[tor-talk] Why do you hide the fact that "Ex-CIA in Tor" from all of Tor users?

2016-06-27 Thread Unknown
trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/19513 I'm fine with who joins to the Tor Project. The difference to the code is reviewable by the community using diff tool. I'm disappointed the fact that you, Tor Project, hide this truth without sharing to the Tor users. signature.asc Description:

Re: [tor-talk] The heartbleed bug, hidden service private_key leakages and IP revealing

2014-04-12 Thread unknown
At first, the local interceptor can extracts private authentication key from heartbleeded guard. Then emulate connection to IP of this guard (a substituted faked MiTM-ed version of the Guard) for the targeted users. Something like this can be done at the any parts of the Tor-network for MiTMing

Re: [tor-talk] TBB 3.5.3 signatures messing

2014-03-22 Thread unknown
Thank you for closing the problem in: https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/11256 -- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org To unsubscribe or change other settings go to https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

Re: [tor-talk] Using Tor Browser without Tor?

2014-02-07 Thread unknown
On Thu, 6 Feb 2014 02:00:02 -0500 Soul Plane soulplan...@gmail.com wrote: Is it ok to use the Tor Browser without Tor? I don't need Tor but I like the privacy features that the browser offers. Yes you can. I use that way for transparent torifycation in Linux, manually restarting Browser and

Re: [tor-talk] Basics of secure email platform

2013-11-02 Thread unknown
On Sat, 2 Nov 2013 13:50:18 +0100 t...@lists.grepular.com wrote: 1) Create a list of tor exit nodes that do not block port 25 2) Command the tor daemon to exit those nodes exclusively. SSL-SMTP configured to works over 465 port in most cases. -- tor-talk mailing list -

Re: [tor-talk] Web of Trust, gpg vs OTR - was: Re: New GPG key for Mike Perry

2013-09-28 Thread unknown
Using Web of Trust you sacrifice your anonimity, forward secrecy and deniability for the sake of privacy in the term of security and integrity of a message context. The graph of your contacts disclosured, timing information leaked for traffic analysis etc. This is a cross purpose to the goals

Re: [tor-talk] Tor browser can be fingerprinted

2013-09-14 Thread unknown
On Fri, 13 Sep 2013 14:06:45 -0700 Mike Perry mikepe...@torproject.org wrote: harmony: Mike Perry: Maybe. It depends on if you resizing the window is actually as random as you think it is. If you keep doing that, and you're one of the few people who does, you might stand out over time?

Re: [tor-talk] Post Quantum Cryptography

2013-08-22 Thread unknown
On Mon, 19 Aug 2013 12:55:13 -0700 Max senffre...@fastmail.fm wrote: Hallo Tor-Devs, considering that D-Wave now claims to have a programmable quantum computer, wouldn't it be nice for Tor to use post-quantum cyrptography? Unfortunately, a lot of quantum secure cryptography already broken

Re: [tor-talk] TBB signatures broken or missing

2013-06-27 Thread unknown
Thnx, now everything is OK ___ tor-talk mailing list tor-talk@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

[tor-talk] TBB signatures broken or missing

2013-06-26 Thread unknown
At the time of writing: https://www.torproject.org/dist/torbrowser/linux/tor-browser-gnu-linux-x86_64-2.3.25-9-dev-en-US.tar.gz OpenPGP signature broken. https://www.torproject.org/dist/torbrowser/linux/tor-browser-gnu-linux-x86_64-2.3.25-10-dev-en-US.tar.gz OpenPGP signature missing. Why

Re: [tor-talk] NSA supercomputer

2013-04-07 Thread unknown
On Sat, 6 Apr 2013 23:54:34 -0400 cmeclax cmeclax-sa...@ixazon.dynip.com wrote: *The NSA runs a Tor relay called Eve. It's picked as the rendezvous point for a hidden service. Can Eve read the plaintext? No. Encryption with HS is end-to-end in any case. Eve cannot reroute data to fake HS

Re: [tor-talk] Tor Browser Bundle .deb packaging solution

2013-01-31 Thread unknown
On Wed, 30 Jan 2013 11:58:01 -0800 Micah Lee micahf...@riseup.net wrote: If you want more than one TBB at a time you won't be able to install them from the package manager anyway. This is true of all software. If you want to run more than one apache2 server at the same time, you'll need to do

Re: [tor-talk] Directory Server Decentralization

2013-01-30 Thread unknown
On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 19:49:23 -0600 Raynardine raynard...@tormail.org wrote: I just wanted to ask here in Tor-Talk where the efforts to decentralize the Tor directory servers have gone so far? One of the goals of centralizing is protect Tor against attacks based on the desynchronisation and

Re: [tor-talk] Tor Browser Bundle .deb packaging solution

2013-01-30 Thread unknown
On Wed, 30 Jan 2013 09:26:22 +0100 Jérémy Bobbio lu...@debian.org wrote: Releasing updated versions is simple. The update would include a new TBB tarball and the launcher script would include a new version, so the next time a user runs Tor Browser it will extract the new version in

Re: [tor-talk] Directory Server Decentralization

2013-01-30 Thread unknown
On Wed, 30 Jan 2013 12:17:04 -0600 Raynardine raynard...@tormail.org wrote: What happens if a government (such as the United States) demands the private keys for the Directory Authorities? Would you even know if it has already happened years ago? And what? Everyone can run your own tor node

Re: [tor-talk] Directory Server Decentralization

2013-01-30 Thread unknown
On Wed, 30 Jan 2013 15:49:54 -0400 Mike Perry mikepe...@torproject.org wrote: Longer term, I'm interested in having some form (or better: many forms) of multipath consensus validation: May be that algo is relevant to independed control of consensus data:

Re: [tor-talk] First TBB-2013 signatures missed

2013-01-07 Thread unknown
OK, now all signatures at the place, thanks. On Sun, 6 Jan 2013 13:30:56 + unknown wrote: https://www.torproject.org/dist/torbrowser/linux/ https://www.torproject.org/dist/torbrowser/linux/tor-browser-gnu-linux-i686-2.3.25-2-dev-en-US.tar.gz https://www.torproject.org/dist/torbrowser

[tor-talk] First TBB-2013 signatures missed

2013-01-06 Thread unknown
https://www.torproject.org/dist/torbrowser/linux/ https://www.torproject.org/dist/torbrowser/linux/tor-browser-gnu-linux-i686-2.3.25-2-dev-en-US.tar.gz https://www.torproject.org/dist/torbrowser/linux/tor-browser-gnu-linux-i686-2.4.7-alpha-1-dev-en-US.tar.gz

Re: [tor-talk] What's written to HD?

2012-11-17 Thread unknown
On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 20:19:56 + Dan Hughes danhughes...@yahoo.co.uk wrote: Hello, Does browsing with TBB installed on the HD or a USB stick and downloading files (.PDFs, SM vids etc.;)) to a USB stick (but not opening online) result in the content of what's browsed or downloaded

Re: [tor-talk] Hidden Services

2012-09-19 Thread unknown
On Wed, 19 Sep 2012 02:05:30 -0400 Gregory Maxwell gmaxw...@gmail.com wrote: It seems to me that there is a common expectation is that onion urls provide a degree of name privacy— generally, if someone doesn't know your name they can't find you to connect to you. If someone violates that

Re: [tor-talk] Firefox security bug (proxy-bypass) in current TBBs

2012-05-04 Thread unknown
On Fri, 4 May 2012 07:27:35 +0200 Fabio Pietrosanti (naif) li...@infosecurity.ch wrote: Any potential DNS-leakage can be prevented with iptables (Debian GNU/Linux way): Well, this can also be prevented if the starter of TBB would be a binary/executable rather than a shell script, and

Re: [tor-talk] Firefox security bug (proxy-bypass) in current TBBs

2012-05-03 Thread unknown
On Wed, 2 May 2012 22:43:52 + Robert Ransom rransom.8...@gmail.com wrote: See https://blog.torproject.org/blog/firefox-security-bug-proxy-bypass-current-tbbs for the security advisory. Robert Ransom ___ tor-talk mailing list

Re: [tor-talk] wget - secure?

2012-04-18 Thread unknown
In theory smart adversary can reduce anonimity set with statisticaly profiling any non-TBB downloaders on the service side or through intercepting exit node traffic. Wget'll get a different responce than standart TBB or another downloaders to cookies and active elements injection, fonts

Re: [tor-talk] Adblock Plus and Ghostery should be included in Tor bundle

2012-02-12 Thread unknown
On Sun, 12 Feb 2012 17:00:59 +0100 Martin Hubbard martin.hubb...@gmx.us wrote: RefControl set to spoof referrer as host webroot is also useful, I think. - Original Message - From: Brian Franklin Sent: 02/12/12 09:53 AM To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org Subject: [tor-talk] Adblock

Re: [tor-talk] Mail through Tor

2012-01-26 Thread unknown
On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 14:41:06 +0100 superpl...@gmx.de wrote: Hi, are there any issues in controlling email-boxes through the provider- webfrontends (gmail, gmx, etc.) using tor? I read for example about referers in between entering account information and being redirected to

Re: [tor-talk] which apps require an http proxy?

2011-11-02 Thread unknown
On Sun, 30 Oct 2011 23:35:18 -0700 Jacob Appelbaum ja...@appelbaum.net wrote: On 10/30/2011 05:37 PM, Roger Dingledine wrote: On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 05:31:34PM -0700, Jacob Appelbaum wrote: otherwise, I sometimes use a HTTP proxy with proxychains to prevent DNS leaky applications that

Re: [tor-talk] Debian-tor 0.2.2.34-1~~squeeze+1 PID/UID bug

2011-10-28 Thread unknown
On Fri, 28 Oct 2011 17:44:59 + unknown unkn...@pgpru.com wrote: If I run previous version of tor Linux-Debian packages and type 'ps aux | grep tor' then the first field is the user debian-tor. After upgrade that field displays only uid (106) but /etc/passwd for debian-tor is correct

Re: [tor-talk] Debian-tor 0.2.2.34-1~~squeeze+1 PID/UID bug

2011-10-28 Thread unknown
On Fri, 28 Oct 2011 18:52:12 + unknown unkn...@pgpru.com wrote: Sorry for the misinformation. ps aux always displays numerical ID's for long usernames. I trying to repeat this situation on another Debian Linux machine with similar versions updates and iptables settings and got

Re: [tor-talk] TBB as user debian-tor

2011-10-14 Thread unknown
On Fri, 14 Oct 2011 12:00:15 +0200 Marco Bonetti si...@slackware.it wrote: - Original Message - it's files to debian-tor with: chown -R debian-tor tor-browser_en-US/ maybe chown -R debian-tor:debian-tor tor-browser_en-US/ should be a little better Mixing permissions from

Re: [tor-talk] Trouble with 2.2.33-3 - Dirty workaround to avoid user local-tor in Linux

2011-10-13 Thread unknown
: Hope that Debian packages with separated tor-daemon itself, Tor-browser and : Tor-browser-plugins will be created sometime This is unlikely unless someone else does the work. Dirty workaround recipe: 1. Leave your transparency torifying iptables-firewall rules as is. 2. Run

Re: [tor-talk] Trouble with 2.2.33-3 - Dirty workaround to avoid user local-tor in Linux

2011-10-13 Thread unknown
On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 20:28:52 +0100 Julian Yon jul...@yon.org.uk wrote: OOI, what's your rationale for believing that your globally configured tor is more secure than the one in TBB? 1. Globally configured tor provided specially for Debian-Linux from http://deb.torproject.org . Signigicant

Re: [tor-talk] Trouble with 2.2.33-3

2011-10-12 Thread unknown
On Mon, 3 Oct 2011 21:39:46 +0400 unknown unkn...@pgpru.com wrote: We talk about it day ago on some web-resource. Possible with you personally :-) Linux provided system Tor-daemon seems more secure then tor started from user. I propose next steps but concern about any Gotcha! here: 1

Re: [tor-talk] Trouble with 2.2.33-3

2011-10-12 Thread unknown
On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 17:18:14 + unknown unkn...@pgpru.com wrote: On Mon, 3 Oct 2011 21:39:46 +0400 unknown unkn...@pgpru.com wrote: We talk about it day ago on some web-resource. Possible with you personally :-) Linux provided system Tor-daemon seems more secure then tor started

Re: [tor-talk] Trouble with 2.2.33-3

2011-10-12 Thread unknown
On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 14:01:33 -0400 and...@torproject.org wrote: did it call a different profile? Before this I just use full path without start-script and not bother about profiles. This version not working without changing $HOME environment variable to `pwd` in start-script. OK, I use

Re: [tor-talk] Getting of Tor Browser

2011-10-04 Thread unknown
On Mon, 3 Oct 2011 22:46:08 -0500 David Carlson carlson...@sbcglobal.net wrote: In the Windows download section there is a variation called Vidalia Bundle which allegedly sets up an environment within which the standard Windows version of Firefox is expected to behave nicely. As a Windows

Re: [tor-talk] Getting of Tor Browser

2011-10-03 Thread unknown
We talk about it day ago on some web-resource. Possible with you personally :-) Linux provided system Tor-daemon seems more secure then tor started from user. I propose next steps but concern about any Gotcha! here: 1) Download, check gnupg signatures and unpack tor-browser. Keep system

[tor-talk] Users profiling through personаl banners filtering settings

2011-03-22 Thread unknown
Too many users dislikes of annoying web elements -- banners, popups, scripts, strange frames. They use a tools to blocks that elements or change webpage rendering. Traditional programs for filtering is a local proxys -- privoxy or polipo are examples with close relation to Tor and used