[tor-relays] Advertised Bandwidth

Hi all, I’d like to understand something about Advertised Bandwidth. I set up my Tor Relay 3 months ago. With the following settings : RelayBandwidthRate 1250 KBytes RelayBandwidthBurst 1450 KBytes But i only get and Advertised Bandwidth of 83.79 KiB/s. Very far from my settings. And also i

[tor-relays] Advertised bandwidth

In /etc/tor/torrc, I have: ahiker!507 ~# fgrep -i bandwidth /etc/tor/torrc | grep -v '^#' RelayBandwidthRate 64 MBytes RelayBandwidthBurst 512 MBytes But metrics.torproject.org says: Details for: ahiker Configuration Nickname ahiker OR Addresses IPv4 Advertised Bandwidth 55.99 KiB/

[tor-relays] Advertised Bandwidth

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hello, My advertised bandwidth is much slower than what it should actually be. I am running on a network that easily achieves 2gbps, although atlas is reporting 4.15mb/s. Have I misconfigured something? Nickname - ServerX5690 -BEGIN PGP SIGNAT

[tor-relays] Advertised Bandwidth

Hello! I'm unclear as to what the "Advertised Bandwidth" is on Atlas. My node has it's bandwidth set to 700Kb/s, however on Atlas the Advertised Bandwidth is around 7Kb/s. I'm on day three of running this relay and I have read the Early Lifecycle blog post, but I'm still confused as to why the Adv

Re: [tor-relays] Advertised Bandwidth

You only define what the max bw is. The “real” bw Tor is using depends on the measurement of the authority servers. https://atlas.torproject.org/#search/flag:authority If you have a bad connection to them: bad luck :( Pro tip: Get yourself

Re: [tor-relays] Advertised Bandwidth

> On 26 Jan 2018, at 03:30, niftybunny wrote: > > You only define what the max bw is. The “real” bw Tor is using depends on the > measurement of the authority servers. > https://atlas.torproject.org/#search/flag:authority And it depends on the bandwidth history of the relay. The network doesn

Re: [tor-relays] Advertised bandwidth

On 4/23/18 11:57, Ian Zimmerman wrote: > In /etc/tor/torrc, I have: > > ahiker!507 ~# fgrep -i bandwidth /etc/tor/torrc | grep -v '^#' > RelayBandwidthRate 64 MBytes > RelayBandwidthBurst 512 MBytes > > But metrics.torproject.org says: > > Details for: ahiker > Configuration > > Nickname >

Re: [tor-relays] Advertised Bandwidth

No, you haven't misconfigured anything, from what I can see. What atlas is reporting is the Observed Bandwidth, which is the average bandwidth observed over the time it's been up. If you hover over the 4.15 mb/s number, you'll see the Bandwidth rate and Bandwidth burst as reported by your server.

Re: [tor-relays] Advertised Bandwidth

  Felix   Gesendet: Montag, 19. Mai 2014 um 07:26 Uhr Von: "Spencer Neitzke" An: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org Betreff: [tor-relays] Advertised Bandwidth -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hello, My advertised bandwidth is much slower than what it should actually be. I am

Re: [tor-relays] Advertised Bandwidth

Betreff: Re: [tor-relays] Advertised Bandwidth Hi It seems something is wrong with your relay. Look at https://consensus-health.torproject.org/ and search your Nickname. You will see it is not voted to be stable. Further if you check for https://atlas.torproject.org/#details

Re: [tor-relays] Advertised Bandwidth

Hi zwiebel, I have informed Linode of this and they are perfectly fine with it. As for the uptime, I just started this a few days ago and have been tweaking the rules every now and then to achieve the best results. If I understand it correctly the Stable tag should be added to my relay after 7

[tor-relays] Advertised Bandwidth increasing

Hi I'm running the new, imaginatively-nicknamed kingqueenbtnftw relay. I have read around a lot but something I don't get. I thought advertised bandwidth was what I'd put in torrc whereas consensus weight was what some uber-machines tested my relay at, with the idea that this can foil disruptio

[tor-relays] Advertised Bandwidth increasing

Hi I'm running the new, imaginatively-nicknamed kingqueenbtnftw relay. I have read around a lot but something I don't get. I thought advertised bandwidth was what I'd put in torrc whereas consensus weight was what some uber-machines tested my relay at, with the idea that this can foil disruptio

Re: [tor-relays] Advertised Bandwidth

Hey there, The advertised bandwidth will increase gradually. Well mine did. M. On 16/08/2014 10:28 am, IceFish ThreeTwo wrote: > > Hello! > > I'm unclear as to what the "Advertised Bandwidth" is on Atlas. My node has > it's bandwidth set to 700Kb/s, however on Atlas the Advertised Bandwidth i

Re: [tor-relays] Advertised Bandwidth

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 8/16/2014 3:33 AM, Mike Patton wrote: > Hey there, > > The advertised bandwidth will increase gradually. Well mine did. > > M. > > On 16/08/2014 10:28 am, IceFish ThreeTwo > wrote: >> >> Hello! >> >> I'm unclear as to what the "Advertised Band

Re: [tor-relays] Advertised Bandwidth

Thank you very much! On Friday, August 15, 2014, s7r wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 8/16/2014 3:33 AM, Mike Patton wrote: > > Hey there, > > > > The advertised bandwidth will increase gradually. Well mine did. > > > > M. > > > > On 16/08/2014 10:28 am, IceFish Th

[tor-relays] Advertised Bandwidth vs. RelayBandwidthRate

Hello all - I see a constant mismatch of my relay regarding the Advertised Bandwidth vs. the defined and available RelayBandwidthRate. Tor metrics usually only shows around 1.3 MiB/s as Advertised Bandwidth (Bandwidth rate: 3 MiB/s, Bandwidth burst: 6 MiB/s). The torrc config defines: RelayBand

Re: [tor-relays] Advertised Bandwidth increasing

Hello Kingqueen, Advertised bandwidth as reported by atlas and globe is really what is observed as of far. Your relay has only been up for four days, and as your relay proves its reliability and speed, advertised bandwidth will go up. Advertised bandwidth is not what you put in torrc. The bandwidt

Re: [tor-relays] Advertised Bandwidth increasing

Hello Jodie, Ah right, thank you, so advertised bandwidth and consensus weight are both essentially other computers' assessment of the game relay's throughput, though different computers and in different ways. Thanks -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. _

Re: [tor-relays] Advertised Bandwidth vs. RelayBandwidthRate

Hi, > On 7 Apr 2020, at 19:56, petra...@protonmail.ch wrote: > >  > Hello all - I see a constant mismatch of my relay regarding the Advertised > Bandwidth vs. the defined and available RelayBandwidthRate. > > Tor metrics usually only shows around 1.3 MiB/s as Advertised Bandwidth > (Bandwidth

Re: [tor-relays] Advertised Bandwidth vs. RelayBandwidthRate

So, could it be that there is just a wording issue on tor-metrics - to me "observed" and "advertised" bandwidth are two different things but they seem to be the same on tor-metrics. I think I do understand the observed bw, however, still struggle to understand the advertised bw. ‐‐‐ Origina

Re: [tor-relays] Advertised Bandwidth vs. RelayBandwidthRate

Hi, > On 8 Apr 2020, at 16:04, petra...@protonmail.ch wrote: > > So, could it be that there is just a wording issue on tor-metrics - to me > "observed" and "advertised" bandwidth are two different things but they seem > to be the same on tor-metrics. I think I do understand the observed bw, >

[tor-relays] Advertised Bandwidth/Consensus Weight Dropping: Is Verizon FiOS throttling Tor Relays?

Hi tor-relays@ mailing list, I run the following Tor middle relay on a 300 Mbps symmetrical Verizon FiOS connection: https://metrics.torproject.org/rs.html#details/2A65713649C1FD68764DBF43C46363168BE8C942 My setup is as follows: * HPE MicroServer Gen10 (AMD X3421) running FreeBSD 12.0 * T

[tor-relays] New round of measuring the accuracy of Tor relays' advertised bandwidth

Hello! You might recall we ran two "speed tests" so far for investigating the accuracy of a relay's advertised bandwidth, one in 2021[1] and another one earlier this year[2]. We gonna pick this test up again this week. However, this time it won't be just a single run but we are rather scheduling

Re: [tor-relays] New round of measuring the accuracy of Tor relays' advertised bandwidth

Georg Koppen: > Hello! > > You might recall we ran two "speed tests" so far for investigating the > accuracy of a relay's advertised bandwidth, one in 2021[1] and another > one earlier this year[2]. > > We gonna pick this test up again this week. However, this time it won't > be just a single run

Re: [tor-relays] New round of measuring the accuracy of Tor relays' advertised bandwidth

On 8/25/21 12:02 PM, Georg Koppen wrote: Hello! You might recall we ran two "speed tests" so far for investigating the accuracy of a relay's advertised bandwidth, one in 2021[1] and another one earlier this year[2]. I do run 2 relays at the same ip address. Do the tests consider that ? -- To

Re: [tor-relays] New round of measuring the accuracy of Tor relays' advertised bandwidth

Toralf Förster: > On 8/25/21 12:02 PM, Georg Koppen wrote: >> Hello! >> >> You might recall we ran two "speed tests" so far for investigating the >> accuracy of a relay's advertised bandwidth, one in 2021[1] and another >> one earlier this year[2]. > > I do run 2 relays at the same ip address. >

Re: [tor-relays] New round of measuring the accuracy of Tor relays' advertised bandwidth

On 9/2/21 9:11 AM, Georg Koppen wrote: No. As far as it matters for the test those two relays are independent relays which each get tested as two random relays would get. Except, that both shares the same network card ... -- Toralf ___ tor-relays mai

Re: [tor-relays] New round of measuring the accuracy of Tor relays' advertised bandwidth

Toralf Förster: > On 9/2/21 9:11 AM, Georg Koppen wrote: >> No. As far as it matters for the test those two relays are independent >> relays which each get tested as two random relays would get. > > Except, that both shares the same network card ... Right, good point. We'll see how that goes. The

Re: [tor-relays] New round of measuring the accuracy of Tor relays' advertised bandwidth

Georg Koppen: > Georg Koppen: >> Hello! >> >> You might recall we ran two "speed tests" so far for investigating the >> accuracy of a relay's advertised bandwidth, one in 2021[1] and another >> one earlier this year[2]. >> >> We gonna pick this test up again this week. However, this time it won't >