Re: [tor-talk] Tor 0.4.6.1-alpha is released

On Fri, 19 Mar 2021 19:07:38 +0100 Markus Reichelt wrote: > * Nick Mathewson wrote: > > > There's a new alpha Tor release! Because it's an alpha, you should > > only run it if you're ready to find more bugs than usual, and > > report them on gitlab.torproject.org. > > it isnt mentioned in the

Re: [tor-talk] New release candidate: Tor 0.4.5.4-rc

On Fri, 5 Feb 2021 08:51:56 -0500 David Goulet wrote: > Can you expand here on why you think an operator using a /64 is worst than an > operator using an IPv4 /24 to run their relays? In the IPv4 a single person will rarely have an entire /24 to themselves; as such connections coming from differ

Re: [tor-talk] New release candidate: Tor 0.4.5.4-rc

On Fri, 22 Jan 2021 12:02:50 -0500 Nick Mathewson wrote: > o Major bugfixes (authority, IPv6): > - Do not consider multiple relays in the same IPv6 /64 network to be > sybils. Fixes bug 40243; bugfix on 0.4.5.1-alpha. Each /64 should be treated as an equivalent to 1 address in the IP

Re: [tor-talk] Expired key for deb.torproject.org?

On Wed, 25 Nov 2020 07:54:39 +0100 Jonathan Marquardt wrote: > I am using the Debian Tor repo on quite a few Debian machines and since a few > days now, none of these machines are able to use the repo. > > "apt update" gives me: > > Err:6 tor+http://sdscoq7snqtznauu.onion/torproject.org buste

Re: [tor-talk] Best alternative to Blutmagie?

On Tue, 4 Feb 2020 23:17:32 - mimb...@danwin1210.me wrote: > Blutmagie seems to be permanently gone, sadly. > > It was great because you could see the speeds of the exit nodes plus their > country. > > Is there a commonly accepted best replacement? Hello, Check out https://torstatus.rueckg

Re: [tor-talk] Surge in Users

On Tue, 04 Jun 2019 19:14:12 +0300 Van Gegel wrote: > Maybe after publication on popular Russian resource Habr:  > https://habr.com/ru/post/448856/ > This is Android app for talking over Tor: > http://torfone.org/download/Torfone.apk > http://torfone.org/download/Torfone_Android_howto.pdf > https

Re: [tor-talk] Tor Browser disabled NoScript, but can't update

On Sat, 4 May 2019 02:21:15 -0500 Joe wrote: > I've used the latest stable TBB 8.0.8 (Linux) since released with the > latest NoScript (at that time). > Today is the 1st day I saw that NoScript was disabled by TBB. > > I see now that it's not a TBB only issue, but also Firefox. > A comment on Re

Re: [tor-talk] Onion website on "usual" server

On Sun, 14 Apr 2019 00:54:42 +0400 meejah wrote: > Mirimir writes: > > > Even so, that's a little fragile. Mistakes happen. And there's the issue > > of web server error messages from the onion site going to clearnet. > > That's one of the mistakes that got DPR pwned. > > The best solution to

[tor-talk] IPv6 for relay-to-relay or client-to-relay communication?

Hello, Does Tor currently use IPv6 connections for relay-to-relay traffic? I now got some IPv6 relays which access IPv4 via tunneling to a separate router, so it would *really* benefit my setup if some of the Tor traffic would move to going over IPv6 directly. However that doesn't seem to be the

Re: [tor-talk] Tor Messenger

On Sun, 10 Feb 2019 17:23:55 +0100 (CET) Nathaniel Suchy wrote: > > So the state of available XMPP Clients today kinda sucks. There's Pidgin > > available for Linux Systems Any issue with Gajim? > The alternative is "chat apps" like Signal by OpenWhisper or Wire by Wire Might as well suggest V

Re: [tor-talk] Detective Conan Japanese Cartoon Advertising Tor For Criminal Activity

On Tue, 08 Jan 2019 03:37:00 + bo0od wrote: > Detective Conan (named as case closed in America) which considered to be > the most famous cartoon in Japan.They produced a Movie in April,2018 > named as "Zero the Enforcer" they mentioned stuff related to Tor Project > but in different ways, her

Re: [tor-talk] circpathbias.c : Your Guard vs The Guard

On Tue, 18 Dec 2018 10:18:55 +0200 Lars Noodén wrote: > On 12/18/18 10:07 AM, Kevin Burress wrote: > > How about "A Guard" > Yes, "A guard" would also reduce the potential for confusion, and it's > even shorter. The log error should clearly convey the information of > whose guard is being noted.

Re: [tor-talk] torstatus.blutmagie.de

On Thu, 18 Oct 2018 10:26:34 +0100 Iain Learmonth wrote: > On 16/10/18 13:17, George wrote: > > While metrics. continues to be a next step, I still find myself wishing > > for the simple birds-eye view that your Tor Status provides. > > Can you provide some examples of things you can do with tor

Re: [tor-talk] torstatus.blutmagie.de

On Tue, 16 Oct 2018 10:58:15 +0200 Olaf Selke wrote: Hello, > I'm planning to shut down my Tor network status site within the next > weeks. The payed SSL certificate will expire 11/06/18 You don't have a redirect to HTTPS, I never knew you had that in the first place, always accessing the site

Re: [tor-talk] Deploying Alt-Svc on your own website. Hello?

On Sat, 22 Sep 2018 15:28:19 +0100 Ben Tasker wrote: > You need to configure your onion server block to respond on port 443 _and_ > to handle your clearnet host header (and serve a publicly trusted > certificate matching that name). Alt-Svc tells the browser to use the > alternate address as a tr

Re: [tor-talk] Deploying Alt-Svc on your own website. Hello?

On Sat, 22 Sep 2018 15:28:19 +0100 Ben Tasker wrote: > Which part are you struggling with? > > The following is assuming you've got a site - www.example.com - that's > accessible at 1234.onion. > > Configure your nginx server block (or apache config) for www.example.com to > include an Alt-Svc

[tor-talk] Deploying Alt-Svc on your own website. Hello?

On Sat, 22 Sep 2018 13:45:33 +0100 Alec Muffett wrote: > I've spent the morning pulling together a bunch of draft thoughts regards > the technical pros/cons of differing forms of site onionification; > thoughts, comments & feedback are warmly welcomed: > > https://medium.com/@alecmuffett/differe

Re: [tor-talk] alt-svc supported by TBB

On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 19:59:00 + TNT BOM BOM wrote: > whythe hell would anyone use anything from Cloudflare with Tor??? Because people use Tor to browse the Internet, and half of the Internet is nowadays CloudFlare. If you're looking to advance a point of view such as [1] -- which may be valid

Re: [tor-talk] torjail - run programs in tor network namespace

On Wed, 25 Jul 2018 01:14:12 -0700 Mirimir wrote: > True. But I'd rather use the Whonix approach. It's doable using two VPS. > That is, if the provider will cooperate. One VPS runs the web server, > and it has no Internet connectivity or public IP, just a private IP on a > local network. The othe

Re: [tor-talk] torjail - run programs in tor network namespace

On Tue, 24 Jul 2018 10:12:24 +0200 bic wrote: > > 2) I enjoy the print output when it's configuring the namespaces, but > > there's no need for so much yelling :) (s/TOR/Tor/) [1] > > > > > print G " * Resolving via TOR" > > > print G " * Traffic via TOR..." > > > print G " * Creating the TOR co

Re: [tor-talk] relayor Debian 8 deprecation notice

On Thu, 31 May 2018 11:29:00 + nusenu wrote: > Due to the upcoming end-of-life date of Debian GNU/Linux 8 ("jessie") > on the 17th of June 2018 > > I'll drop support for Debian 8 in > ansible-relayor with the next release (planned for 2018-06), > please upgrade to Debian 9 if you want to k

Re: [tor-talk] Who controls Tor's DNS Traffic?

On Thu, 10 May 2018 21:53:00 + nusenu wrote: > I had a look at the Tor DNS landscape: > > An Analysis of the Tor DNS Landscape > https://medium.com/@nusenu/who-controls-tors-dns-traffic-a74a7632e8ca "Level 3" on the charts is most likely the notorious 4.2.2.2...4.2.2.6. Those absolutely sho

Re: [tor-talk] Tor bridges in China

On Tue, 17 Oct 2017 01:37:55 +0500 Roman Mamedov wrote: > On Mon, 16 Oct 2017 16:25:43 -0400 > InterN0T wrote: > > > If you can use Tor bridges in China > > You can't: > https://metrics.torproject.org/userstats-relay-country.html?start=2017-07-18&end=2017-

[tor-talk] Tor bridges in China

On Mon, 16 Oct 2017 16:25:43 -0400 InterN0T wrote: > If you can use Tor bridges in China You can't: https://metrics.torproject.org/userstats-relay-country.html?start=2017-07-18&end=2017-10-16&country=cn&events=off Only about 1000 users in a 1.4bn country, bridges don't work there, or at least d

Re: [tor-talk] Unusual Tor's spikes in Egypt and Turkey on 28th August

On Wed, 20 Sep 2017 11:24:57 +0200 Fabio Pietrosanti - Lists wrote: > Hello, > > a close friend (faffa) noticed that on 28th August 2017 there was an > unusual spike of Tor traffic in Egypt and Turkey: > > https://metrics.torproject.org/userstats-relay-country.html?start=2017-06-22&end=2017-09-

[tor-talk] Tor bridges over ICMP or DNS

Hello, Has anyone considered making a Tor bridge protocol with ICMP as transport? https://github.com/DhavalKapil/icmptunnel http://www.mit.edu/afs.new/sipb/user/golem/tmp/ptunnel-0.61.orig/web/ http://thomer.com/icmptx/ http://code.gerade.org/hans/ Or tunneling over DNS? http://code.kryo.se/iodin

Re: [tor-talk] Is there any societal use in Bitcoin?

On Mon, 4 Sep 2017 17:04:10 +0200 Jon Tullett wrote: > As it happens, I just recently transferred funds internationally. It > took 36 hours to clear, at a guaranteed rate. My local bank charged > about $8 in fees But that's still within Europe or the like? Internationally on a wider scale SWIFT

[tor-talk] Tor Logspam

Aug 28 06:19:48.000 [warn] Permissions on directory /var/run/tor are too permissive. Aug 28 06:19:48.000 [warn] Before Tor can create a control socket in "/var/run/tor/control2", the directory "/var/run/tor" needs to exist, and to be accessible only by the user and group account that is running Tor

Re: [tor-talk] Tor Autonomous System stats

On Thu, 24 Aug 2017 13:55:11 +0200 Olaf Selke wrote: > Hello folks, > > blutmagie now offers views on Tor router count and traffic for each AS. > It's just a different php/SQL view on the same db like the main page. > Maybe you find it somewhat useful. > > 1.) List of AS by all Router Count,

[tor-talk] Force OpenSSL AES-NI usage on a VPS without the AES CPU flag passthrough

Hello, Today I found that it is possible to force OpenSSL enable the use of CPU AES acceleration even if it doesn't detect the "aes" CPU flag. Many VPS hosts configure their hypervisors in a way that does not have the flag passed through into VPSes, even though all their host nodes surely have CP

Re: [tor-talk] Tor 0.3.1.5-alpha is released!

On Sun, 6 Aug 2017 02:19:05 +0500 Roman Mamedov wrote: > > There's a new alpha Tor release available! The source is available > > from the "download" page on the website on the website, and packages > > should be available before long. > > So I am u

Re: [tor-talk] Tor 0.3.1.5-alpha is released!

On Tue, 1 Aug 2017 16:30:35 -0400 Nick Mathewson wrote: > Hi, all! > > There's a new alpha Tor release available! The source is available > from the "download" page on the website on the website, and packages > should be available before long. So I am using: > deb http://deb.torproject.org/tor

Re: [tor-talk] Using Raspberry Pi as Tor relay is bad idea??

On Wed, 2 Aug 2017 01:57:49 +0900 Tom Tom wrote: > I recently heard that Raspberry Pi could be used as various server, so I'd > like to buy and use Raspberry Pi as tor relay. Make sure you get the Raspberry Pi version 3. It is much more powerful than previous ones, especially than the first. >

Re: [tor-talk] Fwd: Android Crypto Chat Apps - over Tor?

On Thu, 13 Jul 2017 07:06:03 +0200 "Tom A." wrote: > Hi Grump, > thanks for the classification. who is able to evaluate this? rather than > posting vagueness? > at which apps can you add/apply customized e2e encryption? > https://smokeappope.sourceforge.io/#MobileScoreCard I'm not aware what's

[tor-talk] atlas.torproject.org problems

Hello, Does https://atlas.torproject.org/ work very poorly for anyone else? Half of the time it fails to find any information about the requested relay (by fingerprint), after some reloads it works. Searches also often fail with "Atlas is unable to get a response from its backend server." Also, t

[tor-talk] Russian social networks, search engines, E-Mail services blocked in Ukraine

Hello, https://www.rt.com/business/388502-ukraine-bans-vk-yandex/ Correspondingly we see a hockey stick graph for Tor users in Ukraine: https://metrics.torproject.org/userstats-relay-country.html?start=2017-02-18&end=2017-05-19&country=ua&events=on https://metrics.torproject.org/userstats-bridge-

Re: [tor-talk] Not comfortable with the new single-hop system merged into Tor

On Thu, 22 Dec 2016 06:25:18 -0700 Mirimir wrote: > On 12/22/2016 06:00 AM, laurelai bailey wrote: > > Then i completely misread the previous threads. That happens sometimes o_o > > Well, you didn't _completely_ misread the thread. > > By default, users will be installing a version of Tor which

Re: [tor-talk] Not comfortable with the new single-hop system merged into Tor

On Tue, 20 Dec 2016 23:38:43 -0500 hi...@safe-mail.net wrote: > I just think that this new single-hop system should have been reserved for a > different Tor source/installation, dedicated only to non-anonymous hidden > services, not merge it with the regular Tor software. And this for security.

Re: [tor-talk] Intel ME / AMT + NSL vs Tor Nodes

On Mon, 19 Dec 2016 18:20:41 - "podmo" wrote: > I could ...turn AMT off entirely. Unfortunately that's only what it wants you to believe. With the capabilities it has, and with its code being entirely closed source and unaudited, for a truly secure system you can't rely on this "Okay I'm now

Re: [tor-talk] Intel ME / AMT + NSL vs Tor Nodes

On Sat, 17 Dec 2016 21:48:51 - "podmo" wrote: > It cannot be used to access all your data remotely. That > only works if you have all AMT features enabled, and you have a special > device called a BMC card plugged into your computer and connected to the > network. The whole point of Intel AM

Re: [tor-talk] Tor and iptables.

On Mon, 12 Dec 2016 00:12:54 -0700 Mirimir wrote: > > Also: "-A OUTPUT -i lo -j ACCEPT" is neither a valid rule, nor is it > > necessary, since loopback traffic is already allowed at input and stateful > > inspection is enabled both ways. > > Not valid? It works for me. And by default, I drop

Re: [tor-talk] Multiple CPU cores?

On Mon, 27 Jun 2016 22:38:21 +0200 Aeris wrote: > > Except you can only run two per IPv4 address, and more IPv4 addresses bear > > additional cost (and some management overhead). > > Why can you only run 2 instances per IP ? > AFAIK, you can run any instances you want, just change OR/Dir port, n

Re: [tor-talk] Multiple CPU cores?

On Mon, 27 Jun 2016 18:42:02 +0200 Aeris wrote: > > So does this mean it is useless to run an exit on my 8 core system? > > Just run enough Tor instances to fill you cores or bandwidth :) > Except you can only run two per IPv4 address, and more IPv4 addresses bear additional cost (and some mana

Re: [tor-talk] 2 hop mode for people that only want to use Tor for censorship circumvention to conserve bandwidth and decrease latency?

On Mon, 13 Jun 2016 01:17:08 +0500 Roman Mamedov wrote: > > entry node---> exit node ---> website > > You don't even need 2 hops in this case. Why not propose 1-hop? Oh actually, just remembered reading about that somewhere -- and turns out it wa

Re: [tor-talk] 2 hop mode for people that only want to use Tor for censorship circumvention to conserve bandwidth and decrease latency?

On Sun, 12 Jun 2016 21:56:34 +0200 gdfg dfgf wrote: > I have read the proposal for non hidden .onion services for sites that don't > need anonymity but want to use Tor's end to end encryption and > authentication, for  example Facebook. > > Could the same be done for people that are more inte

Re: [tor-talk] Are squid proxies acceptable on exit nodes?

On Mon, 9 May 2016 16:28:33 +0200 Andreas Krey wrote: > To me it looks like the tor exit is using a squid > proxy - is that an acceptable thing to do as a > relay operator? Squid itself is just a tool, sure it can cache, it can log all requests, but is it configured to do so? Not necessarily so.

Re: [tor-talk] "Circumvent" Cloudflare Captcha alike Sites with Translation

On Sat, 2 Apr 2016 23:02:09 +0200 (CEST) tor_t...@arcor.de wrote: > Hi Tor Talkers, > > i wonder if e. g. google translator may help to read the info behind captcha > walls: > just let a script translate the url-content > e. g. google translation > https://translate.google.com/ > > from detect

Re: [tor-talk] FPGA Tor Relay

On Thu, 25 Feb 2016 12:21:42 -0800 Ryan Carboni wrote: > http://netfpga.org/site/#/systems/1netfpga-sume/details/ > > This is apparently available for an academic price of around two > thousand dollars. And then you have a programming job on your hands to adapt Tor into the FPGA, that could cos

Re: [tor-talk] 4 relays advertising >1000 MByte/s each

On Mon, 1 Feb 2016 15:47:30 -0800 Green Dream wrote: > I still don't understand how such relays can gain a high consensus weight > so quickly (in 1 or 2 days) without help from the bandwidth authorities. Don't worry, just another sting operation to capture someone's traffic (by directing them to

Re: [tor-talk] Sites blocking Tor

On Wed, 20 Jan 2016 20:57:57 +0200 Lars Noodén wrote: > I checked the FAQ and it is unclear about precisely what to do about > sites that gratuitously block Tor. Just recently I noticed that > www.justice.gov blocks Tor. For example the URL > > http://www.justice.gov/atr/cases/exhibits/1332.p

Re: [tor-talk] A little more hostility towards Tor from Twitter

On Sat, 31 Oct 2015 10:10:49 + demos wrote: > by the way a current alternative to twitter is twister: > http://twister.net.co/ Speaking of Twitter alternatives, I find GNU social can be made into a really nice one. Example: https://quitter.se/ It's not full serverless/p2p/bitcoin/blockchain

Re: [tor-talk] Tor Browser and my location

On Tue, 6 Oct 2015 20:57:53 +0100 Ben Tasker wrote: > Google will redirect you to a region specific version of Google based on > geo-location of your source IP. This the the IP of the Tor exit node you're > using, which is why it differs to your location. > > If you set your homepage to https://

Re: [tor-talk] Potential uses for the Tor network

On Sun, 4 Oct 2015 15:39:13 -0400 Bryan Gwin wrote: > My name s Bryan Gwin (I have my masters in computer science) and I have a > quick question. Is it possible for someone to design some software that can > utilize the Tor network (i.e. software that will allow users to communicate > with each

Re: [tor-talk] Onionmap, a free software worldmap of Tor relays

On Fri, 18 Sep 2015 15:51:14 +0200 opi wrote: > Hi there, > > Last week Luke Millanta released OnionView [1], a nice map showing the > location of all Tor relays around the world. It's not free software, > and using Google Maps doesn't really make me happy. > > Few days ago I started working on

Re: [tor-talk] TWN Submission

On Wed, 9 Sep 2015 23:06:28 +1000 Luke Millanta wrote: > Hello, > > Karsten asked me to send a quick introduction about my new web service, > OnionView.com Upon clicking any of the circles it takes me to the maximum zoom level at the corresponding city/location (literally nose into the ground,

Re: [tor-talk] (no subject)

On Sat, 29 Aug 2015 17:11:23 +0200 blaatenator wrote: > Indeed, some (coincidentally???) big corps do block relays. For a while > I ran a relay from my home connection and for instance Nike was not > reachable without the use of a VPN (I don't mind, and even favor, Nike > being out of the picture

Re: [tor-talk] hardware recommendations

On Sat, 29 Aug 2015 10:55:02 +0200 blaatenator wrote: > Are there more recommendations regarding this sort of stuff? Like a > 'best buy' guide for secure hardware, or ways to work around insecure > hardware. Take a look at http://www.fsf.org/resources/hw -- With respect, Roman signature.asc

Re: [tor-talk] future of torstatus.blutmagie.de

On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 16:22:18 +0200 Olaf Selke wrote: > not everybody feels comfortable relying on a service from Moscow On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 16:53:47 +0200 Tom van der Woerdt wrote: > run it from a more favorable location Really now, so everyone is silently okay with the Tor project as a whole

Re: [tor-talk] (no subject)

On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 21:08:45 -0700 Ryan Carboni wrote: > > Does anyone in Tor want to name a price to get this task done? > > > > The price of a public dedicated ip address is at worst, $20 a month. What. More like $3-5, and that's indeed at worst, with the price more commonly being around $1

Re: [tor-talk] (no subject)

On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 15:28:01 -0700 Yuri wrote: > On 08/11/2015 15:13, Ryan Carboni wrote: > > Why is there no multicore support for Tor? I haven't been able to find an > > answer to this question. > > This is maybe because even with the quite high for the Tor network > bitrates of 5-6MBps tor p

Re: [tor-talk] Any Windows Software shipping Tor 0.2.4.23?

On Fri, 31 Jul 2015 18:58:40 -0400 grarpamp wrote: > On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 6:36 PM, nusenu wrote: > > Is anyone aware of software (incl. malware) that ships Tor v0.2.4.23 for > > Windows? > > https://raw.githubusercontent.com/nusenu/tor-network-observations/master/Windows_0.2.4.23_orport443_di

Re: [tor-talk] comicskingdom.com inaccessible by Tor?

On Mon, 27 Jul 2015 18:54:59 + (UTC) bao song wrote: > A few weeks ago, I suddenly could not access comicskingdom.com with Tor. > For several years before that, I had no problem accessing comicskingdom.com > with Tor. > It might be interesting to figure out how they are blocking Tor, since w

Re: [tor-talk] USB Sticks for Tails -> CCCamp

On Wed, 22 Jul 2015 08:59:43 -0700 Apple Apple wrote: > On 22 Jul 2015 13:22, "Jacob Appelbaum" wrote: > > DVD drives are programmable computers until we find evidence > > suggesting the opposite. > > And USB host controllers? DVD drives really are; see for example [1] for information about DV

Re: [tor-talk] Question regarding some strange behavior on some exitnodes

On Sat, 27 Jun 2015 17:42:35 +0200 chloe wrote: > > Hello, > > I have a question regarding some strange behavior on some nodes(11 of > them). > > > See this access-log: > > 81.89.0.201 - - [25/Jun/2015 12:25:30] "GET /db/backups/965110218-2015 > HTTP/1.1" 200 5057 > 37.187.202.46 - - [25/J

Re: [tor-talk] Creation of TOR Linux distribution for relay or server with everything preconfigured

On Fri, 26 Jun 2015 05:25:04 -0400 Griffin Boyce wrote: >Most of the configuration (at least in my case) has to do with > deciding on the right speed for the relay and setting a bandwidth cap. > And when using a VPS, I set "AccountingMax" and "AccountingStart" to > stay within my expected

Re: [tor-talk] Atlas

On Thu, 10 Jul 2014 08:02:32 -0700 C B wrote: > Any chance of creating a non-javascript version of the Atlas, at  > https://atlas.torproject.org/ ? I can access it by allowing temporary all > access, but it seems that it would be easier if a non-javascript version > could be created, or added.

Re: [tor-talk] Benefits of Running TBB in a VM?

On Sat, 5 Jul 2014 10:05:10 -0700 Bobby Brewster wrote: > >>>if your non-VM host system has been compromised, there is absolutely no > >>>notable advantage to using a vm.  your vm will be affected by the > >>>malware that sits on the host system.  > > > I don't understand this. If my Ubuntu sy

Re: [tor-talk] messing with XKeyScore

On Sat, 5 Jul 2014 03:59:28 + Matthew Finkel wrote: > This problem makes me sad on many levels, and I'm not opposed to > implementing mitigation techniques (within reason) based on the > rulesets, however we shouldn't do anything that will hurt our users nor > should be do anything that makes

Re: [tor-talk] visa.com blocked // livejournal.com

On Thu, 3 Jul 2014 04:15:37 - "Paul A. Crable" wrote: > It appears to me that visa.com is blocking access to its site by users > using TOR. Yes, and they even block IPs of non-exit relays. But that's somewhat of an old story, in this case it is still Akamai who's to blame, and this has been

Re: [tor-talk] Tor Exit Operator convicted in Austrian lower court

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 03 Jul 2014 03:54:32 +0300 s7r wrote: > In the blockchain I saw a pretty good fed of BTC to his donation > address - folks in the community didn't turn back on this. With that > sum donated there he could arrange for a top lawyer, minimum. I

Re: [tor-talk] StartCom certs untrusted

On Tue, 01 Jul 2014 11:49:03 -0700 Garth Patil wrote: > Hi, > I'm using Tor Browser 3.6.2-MacOS. I have a site that uses a free class > 1 SSL cert from StartCom . Recent versions of > Chrome and Firefox don't seem to have this problem, but Tor Browser > gives the untrus

Re: [tor-talk] Illegal Activity As A Metric of Tor Security and Anonymity

On Wed, 25 Jun 2014 21:28:42 +0100 Mark McCarron wrote: > I have been examining the number of what would normally be deemed as illegal > sites sites on Tor. Eliminating the narcotics trade, as these tend to be > intelligence agency backed enterprises, a serious decline has been noted > across

Re: [tor-talk] Running an exit node which exits on a different IP than it listens to

On Tue, 24 Jun 2014 15:07:16 +0200 Anders Andersson wrote: > The reason would be to minimize the chances of the exit IP ending up > in some overzealous blacklist. I think the long-time position of the Tor project was that if someone wants to block all Tor exit relays, they should be able to do s

Re: [tor-talk] Ad Blocking Software

On Tue, 10 Jun 2014 10:49:01 +0200 Anders Andersson wrote: > On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 9:18 PM, Antonio Z wrote: > > I understand that it is not necessary, but I believe that making your > > own ad blocking software would bring more people to tor. It does not > > even have to come with the bundle.

Re: [tor-talk] Problematic ORPorts

On Sat, 7 Jun 2014 14:02:43 -0400 grarpamp wrote: > > So my idea is, maybe consider making directory authorities blacklist some > > ports as being unacceptable as ORPorts, 22 and 53 come to mind for a start, > > along with maybe 25 to avoid false alarms from anti-spam countermeasures. > > ORport

[tor-talk] Problematic ORPorts

Hello, Recently on this mailing list and on tor-relays there have been some cases when relay nodes using standard ports commonly used for other services as their ORPort cause issues with ISPs of someone else running a relay. Notably once a relay on port 53 have triggered "high DNS traffic anomaly

[tor-talk] Setting up an IPv6-supporting obfs3 bridge?

Hello, The [1] page currently does not mention anything about IPv6 at all; after following the instructions in it, the bridge only listens on IPv4. If I add an IPv6 ORPort as described in [2], this does make Tor itself listen on IPv6, but still the obfsproxy only opens an IPv4 port: May 22 09:27

Re: [tor-talk] Small server, not much bandwidth

On Thu, 10 Apr 2014 18:24:00 +0100 John Williams wrote: > 3. If I run obfsproxy, should I open the regular tor port 9001 to the > internet also? Or will that get me onto blacklists of "known tor > bridges" and cause my whole IP address to be blocked? The "regular tor port" doesn't *have* to be 9

Re: [tor-talk] Terminology: Deep v Dark Web

On Sat, 25 Jan 2014 14:33:12 -0700 Mirimir wrote: > Analogous private networks, generally called anonets, are also routed > via VPNs through the Internet. There is anoNet/anoNet2 [1] which are a very specific particular project; but that's the first time ever I hear that "private networks... are

Re: [tor-talk] Businesses blocking Tor access

On Thu, 16 Jan 2014 16:25:38 -0800 (PST) C B wrote: > A different error code, this time from http://www.funtrivia.com/ > > Access Denied: code FTTT  F*** This Troublesome Tor? :) -- With respect, Roman signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torpr

Re: [tor-talk] Any risks with another application using Tor's SOCKS 5 interface?

On Wed, 4 Dec 2013 10:57:36 -0800 James Marshall wrote: > SOCKS 5 is insecure if the client and server are on different hosts and What exactly that insecurity consists of? If your aim is to open an client-less "in-proxy" to Tor network for anyone to use, then you might just as well open your SO

Re: [tor-talk] Open Source Router

On Wed, 27 Nov 2013 17:59:39 -0600 Ed Fletcher wrote: > There has been lots of discussion on this list about the Safeplug, which > didn't garner much enthusiasm from the list members. I haven't seen > this project mentioned: > > http://www.orp1.com/ > > An open-source software and hardware r

Re: [tor-talk] Pogoplug as a new twist on a good idea

On Wed, 27 Nov 2013 11:44:04 -0800 accountabil...@bitmessage.ch wrote: > Several have posted about setting up Pogoplug or Raspberry Pi as a > dedicated Tor relay, but I wanted to suggest a related potential > opportunity for contributing to Tor from your university, office, etc. for > less than $5

Re: [tor-talk] "Safeplug"

Some more information from [1] - "users can whitelist certain sites so that their use is not run through Tor." - "Users can also set up Safeplug to work on a per-browser basis, so for example Firefox may always run through Tor while Chrome won’t." - "users can also set themselves up as Tor nod

Re: [tor-talk] "Safeplug"

On Fri, 22 Nov 2013 10:45:35 -0800 Yuri wrote: > Also, without the device being open source (and how can it really be?) Why can't it be? Well, maybe not the whole device down to the CPU Verilog design level, but they could post source-code for the firmware with the instructions to build and fl

Re: [tor-talk] "Safeplug"

On Fri, 22 Nov 2013 10:56:55 -0500 and...@torproject.is wrote: > Out of all the concerns about how they implemented it and such, my > main concern is that it just adds more clients to the network without > giving back in the form of relays or bridges. If these are all real people using and gettin

Re: [tor-talk] "Safeplug"

On Fri, 22 Nov 2013 06:25:33 -0500 Sean Alexandre wrote: > On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 04:50:44PM +0600, Roman Mamedov wrote: > > https://pogoplug.com/safeplug > > > > Someone should buy this and post a teardown. :) > > > > (via > > http://www.cnx-software.co

[tor-talk] "Safeplug"

https://pogoplug.com/safeplug Someone should buy this and post a teardown. :) (via http://www.cnx-software.com/2013/11/22/49-safeplug-tor-router-let-you-browse-the-net-anonymously/ ) -- With respect, Roman signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.t

Re: [tor-talk] Why my relay doesn't get any traffic and doesn't show up in the list torstatus.blutmagie.de ?

On Thu, 21 Nov 2013 01:39:47 -0800 Yuri wrote: > I have a tor relay running with default parameters, see torrc below. > Ports 9001 and 9030 are forwarded WAN->tor server on LAN in router, and > LAN->WAN is open. > > There are no messages in log, all seems to be ok. 'No messages'? So you don't

Re: [tor-talk] TOR network topology

On Fri, 25 Oct 2013 12:17:57 + Mads Tinggaard Pedersen wrote: > shape of the network, perhaps based by country? > > what nodes in the network graph is connected to one another. There is no real shape or topology or any fixed node-to-node connections to speak of, really. Each client picks 3

Re: [tor-talk] linux configuration, root installation

On Thu, 24 Oct 2013 16:42:02 -0400 krishna e bera wrote: > What if TBB was labelled as "Portable Tor Browser Bundle" or "Portable > TBB"? (on each appropriate platform) ...then everyone who doesn't need to use it in an actual portability scenario (on an USB stick) would look for/ask if there's a

Re: [tor-talk] VOIP and tor

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 23 Oct 2013 22:23:48 -0700 Bry8 Star wrote: > As far as i'm aware there are few voice & text language > physical-machine based translator, that can convert language, and > then speak it out with another speakers voice in another language. >

Re: [tor-talk] TBB and tor-relays as a bitcoin wallets

On Tue, 22 Oct 2013 19:41:27 +0200 Eugen Leitl wrote: > On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 10:09:52PM +0600, Roman Mamedov wrote: > > > > 1).I think Cody Wilson is working on a bitcoin wallet in a browser. > > > > Please stop trying to make people build buttcoin wallet

Re: [tor-talk] TBB and tor-relays as a bitcoin wallets

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 22 Oct 2013 14:40:52 + Trigger Happy wrote: > Just an idea. In theory : is it possible to implement bitcoin wallet > into tor-relay and TBB 1) ? TBB users could tip tor-relays (f.e. 1 > satoshi for guard and middle relay, 3 satoshi for e

Re: [tor-talk] The NSA's problem? Too much data?

On Sun, 20 Oct 2013 18:58:34 +0200 Antispam 06 wrote: > On 20.10.2013 18:09, Anonymous wrote: > > What about users own domains? :) > > Checked that list. Mostly vanity domains like $fist_name@$last_name.com. > I think it's the same with car licence plates. I am not sure "what about" them, but

Re: [tor-talk] The NSA's problem? Too much data?

On Thu, 17 Oct 2013 17:22:18 + Tempest wrote: > Michael Wolf: > > > > I only commented that I don't click on the "tinyurl"s, since I have > > no idea where they're going. > > use longurl.org or someting similar to see where they go. It will > expand shortened links for you Several years do

Re: [tor-talk] The NSA's problem? Too much data?

On Wed, 16 Oct 2013 02:00:23 -0400 grarpamp wrote: > Ironic to see them using these to link to recent revelations when... > - it's centralized, Irony here is that all three of you are still using GMail. :) -- With respect, Roman signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- tor-talk mailing l

Re: [tor-talk] dynamically adjusting bandwidth

On Sun, 13 Oct 2013 17:25:02 -0400 starli...@binnacle.cx wrote: > Hello, > > I've recently established a full-time relay > running on a fast Linux router. Working nice > with version 0.2.4.17-rc. > > Have a daily offsite backup that was butting heads > with TOR traffic, so I wrote a 'tor_bwredu

[tor-talk] Hardware openness, Lemote Yeeloong

On Mon, 7 Oct 2013 23:43:04 +0200 Eugen Leitl wrote: > Eventually, we will have completely open hardware we can trust. > But that day is not here yet. Meanwhile, let's minimize the amount > of evil in the system. One can get the Lemote Yeeloong netbook (that Richard Stallman also uses), 8.9" ve

Re: [tor-talk] Running an exit node thru a VPN

On Tue, 08 Oct 2013 11:54:33 +0200 Walter Rudametkin wrote: > Hi everybody, > > Is there a reason why Romania has such a high concentration of 100+ Mbit > exit nodes? http://www.voxility.com/ - a popular colocation and dedicated server provider. They are also both 37.221 and 93.115 bubbles he

  1   2   >