Re: [tor-talk] Tor source code

r anyone else can't check if it is secure, you nor anyone can't modify it (legally) to fix their insecurities until the developers do so (if they do). -- Juan Miguel Navarro Martínez GPG Keyfingerprint: 5A91 90D4 CF27 9D52 D62A BC58 88E2 947F 9BC6 B3CF signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digit

Re: [tor-talk] Tor 0.2.9.2-alpha is released

t so the alpha, beta and rc versions could be better > tested. > -- Juan Miguel Navarro Martínez GPG Keyfingerprint: 5A91 90D4 CF27 9D52 D62A BC58 88E2 947F 9BC6 B3CF -- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org To unsubscribe or change other settings go to https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

Re: [tor-talk] Why so may exit node IP addresses in the TBB?

blog/tor-browser-45-alpha-1-released > > > That doesn't answer the question though why the different circuits use > different exit nodes. They could all use the same exit node. I recall > seeing fair bit of debate over how many exit nodes a Tor client should use > and how often it

Re: [tor-talk] Why so may exit node IP addresses in the TBB?

ach of the five sites has >>> the IP >>> address of a different exit node. >>> >>> Is this a new policy? What is the purpose? >>> -- >>> tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org >>> To unsubscribe or change other settings go

Re: [tor-talk] Question for those who say "Tor is pwned"

On Mon, 20 Jun 2016 19:12:31 -0700 Ted Smith wrote: > Paul, it pains me to see someone, who has contributed so much to > humanity through a long and celebrated career as a scientist, feel > the need to engage with what is at worst an agent of some oppressive > government

Re: [tor-talk] Question for those who say "Tor is pwned"

On Tue, 21 Jun 2016 00:19:39 -0400 Paul Syverson wrote: I > "A Peel of Onion". Here's an excerpt: > > > Mixes are also usually intended > to resist an adversary that can observe all traffic everywhere and, > in some threat models, to actively change

Re: [tor-talk] Question for those who say "Tor is pwned"

On Mon, 20 Jun 2016 21:25:53 -0400 Paul Syverson wrote: > > I know I'm feeding the troll, but this is just crap. I invented onion > routing You mean, you invented the name? Or are you claiming you were the very first who came up with the idea of

Re: [tor-talk] Food for thought

On Tue, 21 Jun 2016 10:12:51 +1000 Zenaan Harkness wrote: > Those who remain there and genuinely thought/ think they were "for the > cause" prolly have some serious soul searching to do on an > organisational humans level. I wish, but I'm not holding my breath. Just

Re: [tor-talk] Question for those who say "Tor is pwned"

On Mon, 20 Jun 2016 20:10:25 -0400 Roger Dingledine wrote: > but I think we should soon find > the time anyway to proceed to the "clean up our lists" plan.) spoken like a true fascist > > --Roger > -- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org To

Re: [tor-talk] Question for those who say "Tor is pwned"

On Mon, 20 Jun 2016 18:52:17 -0500 Anthony Papillion <anth...@cajuntechie.org> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > On 6/20/2016 6:39 PM, juan wrote: > > > > by-the-way > > > > http://www.ohmygodel.com/publications/users

Re: [tor-talk] Question for those who say "Tor is pwned"

On Mon, 20 Jun 2016 18:50:10 -0500 Anthony Papillion <anth...@cajuntechie.org> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > On 6/20/2016 6:35 PM, juan wrote: > > On Mon, 20 Jun 2016 18:07:12 -0500 Anthony Papillion > > <anth...@cajuntechie

Re: [tor-talk] Question for those who say "Tor is pwned"

by-the-way http://www.ohmygodel.com/publications/usersrouted-ccs13.pdf Users Get Routed: Traffic Correlation on Tor by Realistic Adversaries "Tor is known to be insecure against an adversary that can observe a user’s traffic entering and

Re: [tor-talk] Question for those who say "Tor is pwned"

On Mon, 20 Jun 2016 18:07:12 -0500 Anthony Papillion wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > I see a lot of people talking about how Tor is pwned by the US > Government and is insecure 'by design'. I'm assuming that they know > this from a

Re: [tor-talk] Food for thought

On Mon, 20 Jun 2016 14:00:25 -0600 Mirimir wrote: > > Do you actually understand Tor's design? Yes. Do you? And do you understand why the US military created tor? > > >> For links, check out /r/Tor. > > > > > > So far I found this : > > > >

Re: [tor-talk] Food for thought

On Mon, 20 Jun 2016 11:42:55 -0600 Mirimir <miri...@riseup.net> wrote: > Yes, I see that too, and maybe that's what we have here. But hey, > Juan, maybe Jake's departure was a win for the "unpwn Tor" faction ;) Not sure how that could be the case.

Re: [tor-talk] "But he does good work." *Appelbaum*

On Mon, 20 Jun 2016 20:39:28 +0200 Andreas Krey <a.k...@gmx.de> wrote: > On Mon, 20 Jun 2016 13:20:16 +0000, juan wrote: > ... > > See, the 'community' of clown 'hackers', sellouts and frauds > > working for the US gov't and vasal states deems that X is > >

Re: [tor-talk] "But he does good work." *Appelbaum*

On Mon, 20 Jun 2016 17:48:41 +0200 Andreas Krey wrote: > How should 'due process' look like if someone is doing thing > that are not criminal, yet are not considered acceptable within a > community? What should be highlighted here is the chemically pure fascist

Re: [tor-talk] "But he does good work." *Appelbaum*

On Mon, 20 Jun 2016 14:19:59 + Tempest wrote: > that rule only applies in a court of law. if you steal from me and are > never taken to court, it's not a violation of "due process" if i call > you a thief, nor is it defamation. That is of course correct...IF

Re: [tor-talk] Food for thought

On Sat, 18 Jun 2016 16:40:08 -0600 Mirimir wrote: > now that I've seen various leaked internal > documents, I'm convinced that Jake did some serious shit, and had to > go. Any links to those docs? So far all the 'evidence' I've seen is evidence showing

[tor-talk] Fw: FOAD argentina scum

Just got this from some upstanding member of this fine 'community'. Begin forwarded message: Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2016 03:32:34 +0200 (CEST) From: Nomen Nescio <nob...@dizum.com> To: juan@gmail.com Subject: FOAD argentina scum Re: [tor-talk] Bittorrent starting to move entirely

Re: [tor-talk] Bittorrent starting to move entirely within anonymous overlay nets

On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 23:20:16 +0200 Aymeric Vitte wrote: > > > Le 17/06/2016 à 12:51, Zenaan Harkness a écrit : > >> Even if an interesting move as you described (ie onions + > >> onioncat) I > >> > don't really think that it can scale to the extent required by a > >> >

Re: [tor-talk] Poetic justice

On 06/10/2016 07:28 PM, a...@cock.lu wrote: > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PWdL1g3xRHY Do you think that smug > > asshole still agrees with censorship and lynch mobbing now that > > he's the target of them? https://xkcd.com/1357/ that comic is of course ignorante bullshit coming

Re: [tor-talk] Jacob Appelbaum allegedly intimidated victims into silence and anonymity

On Fri, 10 Jun 2016 05:54:34 + Tempest wrote: > and this is the big issue. so tired of hearing people talk about "due > process" as if it applies to social discourse. it's doesn't. due > process is for the state. if it happened, speak out. this bull shit > needs to

Re: [tor-talk] Reddit user babalui1 claims that Roger Dingledine is next to get fired by the Tor Project

On Wed, 8 Jun 2016 22:13:08 - carlos...@sigaint.org wrote: > Reddit user babalui1 claims that Roger Dingledine is next to get > fired by the Tor Project > > "Next to get booted from the Tor Project will be one of the founders > of the Tor Project Roger Dingledine, the official reason will be

Re: [tor-talk] CULT OF THE DEAD COW Statement on Jacob Appelbaum / ioerror

On Tue, 07 Jun 2016 22:08:57 +0300 ja.talk wrote: cult of the clown cow vomited : > We know that it may be scary, but we also encourage victims to > contact their appropriate local authorities. Just in case somebody out there hasn't yet realized what kind

Re: [tor-talk] Decoding Jake Appelbaum

On Tue, 07 Jun 2016 03:09:14 +0300 ja.talk wrote: > Appelbaum told Shepard in a bar in > front of another colleague that he was going to have sex with her, > using a misogynistic phrase. Wow! a 'misogynistic' phrase. That is no doubt a terrible crime

Re: [tor-talk] Decoding Jake Appelbaum

On Tue, 07 Jun 2016 02:15:45 +0300 ja.talk wrote: > His statement is carefully worded, and so I did my best to decipher > it here. > > "In the past few days, a calculated and targeted attack has been > launched to spread vicious and spurious allegations against me." >

Re: [tor-talk] Has anyone HEARD from IOError since his last tweet?

On Mon, 6 Jun 2016 15:17:14 +0300 Александр wrote: > Unambiguous and comprehensive response from Jacob Appelbaum himself > > In the past few days, a calculated and targeted attack has been > launched to spread vicious and spurious allegations against me. Given > the way

Re: [tor-talk] Manipulation is a bitch and you're all pawns

On Mon, 6 Jun 2016 10:39:50 +0200 carlo von lynX <l...@time.to.get.psyced.org> wrote: > On Sun, Jun 05, 2016 at 02:46:52PM -0300, juan wrote: > > On Sun, 5 Jun 2016 17:03:45 +0200 > > carlo von lynX <l...@time.to.get.psyced.org> wrote: > > > > > Ju

Re: [tor-talk] Any updates from Tor Project on ioerror?

On Mon, 06 Jun 2016 17:30:14 +0200 ma...@wk3.org wrote: > Quoting Not Friendly (2016-06-06 16:22:54) > > At the current point in time no evidence has been provided to prove > > the allegations against Jacob. Until time that such evidence is > > provided to the public I choose to believe that

Re: [tor-talk] A possible solution to traffic correlation attacks,

On Mon, 06 Jun 2016 00:48:22 -0500 CANNON NATHANIEL CIOTA wrote: > I know that Tor has stated in > past that they don't claim to protect from a GPA. Of course. Tor is purposely designed to allow the US military to spy on everyone. Obviously something

Re: [tor-talk] A possible solution to traffic correlation attacks,

On Sun, 05 Jun 2016 17:13:41 -0400 notfrien...@riseup.net wrote: > So randomizing the times that traffic enters the network and exits > the network wouldn't work? Like it enters a note and 30 ms after > received or another random delay couldn't it exit. It would be harder > to correlate the

Re: [tor-talk] http://jacobappelbaum.net/

On Sun, 5 Jun 2016 17:03:45 +0200 carlo von lynX wrote: > Julia Schramm who did everything > right, https://torrentfreak.com/fail-prominent-pirate-party-politician-polices-book-pirates-120918/#disqus_thread just in case some people still haven't realized

Re: [tor-talk] delete my email-address on mailing list

t; With kind regards, remawoba -- Juan Miguel Navarro Martínez GPG Keyfingerprint: 5A91 90D4 CF27 9D52 D62A BC58 88E2 947F 9BC6 B3CF -- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org To unsubscribe or change other settings go to https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

Re: [tor-talk] Tor (and other nets) probably screwed by Traffic Analysis by now

On Thu, 2 Jun 2016 11:32:45 -0400 grarpamp wrote: > It is those out of control self aware self preserving entities You mean, the government : the very same self-serving-and-preserving entity that created and runs tor. > with their secret games

Re: [tor-talk] Tor (and other nets) probably screwed by Traffic Analysis by now

On Thu, 2 Jun 2016 00:13:10 -0400 grarpamp wrote: > https://motherboard.vice.com/read/the-uk-is-using-bulk-interception-to-catch-criminalsand-not-telling-them "UK authorities are collecting and analysing data in bulk to identify suspected child exploitation" The only half

Re: [tor-talk] Where is the Tor source code? [Was Re: FBI harassing Tor devs]

eing a link to the page with distro packages and source code. > > Perhaps it could say instead: > > "Looking for Distro-specific Packages or Source Code? View All Downloads" > > -- Juan Miguel Navarro Martínez GPG Keyfingerprint: 5A91 90D4 CF27 9D52 D62A BC58 88E2 9

Re: [tor-talk] 1 Million People use Facebook over Tor

On Fri, 22 Apr 2016 23:02:11 -0400 Roger Dingledine wrote: > On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 11:41:09AM +1000, Peter Tonoli wrote: > > This is a real success story for Tor > > I agree! > > Thank you Alec and other security people at Facebook The fact that you brag about your

Re: [tor-talk] 1 Million People use Facebook over Tor

On Fri, 22 Apr 2016 23:02:11 -0400 Roger Dingledine wrote: > On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 11:41:09AM +1000, Peter Tonoli wrote: > > This is a real success story for Tor > > I agree! > > Thank you Alec and other security people at Facebook for seeing the > value in secure

Re: [tor-talk] web browser add-on extensions vulnerabilities

On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 16:12:45 -0500 Joe Btfsplk wrote: > On 4/10/2016 5:36 AM, jb wrote: > > Tor Browser users: > > > > NoScript and other popular Firefox add-ons open millions to new > > attack > >

Re: [tor-talk] Innocent Seattle Exit Operators And Privacy Advocates Raided - Tor was run out of home

On Tue, 5 Apr 2016 16:27:35 -0700 Phil Mocek wrote: > On 04/04/2016 05:50 AM, tor_t...@arcor.de wrote: > > why is https://www.seattleprivacy.org/ down for Tor users > > It is down--for everyone--because it was hosted at David's home > among the various hardware that

Re: [tor-talk] The TOR's Defense Operations

On Tue, 29 Mar 2016 12:24:35 +0200 Milica Đekić wrote: > Hello! > > I would suggest to talk a bit more about the defense operations > regarding an organized crime and terrorism You mean, your government, and the rest of national governments? Those

Re: [tor-talk] Fwd: Cryptopolitik and the Darknet

On Fri, 26 Feb 2016 04:37:17 + eliaz wrote: > > That some people might have a non-criminal reason 'criminal' as defined by whom? Ah yes, as defined by the criminal crazies who run your government. Cute. -- tor-talk mailing list -

Re: [tor-talk] Fwd: Cryptopolitik and the Darknet

On Fri, 26 Feb 2016 04:37:17 + eliaz wrote: > > It's easy to be a libertarian or anarchist at home. It's even easier to be a psycho willing to kill people who don't obey your deranged 'laws'. Which is what you stand for if you are not an

Re: [tor-talk] Tor for everyone; introducing Eccentric Authentication

On Thu, 25 Feb 2016 00:26:02 +0100 Guido Witmond wrote: > So, to answer your question: people communicate id@site names, the > computer verifies the uniqness properties to determine the > corresponding public keys. The requirement to make the relation > between names and

Re: [tor-talk] Tor for everyone; introducing Eccentric Authentication

On Wed, 24 Feb 2016 23:04:39 +0100 Guido Witmond wrote: > My drive is to make key exchange happen as a natural part of normal > interactions between people. So teach people how to exchange keys. > Not as a separate step that could be > neglected, forgotten or done

Re: [tor-talk] PGP and Signed Messages,

y that if he calls bullshit on X keybase account or other site, it'll certainly be it. - -- Juan Miguel Navarro Martínez GPG Keyfingerprint: 5A91 90D4 CF27 9D52 D62A BC58 88E2 947F 9BC6 B3CF -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJWx3ThAAoJECDeJXHIWzXQo5UIAMitGjVCkWG42I/

Re: [tor-talk] PGP and Signed Messages,

ww.reddit.com/r/KeybaseProofs. For both last verification processes, it contains some code and a PGP message. > I'm not a Keybase user (I've been waiting for more than a year and > a half, I believe for an invite from them) > If you are still interested, I could send you one. - -- Juan

Re: [tor-talk] Network Analysis of Overlay Networks, Capabilities, Fill Traffic [was: VPN less safe?]

On Tue, 26 Jan 2016 18:49:53 -0500 grarpamp wrote: >> virtually all the world's infrastructure is 'compromised'? > The USA and Soviets have decades experience tapping cables > around the globe in a cold war sense. I think the paper is mostly referring to what

Re: [tor-talk] Using VPN less safe?

On Mon, 25 Jan 2016 10:25:20 -0500 Paul Syverson wrote: > "20,000 In League Under the Sea: Anonymous Communication, Trust, > MLATs, and Undersea Cables" available at >

Re: [tor-talk] Escape NSA just to enter commercial surveillance?

On Sat, 16 Jan 2016 06:43:25 +0100 Anders Andersson wrote: > On the other hand, if you want to look like a screaming child with no > other agenda than wanting to be at the center of attention, you're > doing a good job. Thank you Anders for your wise words. I do

Re: [tor-talk] Escape NSA just to enter commercial surveillance?

On Fri, 15 Jan 2016 23:34:00 -0700 Mirimir <miri...@riseup.net> wrote: > On 01/15/2016 01:11 PM, juan wrote: > > I like your attitude, juan, but recommending proxies is dangerous :( I'm not really recommending anything, just making some observations. > &g

Re: [tor-talk] Escape NSA just to enter commercial surveillance?

On Fri, 15 Jan 2016 02:36:59 +0500 Артур Истомин wrote: > I think, greatest danger *for most people* comes from > corporations like Google, Facebook, Twitter etc whose money - our > privacy, not from NSA/GCHQ/FSB/... They are one and the same thing. The 'western'

Re: [tor-talk] Escape NSA just to enter commercial surveillance?

On Thu, 14 Jan 2016 22:37:25 +0100 Andreas Krey <a.k...@gmx.de> wrote: > On Thu, 14 Jan 2016 14:25:20 +0000, juan wrote: > ... > > Of course. It's absurd. There's nothing hidden about > > facebook's location so a 'hidden' service is...nonsense. > > You

Re: [tor-talk] Escape NSA just to enter commercial surveillance?

On Thu, 14 Jan 2016 23:08:14 +0100 creo <creo-tor-li...@blackmesa.at> wrote: > Am 2016-01-14 18:52, schrieb juan: > > > Philipp Winter <p...@nymity.ch> wrote: > > > >> Logging in to Facebook over Tor reveals your identity, > >> but not your loca

Re: [tor-talk] Escape NSA just to enter commercial surveillance?

fore Facebook, but would it be > worth risking detection for Facebook? > > In both setups, there's the risk FB themselves could try and implement > something to identify the user's location of course, but that's a > different kettle of fish. > On 15 Jan 2016 19:20, "juan&quo

Re: [tor-talk] Escape NSA just to enter commercial surveillance?

On Thu, 14 Jan 2016 17:58:50 +0100 Markus Hitter wrote: > > On 32C3 a few weeks ago ... > > https://media.ccc.de/v/32c3-7322-tor_onion_services_more_useful_than_you_think > > ... Roger cheered a lot about Facebook offering a hidden service. > > To be honest, this surprises

Re: [tor-talk] Escape NSA just to enter commercial surveillance?

On Thu, 14 Jan 2016 12:51:31 -0500 Philipp Winter wrote: > On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 05:58:50PM +0100, Markus Hitter wrote: > > To be honest, this surprises me quite a bit. Tor is for > > anonymisation, so one can escape tax paid surveillance by NSA, GCHQ > > & Co., which is

Re: [tor-talk] Hello I have a few question about tor network

On Tue, 29 Dec 2015 14:09:05 +0900 (KST) 권현준 wrote: > 2. If not, How can cracker attack tor network that tor can't prevent? http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2015/11/tor-director-fbi-paid-carnegie-mellon-1m-to-break-tor-hand-over-ips/

Re: [tor-talk] A curious email from Twitter mentioning Tor Project

On Thu, 24 Dec 2015 11:53:23 +0100 Jens Kubieziel wrote: > * Akater schrieb am 2015-12-24 um 04:08 Uhr: > > Given all this, the following email (Received 2015-12-11 from > > i...@twitter.com) is somewhat curious: > > Thanks for mentioning it. There were several users who

Re: [tor-talk] Carnegie Mellon's Paid Snitches - Responsibile For More Arrests

On Mon, 21 Dec 2015 23:49:56 -0500 grarpamp wrote: > http://www.dailydot.com/politics/tor-silk-road-deep-web-tor-attack-irish-drug-dealer/ > http://www.gwern.net/Black-market%20arrests > https://github.com/gwern/gwern.net > > Drug case in Ireland has fingerprints of Carnegie

Re: [tor-talk] Russia actually kind of cracked (?) Tor

On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 15:33:56 +0100 Andreas Krey wrote: > https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sichere_Inter-Netzwerk_Architektur > That is LI; I don't know what the secret services are doing. translation : "lawful" doesn't mean shit. > I don't know what the secret services

Re: [tor-talk] Removing viruses from the BIOS Chip to Vladimir and Matthew Kaufman

On Mon, 23 Nov 2015 20:29:25 -0500 "William H. Depperman" wrote: > To Rick Evans: > > I am not a Hacker. So you have to become one, or get in touch with a 'hacker' you can trust. > You seem to be writing just to be > writing. I have to have

Re: [tor-talk] Islamic State

On Wed, 18 Nov 2015 15:07:15 -0600 Terrence Gordon wrote: > How can I help out in the war against ISIS? Murder a few brown children. That's what americans and their european pets do better. -- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org

Re: [tor-talk] A little more hostility towards Tor from Twitter

On Wed, 28 Oct 2015 05:41:15 + Alec Muffett wrote: > > On Oct 27, 2015, at 9:31 PM, Jonathan Wilkes > > wrote: "even > > Facebook let's you use Tor if you wanna. #gimmesomeprivacy". > > That is certainly one approach; I would suggest a different one: >

Re: [tor-talk] A little more hostility towards Tor from Twitter

On Wed, 28 Oct 2015 05:41:15 + Alec Muffett wrote: > > On Oct 27, 2015, at 9:31 PM, Jonathan Wilkes > > wrote: "even > > Facebook let's you use Tor if you wanna. #gimmesomeprivacy". > > That is certainly one approach; I would suggest a different one: >

Re: [tor-talk] Tor

On Wed, 21 Oct 2015 00:06:14 -0700 Spencer wrote: > Hi, > > > > > Justin: > > We Do Not want you in our community. > > > > Yes we do; see Juan's earlier comments regarding cover. > Thanks Spencer. Moral support is always appreciated. >

Re: [tor-talk] Tor

On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 21:03:19 -0500 Justin wrote: > Actually, you’re totally wrong. According to a top secret NSA > document, which you can view online: Tor is the king of high secure, > low latency anonymity. No contender awaits the throne. funny how tor

Re: [tor-talk] Tor

es behind them are > so important. > > > > > > > On 10/18/15 1:05 AM, Virgil Griffith wrote: > > > I re-iterate a request for the tor-opentalk@ list. > > > > > > -V > > > > > > On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 2:58 PM Josef Stautner <

Re: [tor-talk] Tor

On Sun, 18 Oct 2015 08:58:17 +0200 Josef Stautner <he...@veloc1ty.de> wrote: > Hello Juan, > > I can't understand why you subscribe to a list of "scammers" then. To make the obvious point that they are scammers. Get it now?. It shouldn't

Re: [tor-talk] Tor

On Sun, 18 Oct 2015 21:11:56 +0200 Josef Stautner wrote: > Thanks for the conversation :-) nichts zu danken -- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org To unsubscribe or change other settings go to

Re: [tor-talk] Tor

On Sat, 17 Oct 2015 14:58:55 -0800 I wrote: > OFF the list, please Why? You don't want people to know what kind of scam the tor project is? > > > > -- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org To unsubscribe or change other

Re: [tor-talk] Tor

On Sat, 17 Oct 2015 21:59:51 + Cubed wrote: > > So if you feel you were misled at some point, help us out and show us > where the mistake is so it can be fixed. It's quite clear why your fucking scam is a scam. Reread my original message, then

Re: [tor-talk] Tor

On Wed, 14 Oct 2015 16:42:07 +0200 aka wrote: > US Navy wanted a mesh network for their ships so an adversary couldn't > determine by passively listening what ship is the flagship. except onion routing bullshit only 'works' if the 'adversary' can't

Re: [tor-talk] Tor

On Mon, 12 Oct 2015 20:48:22 -0400 kennedy weinrich wrote: > What was the main purpose in creating Tor or the Tor Project? Extending the reach of american crimes and empire. Tor is a project of the pentagon - as such its main purpose is, obviously,

Re: [tor-talk] How do you configure a Tor relay on Windows?

should be under \Data > director but it's not there. > > Is there updated doc on how to install and configure a relay on Windows > or can anyone give me some advice? > > Thanks, > Cypher > -- Juan Miguel Navarro Martínez GPG Keyfingerprint: 5A91 90D4 CF27 9D52 D62A BC5

Re: [tor-talk] Tor 0.2.5+ can not connect Freenode hidden service anymore

different ports combination (i.e. +6697, +7000, etc). All connection are failed. My proxy setting is 127.0.0.1:9050, the error message always is: * Proxy: Connection refused, so I think the problem is not Freenode side. Please help. Any advice is appreciated. Thanks in advance. -- Juan Miguel

Re: [tor-talk] Historically speaking, what was the U.S. navy /military

On Mon, 3 Aug 2015 14:41:18 +0800 Virgil Griffith i...@virgil.gr wrote: I delegate this thread to tor-opent...@lists.torproject.org what? On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 1:05 PM, Juan juan@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, 3 Aug 2015 07:16:43 +0300 Cari Machet carimac...@gmail.com

Re: [tor-talk] Historically speaking, what was the U.S. navy /military

the kind of answers your question would generate. On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 1:05 PM, Juan juan@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, 3 Aug 2015 07:16:43 +0300 Cari Machet carimac...@gmail.com wrote: https://youtu.be/qXajND7BQzk?t=27m40s here is on camera explanation

Re: [tor-talk] Historically speaking, what was the U.S. navy /military

On Mon, 3 Aug 2015 07:16:43 +0300 Cari Machet carimac...@gmail.com wrote: https://youtu.be/qXajND7BQzk?t=27m40s here is on camera explanation of why the navy wants you to use tor ... if YOU dont it wont work Bingo. If only the criminals from the americunt military and

Re: [tor-talk] TOR Network Map

users. Now that the TOR bundle and TAILS don't include the network map software anymore what would be an alternative? -- -- Juan Miguel Navarro Martínez GPG Keyfingerprint: 5A91 90D4 CF27 9D52 D62A BC58 88E2 947F 9BC6 B3CF -- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org

Re: [tor-talk] Historically speaking, what was the U.S. navy /military

On Wed, 29 Jul 2015 12:32:56 + Virgil Griffith i...@virgil.gr wrote: Historically speaking, what was the U.S. navy /military ntending to use Tor for? me: Exactly the same things they use it for right now. Communications for their murdering operations, spying,

Re: [tor-talk] Historically speaking, what was the U.S. navy /military

On Wed, 29 Jul 2015 12:32:56 + Virgil Griffith i...@virgil.gr wrote: Historically speaking, what was the U.S. navy /military ntending to use Tor for? Exactly the same things they use it for right now. Communications for their murdering operations, spying,

Re: [tor-talk] Historically speaking, what was the U.S. navy /military

search this list for posts by syverson commenting on tor 'limitations' Le mercredi 29 juillet 2015, Juan juan@gmail.com a écrit : On Wed, 29 Jul 2015 12:32:56 + Virgil Griffith i...@virgil.gr javascript:; wrote: Historically speaking, what was the U.S. navy

Re: [tor-talk] evidence that Tor isn't amoral?

On Wed, 15 Jul 2015 08:16:15 + Lara lara@emails.veryspeedy.net wrote: You simply don't understand that users's world. In there, his mother becoming pregnant is a political statement, heck, even going to the toilet can be an act of support for or against the government, In that twisted

Re: [tor-talk] evidence that Tor isn't amoral?

On Tue, 14 Jul 2015 12:54:53 + Speak Freely when2plus2...@riseup.net wrote: However, because you accused me of sending hate mail anonymously, I'd like to explicitly refute that claim. Trust me, I wouldn't have sent hate mail to you anonymously. Sure. Except that it just so

Re: [tor-talk] evidence that Tor isn't amoral?

On Tue, 14 Jul 2015 16:13:46 -0700 Apple Apple djjdjdjdjdjdj...@gmail.com wrote: On 14 Jul 2015 22:31, Juan juan@gmail.com wrote: You just keep vomiting the same corrupt nonsense. Oh yeah, you are such galant defenders...of americunt fascism...which you try

Re: [tor-talk] evidence that Tor isn't amoral?

On Mon, 13 Jul 2015 04:56:30 + Zenaan Harkness z...@freedbms.net wrote: Really, it's fence-sitting amoral positions like yours that really get my chicken going... fix the world already, Zenaan Fixing the world, yes. It's only a matter of getting enough funding from the

Re: [tor-talk] evidence that Tor isn't amoral?

On Fri, 10 Jul 2015 14:35:04 -0500 Drew Fustini pdp7p...@gmail.com wrote: Greetings - I am a Tor Browser user and also an operator of a couple Tor relays. I believe the Tor Project has a noble mission. An online friend recently claimed to me that amoral content is a huge portion of the

Re: [tor-talk] evidence that Tor isn't amoral?

On Fri, 10 Jul 2015 16:26:42 -0400 z9wahqvh z9wah...@gmail.com wrote: far be it for me to agree with Juan, Of course. Doing so would result in your funding from the 'department of defense' being cut off. -- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org To unsubscribe

Re: [tor-talk] evidence that Tor isn't amoral?

be it for me to agree with Juan, Of course. Doing so would result in your funding from the 'department of defense' being cut off. -- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org To unsubscribe or change other settings go to https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman

Re: [tor-talk] OFTC and Tor

. -- Juan Miguel Navarro Martínez GPG Keyfingerprint: 5A91 90D4 CF27 9D52 D62A BC58 88E2 947F 9BC6 B3CF -- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org To unsubscribe or change other settings go to https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

Re: [tor-talk] TorBirdy and Gmail (continuation)

grarpamp: On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Juan Miguel Navarro Martínez juanmi.3...@gmail.com wrote: If Hotmail, Gmail or Yahoo has problems with Tor being used, you need to find a way for it to work. Hotmail isn't complaining about Tor as far as I know, Gmail does but should be solved and I

Re: [tor-talk] TorBirdy and Gmail (continuation)

? Many thanks J - -- Juan Miguel Navarro Martínez GPG Keyfingerprint: 5A91 90D4 CF27 9D52 D62A BC58 88E2 947F 9BC6 B3CF -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJVYfUhAAoJEELfPuRPJIB7+L4IAI11+XJYstsI3RDDxEWcysCF 3wrH3ThtconSl1F5LOKbvSHOwQk314Q3hLgtW2eqWBnBrff4h1WpIaXQz70ascZo

Re: [tor-talk] TorBirdy and Gmail (continuation)

complaining about Tor as far as I know, Gmail does but should be solved and I don't know about Yahoo. -- Juan Miguel Navarro Martínez GPG Keyfingerprint: 5A91 90D4 CF27 9D52 D62A BC58 88E2 947F 9BC6 B3CF -- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org To unsubscribe or change other

Re: [tor-talk] Use of TOR for illegal activities

On Wed, 20 May 2015 03:10:05 - Paul A. Crable p...@crable.us wrote: Is there some way to keep TOR out of the hands of sleazebags and crooks? The sleazebahs or better scumbags are the US government and its supporters, sonny. Paul -- tor-talk mailing list -

Re: [tor-talk] Use of TOR for illegal activities

On Wed, 20 May 2015 11:38:08 +0200 Casey Callendrello c...@caseyc.net wrote: Frankly, Tor's twelve-year delay in implementing RFC 3514* is a stain upon its reputation. There's no parody like unintentional self-parody. --Casey * Note the published date. On 5/20/15 6:20

Re: [tor-talk] Meeting Snowden in Princeton

On Sun, 3 May 2015 02:02:44 -0700 coderman coder...@gmail.com wrote: On 5/3/15, benjamin barber barb...@barberb.com wrote: Except that TOR says they're going to help LEO with stop cyber criminals according to briefings with UK parliament. what part of Will never compromise Tor do you not

Re: [tor-talk] Gmail is blocking sending email from smtp.gmail.com

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Akater: No, Google does not block tor. It happened to me as well with error messages intrusion detected and insecure device. I had to modify Google security settings to make it work. Could you please tell what exactly did you modify? I've

Re: [tor-talk] Clarification of Tor's involvement with DARPA's Memex

On Fri, 17 Apr 2015 17:38:37 +0100 Thomas White thomaswh...@riseup.net wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 So I was reading through the following article: http://www.forbes.com/sites/thomasbrewster/2015/04/17/darpa-nasa-and-par tners-show-off-memex/ And there is some

  1   2   3   >