlas using the
ContactInfo field on my relays, what's the best way to do it? Should I
upload my key to some of the public keyservers and then list the
fingerprint on Atlas?
Yes. I use the MIT Keys
If I want to include a reference to my public PGP key on Atlas using the
ContactInfo field on my relays, what's the best way to do it? Should I upload
my key to some of the public keyservers and then list the fingerprint on Atlas?
If so which keyservers are recommended?
I had a thought to publi
I can just imagine someone panting while dragging a sub-$35 old desktop
computer up the stairs after physically searching for it in a nearby junkyard.
A considerable level of destitution and a commendable commitment to the cause
of Tor would be required.
-Original Message-
From: tor-r
That's a thorough and useful answer. Thank you Tim.
-Original Message-
From: tor-relays [mailto:tor-relays-boun...@lists.torproject.org] On Behalf Of
teor
Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2016 12:12 AM
To: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
Subject: Re: [tor-relays] Circuits from Tor relay?
>
On Wed, 7 Dec 2016 00:36:15 +
Duncan Guthrie wrote:
> My original figure may have been... somewhat off. With different models
> they may have updated the network hardware.
They did not. All models with Ethernet use the same SMSC LAN9514 chip.
> A more general point is that old desktop comp
> On 7 Dec. 2016, at 11:38, Tobias Sachs wrote:
>
> Hey teor,
>
> my relay 5665A3904C89E22E971305EE8C1997BCA4123C69 is according to your log
> [4] black and whitelisted. But it is only in the whitelist from you [1]
> My second relay B567E8E39641F61091C1F2CAAAF73D3D1BF9CFE1 is according to [4]
Hey teor,
my relay 5665A3904C89E22E971305EE8C1997BCA4123C69 is according to your log [4]
black and whitelisted. But it is only in the whitelist from you [1]
My second relay B567E8E39641F61091C1F2CAAAF73D3D1BF9CFE1 is according to [4]
blacklisted but also not in [2].
I hope you can clarify this
On 06/12/16 21:10, SuperSluether wrote:
I don't know the actual numbers for the Raspberry Pi 1, I was just
quoting from Duncan:
https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/2016-December/011182.html
I was told this figure by a friend who tried networking "stuff" on a Pi.
From personal ex
> On 7 Dec. 2016, at 11:04, l3thal.inject...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> Hey Tim,
>
> I believe my relay may already be on the fallback list. If not, please
> feel free to include it. It has been up, fast and stable for well over
> 2 years and will up for the indefinite future at this time.
Thanks, I
Hey Tim,
I believe my relay may already be on the fallback list. If not, please
feel free to include it. It has been up, fast and stable for well over
2 years and will up for the indefinite future at this time.
Thanks
On Sun, Dec 4, 2016 at 5:44 AM, teor wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE--
> On 7 Dec. 2016, at 08:07, Rana wrote:
>
> Arm reports that my relay has 15 circuits connected to my (middle only)
> relay. Some of the circuits have one middle relay and some of them have two.
> All the circuits are FROM my relay to exit nodes, and all have the same guard
> (first) relay.
On Tue, 6 Dec 2016 22:00:20 +0100
diffusae wrote:
> Well, I can read and also now the translation from Bits to Bytes.
> But I am not sure about your value of the maximum network capacity.
>
> That's the iperf3 measurement of a Raspberry Pi 1 Model B+:
>
> [ ID] Interval Transfer B
Ahh, ok. It looks like, that should be a bit more that 1 MB/s.
Regards,
On 06.12.2016 22:10, SuperSluether wrote:
> I don't know the actual numbers for the Raspberry Pi 1, I was just
> quoting from Duncan:
> https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/2016-December/011182.html
>
>
> On 12
I don't know the actual numbers for the Raspberry Pi 1, I was just
quoting from Duncan:
https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/2016-December/011182.html
On 12/06/2016 03:00 PM, diffusae wrote:
Well, I can read and also now the translation from Bits to Bytes.
But I am not sure about
Arm reports that my relay has 15 circuits connected to my (middle only)
relay. Some of the circuits have one middle relay and some of them have two.
All the circuits are FROM my relay to exit nodes, and all have the same
guard (first) relay.
My relay has a small number of inbound connections and
Well, I can read and also now the translation from Bits to Bytes.
But I am not sure about your value of the maximum network capacity.
That's the iperf3 measurement of a Raspberry Pi 1 Model B+:
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Retr
[ 4] 0.00-10.00 sec 83.6 MBytes 8.36 M
Hi Tim!
Thanks a lot for your hint.
I've changed it. I'd recognized the public IPs with arm, but didn't know
the circumstances. Now it should be in a more secure mode,
than before.
Regards,
On 05.12.2016 23:49, teor wrote:
>
>> On 6 Dec. 2016, at 08:32, diffusae wrote:
>>
>> Hi!
>>
>> On 05.1
Hi!
That's from today:
rx | tx |total| avg. rate
+-+-+---
today 6,26 GiB |5,21 GiB | 11,47 GiB | 1,27 Mbit/s
It's just a "low" bandwidth, but this depends on the ISP
Am 06.12.2016 um 18:16 schrieb Rana:
> -Original Message-
> From: tor-relays [mailto:tor-relays-boun...@lists.torproject.org] On Behalf
> Of pa011
> Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2016 1:24 AM
> To: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
> Subject: Re: [tor-relays] Unwarranted discrimination of re
Again, bits or bytes. I can't believe I'm repeating myself, don't you
people read?
The ORIGINAL (version 1) Raspberry Pi had a max of 1 MegaBYTE.
1 MegaBYTE = 8 megaBITS
Obviously other factors limit performance, but looking at just the maximum
network capacity of a Raspberry Pi 1, it could hand
-Original Message-
From: tor-relays [mailto:tor-relays-boun...@lists.torproject.org] On Behalf Of
pa011
Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2016 1:24 AM
To: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
Subject: Re: [tor-relays] Unwarranted discrimination of relays with dynamic IP
> I would like to hear abou
Same here - i'll submit a ticket
Submission rejected as potential spam
Content contained these blacklisted patterns: 'http:', '(?i)business'
Hopefully they can fix it as I could update quite alot of stuff on there
regards
Mark B
> On 6 Dec 2016, at 10:42, teor wrote:
>
>
>> On 6 Dec. 2
> On 6 Dec. 2016, at 21:40, heartsucker wrote:
>
> If you attempt to edit the wiki, this error shows up:
>
> Submission rejected as potential spam
>
>Content contained these blacklisted patterns: 'http:',
> '(?i)(call|customer|technical).?support'
>
> Since these patters already exist in
If you attempt to edit the wiki, this error shows up:
Submission rejected as potential spam
Content contained these blacklisted patterns: 'http:',
'(?i)(call|customer|technical).?support'
Since these patters already exist in the wiki, I can't make updates.
-h
On 12/06/2016 11:33 AM, teor w
> On 6 Dec. 2016, at 21:15, Sec INT wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> Does anyone know a contact for updating the wiki page for good bad isps - im
> using five of them and one is not doing what is advertised - i.e. Shutting
> off an exit node each time a spam abuse emailer asks them to despite there
> being
Hi
Does anyone know a contact for updating the wiki page for good bad isps - im
using five of them and one is not doing what is advertised - i.e. Shutting off
an exit node each time a spam abuse emailer asks them to despite there being
little evidence to back up their claims
regards
Mark B
26 matches
Mail list logo
