If the iPod looks like a USB disk then TinySC should be able to work
with it.
Currently TinySC will only take files on something that looks like a
disk connected to the USB port or an SD card.
To use a NAS you would have to mount the NAS (which can be done using
linux commands, there is no GUI
There are two crystals, one which is used for 44.1 and 88.2 and the
other used for 48 and 96. The master clocks are divided down by integer
amounts for whatever frequencies are needed for the sample rate in
question (word clocks, bit clocks etc).
John S.
--
JohnSwenson
Mnyb;456721 Wrote:
I see a Tiny problem source here.
A wireless Touch as a server, streaming to other wireless
squeezeboxes.
This is the famous not recommended double wireless hops rigth in the
box.
Where is the second wireless hop ? If the Touch is getting its audio
files from
andynormancx;456867 Wrote:
Where is the second wireless hop ? If the Touch is getting its audio
files from SD/USB then there is only a single wireless hop between the
Touch and the other players.
To the wireless router and then to the player. Requires double the
wireless bandwidth than if
ziggyb63;456583 Wrote:
Yeah, I have about 40 DVD-A's I ripped, then used SOX manually to get to
24/48 - but I then deleted the original rips :( Guess I am going to have
to re-do them all again
Can't wait, 24/96 out to my Benchmark DAC1... wonder if I will be able
to tell the
On Sep 10, 2009, at 7:31 AM, gandalf wrote:
Just got 2 SqueezeBox Touch units (just released in New Zealand .. 1st
for once!!), to add to our Squeezebox Boom.. The Boom has been happily
running from SqueezeBox Server v7.3.3. When the Touch goes to open the
Library, it reports The Server
Good to know that. I'll be depandant on Synology for updates so No
buying touch or radio before synology have a new version posted.
--
EowynCarter
EowynCarter's Profile:
Please note that officially Touch isn't for sale before december. No
need
to rush...
Yep. And maybe by then, update will be there ;)
--
EowynCarter
EowynCarter's Profile:
I bought one from Ripcaster last year for £145, but $/£ exchange has
since driven prices up. Was just wandering if we may get typical
experience/price curve drop in IT kit, before next Big Thing or
iteration ramps up shipments.
--
turbot fiend
dave77;456917 Wrote:
I doubt it, Touch is £259, SB3 is £179. If I was in the market at the
moment for a new unit I'd go for the SB3 and I'm sure lots of other
would. There will still be a high demand for the SB3.
The Touch was the very reason to bring me back the Squeezebox platform,
a few
Mnyb;456800 Wrote:
4 This is only true if you live in the US in the rest of the world Touch
is more expensive than SB3 on logitech's own websites !? They apparently
failed to coordinate this marketing effort worldwide.
In general Touch cost more than SB3 , but there is an exception in the
The iPod Touch cannot be accessed as a mass storage device, so the SB
Touch won't be able to access the music on it.
In theory someone could put together some code to give the SB Touch
access to the music on the iPod Touch, but it won't work out of the box.
--
andynormancx
Yes, it will. Yes,
Mnyb;456800 Wrote:
In general Touch cost more than SB3 , but there is an exception in the
US they have the same price.
COST wise, the 4.3 widescreen 480x272 LCD is actually quite an
inexpensive commodity. It is NOT high resolution. its is very average.
Not sure about Logitech's
a unique system able to manage all my home media.
Currently I'm using:
- a SC+SB3 to organize and play my music
- kphotoalbum (http://www.kphotoalbum.org/) to tag, organize and visualize
photos on my laptop
- xbmc (http://www.xbmc.org/) to organize and play videos on my laptop
As I'm
Mnyb;456721 Wrote:
I see a Tiny problem source here.
A wireless Touch as a server, streaming to other wireless
squeezeboxes.
This is the famous not recommended double wireless hops rigth in the
box.
Good observation. I'm one of the no multiple wireless hops
crusaders, perhaps even its
The website does not have it under specifications...
--
gorman
gorman's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=56
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=67742
I measured it and put in in the Hardware Comparison wiki page:
http://wiki.slimdevices.com/index.php/HardwareComparison
--
Mark Lanctot
Current: SB2, Transporter, Boom (PQP3 - late beta, PQP1 - early beta),
SBC (early beta), Squeezebox Radio (PB1 - early beta), Squeezebox Touch
(late beta)
On Sep 10, 2009, at 9:47 PM, CliffC wrote:
Peter Stockwell;455984 Wrote:
Currently I have an external usb drive, on my mac mini, where I store
the music files.
I use iTunes to manage the content.
So, with a touch I could attach the usb drive to the touch. The mac
can then be configured
andyg;454605 Wrote:
Are you serious? The scanner on Touch is really slow, and it should
just work when adding new files, not require the user to go and
initiate a rescan. That's been a complaint about SC forever now...
probably with many complaints from you even. :)Andy I promise and
19 matches
Mail list logo
