increased exponentially:
http://www.truthfulpolitics.com/images/us-federal-debt-by-president-political-party.jpg
Trillions are going somewhere, so whatever it is, it is big and they are
willing to undermine the financial health of the nation to deliver it.
Regards,
Mark McCarron
Date: Sun, 13
for the last decade or more???
It would seem to indicate that there is a Manhatten-style project underway.
Regards,
Mark McCarron
Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2014 23:14:30 +
From: simonsn...@openmailbox.org
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Subject: [tor-talk] Questions about NSA monitoring of Tor
and hidden services,
whilst pretending to provide anonymity.
I don't see anyone denying it. Do you?
Its been 6 days already.
Regards,
Mark McCarron
From: fuersch...@gmail.com
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2014 18:39:13 +0200
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Illegal Activity
software, be it Tor or Freenet (etc), then quantify the information (data
points) available and what inferences can be made from them.
Then annoy the hell out of the developers until they eliminate each data point.
Regards,
Mark McCarron
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2014 16:18:40 -0300
From: juan
is being done about
it.
That will tell everyone what they need to know.
Regards,
Mark McCarron
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2014 16:26:04 -0400
From: paul.syver...@nrl.navy.mil
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Illegal Activity As A Metric of Tor Security and
Anonymity
fully fleshed out but to the end user
it would be a CPanel like interface and a standard website with DB support.
I'll see about expanding on this.
Regards,
Mark McCarron
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2014 16:00:59 -0400
From: paul.syver...@nrl.navy.mil
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Subject: Re: [tor
Except that we know that such an attack is underway through PRISM and that no
one made any moves to fix it.
How long has it been now??? A year???
By any measure I am sure we can call that material assistance.
Regards,
Mark McCarron
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2014 17:55:18 -0400
From: grif
makes any moves to correct the situation.
That pretty much tells everyone what they needed to know about Tor and its
developers.
Regards,
Mark McCarron
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 21:02:24 +1000
From: z...@freedbms.net
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Illegal Activity
-to-end traffic
analysis to protect hidden services. Certainly there are questions about Tor
and its devs, but the final implementation can be reviewed independently.
Regards,
Mark McCarron
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 14:45:12 +0200
From: a.k...@gmx.de
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Subject: Re
Mick,
I would be very careful what you claim in your emails. I have the capability
of suing you into oblivion, that email constitutes defamation. Nothing like
that was ever said, either retract it or I will take you for everything that
you've got.
Your choice.
Regards,
Mark McCarron
Date
indication what happened.
Mark McCarron - June 25th
If he attempts to insinuate that I was accessing or attempting access illegal
material again, I will sue him.
He obviously has a problem, not with me, but the discussion about securing Tor
against intelligence agencies with a global view
only assume that you're a sock
puppet for an intelligence agency who has started to panic about the network
going truly dark.
Deal with it.
Regards,
Mark McCarron
Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2014 11:02:25 +1000
From: z...@freedbms.net
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Illegal
in mind that I
am a security specialist too and know that to be untrue.
I don't mean to be confrontational in any way, but the credibility of this
project is on the line here.
Regards,
Mark McCarron
Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2014 08:31:20 -0400
From: a...@mit.edu
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
this
was an unfortunate accident.
Regards,
Mark McCarron
Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2014 18:41:55 +0100
From: m...@rlogin.net
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Illegal Activity As A Metric of Tor Security and
Anonymity
On Sun, 29 Jun 2014 14:11:18 +0100
Mark McCarron mark.mccar
to that in the future versions of Tor.
Regards,
Mark McCarron
Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2014 14:54:03 -0400
From: a...@mit.edu
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Illegal Activity As A Metric of Tor Security and
Anonymity
On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 07:30:35PM +0100, Mark McCarron
that statement is missing and why it was never implemented.
Just by asking those questions, we can better observe the intentions, or at
least make people squirm a little. :)
Regards,
Mark McCarron
Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2014 15:45:43 -0400
From: mikew...@riseup.net
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
and as its metadata, that implies traffic
analysis.
So, its a patchwork model and the costs are spread across many nations and
information sharing to isolate sites is policy driven.
Regards,
Mark McCarron
Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2014 16:14:18 -0700
From: coder...@gmail.com
To: tor-talk
is gone.
Regards,
Mark McCarron
Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2014 11:19:00 -0300
From: juan@gmail.com
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Illegal Activity As A Metric of Tor Security and
Anonymity
On Fri, 27 Jun 2014 13:48:27 -0700
coderman coder...@gmail.com wrote
consistent factors are there?
Regards,
Mark McCarron
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
and then modify it. That's a complex design, but robust
and the traffic analysis would yield little-to-no actionable information.
Does anyone have any other ideas?
Regards,
Mark McCarron
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 15:38:01 -0300
From: juan@gmail.com
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Subject: Re: [tor
been compromised on a global scale
with very little fanfare or moves to correct the situation.
Does anyone have any insights into the problem?
Regards,
Mark McCarron
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other
and Security of Tor?
The software is compromised in some fashion and we need to understand this.
Regards,
Mark McCarron
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 16:17:41 -0500
From: joebtfs...@gmx.com
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Illegal Activity As A Metric of Tor Security
, at worst, non-existent.
Anyway, this is off-topic, so I won't be delving into this any further.
Regards,
Mark McCarron
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 17:36:06 -0400
From: ape...@gmail.com
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Illegal Activity As A Metric of Tor Security
Anonymous is an astro-turfed cover for the CIA.
Regards,
Mark McCarron
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 19:16:48 -0300
From: juan@gmail.com
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Illegal Activity As A Metric of Tor Security and
Anonymity
On Wed, 25 Jun 2014 21:28:42 +0100
' that indicates the overall effectiveness of the Tor platform.
The canary is dead. Something is wrong with Tor and we need to find it.
Regards,
Mark McCarron
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 15:53:50 -0700
From: coder...@gmail.com
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Illegal
arrived or remained
even after the Freedom Hosting bust.
I think everyone needs to stop looking for excuses and start examining why this
is happening and fix it. Otherwise, this project is a waste of time.
Regards,
Mark McCarron
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 19:15:26 -0600
From: miri...@riseup.net
?
Mark McCarron
Lunar lu...@torproject.org wrote:
Joe Btfsplk:
I missed the memo on all reasons why Vidalia - bad, Tor Launcher -
good.
At least:
http://users.encs.concordia.ca/~clark/papers/2007_soups.pdf
http://petsymposium.org/2012/papers/hotpets12-1-usability.pdf
and Vidalia has no maintainers
at present and
provides no anonymity as it fails to deal with traffic analysis.
Regards,
Mark McCarron
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2014 18:23:08 -0800
From: sch...@eff.org
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] !!! Important please read. !!!
TheMindwareGroup writes:
I don't know
Regards,
Mark McCarron
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2014 13:22:27 +0100
From: a.k...@gmx.de
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] !!! Important please read. !!!
On Wed, 08 Jan 2014 11:25:02 +, Mark McCarron wrote:
...
In regards to identifying Tor users, this is more
Regards,
Mark McCarron
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2014 14:40:11 +0100
From: a.k...@gmx.de
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] !!! Important please read. !!!
On Wed, 08 Jan 2014 13:17:47 +, Mark McCarron wrote:
...
In fact, the EU mandates that this data be held
to
explicitly allow that by clicking a button.
That said, all of this is a complete waste of time if Tor does not start
integrating techniques to prevent traffic analysis.
Regards,
Mark McCarron
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2014 05:09:23 -0500
From: mikewol...@gmail.com
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Subject
connections.
Regards,
Mark McCarron
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2014 15:00:41 +0100
From: a.k...@gmx.de
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Risk of selectively enabling JavaScript
On Tue, 07 Jan 2014 12:58:49 +, Mark McCarron wrote:
...
The fact that TBB disables javascript
We're not discussing censorship, but the removal of potential exploitable data.
Its not a keyword system, it removes cookies, web bugs, adds jitter to
timings, etc. It can be disabled with a click.
Regards,
Mark McCarron
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2014 09:56:41 -0500
From: and...@paolucci.ca
Point by point.
Javascript, by itself, is not an issue and poses no more of a security
threat than any other type of data transferred online. Coding errors in
image handling, html parsing, ftp, etc., can all be used to inject code.
Note that (potential) privilege escalation bugs
were your results?
Regards,
Mark McCarron
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
Mark McCarron
Nathan Freitas nat...@freitas.net wrote:
On 12/07/2013 07:59 PM, Mark McCarron wrote:
I would be wary of Android. Its is complex to secure given the
closed nature of most handsets.
Do you have a mobile OS of choice that you feel is more trustworthy, or
are you referring
, this is about backdooring TOR, nothing
else.
That alone, at least to me, indicates that the IETF is pretty much NSA, or
representing their interests. I wouldn't trust them as far as I could throw
them.
I vote no.
Regards,
Mark McCarron
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 17:47:48 +0100
From: eu...@leitl.org
How about a certification program? A company can donate some funds to have
their product evaluated and if successful gain TOR Certified status. It
would stop all this nonsense and provide everyone the opportunity to request
specific features or amendments to designs.
I understand that no one
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 11:47:06 +0100
From: t...@unterderbruecke.de
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] New TOR Service Suggestions and Enhancements
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/19/2013 06:50 AM, Mark McCarron wrote:
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2013
Regards,
Mark McCarron
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 14:01:58 +
From: bm-2ctpedtadjx2bqf6wuux1cper78sq3x...@bitmessage.ch
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] New TOR Service Suggestions and Enhancements
Mark McCarron:
This will assist in eliminating the global view
With all the recent crack downs on civil liberties, seizure of TOR services and
general censorship that is now hitting even mainstream search engines, I would
like to propose a set of new services and some enhancements to the network
layer to improve anonymity. We need to get as much support
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2013 21:11:40 +0100
From: t...@unterderbruecke.de
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] New TOR Service Suggestions and Enhancements
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/18/2013 05:23 PM, Mark McCarron wrote:
With all the recent
42 matches
Mail list logo
