Re: [SlimDevices: Touch] 'connection refused' by squeeze server

2011-06-01 Thread Mnyb
What I meant to say what that most(all ?) Linux do have the firewall enabled by default. And ufw is just a tool to handle it so i suspect that you actually have the fw on. Start ufw and set the exceptions or as a test just disable it. -- Mnyb

Re: [SlimDevices: Touch] Now Playing/Artwork lags behind

2011-06-01 Thread Don7031
I change stations/albums or cycle the unit off and on. If that doesn't work, I unplug my router and plug it back in. The router trick also works when the Now Playing list is off which is even more annoying. -- Don7031

Re: [SlimDevices: Touch] Now Playing/Artwork lags behind

2011-06-01 Thread sachadog
Hi, I personally don't get any problems with artwork on the Touch or Duet, except when I have used the latest release SBS 7.5.4. You will see from various threads that 7.5.4.s scanner.exe has displayed faults when scanning music/artwork files. That said, in reading threads over the years, I have

Re: [SlimDevices: Touch] Cannot access my Network Drive with New Access Point.......

2011-06-01 Thread JJZolx
It sure seems like you have an additional DHCP server running on your network that is handing out 192.168.1.x addresses. If the Squeezebox Touch was contacting the DHCP server on the old router then it would be getting a 192.168.0.x IP address. If it were unable to contact any DHCP server then it

Re: [SlimDevices: Touch] Cannot access my Network Drive with New Access Point.......

2011-06-01 Thread Cut-Throat
Mnyb;634267 Wrote: Everything on your network should have 192.168.0.X addresses including the AP itself . The router you have re-purposed as an AP also has an IP address for itself in fact everything on an network has an IP. But something is handing out 192.168.1X addresses as JJ pointed

[SlimDevices: Touch] Filtering out tracks

2011-06-01 Thread homonk
Hello In my iTunes library I have quite a lot bbc radio shows (around half an hour long) and podcasts that turn up when I put a random mix on the squeezebox and ruin everything. Could anyone help me with the best way to filter these out? In iTunes I have created a smart playlist that catches

Re: [SlimDevices: Touch] 100 song max in playlist using Tiny SBS??

2011-06-01 Thread bitstopjoe
I DID do a search and all I saw was a config setting for SBS and 500 playlist limit. Since I am not using SBS but the one built into the Touch, I posted my question about the 100 playlist limit Seems to me to be apples and oranges but I could have missed something on a search.. So who knows..

Re: [SlimDevices: Touch] Looking for Stable Squeezebox Server Release

2011-06-01 Thread maggior
I've been running 7.5.0 for over a year with no trouble. The only reason I updated to that version was that I purchased a Touch. -- maggior Rich - Setup: 2 SB3s, 4 Booms, 1 Duet, 1 Receiver, 1 Touch, iPeng on iPod Touch. SuSE 11.0 Server running SqueezeBoxServer 7.5.0, MusicIP, and

Re: [SlimDevices: Touch] Filtering out tracks

2011-06-01 Thread lasker98
You could change the genre of what you want to filter to something unique, like radio for example. Then when selecting random mix through web interface, you get the option of selecting which genres to include in a random mix. You would just have to de-select the ones you don't want. I use this to

Re: [SlimDevices: Touch] Cannot access my Network Drive with New Access Point.......

2011-06-01 Thread Cut-Throat
JJZolx;634259 Wrote: It sure seems like you have an additional DHCP server running on your network that is handing out 192.168.1.x addresses. If the Squeezebox Touch was contacting the DHCP server on the old router then it would be getting a 192.168.0.x IP address. If it were unable to

Re: [SlimDevices: Touch] Cannot access my Network Drive with New Access Point.......

2011-06-01 Thread JJZolx
Also... Try connecting to 192.168.9.1 in a web browser and see where it takes you. -- JJZolx JJZolx's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10 View this thread:

Re: [SlimDevices: Touch] Cannot access my Network Drive with New Access Point.......

2011-06-01 Thread Cut-Throat
JJZolx;634318 Wrote: Then go through the new router with a fine-toothed comb. Look at every possible setting. See my post above above about the difference between the DHCP client and the DHCP server running on the router. I did that. In fact, I found another document that takes you through

Re: [SlimDevices: Touch] Cannot access my Network Drive with New Access Point.......

2011-06-01 Thread JJZolx
I dunno. Try this maybe. http://www.softpedia.com/get/Network-Tools/Network-IP-Scanner/DHCPExplorer.shtml -- JJZolx JJZolx's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10 View this thread:

Re: [SlimDevices: Touch] Looking for Stable Squeezebox Server Release

2011-06-01 Thread paulster
7.5.2 has been probably the most stable release to date. 7.5.3 was a disaster, which is why 7.5.4 came out to address those problems. I've been running 7.5.4 since it was beta and haven't found any particular problems with it at all, but some people seem to have scanner problems with it. If

Re: [SlimDevices: Touch] Cannot access my Network Drive with New Access Point.......

2011-06-01 Thread Cut-Throat
I suspect that there is something funky going on with the SBT. My laptop functions perfectly with the new router configured as an Access Point. I have decided to 'prove' it by actually buying an Access Point. It's cheap enough at $30. I am betting that the SBT still will not work with it. Here

Re: [SlimDevices: Touch] Cannot access my Network Drive with New Access Point.......

2011-06-01 Thread Cut-Throat
garym;634348 Wrote: I might take that bet. Still seems like you have two DIFFERENT networks going on here. one at 192.168.1.x and the other at 192.168.0.x. Everything needs to be one or the other, with only the x at the end different. That is, my router, my computers, my SB players AND MY

Re: [SlimDevices: Touch] Looking for Stable Squeezebox Server Release

2011-06-01 Thread gregb
the bigger issue may be you are running an incredible old version of firmware on the ReadyNAS. Agreed. RAIDiator 4.2.3 has been very stable for two years. Stable is good :-) Looks like several suggest Squeezebox Server 7.5.2. Features are secondary to reliability / stability. Others? --