[Touch-packages] [Bug 2081684] Re: Things depending on libmount1 complain MOUNT_2_40 not found

2024-09-26 Thread Dan Bungert
** Tags removed: rls-oo-incoming ** Tags added: foundations-todo -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to util-linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2081684 Title: Things depending on libmount1 complain MO

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2078573] Re: I can no longer boot from my Thunderbolt disk

2024-09-26 Thread Dan Bungert
** Tags removed: rls-nn-incoming ** Tags added: foundations-todo ** Changed in: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Benjamin Drung (bdrung) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools i

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2003266] Re: 22.04 package lacks GSSAPI support

2024-09-24 Thread Dan Bungert
LGTM, uploading, thank you! ** Changed in: neon27 (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: New => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to neon27 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2003266 Title: 22.04 pa

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2059734] Re: Tar fails to extract archives that include folders with certain permissions on armhf

2024-09-24 Thread Dan Bungert
Hi Ghadi, I reviewed this patch today. Thanks for the work on this. > this time I only back ported the fchmodat2 syscall and only for arm, aarch64, and powerpc platforms The upstream patch is applying the value 452 to all arches in syscalls.csv, and that's what's in noble+. Would you help me u

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2077159] Re: i40e interfaces renamed after upgrade from hwe-6.5

2024-09-19 Thread Dan Bungert
** Tags removed: rls-jj-incoming ** Tags added: foundations-todo -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2077159 Title: i40e interfaces renamed after upgrade from h

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2078555] Re: Upgrading from 22.04 to 24.04.01 breaks dnsmasq

2024-09-05 Thread Dan Bungert
** Changed in: dnsmasq (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Triaged ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Triaged ** Changed in: dnsmasq (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Change

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2073552] Re: Add SoundWire devices to alsa-info reported in ACPI

2024-09-04 Thread Dan Bungert
So if you look at https://merges.ubuntu.com/main.html?query=alsa- utils&showProposed=true&showMergeNeeded=true&showLongBinaries=true you can see the state of this - Ubuntu has a delta on the alsa-utils package, the Ubuntu version is 1.2.11-1ubuntu1 and the Debian version is 1.2.12-1. Someone would

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2073552] Re: Add SoundWire devices to alsa-info reported in ACPI

2024-08-13 Thread Dan Bungert
> The Oracular is expected to sync with v1.2.12 and we may not have to backport to Oracular. What happens if the merge of alsa-utils doesn't occur? Right now we are in a state where a merge is required, so this isn't going to autosync, and if the merge doesn't happen in Oracular then users will

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2073552] Re: Add SoundWire devices to alsa-info reported in ACPI

2024-08-13 Thread Dan Bungert
** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~mschiu77/ubuntu/+source/alsa-utils/+git/alsa-utils/+merge/469921 ** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~mschiu77/ubuntu/+source/alsa-utils/+git/alsa-utils/+merge/469920 -- You received this bug notification because you

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2071468] Re: ELF package metadata failure: environment variable ‘DEB_HOST_ARCH’ not defined

2024-08-13 Thread Dan Bungert
@Nathan Teodosio (nteodosio) > speech-dispatcher > +export DEB_BUILD_OS_RELEASE_ID=$(dpkg-buildflags --get > DEB_BUILD_OS_RELEASE_ID) This part looks incorrect. Running that command returns an empty string, when I believe the expected value is "ubuntu". I ended up dealing with this problem

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2064360] Re: libpam-doc: doc-base reports missing files

2024-05-01 Thread Dan Bungert
** Patch added: "1.5.2-9.1ubuntu3_to_1.5.3-5ubuntu5_libpam-doc.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pam/+bug/2064360/+attachment/5773775/+files/1.5.2-9.1ubuntu3_to_1.5.3-5ubuntu5_libpam-doc.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch se

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2064360] Re: libpam-doc: doc-base reports missing files

2024-05-01 Thread Dan Bungert
** Description changed: + [ Impact ] + + * In the pam 1.5.3-1 merge, documents formerly found in libpam-doc +were omitted. Just a few documents remain in a package that +formerly had many in /usr/share/doc/libpam-doc/{html,txt}. + * A debdiff of the dropped files can be found in attach

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2064360] Re: libpam-doc: doc-base reports missing files

2024-05-01 Thread Dan Bungert
** Attachment added: "1.5.2-9.1ubuntu3_to_1.5.3-5ubuntu5_libpam-doc.debdiff.notapatch" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pam/+bug/2064360/+attachment/5773776/+files/1.5.2-9.1ubuntu3_to_1.5.3-5ubuntu5_libpam-doc.debdiff.notapatch -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2064350] Re: pam_userdb.so is missing

2024-05-01 Thread Dan Bungert
** Description changed: + [ Impact ] + + * In the process of bootstrapping pam for time_t, libdb-dev was +deliberately removed in salsa commit 65621d8 to allow libdb-dev to +undergo time_t transition. + * The result of that is no pam_userdb.so in libpam-modules + * The fix takes the fo

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2064360] Re: libpam-doc: doc-base reports missing files

2024-05-01 Thread Dan Bungert
hanged in: pam (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: pam (Ubuntu Noble) Assignee: (unassigned) => Dan Bungert (dbungert) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pam i

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2064350] Re: pam_userdb.so is missing

2024-05-01 Thread Dan Bungert
** Changed in: pam (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed ** Changed in: pam (Ubuntu Noble) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: pam (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: pam (Ubuntu Noble) Assignee: (unassigned) => Dan Bunge

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2064360] Re: libpam-doc: doc-base reports missing files

2024-04-30 Thread Dan Bungert
** Changed in: pam (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: pam (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Dan Bungert (dbungert) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pam in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2064360] [NEW] libpam-doc: doc-base reports missing files

2024-04-30 Thread Dan Bungert
Public bug reported: Imported from Debian bug http://bugs.debian.org/1065064: Package: libpam-doc Version: 1.5.3-4 Severity: normal An upgrade reported: Error in `/usr/share/doc-base/libpam-doc.pam-admin-guide', line 14: all `Format' sections are invalid. Error in `/usr/share/doc-base/libp

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2064350] Re: pam_userdb.so is missing

2024-04-30 Thread Dan Bungert
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #1065088 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1065088 ** Also affects: pam (Debian) via https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1065088 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2064350] Re: pam_userdb.so is missing

2024-04-30 Thread Dan Bungert
** Also affects: pam (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pam in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064350 Title: pam_userdb.so is missing Status

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2064350] Re: pam_userdb.so is missing

2024-04-30 Thread Dan Bungert
** Changed in: pam (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pam in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064350 Title: pam_userdb.so is missing Status in pam package

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2058179] Re: Kernel 6.8 + zfs-2.2.2: copy_file_range Operation Not Supported

2024-04-20 Thread Dan Bungert
Per https://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2024/04/20/%23ubuntu-release.html#t18:58 the required kernel is -31, which is currently in proposed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/b

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2057996] Re: ubuntu-24.04 version: cmd-curthooks/:Fail:Installing packages on target system:efibootmgr, grub-efi-amd64-signed, nvme-cli, nvme-stas, shim-signed

2024-04-03 Thread Dan Bungert
** Changed in: subiquity (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-meta in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2057996 Title: ubuntu-24.04 version: cmd-curthooks/

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2057996] Re: ubuntu-24.04 version: cmd-curthooks/:Fail:Installing packages on target system:efibootmgr, grub-efi-amd64-signed, nvme-cli, nvme-stas, shim-signed

2024-03-15 Thread Dan Bungert
** Also affects: ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-meta in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2057996 Title: ubuntu-24.04 version: c

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2055453] Re: FTBFS with -Werror=implicit-function-declaration

2024-02-29 Thread Dan Bungert
** Description changed: As part of time_t work, -Werror=implicit-function-declaration is being - set, but that causes the following FTBFS: + set on armhf, but that causes the following FTBFS on any arch with the + same -Werror=implicit-function-declaration setting: https://launchpadlibraria

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2055453] [NEW] FTBFS with -Werror=implicit-function-declaration

2024-02-29 Thread Dan Bungert
Public bug reported: As part of time_t work, -Werror=implicit-function-declaration is being set, but that causes the following FTBFS: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/716768885/buildlog_ubuntu-noble- armhf.pam_1.5.3-5ubuntu1_BUILDING.txt.gz In file included from obscure.c:42: obscure.c: In functio

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2054620] Re: libdm returns wrong error code when dm-verity key cannot be found

2024-02-27 Thread Dan Bungert
With the updated context, I think the proposal looks reasonable and would be comfortable sponsoring the upload. I suggest first waiting for the lvm2 merge to migrate, just to rule out issues on that front. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded pack

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2052982] Re: regression in debconf-copydb when writing to stdout

2024-02-12 Thread Dan Bungert
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #1063817 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1063817 ** Also affects: debconf (Debian) via https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1063817 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification beca

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2052982] Re: regression in debconf-copydb when writing to stdout

2024-02-12 Thread Dan Bungert
** Changed in: debconf (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: ubiquity (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: ubiquity (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Invalid ** Changed in: debconf (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You receive

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2052982] [NEW] regression in debconf-copydb when writing to stdout

2024-02-12 Thread Dan Bungert
Public bug reported: While debugging a FTBFS in Ubiquity, I observed that the usage of debconf-copydb regressed when using version 1.5.85 of debconf. The previous-in-ubuntu version 1.5.82 of debconf was OK. That invocation looks roughly like: debconf-copydb templatedb pipe --config=Name:pipe --c

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2051576] Re: Please merge 1.9.15p5-3 into noble

2024-02-06 Thread Dan Bungert
LGTM, uploading. ** Changed in: sudo (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Committed ** Changed in: sudo (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Wishlist -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to sudo in Ubuntu. https://bugs

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2049540] Re: hundreds of differences in module list between initramfs-tools version 0.142ubuntu10 and version 0.142ubuntu11

2024-01-22 Thread Dan Bungert
Hi Ben, > Is there any proof that these modules are needed? It appears we have very different assumptions for how dracut was to be brought on board. Diffstat of 0.142ubuntu1[01].log looks like: 1 file changed, 229 insertions(+), 661 deletions(-) That sounds like a lot of changes, in a LTS. I

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2049540] Re: hundreds of differences in module list between initramfs-tools version 0.142ubuntu10 and version 0.142ubuntu11

2024-01-16 Thread Dan Bungert
** Tags added: rls-nn-incoming -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2049540 Title: hundreds of differences in module list between initramfs-tools version

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2049540] Re: hundreds of differences in module list between initramfs-tools version 0.142ubuntu10 and version 0.142ubuntu11

2024-01-16 Thread Dan Bungert
** Attachment added: "0.142ubuntu11.log" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-tools/+bug/2049540/+attachment/5740004/+files/0.142ubuntu11.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools i

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2049540] Re: hundreds of differences in module list between initramfs-tools version 0.142ubuntu10 and version 0.142ubuntu11

2024-01-16 Thread Dan Bungert
** Attachment added: "0.142ubuntu19.log" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-tools/+bug/2049540/+attachment/5740005/+files/0.142ubuntu19.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools i

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2049540] Re: hundreds of differences in module list between initramfs-tools version 0.142ubuntu10 and version 0.142ubuntu11

2024-01-16 Thread Dan Bungert
** Attachment added: "0.142ubuntu10.log" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-tools/+bug/2049540/+attachment/5740003/+files/0.142ubuntu10.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools i

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2049540] [NEW] hundreds of differences in module list between initramfs-tools version 0.142ubuntu10 and version 0.142ubuntu11

2024-01-16 Thread Dan Bungert
Public bug reported: When analyzing the kernel modules present in the current initrd, I have found that there are hundreds of such differences, and that this started with the move to dracut. I believe that the move to dracut was intended to be relatively module neutral - see LP: #2031841 and LP:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2046389] Re: FTBFS if bash-completion is installed at build time

2023-12-13 Thread Dan Bungert
** Changed in: p11-kit (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to p11-kit in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2046389 Title: FTBFS if bash-completion is installed at

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2046389] Re: FTBFS if bash-completion is installed at build time

2023-12-13 Thread Dan Bungert
** Changed in: p11-kit (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Dan Bungert (dbungert) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to p11-kit in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2046389 Title: FTBFS if b

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2046389] [NEW] FTBFS if bash-completion is installed at build time

2023-12-13 Thread Dan Bungert
Public bug reported: p11-kit will FTBFS if bash-completion happens to be installed on the system building p11-kit. The failure is raised by dh_missing:    dh_missing dh_missing: warning: usr/share/bash-completion/completions/p11-kit exists in debian/tmp but is not installed to anywhere (related

[Touch-packages] [Bug 589496] Re: bash --rcfile does not behave as documented

2023-11-14 Thread Dan Bungert
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1097467 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1097467 Merging with LP: #1097467, as documentation fixes are happening there to reflect long-standing upstream desired behavior. ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1097467 bash does not fulfill --rc

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1097467] Re: bash does not fulfill --rcfile option properly

2023-11-14 Thread Dan Bungert
Uploaded ** Changed in: bash (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Dan Bungert (dbungert) ** Changed in: bash (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to b

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2040481] Re: Cannot install Jammy server on machine using pppoe connection to access internet

2023-10-26 Thread Dan Bungert
** Changed in: ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu Noble) Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided => Medium -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-meta in Ubuntu. https

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2039611] Re: [SRU] Fix fcc-unlock script for Lenovo X13s

2023-10-24 Thread Dan Bungert
I'm unsubscribing sponsors for the moment, when you are content with the results on noble please provide a modified debdiff with a SRU-friendly version number for mantic and subscribe sponsors again. Thanks. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded pa

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2039611] Re: [SRU] Fix fcc-unlock script for Lenovo X13s

2023-10-24 Thread Dan Bungert
. Uploading for noble. ** Changed in: modemmanager (Ubuntu Noble) Assignee: (unassigned) => Dan Bungert (dbungert) ** Changed in: modemmanager (Ubuntu Noble) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: modemmanager (Ubuntu Noble) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You rece

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2039611] Re: [SRU] Fix fcc-unlock script for Lenovo X13s

2023-10-24 Thread Dan Bungert
** Also affects: modemmanager (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: modemmanager (Ubuntu Mantic) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed t

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2034986] Re: some text became unreadable during a distribution upgrade

2023-10-12 Thread Dan Bungert
** Description changed: [ Impact ]  * On Ubuntu Mate with the Lunar series, when running    ubuntu-release-upgrader, the displayed font of running    applications (including the upgrader) becomes very corrupted.  * This is not just a display problem, it is also a functional one.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2034986] Re: some text became unreadable during a distribution upgrade

2023-10-12 Thread Dan Bungert
** Description changed: [ Impact ]  * On Ubuntu Mate with the Lunar series, when running    ubuntu-release-upgrader, the displayed font of running    applications (including the upgrader) becomes very corrupted.  * This is not just a display problem, it is also a functional one.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2034986] Re: some text became unreadable during a distribution upgrade

2023-10-12 Thread Dan Bungert
** Description changed: [ Impact ]  * On Ubuntu Mate with the Lunar series, when running    ubuntu-release-upgrader, the displayed font of running    applications (including the upgrader) becomes very corrupted.  * This is not just a display problem, it is also a functional one.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2034986] Re: some text became unreadable during a distribution upgrade

2023-10-12 Thread Dan Bungert
** Description changed: [ Impact ] - * On Ubuntu Mate with the Lunar series, when running -ubuntu-release-upgrader, the displayed font of running -applications (including the upgrader) becomes very corrupted. +  * On Ubuntu Mate with the Lunar series, when running +    ubuntu-release

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2034986] Re: some text became unreadable during a distribution upgrade

2023-10-12 Thread Dan Bungert
** Description changed: [ Impact ] * On Ubuntu Mate with the Lunar series, when running ubuntu-release-upgrader, the displayed font of running applications (including the upgrader) becomes very corrupted. * This is not just a display problem, it is also a functional one.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2034986] Re: some text became unreadable during a distribution upgrade

2023-10-12 Thread Dan Bungert
** Description changed: + [ Impact ] + + * On Ubuntu Mate with the Lunar series, when running +ubuntu-release-upgrader, the displayed font of running +applications (including the upgrader) becomes very corrupted. + + * This is not just a display problem, it is also a functional one. +

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2037202] Re: Mantic/23.10: PXE boot tries to initialize DHCP before network link is up

2023-10-03 Thread Dan Bungert
** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~mwhudson/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-tools/+git/initramfs-tools/+merge/452586 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launc

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2037569] Re: udev issues with mantic beta

2023-10-02 Thread Dan Bungert
Seb reviewed and +1ed on IRC. Uploaded. ** Changed in: udisks2 (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Dan Bungert (dbungert) ** Changed in: udisks2 (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2037569] Re: udev issues with mantic beta

2023-10-02 Thread Dan Bungert
Proposed changes to avoid the event storm ** Patch added: "udisks2-1_2.10.1-1_2.10.1-1ubuntu1.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/udisks2/+bug/2037569/+attachment/5705929/+files/udisks2-1_2.10.1-1_2.10.1-1ubuntu1.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2037569] Re: udev issues with mantic beta

2023-10-02 Thread Dan Bungert
proposal 4. set ID_PART_TABLE_TYPE in the appropriate spot -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2037569 Title: udev issues with mantic beta Status in Ubuntu on

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2037569] Re: udev issues with mantic beta

2023-09-30 Thread Dan Bungert
after exploring udisks2/libblockdev/libfdisk, I have three possible proposals for resolution: 1. hack udisks2 udisks_linux_partition_table_update * calling bd_part_get_disk_spec is always going to be a loop, unless * watches have been inhibited * or calling bd_part_get_disk_spec causes

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2037569] Re: udev issues with mantic beta

2023-09-29 Thread Dan Bungert
Marking invalid in systemd, other than long-standing udev rules being involved I'm not sure this will be fixed in systemd. Exploring if libblockdev with the s390 plugin enabled helps. ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Invalid ** Also affects: libblockdev (Ubuntu) Imp

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2037569] Re: udev issues with mantic beta

2023-09-29 Thread Dan Bungert
In function udisks_linux_partition_table_update if num_parts > 0, no ID_PART_TABLE_TYPE is present, and bd_part_get_disk_spec fails to get the disk information including part_type, this function will fail. Also, because libblockdev uses libfdisk in a manner that opens the disk RW, that causes anot

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2037425] Re: ubuntu-server pulls in ZFS userspace

2023-09-29 Thread Dan Bungert
seed MP merged, dput of ubuntu-meta done. ** Changed in: ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu Mantic) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-meta in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.ne

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2037569] Re: udev issues with mantic beta

2023-09-27 Thread Dan Bungert
Spent some time analyzing this. Frank loaned me a test system. The test system in the "idle" state is enough to see the issue, with a persistent load of 3+ when nothing is happening except event loop spin. The test system is using a dasd as the disk that it is running from. With some udev traci

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2037569] Re: udev issues with mantic beta

2023-09-27 Thread Dan Bungert
** Also affects: udisks2 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: udisks2 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.lau

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2037569] Re: udev issues with mantic beta

2023-09-27 Thread Dan Bungert
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2037569 Title: udev issues with mantic beta Status in Ubunt

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2037425] Re: ubuntu-server pulls in ZFS userspace

2023-09-26 Thread Dan Bungert
** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~dbungert/ubuntu-seeds/+git/ubuntu/+merge/452156 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-meta in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2037425 Title:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2037425] Re: ubuntu-server pulls in ZFS userspace

2023-09-26 Thread Dan Bungert
** Changed in: ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu Mantic) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu Mantic) Assignee: (unassigned) => Dan Bungert (dbungert) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscri

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2035061] Re: uptime -p reports incorrect output after 52 weeks

2023-09-12 Thread Dan Bungert
Hi Robert, thanks for the update to the description. I would like to see two things 1. (Like Paride, I don't have a SRU hat to wear) While this updated description elaborates on what has changed, it doesn't really go into the "what can go wrong" territory. This is an important field for SRU revi

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2034967] Re: cloud-init & cloud-guest-utils are installed on non-cloud installations

2023-09-08 Thread Dan Bungert
** Changed in: subiquity (Ubuntu) Status: New => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-meta in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2034967 Title: cloud-init & cloud-guest-utils are inst

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2026199] Re: Please merge 3.137 into mantic

2023-07-11 Thread Dan Bungert
Uploaded, thanks! ** Changed in: adduser (Ubuntu) Assignee: Mateus Rodrigues de Morais (mateus-morais) => Dan Bungert (dbungert) ** Changed in: adduser (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2002043] Re: Python extension modules get built using wrong compiler flags with python2

2023-07-11 Thread Dan Bungert
** Merge proposal unlinked: https://code.launchpad.net/~dbungert/ubuntu-sponsoring/+git/ubuntu-sponsoring/+merge/446529 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to python2.7 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2002043] Re: Python extension modules get built using wrong compiler flags with python2

2023-07-11 Thread Dan Bungert
** Merge proposal unlinked: https://code.launchpad.net/~dbungert/ubuntu-sponsoring/+git/ubuntu-sponsoring/+merge/446529 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to python2.7 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2026292] Re: conflict on syslog.service when moving between rsyslog and busybox-syslogd

2023-07-06 Thread Dan Bungert
** Changed in: busybox (Ubuntu) Status: New => Won't Fix ** Changed in: rsyslog (Ubuntu) Status: New => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to busybox in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bug

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2026292] Re: conflict on syslog.service when moving between rsyslog and busybox-syslogd

2023-07-06 Thread Dan Bungert
** Attachment added: "syslog-service-conflict" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/busybox/+bug/2026292/+attachment/5684334/+files/syslog-service-conflict -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to busybox in Ub

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2026292] Re: conflict on syslog.service when moving between rsyslog and busybox-syslogd

2023-07-06 Thread Dan Bungert
This script is a reproducer, assuming it installs the affected busybox- syslogd. Debian sid (systemd 253) passes. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to busybox in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2026292 Tit

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2026292] [NEW] conflict on syslog.service when moving between rsyslog and busybox-syslogd

2023-07-06 Thread Dan Bungert
Public bug reported: Suppose a system with systemd 252 and rsyslog installed. Install busybox-syslogd version 1:1.36.1-3ubuntu1, which will cause rsyslog to be removed (but not purged). The install of busybox-syslogd will fail as follows: Failed to preset unit, file "/etc/systemd/system/syslog.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2008952] Re: DNS failure while trying to fetch user-data

2023-06-09 Thread Dan Bungert
** Changed in: subiquity Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2008952 Title: DNS failure while trying to fetch user-data Status in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2019856] Re: Add missing ARM-cores to support Grace-based systems

2023-05-30 Thread Dan Bungert
Uploaded for Mantic, thanks! ** Changed in: util-linux (Ubuntu Mantic) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to util-linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2019856

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2019856] Re: Add missing ARM-cores to support Grace-based systems

2023-05-30 Thread Dan Bungert
** Changed in: util-linux (Ubuntu Mantic) Assignee: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira (mfo) => Dan Bungert (dbungert) ** Changed in: util-linux (Ubuntu Mantic) Importance: Undecided => Wishlist -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded pa

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2008952] Re: DNS failure while trying to fetch user-data

2023-03-24 Thread Dan Bungert
What a mess! I have uploaded the livecd-rootfs change proposed by Chad in #26. Note that there is another problem around jsonschema exposed by this that is in progress. ** Also affects: livecd-rootfs (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: livecd-rootfs (Ubuntu)

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2011751] Re: openbox crashed with SIGABRT

2023-03-23 Thread Dan Bungert
Thanks, uploaded! ** Changed in: openbox (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to glib2.0 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2011751 Title: openbox crashed

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2011751] Re: openbox crashed with SIGABRT

2023-03-23 Thread Dan Bungert
Thanks for the patch, Aaron. I'm able to reproduce this bug using the firefox f11 -> open link in new window, when using the live session of the daily-live lubuntu iso. And the attached patch does seem to help. Overall the patch is what I was hoping to see, but I will request some changes. * The

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2011751] Re: openbox crashed with SIGABRT

2023-03-21 Thread Dan Bungert
Partial review of the patch so far. I haven't read much openbox code so take this with a grain of salt. https://bugzilla.icculus.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6669#c9 mentions a concern that itPrev may still be pointing to invalid data. I share this concern. I think some interesting testcases are what ha

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1956102] Re: Time for the US is shown in 24h format. It should be 12h with AM/PM

2023-03-15 Thread Dan Bungert
Curtin is not the appropriate place to land fixes or even quirk workarounds for this problem. I would appreciate if you avoided adding uninvolved components to the bug, especially when it has already been pointed out that this is the wrong spot. The linked threads you mention do not appear to me

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1956102] Re: Time for the US is shown in 24h format. It should be 12h with AM/PM

2023-03-15 Thread Dan Bungert
** Changed in: curtin (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gsettings-desktop-schemas in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1956102 Title: Time for the US is shown in 24

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1956102] Re: Time for the US is shown in 24h format. It should be 12h with AM/PM

2023-03-15 Thread Dan Bungert
Curtin (no "a") doesn't manage time settings, so the fix definitely isn't going there. Comment #4 though makes this sound like it needs to be in the image, and isn't installer specific? Or can you clarify what you'd like the installer to do here? ** Changed in: curtain (Ubuntu) Status: Ne

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2008952] Re: DNS failure while trying to fetch user-data

2023-03-14 Thread Dan Bungert
I played with a two variation of dropping in some after directives, but obtained similar failing results where the network state was not what cloud-init wanted at the time it started. @Chad - what's your thoughts on some service reordering? -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2008952] Re: DNS failure while trying to fetch user-data

2023-03-08 Thread Dan Bungert
> So I wonder what is the exact sequence of events for running the Netplan generator (by systemd), installing the 50-cloud-init.yaml file (by cloud-init), installing the 01-network-manager-all.yaml file (by the installer?), executing `netplan apply` (by cloud-init). By the time Subiquity has start

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2008952] Re: DNS failure while trying to fetch user-data

2023-03-08 Thread Dan Bungert
So while this bug talks about netboot, I think it isn't necessary to involve that for testing purposes. I suggest simply booting the desktop daily-live with the nocloud kernel command line listed above and seeing how things go. Are the various network tools doing what we expect? Note that gnome-

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2008952] Re: DNS failure while trying to fetch user-data

2023-03-07 Thread Dan Bungert
** Tags added: rls-ll-incoming -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2008952 Title: DNS failure while trying to fetch user-data Status in cloud-init: Triaged S

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2008952] Re: DNS failure while trying to fetch user-data

2023-03-07 Thread Dan Bungert
Looking at the desktop ISOs, while the system is configured with Netplan to use NetworkManager, there seems to be some conflict here where systemd-networkd is trying to interact with the device. Some feedback would be appreciated. The practical result is that early boot cloud- init is not able to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2009034] Re: Ubuntu 23.04 Canary subiquity crashed install failed

2023-03-02 Thread Dan Bungert
** Also affects: subiquity (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid ** Summary changed: - Ubuntu 23.04 Canary subiquity crashed install failed + subiquity subcommand crash on apt hash mismatch ** Changed in: subiquity (Ub

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2004092] Re: casper fails to add any users because GID 999 is already taken

2023-02-09 Thread Dan Bungert
>> the next casper upload will regress the current version of the fix > What is the rationale for reverting this change? As of yet I think that has't happened. Right now we have 2 caspers * git casper at https://git.launchpad.net/casper, version 1.478, without this proposed fix since the MP was

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2004092] Re: casper fails to add any users because GID 999 is already taken

2023-02-07 Thread Dan Bungert
Tagged incoming as while there is a modified casper uploaded, the matching merge proposal was disapproved (https://code.launchpad.net/~tsimonq2/casper/+git/casper/+merge/436490), so the next casper upload will regress the current version of the fix. A longer term solution is needed. ** Tags added:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2004092] Re: casper fails to add any users because GID 999 is already taken

2023-01-31 Thread Dan Bungert
** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~tsimonq2/casper/+git/casper/+merge/436490 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2004092 Title: casper fai

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2002789] Re: Missing 50-ubuntu-logging in sysvinit-utils 3.05-7ubuntu1

2023-01-19 Thread Dan Bungert
I have sponsored this upload. ** Changed in: sysvinit (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to sysvinit in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2002789 Title:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2002789] Re: Missing 50-ubuntu-logging in sysvinit-utils 3.05-7ubuntu1

2023-01-19 Thread Dan Bungert
** Changed in: sysvinit (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Dan Bungert (dbungert) ** Changed in: sysvinit (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: sysvinit (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Wishlist -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1998787] Re: Please merge unattended-upgrades 2.9.1+nmu2 from Debian unstable.

2022-12-14 Thread Dan Bungert
Sponsored, thanks Dave! ** Changed in: unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Dan Bungert (dbungert) ** Changed in: unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Wishlist ** C

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1981385] Re: initrd lacks modules to mount boot image from http boot

2022-12-12 Thread Dan Bungert
** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-jammy ** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-jammy -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1981385] Re: initrd lacks modules to mount boot image from http boot

2022-12-12 Thread Dan Bungert
I have self-verified the change and it passes my listed test plan. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1981385 Title: initrd lacks modules to mount boot

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1996619] Re: Setfont error due to deprecated PIO_FONTX ioctl

2022-11-28 Thread Dan Bungert
I am marking this invalid for Subiquity as I believe no changes are needed there. When we rebuild for 22.04.2 this change should be picked up, once that SRU to Jammy is done. ** Changed in: subiquity Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1996619] Re: Setfont error due to deprecated PIO_FONTX ioctl

2022-11-15 Thread Dan Bungert
After discussion with Heather we determined that * We want this font for display of the snap list results * kbd 2.4.5 is believed to have the fix * The fixed kbd package should be merged to lunar, and a SRU appropriate fix to jammy ** Also affects: kbd (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided St

  1   2   >