for this to be happening?
Chris
--
Chris
KeyID 0xE372A7DA98E6705C
31.11972; -97.90167 (Elev. 1092 ft)
11:14:44 up 2 days, 13:35, 1 user, load average: 0.67, 0.32, 0.17
Description:Ubuntu 16.04.2 LTS, kernel 4.4.0-87-generic
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Sun, 2017-04-16 at 12:47 -0300, Carlos Garnacho wrote:
> Hi Jose!
>
> On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 9:58 AM, Jose Arroyo <jose.m.arroyo.se@gmail.
> com> wrote:
> >
> > Hello Chris,
> >
> > It's been a while since I've dived into Tracker so my c
I've submitted bug report https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=78
1384 I hope this is sufficient, if not or if more information is needed
please let me know.
--
Chris
KeyID 0xE372A7DA98E6705C
31.11972; -97.90167 (Elev. 1092 ft)
19:49:20 up 5:37, 3 users, load average: 0.27, 0.24, 0.21
On Sun, 2017-04-16 at 16:41 -0500, Chris wrote:
> On Sun, 2017-04-16 at 13:41 +0100, Sam Thursfield wrote:
> >
> > Hi Chris
> >
> > On 4/15/17, Chris <cpoll...@embarqmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > I've asked abou
On Sun, 2017-04-16 at 13:41 +0100, Sam Thursfield wrote:
> Hi Chris
>
> On 4/15/17, Chris <cpoll...@embarqmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I've asked about this several times and have received, that I'm
> > aware
> > of, no replies. Not even one saying 'don't w
On Sun, 2017-04-16 at 13:41 +0100, Sam Thursfield wrote:
> Hi Chris
>
> On 4/15/17, Chris <cpoll...@embarqmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I've asked about this several times and have received, that I'm
> > aware
> > of, no replies. Not even one saying 'don't w
://pastebin.com/rWpuwgEJ
Chris
--
Chris
KeyID 0xE372A7DA98E6705C
31.11972; -97.90167 (Elev. 1092 ft)
15:20:40 up 1:11, 1 user, load average: 1.42, 1.39, 0.83
Description:Ubuntu 16.04.2 LTS, kernel 4.4.0-72-generic
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
: xenial
Any possible reason for this?
Chris
--
Chris
KeyID 0xE372A7DA98E6705C
31.11972; -97.90167 (Elev. 1092 ft)
21:54:43 up 1:47, 1 user, load average: 1.63, 1.43, 0.85
Description:Ubuntu 16.04.2 LTS, kernel 4.4.0-72-generic
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message
is snippets of both times it happened - https://pastebin.com/Mdhiq
mxJ
Chris
--
Chris
KeyID 0xE372A7DA98E6705C
31.11972; -97.90167 (Elev. 1092 ft)
18:05:04 up 2:45, 1 user, load average: 0.39, 0.31, 0.35
Description:Ubuntu 16.04.2 LTS, kernel 4.4.0-72-generic
signature.asc
Description
Version table:
*** 1.6.2-0ubuntu1.1 500
however tracker --version reports
tracker --version
Tracker 1.12.0
I 'assume' that 1.12.0 is the version running. This hasn't shown up in
any snippets since then, so far.
Chris
--
Chris
KeyID 0xE372A7DA98E6705C
31.11972; -97.90167 (Elev. 1092 ft)
08
have the Ubuntu
package version 1.8.3 installed and installed 1.12 from source how can
I make sure 1.12 is being used instead of 1.8.3?
Thanks
Chris
--
Chris
KeyID 0xE372A7DA98E6705C
31.11972; -97.90167 (Elev. 1092 ft)
14:51:10 up 22 min, 1 user, load average: 1.18, 1.42, 1.80
Description
On Tue, 2017-03-21 at 03:51 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> 2017-03-21 3:25 GMT+01:00 Chris <cpoll...@embarqmail.com>:
> >
> > Thanks Michael, that took care of all except the glib >=2.44.0
> > issue
> > which I'll have to work on. These have now popped
On Tue, 2017-03-21 at 03:10 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> 2017-03-21 2:25 GMT+01:00 Chris <cpoll...@embarqmail.com>:
> >
> > Trying to install from the .tar file and I get this when running
> > $./config
> >
> > configure: error: Packa
talled: 3.11.0-1ubuntu1
Candidate: 3.11.0-1ubuntu1
Version table:
*** 3.11.0-1ubuntu1 500
500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial/main amd64
Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
I'd guess that glib has to be installed since a lot depends on it. The
latest version of glib
On Thu, 2017-03-02 at 17:43 +0100, Carlos Garnacho wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 3:24 PM, Chris <cpoll...@embarqmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Could someone be kind enough to tell me what this warning means?
> > The
> > complete line
On Sun, 2017-03-05 at 16:57 +0100, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-02-28 at 08:33 -0600, Chris wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 2017-02-28 at 09:10 +0100, Jean-Christophe Baptiste wrote:
>
> Hello Chris,
>
> You asked a question about how to do something a Tracker devel
On Thu, 2017-03-02 at 17:43 +0100, Carlos Garnacho wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 3:24 PM, Chris <cpoll...@embarqmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Could someone be kind enough to tell me what this warning means?
> > The
> > complete line
shouldn't be there.
Chris
--
Chris
KeyID 0xE372A7DA98E6705C
31.11972; -97.90167 (Elev. 1092 ft)
08:21:11 up 44 min, 1 user, load average: 0.12, 0.18, 0.80
Description:Ubuntu 16.04.2 LTS, kernel 4.4.0-65-generic
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Tue, 2017-02-28 at 16:49 +0100, Carlos Garnacho wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 3:50 PM, Chris <cpoll...@embarqmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 2017-02-28 at 11:23 +0100, Carlos Garnacho wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> >
On Tue, 2017-02-28 at 15:59 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> 2017-02-28 15:50 GMT+01:00 Chris <cpoll...@embarqmail.com>:
> >
> > Hi Carlos, someone suggested, I think it was on the list, that an X
> > process is changing the permission of /run/user/1000/dconf/user
> &g
On Tue, 2017-02-28 at 11:23 +0100, Carlos Garnacho wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 6:52 PM, Chris <cpoll...@embarqmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > The complete notation to my syslog that I'm seeing every two
> > minutes
> > every hour, every day is:
On Tue, 2017-02-28 at 09:10 +0100, Jean-Christophe Baptiste wrote:
> Le 27/02/2017 à 23:35, Chris a écrit :
> >
> > On Mon, 2017-02-27 at 23:20 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> > >
> > > 2017-02-27 23:09 GMT+01:00 Chris <cpoll...@embarqmail.com>:
> > &
On Mon, 2017-02-27 at 16:35 -0600, Chris wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-02-27 at 23:20 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> >
> > 2017-02-27 23:09 GMT+01:00 Chris <cpoll...@embarqmail.com>:
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, 2017-02-27 at 19:31 +0100, Michael Bieb
On Mon, 2017-02-27 at 23:20 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> 2017-02-27 23:09 GMT+01:00 Chris <cpoll...@embarqmail.com>:
> >
> > On Mon, 2017-02-27 at 19:31 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> > >
> > > Can you check the permissions of /run/user/1000/dconf/user?
On Mon, 2017-02-27 at 19:31 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Can you check the permissions of /run/user/1000/dconf/user? My guess
> is that it is root owned because you've started an X application as
> root.
chris@localhost:~$ ls -l /run/user/1000/dconf
total 4
-rw--- 1 chris chris 2
it fixed.
Chris
--
Chris
KeyID 0xE372A7DA98E6705C
31.11972; -97.90167 (Elev. 1092 ft)
11:42:41 up 4 days, 20:31, 1 user, load average: 0.48, 0.17, 0.17
Description:Ubuntu 16.04.2 LTS, kernel 4.4.0-64-generic
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
rs,
> Carlos
>
Excellent fix on that one Carlos. So far in two days since I updated no
problems at all. This bug - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/d
conf/+bug/1654406 I'd be correct in saying is a dconf bug not a tracker
bug?
Chris
--
Chris
KeyID 0xE372A7DA98E6705C
31.11972;
On Wed, 2017-02-22 at 11:09 +0100, Carlos Garnacho wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 12:30 AM, Chris <cpoll...@embarqmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > I'm sure hoping I'm sending this to the correct list. If not I
>
> It is :)
>
> >
&g
On Wed, 2017-02-22 at 11:09 +0100, Carlos Garnacho wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
Good morning Carlos
> > sincerely apologize. I've been experiencing this - tracker-store
> > crashed with SIGSEGV in g_slice_alloc() almost daily since
> > 12/31/2016.
> > It's listed her
and assigned to nobody. Here is some version
information:
Distributor ID: Ubuntu
Description:Ubuntu 16.04.2 LTS
Release:16.04
Codename: xenial
chris@localhost:~$ apt-cache policy tracker
tracker:
Installed: 1.8.3-0ubuntu0~xenial1
Candidate: 1.8.3-0ubuntu0~xenial1
Version table
,
Martyn
Hi,
Nothing in Ubuntu is currently using this, so I'd be happy to see it go.
Thanks
Chris
___
tracker-list mailing list
tracker-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/tracker-list
.
That workaround was introduced sometime before 0.6.6 I think, but it is not
clear to me whether it was introduced to fix any specific issue with running
out of inotify watches. If you think it is not necessary, then it might be
good to drop it.
Regards
Chris
Hi,
Just a note to let you know that I am using trackerd on the desktop
hosts instead of running a seperate server just for indexing.
Each hosts servers desktops to about 8 users simultaneously and I have
had no problems at all with trackerd.
Thank you very much for your work.
Chris.
On Tue
go back to desktop_server and kill trackerd, then go to
index_server, I can start trackerd ok.
As you can appreciate, I'm quite lost as to what's happening. There
are dbus'es running on different servers. But they do indeed seem to
be comunicating.
Sorry about the mess.
Thanks.
Chris.
On Tue
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 10:24 AM, Martyn Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chris Fanning wrote:
Hi,
Hi :)
Ok, I tried it and it works. Users are going to love this!
I think it would be nice to be able to pass a different
/path/to/my/index_server/tracker.cfg to trackerd on the index_server
35 matches
Mail list logo
