Re: [SlimDevices: Touch] Asynch USB vs. non-USB

2012-10-05 Thread dsdreamer
dsdreamer wrote: I have the Rega DAC too, BTW. Anything that has SPDIF as its output is going to suffer from the main design flaw of SPDIF: namely the need to recover the clock from the data. If you could go USB to I2S such that the clock is transmitted explicitly and separately from the

Re: [SlimDevices: Touch] Asynch USB vs. non-USB

2012-03-23 Thread john4456
rgro, I also have a Rega dac and have used it via usb from the SBT thanks to Triode's work. I found there was quite a difference in presentation compared to spdif. Which you prefer is subjective, but you should give it a try. The changes are easy to reverse. -- john4456

Re: [SlimDevices: Touch] Asynch USB vs. non-USB

2012-03-23 Thread dsdreamer
john4456;697048 Wrote: rgro, I also have a Rega dac and have used it via usb from the SBT thanks to Triode's work. I found there was quite a difference in presentation compared to spdif. Which you prefer is subjective, but you should give it a try. The changes are easy to reverse. Very

Re: [SlimDevices: Touch] Asynch USB vs. non-USB

2012-03-22 Thread Mnyb
Consider this . Async USB may be the best interface ever if properly implemented . But spdiff and TOS is not to shoddely done in a good DAC either . There is a lot of well implemented work arounds to the inherit weaknesses in those connections . Can anyone be expected to hear any difference

[SlimDevices: Touch] Asynch USB vs. non-USB

2012-03-21 Thread rgro
Looking at all the excitement over Triode's work with asynchronous USB stuff, can someone explain to all of us numpties if asynch USB is somehow better than, for instance, using a regular dac's connection to the Touch via coax or toslink? For instance, my Rega dac has a USB input. If the

Re: [SlimDevices: Touch] Asynch USB vs. non-USB

2012-03-21 Thread JohnSwenson
rgro;696779 Wrote: Looking at all the excitement over Triode's work with asynchronous USB stuff, can someone explain to all of us numpties if asynch USB is somehow better than, for instance, using a regular dac's connection to the Touch via coax or toslink? For instance, my Rega dac has a

Re: [SlimDevices: Touch] Asynch USB vs. non-USB

2012-03-21 Thread eiffel
The main advantage of the Asynch USB connection is the elimination of clock jitter. Basically, rather than having to recover a clock signal from the signal sent by the SBT to the DAC (Push), the asynch USB approach allows the DAC to control when it receives information (Pull). SBTs are fairly

Re: [SlimDevices: Touch] Asynch USB vs. non-USB

2012-03-21 Thread rgro
Thank you both. In light of your commenets, I did a bit of research on the Rega dac. It seems that its USB interface only supports up to 16 bit/48khz files. While I don't have a huge amount of 24 bit/88/96khz files, I have enough that I don't think I would sacrifice those in order to make

Re: [SlimDevices: Touch] Asynch USB vs. non-USB

2012-03-21 Thread dsdreamer
rgro;696833 Wrote: Thank you both. In light of your commenets, I did a bit of research on the Rega dac. It seems that its USB interface only supports up to 16 bit/48khz files. While I don't have a huge amount of 24 bit/88/96khz files, I have enough that I don't think I would sacrifice