-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 08/07/2015 10:16 PM, Seth David Schoen wrote:
> MaQ writes:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm curious, I'm developing an app whereas sharing/collaboration
>> can be done by localhost through tor and .onion address between
>> pairs or multiples. When I use
Tor Weekly News August 8th, 2015
Welcome to the thirtieth issue in 2015 of Tor Weekly News, the weekly
newslette
Seth and et al,
Thank you very much for the answers. It basically confirmed what I
thought. Was also experimenting with a self-signed cert anyway as people
connecting would already have a direct association.
My thoughts after answers, while not knowing how everything works behind
scenes, are the
MaQ writes:
> Also, while it was said that .onion encryption was of lower standard,
> wouldn't a high degree of privacy and randomness still be assured,
> except for maybe alphabet agencies and more nefarious types out there
> specifically targeting a subject or .onion addresses in general, and
>
Jeremy Rand writes:
> It's theoretically possible to use naming systems like Namecoin to
> specify TLS fingerprints for connections to Tor hidden services, which
> would eliminate the need for a CA. I'm hoping to have a proof of
> concept of such functionality soon.
Is there a way to prevent an
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 08/09/2015 01:04 AM, Seth David Schoen wrote:
> Jeremy Rand writes:
>
>> It's theoretically possible to use naming systems like Namecoin
>> to specify TLS fingerprints for connections to Tor hidden
>> services, which would eliminate the need for
