On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 23:20:16 +0200
Aymeric Vitte <vitteayme...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Le 17/06/2016 à 12:51, Zenaan Harkness a écrit :
> >> Even if an interesting move as you described (ie onions +
> >> onioncat) I
> >> > don't really think that it can scale to the extent required by a
> >> > bt p2p network, I don't think either that using hidden services
> >> > is a good solution to reach peers, and is it not an issue to
> >> > have potentially plenty of new nodes (peers) relaying the Tor
> >> > traffic and decreasing the efficiency of the Tor circuits due to
> >> > their upload bandwidth?
> > Those are not grarpamp's point - as load increases toi the point
> > where the network has some actual "problem", this will motivate
> > various people to do those things required to actually improve the
> > network.
>
> That's what I am saying, move bt to anonymous, more traffic,
> increasing nodes, this will never happen with the Tor network
I didn't pay attention to the allegdly 'technical' details but
the bottom line is that the tor mafia is not interested in
having more traffic and helping honest people fight against the
copyright cunts.
Which is hardly surprising. The tor project isn't interested in
doing anything that could even slightly threaten the americunt
establishment. Granted it would be rather absurd for a US
military 'spinoff' to do that.
>
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
