There are several issues to consider here:
Using the Phone as an example is a bad idea because it is a special
case. The phone app does NOT requite sync but access to different areas
on the device. Notifications, contacts, even messages to some extent.
Calls, incoming, missed and outgoing are asso
Renato, that is covered by my point (C) above: it's only a theoretical
problem as long as no other address book apps even exist. If we get to a
point where >30% or so of Ubuntu users are using a non-default address
book or calendar app, then it might become true that most people don't
look in the d
I would like to keep address-book-app away from the sync service. Today
it has a sync button only because we did not find a way yet to auto-sync
if the server side changes.
Since we can have different address-books apps in the phone. In my
opinion the sync service should be configured on system-
Our sync service has a global setting that says if the background sync
can happen over 3g. And a sync plugin can sync any kind of data (twitter
messages, chat-log, calendar, contacts. etc). In my opinion we should
not have individual setting for different service.
--
You received this bug notific
This needs separate design for the Contacts app and for the Calendars
app.
** Also affects: ubuntu-calendar-app (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: address-book-app (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: ubuntu-ux
Status: In P
5 matches
Mail list logo
