Phil Leigh;482079 Wrote:
I'm working on a test to prove there is a difference (if there is one).
I just need a day free of DIY, work etc... :-(
That's very interesting, Phil.
It's nearly impossible to do an A/B test on this, without having two
boxes, so, would be nice to have a test with a
I said I do hear a difference between networked SBS or TinySC, at this
point I don't know for sure why. It MAY be different data, but I don't
think so. Phil's test will prove that one way or the other.
If the bits are identical then proving it gets hard. At this level of
quality (I DID say the
I am in the market for the Touch when it is released. I am in the
process of ripping my entire collection to lossless and want to get a
network drive ready. What format (FAT32, NTFS, etc.)does the drive need
to be for the Touch to read it? I am running a Mac setup at this point,
but am using
metalbob;482188 Wrote:
I am in the market for the Touch when it is released. I am in the
process of ripping my entire collection to lossless and want to get a
network drive ready. What format (FAT32, NTFS, etc.)does the drive need
to be for the Touch to read it? I am running a Mac setup
Just to be clear, the test I am planning wilsee if there is a difference
between the same flac being played from a network PC running sbs or a
local usb disk runing under tinysc (all via the analogue outputs).
It won't categorically prove the difference (if any) is audible, but it
should provide
