Mansour Moufid:
Pizza is a real problem:
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/hezbollah-names-cia-agents-in-lebanon/
Coffee too!
Fascinating article.
A group speculates about some people. Their method might be as
rudimentary as locating a blond person in a part of the city where all
people have
dear paul - specifically how did YOU know how to / or that you could get
funding from the navy... specifically the navy that is... not just the
general US gov
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 5:56 PM, Paul Syverson paul.syver...@nrl.navy.mil
wrote:
On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 03:58:59PM +0800, Virgil
the very nature of parasitic behavior
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 8:05 AM, Juan juan@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 3 Aug 2015 07:16:43 +0300
Cari Machet carimac...@gmail.com wrote:
https://youtu.be/qXajND7BQzk?t=27m40s
here is on camera explanation of why the navy wants you to use
tor ...
dear virgil you are not my representative on planet fucking earth
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 5:20 PM, Cari Machet carimac...@gmail.com wrote:
the very nature of parasitic behavior
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 8:05 AM, Juan juan@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 3 Aug 2015 07:16:43 +0300
Cari Machet
Hi Cari,
On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 06:38:07PM +0300, Cari Machet wrote:
dear paul - specifically how did YOU know how to / or that you could get
funding from the navy... specifically the navy that is... not just the
general US gov
I'm confused. I work at the U.S. Naval Research Laboratory. The
On 08/03/2015 10:02 AM, Paul Syverson wrote:
Hi Cari,
On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 06:38:07PM +0300, Cari Machet wrote:
dear paul - specifically how did YOU know how to / or that you could get
funding from the navy... specifically the navy that is... not just the
general US gov
I'm confused.
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 9:55 AM, Alexandre Guillioud
guillioud.alexan...@gmail.com wrote:
I had heard that the original use case were to protect their (US navy)
ships against command center localisation through RF harvesting. The onion
routing of the admiral commands through a few boats means
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 9:50 AM, Paul Syverson
paul.syver...@nrl.navy.mil wrote:
We came up ourselves with potential application suggestions such as
open source intelligence gathering or phoning home as you put it.
We also came up with other ideas (some good, some bad) and also talked
to
you dont have a wikipedia page so... thanks much...
philosophy of logic huh... so that means you would probably comprehend why
i would be desirous of exhaustive research regarding `evolution`... as you
state below ...and more, if we follow logic, why inaction is unethical of
the mindful
On
On Mon, 3 Aug 2015 14:41:18 +0800
Virgil Griffith i...@virgil.gr wrote:
I delegate this thread to tor-opent...@lists.torproject.org
what?
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 1:05 PM, Juan juan@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 3 Aug 2015 07:16:43 +0300
Cari Machet carimac...@gmail.com
I delegate this thread to tor-opent...@lists.torproject.org
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 1:05 PM, Juan juan@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 3 Aug 2015 07:16:43 +0300
Cari Machet carimac...@gmail.com wrote:
https://youtu.be/qXajND7BQzk?t=27m40s
here is on camera explanation of why the navy wants
On Mon, 3 Aug 2015 14:41:18 +0800
Virgil Griffith i...@virgil.gr wrote:
I delegate this thread to tor-opent...@lists.torproject.org
By the way, you started this thread here and now you want to
move it somewhere else?
You did that on purpose, right? You obviously knew
You did that on purpose, right? You obviously knew the kind of
answers your question would generate.
I was hoping for responses like those from Dr. Syverson. I was not
interested in debating the ethics or justification---simply what the
original funders were looking for /
On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 03:58:59PM +0800, Virgil Griffith wrote:
You did that on purpose, right? You obviously knew the kind of
answers your question would generate.
I was hoping for responses like those from Dr. Syverson. I was not
interested in debating the ethics or
On 08/02/2015 11:05 PM, Juan wrote:
On Mon, 3 Aug 2015 07:16:43 +0300
Cari Machet carimac...@gmail.com wrote:
https://youtu.be/qXajND7BQzk?t=27m40s
here is on camera explanation of why the navy wants you to use
tor ... if YOU dont it wont work
Bingo.
If only the
On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 10:01:41PM +0300, Cari Machet wrote:
i understood you worked there i didnt understand that you worked there
prior to onion routing research
Ah OK. Now your question makes sense to me. I started at NRL in 1989. I
started working on onion routing in 1995. I've worked on a
https://youtu.be/qXajND7BQzk?t=27m40s
here is on camera explanation of why the navy wants you to use tor ... if
YOU dont it wont work
syverson - the way it is portrayed here - worked at the naval lab and
developed the idea there
On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 2:09 AM, Cari Machet carimac...@gmail.com
On Mon, 3 Aug 2015 07:16:43 +0300
Cari Machet carimac...@gmail.com wrote:
https://youtu.be/qXajND7BQzk?t=27m40s
here is on camera explanation of why the navy wants you to use
tor ... if YOU dont it wont work
Bingo.
If only the criminals from the americunt military and
dear roger that is your opinion
all these things you state are conjecture and not based in any formulated
fact or even a tiny little data set
what was being discussed was incredibly important and as far as i am
concerned you are putting up a wall and telling people to keep their mouths
shut
shut which i think is profoundly antithetical to
anything ANYONE working on tor project would
desire
Being asked to take a conversation to another room so the communal space
remains productive in other ways coincides with the desire of many adults
working on the Tor project.
On Sat, 1 Aug 2015
On 7/31/15, Cari Machet carimac...@gmail.com wrote:
dear roger that is your opinion
Roger D:
... please think through whether it contributes usefully to the topic at
hand, and whether it contributes *sufficiently* for many thousands of
people to read it.
Roger asked us to think, before we
right because 'tor talk' is not 'open' to TALK about underlying
philosophical issues regarding critique of actuals within the tor framework
NEED NEW LIST TO ELIMINATE THE 'BAD APPLES'
i want to take a poll how many people on this list have the dna of western
european descent how many identify as
+1 for creating a tor-opentalk list if we need to satisfy the keyboard
philosophers, communal fetishists and other interesting characters who
need an audience to preen/preach in front of. Although I did find the
the original start of this thread to be pretty interesting.
Like many others
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 5:50 PM, Cari Machet carimac...@gmail.com wrote:
Subject: Researchers improve de-anonymization attacks for sites hiding on Tor
another great reason no one should talk about let alone think about
building new/different shit
Exactly. I mention network fill / chaff on
and this is a great example of why you are life full and loved and others
not so much
On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 1:46 AM, grarpamp grarp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 5:50 PM, Cari Machet carimac...@gmail.com wrote:
Subject: Researchers improve de-anonymization attacks for sites
I propose the creation of an alternative mailing list where pressing issues
like the ones in this thread can get airing, attention, and discussion they
deserve.
For such a list I propose the candidate name of
tor-o...@lists.torptoject.org
-V
On Sat, 1 Aug 2015 at 04:45 Virgil Griffith
On 7/30/15, Alexandre Guillioud guillioud.alexan...@gmail.com wrote:
To Zenaan :
I havn't enough grasp on english language (i have a hell of time to debunk
sarcastics comment in my own language, let alone english) to determine if
you are backing me or are pushing me into the cliff.
Don't
dear lara
you have a parasite ... ideology is a belief system belief systems are
religious
::
whoever said that there already are a lot of open source tor like things
... name them here
and making things open source code umn didnt tor like do that too ?? uh
new structures need to be
Cari Machet:
dear lara
you have a parasite ... ideology is a belief system belief systems are
religious
This guy:
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 2:54 PM, Zenaan Harkness z...@freedbms.net wrote:
Is quoting this guy:
On 7/30/15, Alexandre Guillioud guillioud.alexan...@gmail.com wrote:
And
Dear lara you are so dull in the mind you cant remember typing?
+
Cari Machet:
would be more effective if people were working on different projects for
security as many as possible
I feel your pain, bro! How much time should *we* wait for them? *They*
should get to work ASAP!
Hi everybody,
Please remember that the tor-talk list has many thousands of people on
it, and many of them are hoping to learn about how Tor works, as well
as contribute to making Tor work better.
Enormous threads like this one don't do anybody any good at actually
accomplishing either of these
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 07/30/2015 04:01 AM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
Years ago a friend coined the term the FOG - the False Oppositional
Group. In many cases of community issues here in Australia, one or
two people offer to lead a committee to fix the community
On 7/29/15, Juan juan@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, 29 Jul 2015 12:32:56 +
Virgil Griffith i...@virgil.gr wrote:
Historically speaking, what was the U.S. navy /military
ntending to use Tor for?
me:
Exactly the same things they use it for right now.
Communications for their
On 7/29/15, Lara lara@emails.veryspeedy.net wrote:
Alexandre Guillioud:
People which need tor for security, anonymity, can and will inform
themselves.. If they don't, they risk exactly what they were risking
withiut it.
But if that's so, than the sky is not falling. Won't Jeebus come on
On 7/30/15, Alexandre Guillioud guillioud.alexan...@gmail.com wrote:
Reread a few post back.
First you are whining about tor being misused, and after being put in place
by Lara, you say internet is full of ressources anyway ?
Plain nonsense.
Plus, making citation on two weird sentences i
On 7/30/15, Alexandre Guillioud guillioud.alexan...@gmail.com wrote:
Guy, this could be reversed.
Tor has limitations ? Make a pretty infographics on the subject and move
on.
It's not by using these kind of epistomologique principle that you'll
educate the mass.
My point is you are putting
Guy, this could be reversed.
Tor has limitations ? Make a pretty infographics on the subject and move
on.
It's not by using these kind of epistomologique principle that you'll
educate the mass.
My point is you are putting your head into the oven by doing what you do :
you don't want to teach, you
To Zenaan :
I havn't enough grasp on english language (i have a hell of time to debunk
sarcastics comment in my own language, let alone english) to determine if
you are backing me or are pushing me into the cliff.
Anyway, I back you on your description of the situation. A few 'genuine
members'
old at that point.) We had a picture where the ordering
information went over the Web from the Pentagon to Domino's and was
routed by an enemy (Iraq at the time of the putative pizza channel
concern). I remember a point I would make during presentations was
that the enemy could see the
Great idea!
--
devjimsm...@safe-mail.net:
Many people use TOR without understanding enough about how it works.
They trust TOR because of what they hear about it without their own
verification. TOR is just a tool not the solution and you have to
know how to use it correctly.
The Tor
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 03:36:52AM +0800, Virgil Griffith wrote:
old at that point.) We had a picture where the ordering
information went over the Web from the Pentagon to Domino's and was
routed by an enemy (Iraq at the time of the putative pizza channel
concern). I remember a point I
I would risk a dumb question : how can it be 'controlled opposition when
their (NSA) capacities to listen to whoever they want on tor havn't been
demonstrated nor refuted ?
Le mercredi 29 juillet 2015, Juan juan@gmail.com a écrit :
On Wed, 29 Jul 2015 12:32:56 +
Virgil Griffith
controlled opposition is why i skreech about tor - that it is looked to as
THE SOLUTION ... they know what people are using - not as bad as controlled
demolition but...
would be more effective if people were working on different projects for
security as many as possible
On Jul 29, 2015 11:57
Hahahahaha
Le jeudi 30 juillet 2015, Lara lara@emails.veryspeedy.net a écrit :
devjimsm...@safe-mail.net:
Many people use TOR without understanding enough about how it works.
They trust TOR because of what they hear about it without their own
verification. TOR is just a tool not the
I approve. And there is a big problem over here. How to explain these
complicated use cases that would protect people at 99% ?
Le jeudi 30 juillet 2015, devjimsm...@safe-mail.net a écrit :
Many people use TOR without understanding enough about how it works. They
trust TOR because of what they
devjimsm...@safe-mail.net:
Many people use TOR without understanding enough about how it works.
They trust TOR because of what they hear about it without their own
verification. TOR is just a tool not the solution and you have to
know how to use it correctly.
The Tor team should prepare a
Many people use TOR without understanding enough about how it works. They trust
TOR because of what they hear about it without their own verification. TOR is
just a tool not the solution and you have to know how to use it correctly.
--
controlled opposition is why i skreech about tor - that
And there are a lot of project. If these project are followed, they are
mostly open. If they are open, they (the NSA) know what you could be using.
If these project arn't followed by consistant number of peoples, their code
quality could be horrible.
My point is thatwhat you are asking isn't
On Wed, 29 Jul 2015 12:32:56 +
Virgil Griffith i...@virgil.gr wrote:
Historically speaking, what was the U.S. navy /military
ntending to use Tor for?
me:
Exactly the same things they use it for right now.
Communications for their murdering operations, spying,
On Wed, 29 Jul 2015 12:32:56 +
Virgil Griffith i...@virgil.gr wrote:
Historically speaking, what was the U.S. navy /military
ntending to use Tor for?
Exactly the same things they use it for right now.
Communications for their murdering operations, spying,
.
--
Original Message
From: Alexandre Guillioud guillioud.alexan...@gmail.com
Apparently from: tor-talk-boun...@lists.torproject.org
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Historically speaking,what was the U.S. navy /military
Date: Thu, 30
There's enough information available on the internet to gain good knowledge of
how to use TOR. Making sure you know the tools you're using is your
responsibility.
Looking at porn isn't called illegal, *most* self-contained people should be
fine using clearnet.
--
The Tor team should
If 'most' of these 'uninformed' peoples should be 'fine' using clearnet,
then, why are you whinning ?
I mean, if they use the tool incorrectly, they will only face no danger.
People which need tor for security, anonymity, can and will inform
themselves.. If they don't, they risk exactly what they
Alexandre Guillioud:
People which need tor for security, anonymity, can and will inform
themselves.. If they don't, they risk exactly what they were risking
withiut it.
But if that's so, than the sky is not falling. Won't Jeebus come on and
stain his white cloud?
I bet in the next post you're
Reread a few post back.
First you are whining about tor being misused, and after being put in place
by Lara, you say internet is full of ressources anyway ?
Plain nonsense.
Plus, making citation on two weird sentences i wrote a 2am, out of a long
and meaningful message, is equally plain non
Lara, i'm basically on your side on this debate. If you want to troll on
two weird sentences, ignoring most of my message, go on 9gag.
Le jeudi 30 juillet 2015, Lara lara@emails.veryspeedy.net a écrit :
Alexandre Guillioud:
People which need tor for security, anonymity, can and will
My friend if you hear whinning someone should 'help' you *read* my post.
People which need tor for security, anonymity, can and will inform
themselves.. If they don't, they risk exactly what they were risking
withiut it.
Also never say something is a fact about all people that need tor for
On Wed, 29 Jul 2015 22:56:33 +0200
Alexandre Guillioud guillioud.alexan...@gmail.com wrote:
I would risk a dumb question : how can it be 'controlled opposition
when their (NSA) capacities to listen to whoever they want on tor
havn't been demonstrated nor refuted ?
Have you ever heard
Virgil Griffith:
But what was the Navy/military originally hoping to use Tor-related
protocols for? It's unclear to me what their historical motivations were.
Because they are servants of a reptilian specie of aliens, they are
following their masters' plan. They need to spy on *you*. Because
intending to use Tor for?
I know the classic story of US intelligence agents wanting to phone home
from Beijing hotels without Chinese intelligence knowing they were phoning
home as a partial motivation for open-sourcing Tor.
But what was the Navy/military originally hoping to use Tor-related
Am 2015-07-29 14:44, schrieb Lara:
Virgil Griffith:
But what was the Navy/military originally hoping to use Tor-related
protocols for? It's unclear to me what their historical motivations
were.
Because they are servants of a reptilian specie of aliens, they are
following their masters' plan.
Hi Virgil,
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 12:32:56PM +, Virgil Griffith wrote:
intending to use Tor for?
I know the classic story of US intelligence agents wanting to phone home
from Beijing hotels without Chinese intelligence knowing they were phoning
home as a partial motivation for
I had heard that the original use case were to protect their (US navy)
ships against command center localisation through RF harvesting. The onion
routing of the admiral commands through a few boats means enemmies can't
detect which on is giving orders.
2015-07-29 14:32 GMT+02:00 Virgil Griffith
Unsubscribe
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 29, 2015, at 9:55 AM, Alexandre Guillioud
guillioud.alexan...@gmail.com wrote:
I had heard that the original use case were to protect their (US navy)
ships against command center localisation through RF harvesting. The onion
routing of the admiral
Unsubscribe
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 29, 2015, at 9:50 AM, Paul Syverson paul.syver...@nrl.navy.mil wrote:
Hi Virgil,
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 12:32:56PM +, Virgil Griffith wrote:
intending to use Tor for?
I know the classic story of US intelligence agents wanting to phone home
hahahaha :)
What's all that bullshit around tor about its security.. The source is
fully disclosed, maintenaned by open source agents. Their are well known
flaws into the system, but, from my engineer point of view, not enough to
void the usage of it.
Come on, some big company/agency can spy by
Unsubscribe
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 29, 2015, at 9:53 AM, Alexandre Guillioud
guillioud.alexan...@gmail.com wrote:
hahahaha :)
What's all that bullshit around tor about its security.. The source is
fully disclosed, maintenaned by open source agents. Their are well known
flaws into
Unsubscribe
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 29, 2015, at 9:01 AM, spriver spri...@autistici.org wrote:
Am 2015-07-29 14:44, schrieb Lara:
Virgil Griffith:
But what was the Navy/military originally hoping to use Tor-related
protocols for? It's unclear to me what their historical motivations
68 matches
Mail list logo
