anyone else can't check if it is secure, you nor
anyone can't modify it (legally) to fix their insecurities until the
developers do so (if they do).
--
Juan Miguel Navarro Martínez
GPG Keyfingerprint:
5A91 90D4 CF27 9D52 D62A
BC58 88E2 947F 9BC6 B3CF
signature.asc
Description
and rc versions could be better
> tested.
>
--
Juan Miguel Navarro Martínez
GPG Keyfingerprint:
5A91 90D4 CF27 9D52 D62A
BC58 88E2 947F 9BC6 B3CF
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
.org/blog/tor-browser-45-alpha-1-released
>
>
> That doesn't answer the question though why the different circuits use
> different exit nodes. They could all use the same exit node. I recall
> seeing fair bit of debate over how many exit nodes a Tor client should use
> and how
the five sites has
>>> the IP
>>> address of a different exit node.
>>>
>>> Is this a new policy? What is the purpose?
>>> --
>>> tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
>>> To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
>>&g
On Mon, 20 Jun 2016 19:12:31 -0700
Ted Smith wrote:
> Paul, it pains me to see someone, who has contributed so much to
> humanity through a long and celebrated career as a scientist, feel
> the need to engage with what is at worst an agent of some oppressive
> government
Hey Ted! Pleas
On Tue, 21 Jun 2016 00:19:39 -0400
Paul Syverson wrote:
I
> "A Peel of Onion". Here's an excerpt:
>
>
> Mixes are also usually intended
> to resist an adversary that can observe all traffic everywhere and,
> in some threat models, to actively change traffic.
> Onion routing
> net
On Mon, 20 Jun 2016 21:25:53 -0400
Paul Syverson wrote:
>
> I know I'm feeding the troll, but this is just crap. I invented onion
> routing
You mean, you invented the name? Or are you claiming you
were the very first who came up with the idea of nesting
encrypted packe
On Tue, 21 Jun 2016 10:12:51 +1000
Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> Those who remain there and genuinely thought/ think they were "for the
> cause" prolly have some serious soul searching to do on an
> organisational humans level.
I wish, but I'm not holding my breath. Just look at the latest
On Mon, 20 Jun 2016 20:10:25 -0400
Roger Dingledine wrote:
> but I think we should soon find
> the time anyway to proceed to the "clean up our lists" plan.)
spoken like a true fascist
>
> --Roger
>
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change
On Mon, 20 Jun 2016 18:52:17 -0500
Anthony Papillion wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> On 6/20/2016 6:39 PM, juan wrote:
> >
> > by-the-way
> >
> > http://www.ohmygodel.com/publications/usersrouted-ccs13.pdf
> >
> &
On Mon, 20 Jun 2016 18:50:10 -0500
Anthony Papillion wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> On 6/20/2016 6:35 PM, juan wrote:
> > On Mon, 20 Jun 2016 18:07:12 -0500 Anthony Papillion
> > wrote:
> >
> > I see a lot of people talk
by-the-way
http://www.ohmygodel.com/publications/usersrouted-ccs13.pdf
Users Get Routed: Traffic Correlation on Tor by Realistic
Adversaries
"Tor is known to be insecure against an adversary that can
observe a user’s traffic entering and
On Mon, 20 Jun 2016 18:07:12 -0500
Anthony Papillion wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> I see a lot of people talking about how Tor is pwned by the US
> Government and is insecure 'by design'. I'm assuming that they know
> this from a thorough analysis of the source c
On Mon, 20 Jun 2016 14:00:25 -0600
Mirimir wrote:
>
> Do you actually understand Tor's design?
Yes. Do you?
And do you understand why the US military created tor?
>
> >> For links, check out /r/Tor.
> >
> >
> > So far I found this :
> >
> > https://assets.documentclo
On Mon, 20 Jun 2016 11:42:55 -0600
Mirimir wrote:
> Yes, I see that too, and maybe that's what we have here. But hey,
> Juan, maybe Jake's departure was a win for the "unpwn Tor" faction ;)
Not sure how that could be the case. Tor is pwned by design. If
On Mon, 20 Jun 2016 20:39:28 +0200
Andreas Krey wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Jun 2016 13:20:16 +0000, juan wrote:
> ...
> > See, the 'community' of clown 'hackers', sellouts and frauds
> > working for the US gov't and vasal states deems that X is
> &g
On Mon, 20 Jun 2016 17:48:41 +0200
Andreas Krey wrote:
> How should 'due process' look like if someone is doing thing
> that are not criminal, yet are not considered acceptable within a
> community?
What should be highlighted here is the chemically pure fascist
thinking behind
On Mon, 20 Jun 2016 14:19:59 +
Tempest wrote:
> that rule only applies in a court of law. if you steal from me and are
> never taken to court, it's not a violation of "due process" if i call
> you a thief, nor is it defamation.
That is of course correct...IF AND ONLY IF I actually
On Sat, 18 Jun 2016 16:40:08 -0600
Mirimir wrote:
> now that I've seen various leaked internal
> documents, I'm convinced that Jake did some serious shit, and had to
> go.
Any links to those docs?
So far all the 'evidence' I've seen is evidence showing how
crazy th
Just got this from some upstanding member of this fine 'community'.
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2016 03:32:34 +0200 (CEST)
From: Nomen Nescio
To: juan@gmail.com
Subject: FOAD argentina scum
Re: [tor-talk] Bittorrent starting to move entirely within anonymou
On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 23:20:16 +0200
Aymeric Vitte wrote:
>
>
> Le 17/06/2016 à 12:51, Zenaan Harkness a écrit :
> >> Even if an interesting move as you described (ie onions +
> >> onioncat) I
> >> > don't really think that it can scale to the extent required by a
> >> > bt p2p network, I don't t
On 06/10/2016 07:28 PM, a...@cock.lu wrote:
> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PWdL1g3xRHY Do you think that smug
> > asshole still agrees with censorship and lynch mobbing now that
> > he's the target of them? https://xkcd.com/1357/
that comic is of course ignorante bullshit coming fro
On Fri, 10 Jun 2016 05:54:34 +
Tempest wrote:
> and this is the big issue. so tired of hearing people talk about "due
> process" as if it applies to social discourse. it's doesn't. due
> process is for the state. if it happened, speak out. this bull shit
> needs to end. 0 tolerance.
On Wed, 8 Jun 2016 22:13:08 -
carlos...@sigaint.org wrote:
> Reddit user babalui1 claims that Roger Dingledine is next to get
> fired by the Tor Project
>
> "Next to get booted from the Tor Project will be one of the founders
> of the Tor Project Roger Dingledine, the official reason will be
On Tue, 07 Jun 2016 22:08:57 +0300
ja.talk wrote:
cult of the clown cow vomited :
> We know that it may be scary, but we also encourage victims to
> contact their appropriate local authorities.
Just in case somebody out there hasn't yet realized what kind
of 'collective' frau
On Tue, 07 Jun 2016 03:09:14 +0300
ja.talk wrote:
> Appelbaum told Shepard in a bar in
> front of another colleague that he was going to have sex with her,
> using a misogynistic phrase.
Wow! a 'misogynistic' phrase. That is no doubt a terrible crime
against humanity. Or perha
On Tue, 07 Jun 2016 02:15:45 +0300
ja.talk wrote:
> His statement is carefully worded, and so I did my best to decipher
> it here.
>
> "In the past few days, a calculated and targeted attack has been
> launched to spread vicious and spurious allegations against me."
>
> I can’t directly sa
On Mon, 6 Jun 2016 15:17:14 +0300
Александр wrote:
> Unambiguous and comprehensive response from Jacob Appelbaum himself
>
> In the past few days, a calculated and targeted attack has been
> launched to spread vicious and spurious allegations against me. Given
> the way these accusations have b
On Mon, 6 Jun 2016 10:39:50 +0200
carlo von lynX wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 05, 2016 at 02:46:52PM -0300, juan wrote:
> > On Sun, 5 Jun 2016 17:03:45 +0200
> > carlo von lynX wrote:
> >
> > > Julia Schramm who did everything
> > > right,
> >
> > h
On Mon, 06 Jun 2016 17:30:14 +0200
ma...@wk3.org wrote:
> Quoting Not Friendly (2016-06-06 16:22:54)
> > At the current point in time no evidence has been provided to prove
> > the allegations against Jacob. Until time that such evidence is
> > provided to the public I choose to believe that Jacob
On Mon, 06 Jun 2016 00:48:22 -0500
CANNON NATHANIEL CIOTA wrote:
> I know that Tor has stated in
> past that they don't claim to protect from a GPA.
Of course. Tor is purposely designed to allow the US military
to spy on everyone. Obviously something to be expected since tor
On Sun, 05 Jun 2016 17:13:41 -0400
notfrien...@riseup.net wrote:
> So randomizing the times that traffic enters the network and exits
> the network wouldn't work? Like it enters a note and 30 ms after
> received or another random delay couldn't it exit. It would be harder
> to correlate the traff
On Sun, 5 Jun 2016 17:03:45 +0200
carlo von lynX wrote:
> Julia Schramm who did everything
> right,
https://torrentfreak.com/fail-prominent-pirate-party-politician-polices-book-pirates-120918/#disqus_thread
just in case some people still haven't realized that
"politician" mean
;
> With kind regards, remawoba
--
Juan Miguel Navarro Martínez
GPG Keyfingerprint:
5A91 90D4 CF27 9D52 D62A
BC58 88E2 947F 9BC6 B3CF
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
On Thu, 2 Jun 2016 11:32:45 -0400
grarpamp wrote:
> It is those out of control self aware self preserving entities
You mean, the government : the very same
self-serving-and-preserving entity that created and runs tor.
> with their secret games interpretations etc, that will
On Thu, 2 Jun 2016 00:13:10 -0400
grarpamp wrote:
> https://motherboard.vice.com/read/the-uk-is-using-bulk-interception-to-catch-criminalsand-not-telling-them
"UK authorities are collecting and analysing data in bulk to identify
suspected child exploitation"
The only half interesting thing her
On Thu, 26 May 2016 06:23:34 +
"mrnob...@mail-on.us" wrote:
> uses fingerprintjs2 library.
>
> Any thoughts?
fuck javascript?
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listi
atter being a link to the page with distro packages and source code.
>
> Perhaps it could say instead:
>
> "Looking for Distro-specific Packages or Source Code? View All Downloads"
>
>
--
Juan Miguel Navarro Martínez
GPG Keyfingerprint:
5A91 90D4 CF27 9D52 D62A
B
On Fri, 22 Apr 2016 23:02:11 -0400
Roger Dingledine wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 11:41:09AM +1000, Peter Tonoli wrote:
> > This is a real success story for Tor
>
> I agree!
>
> Thank you Alec and other security people at Facebook
The fact that you brag about your collaboration
On Fri, 22 Apr 2016 23:02:11 -0400
Roger Dingledine wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 11:41:09AM +1000, Peter Tonoli wrote:
> > This is a real success story for Tor
>
> I agree!
>
> Thank you Alec and other security people at Facebook for seeing the
> value in secure communications, and also for
On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 16:12:45 -0500
Joe Btfsplk wrote:
> On 4/10/2016 5:36 AM, jb wrote:
> > Tor Browser users:
> >
> > NoScript and other popular Firefox add-ons open millions to new
> > attack
> > http://arstechnica.com/security/2016/04/noscript-and-other-popular-firefox-add-ons-open-millions-to
On Tue, 5 Apr 2016 16:27:35 -0700
Phil Mocek wrote:
> On 04/04/2016 05:50 AM, tor_t...@arcor.de wrote:
> > why is https://www.seattleprivacy.org/ down for Tor users
>
> It is down--for everyone--because it was hosted at David's home
> among the various hardware that Seattle Police Department sta
On Tue, 29 Mar 2016 12:24:35 +0200
Milica Đekić wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I would suggest to talk a bit more about the defense operations
> regarding an organized crime and terrorism
You mean, your government, and the rest of national
governments? Those terrorists fully control tor,
On Fri, 26 Feb 2016 04:37:17 +
eliaz wrote:
>
> That some people might have a non-criminal reason
'criminal' as defined by whom? Ah yes, as defined by the
criminal crazies who run your government. Cute.
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubs
On Fri, 26 Feb 2016 04:37:17 +
eliaz wrote:
>
> It's easy to be a libertarian or anarchist at home.
It's even easier to be a psycho willing to kill people who
don't obey your deranged 'laws'. Which is what you stand for if
you are not an anarchist.
--
tor-tal
On Thu, 25 Feb 2016 00:26:02 +0100
Guido Witmond wrote:
> So, to answer your question: people communicate id@site names, the
> computer verifies the uniqness properties to determine the
> corresponding public keys. The requirement to make the relation
> between names and public keys is key. Pun
On Wed, 24 Feb 2016 23:04:39 +0100
Guido Witmond wrote:
> My drive is to make key exchange happen as a natural part of normal
> interactions between people.
So teach people how to exchange keys.
> Not as a separate step that could be
> neglected, forgotten or done wrong.
Ah yo
st globally that if he calls bullshit on X
keybase account or other site, it'll certainly be it.
- --
Juan Miguel Navarro Martínez
GPG Keyfingerprint:
5A91 90D4 CF27 9D52 D62A
BC58 88E2 947F 9BC6 B3CF
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJWx3ThAAoJECDeJXHIWzXQo5UI
st on https://www.reddit.com/r/KeybaseProofs.
For both last verification processes, it contains some code and a PGP
message.
> I'm not a Keybase user (I've been waiting for more than a year and
> a half, I believe for an invite from them)
>
If you are still interested, I could
On Tue, 26 Jan 2016 18:49:53 -0500
grarpamp wrote:
>> virtually all the world's infrastructure is 'compromised'?
> The USA and Soviets have decades experience tapping cables
> around the globe in a cold war sense.
I think the paper is mostly referring to what governments
laug
On Mon, 25 Jan 2016 10:25:20 -0500
Paul Syverson wrote:
> "20,000 In League Under the Sea: Anonymous Communication, Trust,
> MLATs, and Undersea Cables" available at
> http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/popets.2015.1.issue-1/popets-2015-0002/popets-2015-0002.xml?format=INT
As far as I can
On Fri, 15 Jan 2016 23:34:00 -0700
Mirimir wrote:
> On 01/15/2016 01:11 PM, juan wrote:
>
> I like your attitude, juan, but recommending proxies is dangerous :(
I'm not really recommending anything, just making some
observations.
>
> > Fac
On Sat, 16 Jan 2016 06:43:25 +0100
Anders Andersson wrote:
> On the other hand, if you want to look like a screaming child with no
> other agenda than wanting to be at the center of attention, you're
> doing a good job.
Thank you Anders for your wise words. I do notice that you
exactly?
>
> Theoretically, someone could try and attack the dirauths or another
> part if the infrastructure you hit before Facebook, but would it be
> worth risking detection for Facebook?
>
> In both setups, there's the risk FB themselves could try and imple
On Thu, 14 Jan 2016 23:08:14 +0100
creo wrote:
> Am 2016-01-14 18:52, schrieb juan:
>
> > Philipp Winter wrote:
> >
> >> Logging in to Facebook over Tor reveals your identity,
> >> but not your location.
> >
> > any garden variety prox
On Thu, 14 Jan 2016 22:37:25 +0100
Andreas Krey wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Jan 2016 14:25:20 +0000, juan wrote:
> ...
> > Of course. It's absurd. There's nothing hidden about
> > facebook's location so a 'hidden' service is...nonsense.
>
>
On Fri, 15 Jan 2016 02:36:59 +0500
Артур Истомин wrote:
> I think, greatest danger *for most people* comes from
> corporations like Google, Facebook, Twitter etc whose money - our
> privacy, not from NSA/GCHQ/FSB/...
They are one and the same thing. The 'western' system is a
co
On Thu, 14 Jan 2016 12:51:31 -0500
Philipp Winter wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 05:58:50PM +0100, Markus Hitter wrote:
> > To be honest, this surprises me quite a bit. Tor is for
> > anonymisation, so one can escape tax paid surveillance by NSA, GCHQ
> > & Co., which is useful. And then such a
On Thu, 14 Jan 2016 17:58:50 +0100
Markus Hitter wrote:
>
> On 32C3 a few weeks ago ...
>
> https://media.ccc.de/v/32c3-7322-tor_onion_services_more_useful_than_you_think
>
> ... Roger cheered a lot about Facebook offering a hidden service.
>
> To be honest, this surprises me quite a bit.
On Tue, 29 Dec 2015 14:09:05 +0900 (KST)
권현준 wrote:
> 2. If not, How can cracker attack tor network that tor can't prevent?
http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2015/11/tor-director-fbi-paid-carnegie-mellon-1m-to-break-tor-hand-over-ips/
http://www.wired.com/2013/09/freedom-hos
On Thu, 24 Dec 2015 11:53:23 +0100
Jens Kubieziel wrote:
> * Akater schrieb am 2015-12-24 um 04:08 Uhr:
> > Given all this, the following email (Received 2015-12-11 from
> > i...@twitter.com) is somewhat curious:
>
> Thanks for mentioning it. There were several users who received this
> mail, se
On Mon, 21 Dec 2015 23:49:56 -0500
grarpamp wrote:
> http://www.dailydot.com/politics/tor-silk-road-deep-web-tor-attack-irish-drug-dealer/
> http://www.gwern.net/Black-market%20arrests
> https://github.com/gwern/gwern.net
>
> Drug case in Ireland has fingerprints of Carnegie Mellon's attack on
>
On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 15:33:56 +0100
Andreas Krey wrote:
> https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sichere_Inter-Netzwerk_Architektur
> That is LI; I don't know what the secret services are doing.
translation : "lawful" doesn't mean shit.
> I don't know what the secret services are doing.
On Mon, 23 Nov 2015 20:29:25 -0500
"William H. Depperman" wrote:
> To Rick Evans:
>
> I am not a Hacker.
So you have to become one, or get in touch with a 'hacker' you
can trust.
> You seem to be writing just to be
> writing. I have to have a precise explanatio
On Wed, 18 Nov 2015 15:07:15 -0600
Terrence Gordon wrote:
> How can I help out in the war against ISIS?
Murder a few brown children. That's what americans and their
european pets do better.
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change
On Wed, 28 Oct 2015 05:41:15 +
Alec Muffett wrote:
> > On Oct 27, 2015, at 9:31 PM, Jonathan Wilkes
> > wrote:
"even
> > Facebook let's you use Tor if you wanna. #gimmesomeprivacy".
>
> That is certainly one approach; I would suggest a different one:
>
> https://www.facebook.com/notes/al
On Wed, 28 Oct 2015 05:41:15 +
Alec Muffett wrote:
> > On Oct 27, 2015, at 9:31 PM, Jonathan Wilkes
> > wrote:
"even
> > Facebook let's you use Tor if you wanna. #gimmesomeprivacy".
>
> That is certainly one approach; I would suggest a different one:
>
> https://www.facebook.com/notes/al
On Wed, 21 Oct 2015 00:06:14 -0700
Spencer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> >
> > Justin:
> > We Do Not want you in our community.
> >
>
> Yes we do; see Juan's earlier comments regarding cover.
>
Thanks Spencer. Moral support is always appreciated.
> Wordlife,
> Spencer
>
--
tor-ta
On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 21:03:19 -0500
Justin wrote:
> Actually, you’re totally wrong. According to a top secret NSA
> document, which you can view online: Tor is the king of high secure,
> low latency anonymity. No contender awaits the throne.
funny how tor capos don't seem to agree wit
projects head on with open minds is one of the
> many reasons open source software and the communities behind them are
> so important.
>
>
>
> >
> > On 10/18/15 1:05 AM, Virgil Griffith wrote:
> > > I re-iterate a request for the tor-opentalk@ list.
> >
On Sun, 18 Oct 2015 21:11:56 +0200
Josef Stautner wrote:
> Thanks for the conversation :-)
nichts zu danken
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
On Sun, 18 Oct 2015 08:58:17 +0200
Josef Stautner wrote:
> Hello Juan,
>
> I can't understand why you subscribe to a list of "scammers" then.
To make the obvious point that they are scammers. Get it now?.
It shouldn't be to hard to understand.
On Sat, 17 Oct 2015 14:58:55 -0800
I wrote:
> OFF the list, please
Why? You don't want people to know what kind of scam the tor
project is?
>
>
>
>
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torpr
titution for the brainwashing known as public
'education'.
So, you were saying?
>
> > Am 18.10.2015 um 00:12 schrieb Juan :
> >
> > On Sat, 17 Oct 2015 21:59:51 +
> > Cubed wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> So if y
On Sat, 17 Oct 2015 21:59:51 +
Cubed wrote:
>
> So if you feel you were misled at some point, help us out and show us
> where the mistake is so it can be fixed.
It's quite clear why your fucking scam is a scam. Reread my
original message, then come up with a concise and mean
On Wed, 14 Oct 2015 16:42:07 +0200
aka wrote:
> US Navy wanted a mesh network for their ships so an adversary couldn't
> determine by passively listening what ship is the flagship.
except onion routing bullshit only 'works' if the 'adversary'
can't monitor traffic.
on
On Mon, 12 Oct 2015 20:48:22 -0400
kennedy weinrich wrote:
> What was the main purpose in creating Tor or the Tor Project?
Extending the reach of american crimes and empire. Tor
is a project of the pentagon - as such its main purpose is,
obviously, to help the agenda of i
hould be under \Data
> director but it's not there.
>
> Is there updated doc on how to install and configure a relay on Windows
> or can anyone give me some advice?
>
> Thanks,
> Cypher
>
--
Juan Miguel Navarro Martínez
GPG Keyfingerprint:
5A91 90D4 CF27 9D52
preciated.
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
--
Juan Miguel Navarro Martínez
GPG Keyfingerprint:
5A91 90D4 CF27 9D52 D62A
BC58 88E2 947F 9BC6 B3CF
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
of
answers your question would generate.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 1:05 PM, Juan wrote:
> > On Mon, 3 Aug 2015 07:16:43 +0300
> > Cari Machet wrote:
> >
> >> https://youtu.be/qXajND7BQzk?t=27m40s
> >>
> >> he
On Mon, 3 Aug 2015 14:41:18 +0800
Virgil Griffith wrote:
> I delegate this thread to tor-opent...@lists.torproject.org
what?
>
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 1:05 PM, Juan wrote:
> > On Mon, 3 Aug 2015 07:16:43 +0300
> > Cari Machet wrote:
> >
On Mon, 3 Aug 2015 07:16:43 +0300
Cari Machet wrote:
> https://youtu.be/qXajND7BQzk?t=27m40s
>
> here is on camera explanation of why the navy wants you to use
> tor ... if YOU dont it wont work
Bingo.
If only the criminals from the americunt military and other
branch
Also, you can even search this list for posts by syverson
commenting on tor 'limitations'
>
> Le mercredi 29 juillet 2015, Juan a écrit :
>
> > On Wed, 29 Jul 2015 12:32:56 +
> > Virgil Griffith > wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> &g
xplaining
> TOR to potential users. Now that the TOR bundle and TAILS don't include the
> network map software anymore what would be an alternative?
>
>
> --
>
--
Juan Miguel Navarro Martínez
GPG Keyfingerprint:
5A91 90D4 CF27 9D52 D62A
BC58 88E2 947F 9BC6
On Wed, 29 Jul 2015 12:32:56 +
Virgil Griffith wrote:
>> Historically speaking, what was the U.S. navy /military
>> ntending to use Tor for?
me:
>
>
> Exactly the same things they use it for right now.
>
> Communications for their murdering operations, spying,
> p
On Wed, 29 Jul 2015 12:32:56 +
Virgil Griffith wrote:
>Historically speaking, what was the U.S. navy /military
ntending to use Tor for?
Exactly the same things they use it for right now.
Communications for their murdering operations, spying,
propaganda.
On Wed, 15 Jul 2015 08:16:15 +
Lara wrote:
> You simply don't understand that users's world. In there, his mother
> becoming pregnant is a political statement, heck, even going to the
> toilet can be an act of support for or against the government, In that
> twisted world the government is a
On Tue, 14 Jul 2015 16:13:46 -0700
Apple Apple wrote:
> On 14 Jul 2015 22:31, "Juan" wrote:
> > You just keep vomiting the same corrupt nonsense.
> >
> > Oh yeah, you are such galant defenders...of americunt
> > fascism...which yo
On Tue, 14 Jul 2015 12:54:53 +
Speak Freely wrote:
> However, because you accused me of sending hate mail anonymously, I'd
> like to explicitly refute that claim. Trust me, I wouldn't have sent
> hate mail to you anonymously.
Sure. Except that it just so happens that I get hate mail
On Mon, 13 Jul 2015 04:56:30 +
Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> Really, it's fence-sitting amoral positions like yours that really get
> my chicken going... fix the world already,
> Zenaan
Fixing the world, yes. It's only a matter of getting enough
funding from the pentagon, to fig
00
> > z9wahqvh wrote:
> >
> > > far be it for me to agree with Juan,
> >
> > Of course. Doing so would result in your funding from the
> > 'department of defense' being cut off.
> >
> >
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-
On Fri, 10 Jul 2015 16:26:42 -0400
z9wahqvh wrote:
> far be it for me to agree with Juan,
Of course. Doing so would result in your funding from the
'department of defense' being cut off.
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or
On Fri, 10 Jul 2015 14:35:04 -0500
Drew Fustini wrote:
> Greetings - I am a Tor Browser user and also an operator of a couple
> Tor relays. I believe the Tor Project has a noble mission.
>
> An online friend recently claimed to me that "amoral content is a huge
> portion of the exit node traffi
ure if SSL is required to auth,
> but you should really be using it. You need to use port 6697, 7000, or 7070
> for SSL.
>
--
Juan Miguel Navarro Martínez
GPG Keyfingerprint:
5A91 90D4 CF27 9D52 D62A
BC58 88E2 947F 9BC6 B3CF
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
El 20/06/2015 a las 10:18, Mirimir escribió:
> Is Javascript always needed to get the number photo CAPTCHAs?
>
At least for me, it does 100% of the time:
No JS: Infinite unreadable CAPTCHA.
JS: Either number photo or readable CAPTCHA that work at first try.
--
Juan Miguel Navarro Ma
grarpamp:
> On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Juan Miguel Navarro Martínez
> wrote:
>> If Hotmail, Gmail or Yahoo has problems with Tor being used, you need to
>> find a way for it to work. Hotmail isn't complaining about Tor as far as
>> I know, Gmail does but shou
ms with Tor being used, you need to
find a way for it to work. Hotmail isn't complaining about Tor as far as
I know, Gmail does but should be solved and I don't know about Yahoo.
--
Juan Miguel Navarro Martínez
GPG Keyfingerprint:
5A91 90D4 CF27 9D52 D62A
BC58 88E2 947F 9BC6 B3CF
--
ok at my Google Apps for Work support ticket
> regarding this issue?
>
> Many thanks J
>
- --
Juan Miguel Navarro Martínez
GPG Keyfingerprint:
5A91 90D4 CF27 9D52 D62A
BC58 88E2 947F 9BC6 B3CF
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iQEcBAEB
On Wed, 20 May 2015 11:38:08 +0200
Casey Callendrello wrote:
> Frankly, Tor's twelve-year delay in implementing RFC 3514* is a stain
> upon its reputation.
>
There's no parody like unintentional self-parody.
> --Casey
>
> * Note the published date.
>
> On 5/20/15 6:20 AM, Chri
On Wed, 20 May 2015 03:10:05 -
"Paul A. Crable" wrote:
> Is there some way to keep TOR out of the hands of sleazebags and
> crooks?
The sleazebahs or better scumbags are the US government and its
supporters, sonny.
>
> Paul
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To u
1 - 100 of 236 matches
Mail list logo
