radish;480779 Wrote:
>
> So put the SBR in the bedroom as an extra zone. FLAC is a pretty
> insignificant amount of traffic for a decent wireless network to carry,
> and the Touch has a pretty big buffer.
>
Especially since virtually every SB owner eventually gets.. more. May
as well do it i
AndyK;480686 Wrote:
>
> As far as I know, the Touch is supplied with a infrared remote, so that
> it will work with a Harmony, is this correct?.
> If so, will I then be able to control a receiver via a harmony that
> controls the touch?
>
Yes and yes.
>
> Regarding audio streaming maxing out
aubuti;480475 Wrote:
> Yes, you can use the SB Touch as a controller for the SB Duet Receiver.
> But what you heard about 802.11g not being capable of streaming FLAC and
> SBC traffic at the same time is simply wrong. In some cases individual
> wifi networks have problems, but FLACs + SBC traffic
Yes, you can use the SB Touch as a controller for the SB Duet Receiver.
But what you heard about 802.11g not being capable of streaming FLAC and
SBC traffic at the same time is simply wrong. In some cases individual
wifi networks have problems, but FLACs + SBC traffic is nowhere near
maxing out an
Hi
I'm currently thinking of getting a setup like this:
A Duet receiver will be connected to my A/V receiver. A controller will
be used for controlling music around the appartment. However I ilke the
idea of the touch screen device being placed on a shelf, enabling guests
to easily create playli