Well, I think this is settling down into a proper discussion. Whilst the
hypothesis is untested, leveraging illegal activity, especially reviled illegal
activity, as a metric for the quality of anonymity and security provided by Tor
is a sound strategy.
As mentioned before, the 'canary' is dead and we need to understand why. Given
that this is a global phenomenon, then we need to examine the factors that
effect this group. The primary factor would be the software itself. A
secondary factor would be the law, but this is not a consistent factor across
the world.
What other consistent factors are there?
Regards,
Mark McCarron
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
