your proposal sounds fine - what are you complaining about?
Only one thing stands out - direct access. You will surely need IPC to
signal changes made by a direct access user as well as to receive them
jamie
On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 20:43 +0200, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
Comon guys,
I know I'm a
On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 14:54 -0400, Jamie McCracken wrote:
your proposal sounds fine - what are you complaining about?
Only one thing stands out - direct access. You will surely need IPC to
signal changes made by a direct access user as well as to receive them
I should elaborate
If i insert
Sure its definitely worth having a look and its easy to port vala to
genie so i could defintely move over some stuff
WRT list view/icon view - I am making this dependent on the category
selected (as some like images are better in icon view whilst others are
better for lists
jamie
On Fri,
Hi,
What are the problems with TST?
I will be adding support for emails and different views based on file
types soonish as I at last have some free time
Im not sure if tracker-storage supports snippets yet though
Not sure what else is missing?
jamie
On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 16:40 +0200, Lorenzo
On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 16:00 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote:
On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 16:57 +0200, Lorenzo Nizzi Grifi Gargiolli wrote:
Il giorno gio, 08/07/2010 alle 10.50 -0400, Jamie McCracken ha scritto:
Hi,
What are the problems with TST?
TST is good, don't get me wrong
yeah we should definitely add the ontology changes - we really want the
timeline data in tracker
On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 12:21 +0100, Rob Taylor wrote:
On 24/06/10 12:03, Martyn Russell wrote:
Hi,
Hi Martyn,
So, I managed to write a script to list all remote branches with the
last
On Wed, 2010-05-05 at 12:53 +0200, Aleksander Morgado wrote:
Hi Jamie all,
I will modify the libunistring and libicu based algorithms tomorrow so
that if ASCII-7 only, normalization and casefolding is not done, just a
tolower() of each character. That would make the values more
On Wed, 2010-05-05 at 18:39 +0200, Aleksander Morgado wrote:
So, with this improvement considering ASCII-only words a special case,
libunistring really beats them all.
yeah libunistring looks like good stuff - I must check the source!
I still note you need to apply word
On Wed, 2010-05-05 at 19:56 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote:
On Tue, 2010-05-04 at 20:11 +0200, Aleksander Morgado wrote:
Hi all again,
Hi,
I've been playing with substituting the two word break algorithms in
libtracker-fts (custom for non-CJK and pango-based for CJK) with a
-0400, Jamie McCracken wrote:
Thanks for your efforts on this - its very interesting and appreciated
A few comments i would ask (I have only looked at your unicode parsers
in the libtracker-fts directory in your branch so apologies if my
assumptions are wrong):
1) I assume the glib parser
On Tue, 2010-05-04 at 22:13 +0200, Aleksander Morgado wrote:
But apart from that, the performance difference between the glib-parser
tests and the unicode-based-parsers are really not comparable: If all
processed the same number of words, it really seems that both
libunistring-based one and
On Tue, 2010-05-04 at 23:08 +0200, Aleksander Morgado wrote:
Anyway I agree that the fastest and perfect solution would be the one
doing all the needed things in a single iteration: NFC normalization,
word-break detection, a proper case-folding (not
character-per-character!)... even accent
On Mon, 2010-04-26 at 09:54 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote:
On 25/04/10 21:59, Jamie McCracken wrote:
On Sun, 2010-04-25 at 22:34 +0200, Aleksander Morgado wrote:
Hi Jamie,
I think it makes sense to fix this. Just to be clear, does this mean we
don't need Pango in libtracker-fts/tracker
On Sun, 2010-04-25 at 22:34 +0200, Aleksander Morgado wrote:
Hi Jamie,
I think it makes sense to fix this. Just to be clear, does this mean we
don't need Pango in libtracker-fts/tracker-parser.c to determine word
breaks for CJK?
Thats not broken so would not recommend trying to
On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 09:17 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote:
Thanks Aleksander.
I think it makes sense to fix this. Just to be clear, does this mean we
don't need Pango in libtracker-fts/tracker-parser.c to determine word
breaks for CJK?
Thats not broken so would not recommend trying to fix
On Thu, 2010-04-22 at 18:34 +0200, Aleksander Morgado wrote:
Hi all!
I'm currently analyzing the issue reported at GB#579756 (Unicode
Normalization is broken in Indexer and/or Search):
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=579756
All my comments below apply to the contents of
On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 19:20 -0400, Ken Schmedding wrote:
I forgot to mention one other issue with the T-S-T in 0.8.x and
unfortunately for me it is a bad one! I call the T-S-T from scripts
and provide search terms and the T-S-T no longer accepts search terms
as an option from the command
without a maintainer (or at least a guarantee from someone to fix bugs
before important releases), it cannot remain in the tracker repo
As martyn said, applets like deskbar (and tracker-search-bar) will end
up being lost in any event unless they are rewritten in javascript for
the gnome-shell (if
Hi Carlos,
those look good - feel free to merge
I do have some changes but dont know whether they will be done in time
anyway best to get the small fixes in place
thanks
jamie
On Wed, 2010-03-24 at 13:59 +0100, Carlos Garnacho wrote:
Hi!
I've pushed some UI improvements to
TST will have all those features by 0.8 release (I hope) - not sure
about option 4 though
the list/icon views are likely to be category specific as follows:
i plan for say music/image category to show a grid with sortable columns
for artist, track name, duration etc
Whilst for documents we will
On Fri, 2010-03-19 at 16:39 +, Martyn Russell wrote:
On 19/03/10 16:36, Jamie McCracken wrote:
TST will have all those features by 0.8 release (I hope) - not sure
about option 4 though
the list/icon views are likely to be category specific as follows:
i plan for say music/image
On Fri, 2010-03-19 at 16:59 +, Martyn Russell wrote:
On 19/03/10 16:42, Jamie McCracken wrote:
On Fri, 2010-03-19 at 16:39 +, Martyn Russell wrote:
On 19/03/10 16:36, Jamie McCracken wrote:
TST will have all those features by 0.8 release (I hope) - not sure
about option 4 though
On Fri, 2010-02-26 at 10:40 +, Martyn Russell wrote:
On 26/02/10 00:13, Jamie McCracken wrote:
On Thu, 2010-02-25 at 18:20 +, Martyn Russell wrote:
On 25/02/10 18:04, Jamie McCracken wrote:
Hmm if I eject a dvd it works fine!
I guess the null UUID is crashing the string hash
On Fri, 2010-02-26 at 09:51 -0500, Jamie McCracken wrote:
On Fri, 2010-02-26 at 10:40 +, Martyn Russell wrote:
On 26/02/10 00:13, Jamie McCracken wrote:
On Thu, 2010-02-25 at 18:20 +, Martyn Russell wrote:
On 25/02/10 18:04, Jamie McCracken wrote:
Hmm if I eject a dvd it works
Hmm if I eject a dvd it works fine!
I guess the null UUID is crashing the string hash function?
jamie
On Thu, 2010-02-25 at 12:55 -0500, Jamie McCracken wrote:
This crashes for me on start up of miner
I did tracker-control -r
and then ran the miner
Backtrace as follows:
#0
Dunno if this is related to this or not, but were we going to allow
direct access for clients to the tracker db? (as we dont multithread
tracker-store it will get slower and less responsive as more clients use
it)
If so surely quite a lot will need to be in tracker-common or some other
public lib
On Tue, 2010-02-09 at 23:44 +0100, Laurent Aguerreche wrote:
Hi!
Tracker-search-tool does not print any result since some weeks (I use
the Git master branch). According to the git logs, some work happened on
URI/URL.
For TST, I turned the line #84 in tracker-query.gs into:
query = SELECT
I have added this patch - thanks
jamie
On Mon, 2009-11-02 at 16:02 +0100, Juan A. Suarez Romero wrote:
Querying tracker happens everytime user types a letter.
To avoid it, waits for 500ms after user stops typing before asking tracker.
---
src/tracker-search-tool/tracker-entry.gs | 21
THis is nice but I would like feedback from Juerg about metadata field
searching - it should be possible to do this at the tracker-store level
rather than TST
I would like to use fieldname:blah in search terms rather than hack one
specific one in
jamie
On Thu, 2009-11-05 at 12:40 +0100, Juan
number indexing is disabled
On Mon, 2009-11-02 at 16:48 +0200, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
anyone out there?
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 20:34, Tshepang Lekhonkhobetshep...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Am wondering if numbers are indexed, because searching them yields
nothing. If not is it a bug
Thanks for these - I will look at them in the next few days. Im not sure
about second one either - I guess I need to confirm with rest of tracker
team how to handle field specific searches
jamie
On Mon, 2009-11-02 at 16:02 +0100, Juan A. Suarez Romero wrote:
Hello all!
I've been working on a
On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 16:07 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
2009/10/19 Carlos Garnacho carl...@gnome.org:
A bit more polish (like this) here and there and full text support for
more file types and it is imho ready for prime time.
What document formats are you missing specifically?
I have a
I do know that torrents upset Beagle too as they do close writes every
time they update
Its certainly something that needs tuning to give the user a good
experience
jamie
On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 16:16 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote:
On 20/10/09 15:18, Jamie McCracken wrote:
On Tue, 2009-10-20
On Mon, 2009-10-19 at 09:14 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote:
On 18/10/09 17:09, Michael Biebl wrote:
2009/10/18 Laurent Aguerrechelaurent.aguerre...@free.fr:
Hi!
I am trying tracker-search-tool and I feel it very slow while
tracker-search returns results almost immediately.
Is the
On Mon, 2009-10-19 at 15:40 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote:
On 19/10/09 15:28, Jamie McCracken wrote:
On Mon, 2009-10-19 at 09:14 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote:
On 18/10/09 17:09, Michael Biebl wrote:
2009/10/18 Laurent Aguerrechelaurent.aguerre...@free.fr:
Hi!
I am trying tracker-search
On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 23:16 +0200, Laurent Aguerreche wrote:
Le mardi 29 septembre 2009 à 11:20 +0200, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe a écrit :
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 10:27, Tshepang Lekhonkhobetshep...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 21:31, Jamie
McCrackenjamie.mccr...@googlemail.com
you need at least vala 0.7.5 or later as well to build from git
On Sat, 2009-09-26 at 14:18 +0200, Laurent Aguerreche wrote:
Le vendredi 25 septembre 2009 à 21:58 +0200, Michael Biebl a écrit :
2009/9/25 Martyn Russell mar...@lanedo.com:
tracker 0.7.0 is now available for download
On Wed, 2009-09-23 at 16:33 +0200, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 15:31, Tshepang Lekhonkhobetshep...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 17:21, Jamie
McCrackenjamie.mccr...@googlemail.com wrote:
New branch is in new-tracker-search-tool in nice clean, easily
On Tue, 2009-09-22 at 08:15 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote:
On 22/09/09 04:23, Jamie McCracken wrote:
How would you feel about delaying release until end of next week? I know
we are desperate to get something out of the door but I feel an extra
week will allow us to release something thats
Hi martyn
Which version of valac are you using?
jamie
On Mon, 2009-09-21 at 19:52 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote:
On 21/09/09 16:21, Jamie McCracken wrote:
New branch is in new-tracker-search-tool in nice clean, easily readable
and maintainable genie code and fully widgitised too!
Stiff
I also think we should decide which version of vala to use and maybe do
a version check in configure.ac
On Mon, 2009-09-21 at 19:52 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote:
On 21/09/09 16:21, Jamie McCracken wrote:
New branch is in new-tracker-search-tool in nice clean, easily readable
and maintainable
On Mon, 2009-09-21 at 22:54 +0200, Luca Ferretti wrote:
Il giorno lun, 21/09/2009 alle 15.57 -0400, Jamie McCracken ha scritto:
I also think we should decide which version of vala to use and maybe do
a version check in configure.ac
Just a note: Vala isn't an allowed binding for GNOME
How would you feel about delaying release until end of next week? I know
we are desperate to get something out of the door but I feel an extra
week will allow us to release something thats more polished
I suggest going into feature freeze end of this week and spend all of
next week fixing bugs
Fine with me
jamie
On Fri, 2009-08-21 at 14:12 +0200, Jürg Billeter wrote:
Hi all,
we're considering to allow applications to query the data in Tracker
using a direct access library at some point in the future, i.e., a
public library that directly reads from the SQLite database instead of
On Thu, 2009-08-13 at 08:52 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote:
On 13/08/09 08:30, Ivan Frade wrote:
Sorry, i pressed Reply instead of Reply all
:)
-- Forwarded message --
From: Ivan Fradeivan.fr...@gmail.com
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 23:27:03 +0300
Subject: Re: [Tracker]
I would like to add another related matter
As you know, tracker is about much more than mobiles and we want it to
rock on all platforms be they desktops, netbooks or mobiles
As the most tracker-friendly distro (after Maemo!), Ubuntu is keen on
using CouchDB for user metadata and as we will need
should not be a problem with breadth first as you only hold the current
directory handle and the file you are indexing handle. subdirs are
stored on a list for breadth first
On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 13:25 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote:
On 28/07/09 12:54, Jamie McCracken wrote:
On Tue, 2009-07-28
Dont worry - I will send you patches next time I wanna change tracker
internals :)
jamie
On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 12:16 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote:
On 28/07/09 12:12, Martyn Russell wrote:
Hi,
Can we please NOT commit to the git repository with blank commit
messages. There are 2 instances
it again
later if necessary.
Regards,
Ivan
On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 4:01 AM, Jamie McCracken
jamie.mccr...@googlemail.com wrote:
I hope to have a new UI (actually it will look quite similar)
next week
It probably wont be as advanced as I like but we
with the flow is a good thing, but I
really hope we don't release such a poor tracker UI when the
architecture has been made so wonderously powerful underneath.
My 2 cents...
Mike
Jamie McCracken wrote on 07/10/2009 04:11 AM:
I started looking at fixing the UIs yesterday so hopefully
are fields)
jamie
On Fri, 2009-07-10 at 13:27 +0200, Adrien Bustany wrote:
Hi Jamie,
could you explain briefly or write somewhere how you're using ontologies
to display results ? For example, how are you getting the file path,
classifying the results etc...
On 10/07/09 13:11, Jamie McCracken
On Fri, 2009-07-10 at 14:47 +0200, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
I'm sure that if there are performance issues with Zeitgeist that the
Zeitgeist team will eventually optimize them out.
For example, indeed, by reimplementing them in a more performing
programming language, or maybe even by
.
If the tracker/zeitgeist thing does not perform well they may revert to
using their own db so its in our interests to help them out here
jamie
On Fri, 2009-07-10 at 14:17 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote:
On 10/07/09 14:04, Jamie McCracken wrote:
On Fri, 2009-07-10 at 14:47 +0200, Philip Van Hoof wrote
Hi Natan,
thanks for the clarity
1. A high level API that wraps around SPARQL: I do like the option of
using SPARQL for advanced queries, but right now we don't need that
much power and it raises the entry bar for new developers.
I believe this is planned. We have discussed having
Hi folks,
We have been having a few discussions on issues with next version of
tracker at Guadec
We will likely have more discussions throughout rest of guadec
Issues:
1) Storage of Events in tracker and nepomuk. Events as defined by
zeitgeist include fields like URI, EventAction, EventDate.
great stuff guys
thanks
jamie
On Thu, 2009-05-21 at 11:27 +0200, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
Hi guys!
Passionate observers of the project have probably noticed that Jürg and
me have started working on several new branches.
We started out with calling them architecture-something followed by
Good catch
I always used to do a valgrind before any release - hope you guys do the
same
jamie
On Fri, 2009-05-15 at 14:24 +0200, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
On Thu, 2009-05-14 at 18:48 +0200, Carlos Garnacho wrote:
Here's an updated version, basically it moves table data handling to
On Fri, 2009-05-15 at 19:45 +0200, Luca Ferretti wrote:
2009/5/15 Martyn Russell mar...@imendio.com:
Hi all,
Just to let you know. I didn't release today due to some issues I ran
into and wasn't expecting. I committed the performance improvement which
there has been a thread running
On Wed, 2009-04-15 at 21:32 -0700, Michael Lissner wrote:
Hi!
I've been using tracker for a while now, and following this list for a
bit, and I thought I would mention something that doesn't seem to come
up here too much.
From the conversations I've heard, the back end design of
On Wed, 2009-04-15 at 10:51 +0300, Ivan Frade wrote:
Hi Jamie!
El mar, 14-04-2009 a las 19:18 +0200, ext Jamie McCracken escribió:
Hi Martyn and team,
Just like to thank you all for your fantastic efforts in firefighting
the bugs in the 0.6.9x versions
These embedded devices
Hi Martyn and team,
Just like to thank you all for your fantastic efforts in firefighting
the bugs in the 0.6.9x versions
As you are no doubt aware, Ubuntu is in RC so its unlikely to accept
further releases and I also think fighting further issues which are
likely qdbm/ext4 related is a lost
On Mon, 2009-04-06 at 12:10 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote:
Martyn Russell wrote:
Hi all,
This week and next week are quite crucial for the project as we plan to
try and do the following:
- Move to GIT with GNOME
- Move to GIT with Maemo
- Release 0.6.93
I would like to have
On Fri, 2009-04-03 at 12:09 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote:
Hi all,
I have spent a lot of time this week triaging bug reports in Launchpad
and I noticed ubuntu patches the setrlimit() call we use. I haven't seen
exactly how, but we did some light testing here by not using it at all,
and the
On Fri, 2009-04-03 at 14:47 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote:
Jamie McCracken wrote:
On Fri, 2009-04-03 at 12:09 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote:
Hi all,
I have spent a lot of time this week triaging bug reports in Launchpad
and I noticed ubuntu patches the setrlimit() call we use. I haven't
On Fri, 2009-04-03 at 15:18 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote:
Jamie McCracken wrote:
On Fri, 2009-04-03 at 14:47 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote:
Jamie McCracken wrote:
On Fri, 2009-04-03 at 12:09 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote:
Hi all,
I have spent a lot of time this week triaging bug reports
I would rather we increase the memory usage permitted rather than
risk flames of tracker making their system unusable.
We already have this with the current solution. Right now people are
already saying they get too many crashes and they are disabling indexing
or removing Tracker
Hi richard,
Tracker does indeed use HAL for power management and for detecting
removable storage
As HAL support is optional (not all platforms have HAL like solaris) it
would probably make sense to switch to a raw dbus solution
the only sang at this stage is which distro's use Device kit? I
On Wed, 2009-03-25 at 13:30 +0100, Carlos Garnacho wrote:
On mié, 2009-03-25 at 12:27 +0100, laurent.aguerre...@free.fr wrote:
Hi!
I still see tracker-indexer getting stuck with words it cannot index.
My computer has around 300 pdf where most of them have more than 8 pages
written
On Fri, 2009-03-20 at 15:38 +0100, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
On Sat, 2009-03-14 at 21:51 +0100, Laurent Aguerreche wrote:
But I experience many troubles with Evolution 2.24.5 for a long time
(before Tracker 0.6.90): after a moment, Evolution loops forever when it
tries to download mails, or
On Mon, 2009-03-16 at 11:26 +0200, Ivan Frade wrote:
Hi!
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 11:02 AM, Martyn Russell mar...@imendio.com
wrote:
Jamie McCracken wrote:
Anyway I think thats better than say calc stats
continuously especially
On Mon, 2009-03-16 at 09:02 +, Martyn Russell wrote:
Jamie McCracken wrote:
Whilst its not tremendously urgent, the optimal solution AFAICT is to
have an in memory stat table
Basically calc stats once at startup and then increment/decrement as you
index
You could recalc stats
On Mon, 2009-03-16 at 13:57 +0100, Jürg Billeter wrote:
On Sat, 2009-03-14 at 14:03 -0400, Jamie McCracken wrote:
On Sat, 2009-03-14 at 18:32 +0100, Jürg Billeter wrote:
On Sat, 2009-03-14 at 11:18 -0400, Jamie McCracken wrote:
yeah I dont know why they replaced the fast summarised stats
On Sun, 2009-03-15 at 10:10 +, Martyn Russell wrote:
Jamie McCracken wrote:
On Sat, 2009-03-14 at 18:32 +0100, Jürg Billeter wrote:
On Sat, 2009-03-14 at 11:18 -0400, Jamie McCracken wrote:
yeah I dont know why they replaced the fast summarised stats with a real
time count which
On Sat, 2009-03-14 at 18:32 +0100, Jürg Billeter wrote:
On Sat, 2009-03-14 at 11:18 -0400, Jamie McCracken wrote:
yeah I dont know why they replaced the fast summarised stats with a real
time count which is way too slow
martyn can you revert that bit?
doing a count with group
Hi Carlos,
there are indeed advantages and disadvantages to doing things
differently
Im real busy today and tomorrow but could we have an IRC meet on Friday
at usual time 14:00 GMT (9am for me) to discuss this
jamie
On Tue, 2009-03-10 at 19:56 +0100, Carlos Garnacho wrote:
Hi all,
We (As
Acutually I have a meeting on friday so tomorrow at same time would be
best for me
jamie
On Wed, 2009-03-11 at 11:13 -0400, Jamie McCracken wrote:
Hi Carlos,
there are indeed advantages and disadvantages to doing things
differently
Im real busy today and tomorrow but could we have an IRC
On Thu, 2009-03-05 at 17:07 +, Martyn Russell wrote:
Hi all,
Jamie, this week we realised that QDBM is really taking a lot of time
and is now the most prominent thing to fix to get some speed increase in
all areas. Couple this with the fact that we will be trying to move to
vstore
On Mon, 2009-02-09 at 10:49 +, Martyn Russell wrote:
Martyn Russell wrote:
Jamie McCracken wrote:
[snip]
Attila (working at Nokia) has experienced some slowdowns this morning
with some initial testing - this could be the new extractor logging of
course and I plan on minimising
On Thu, 2009-02-05 at 16:26 +, Martyn Russell wrote:
Jamie McCracken wrote:
we are not deleting from qdbm! If you have changed stuff to do this then
please revert. O.6.6 never deleted from qdbm and indeed never should as
its prohibitively expensive
Carlos is working on a fix. If we
On Fri, 2009-02-06 at 16:41 +0100, Carlos Garnacho wrote:
we are only deleting from sqlite. Phantom hits are weeded out by
checking if service ID exists in sqlite. Hit counts for searches are
estimates only (same as they are for google)
I still think there should be some cleanup task or
On Thu, 2009-02-05 at 14:03 +, Martyn Russell wrote:
Jamie McCracken wrote:
On Thu, 2009-02-05 at 13:10 +0100, Carlos Garnacho wrote:
Hi!
On mar, 2009-02-03 at 16:56 +0100, Carlos Garnacho wrote:
On mar, 2009-02-03 at 13:28 +0100, Carlos Garnacho wrote:
snip
2*) Moving
On Thu, 2009-02-05 at 15:50 +, Martyn Russell wrote:
Jamie McCracken wrote:
On Thu, 2009-02-05 at 14:03 +, Martyn Russell wrote:
Jamie McCracken wrote:
Thanks I will check over weekend and try and fix some outstanding issues
with TST
If all goes well we can release next week
On Mon, 2009-02-02 at 18:30 +, Martyn Russell wrote:
Hi,
I should add, I consider #2 the only issue here worth looking at prior
to release.
For #1, no one on the Tracker team has this issue as far as I am aware
and it looks to me like it is just an old machine problem and can be
On Mon, 2009-02-02 at 18:45 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
2009/2/2 Martyn Russell mar...@imendio.com:
3*) TST still shows email category twice - Im not sure of cause but i am
investigating this one
OK, great thanks.
See http://live.gnome.org/Tracker/ReleaseStatus, point 6.) (under
On Mon, 2009-02-02 at 10:14 +, Martyn Russell wrote:
2*) Moving a file into another directory caused the file to no longer be
searchable. Also when renaming a directory a search on the new name only
finds the changed directory name but none of its files or subfolders.
Tracker should
On Fri, 2009-01-30 at 09:46 +, Martyn Russell wrote:
Jamie McCracken wrote:
But just when I was happy about one issue being fixed, I noticed that
performance on removal is awful again:
Unpacking linux-2.6.28.tar.bz2 in $HOME takes tracker (r2862) around
20 minutes to index.
When I
On Fri, 2009-01-30 at 12:58 +0100, Carlos Garnacho wrote:
On jue, 2009-01-29 at 16:44 -0500, Jamie McCracken wrote:
On Thu, 2009-01-29 at 21:46 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
2009/1/29 Michael Biebl mbi...@gmail.com:
2009/1/29 Martyn Russell mar...@imendio.com:
Jamie McCracken wrote
On Fri, 2009-01-30 at 09:46 +, Martyn Russell wrote:
Jamie McCracken wrote:
But just when I was happy about one issue being fixed, I noticed that
performance on removal is awful again:
Unpacking linux-2.6.28.tar.bz2 in $HOME takes tracker (r2862) around
20 minutes to index.
When I
On Fri, 2009-01-30 at 12:58 +0100, Carlos Garnacho wrote:
On jue, 2009-01-29 at 16:44 -0500, Jamie McCracken wrote:
On Thu, 2009-01-29 at 21:46 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
2009/1/29 Michael Biebl mbi...@gmail.com:
2009/1/29 Martyn Russell mar...@imendio.com:
Jamie McCracken wrote
On Thu, 2009-01-29 at 12:38 -0500, Jamie McCracken wrote:
On Thu, 2009-01-29 at 15:59 +, Martyn Russell wrote:
Jamie McCracken wrote:
On Wed, 2009-01-28 at 13:40 +, Martyn Russell wrote:
Jamie McCracken wrote:
On Thu, 2009-01-15 at 11:36 +, Martyn Russell wrote:
I feel I
On Thu, 2009-01-29 at 21:46 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
2009/1/29 Michael Biebl mbi...@gmail.com:
2009/1/29 Martyn Russell mar...@imendio.com:
Jamie McCracken wrote:
I think the crawling should be made more efficient wrt apps and
conversations - can you handle this? (IE use subfolder
On Wed, 2009-01-28 at 13:40 +, Martyn Russell wrote:
Jamie McCracken wrote:
On Thu, 2009-01-15 at 11:36 +, Martyn Russell wrote:
I feel I need more time to asses this - can we delay releasing til next
week please
I ran it over the weekend and noticed some heavy disk IO
I
On Thu, 2009-01-22 at 17:39 +0200, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
Hi,
What of the remaining pieces reported by michael @
http://live.gnome.org/Tracker/ReleaseStatus.
The 2nd issue is more serious IMO.
2nd issue cant be fixed easily with qdbm
Sqlite FTS will fix it but with qdbm the hit
On Thu, 2009-01-22 at 20:54 +, Martyn Russell wrote:
Christophe Fergeau wrote:
If you want to know who the real establishment is in America and
around the world, the real power behind the so-called
''military-industrial complex'', the real maleficent power that has
led this world to
On Thu, 2009-01-15 at 11:36 +, Martyn Russell wrote:
Hi Jamie,
So we have been in a state of bug fixing on Tracker trunk now for a good
few months ironing out issues we have found and preparing for a release.
We would like to make this release at the end of next week if possible.
On Thu, 2009-01-15 at 11:36 +, Martyn Russell wrote:
Hi Jamie,
So we have been in a state of bug fixing on Tracker trunk now for a good
few months ironing out issues we have found and preparing for a release.
We would like to make this release at the end of next week if possible.
of these)?
most of those asked to be added so they need to tell me if they no
longer wish to receive email bug reports
Edward Duffy
Jamie McCracken
Marcus Fritzsch
avazhang
seven
jerry tan
Halton Huo
Ivan Frade
Martyn Russell
Carlos Garnacho
Between Ivan and I, more triaging
On Sat, 2008-12-06 at 12:36 +, Martyn Russell wrote:
On 05/12/08 11:03, Luca Ferretti wrote:
There are two missing stuff for tracker module on bugzilla.gnome.org
#1 Can't specify Version
The only allowed version is unspecified. You (bug reporter or
developer)
On Tue, 2008-12-02 at 18:54 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
16.) Searching for the term tracker yields interesting results: I
get a log of sound and video files which have nothing to do with
tracker.
Reason is, that the music files have Genre: tracker:unknown and the
videos Author:
On Thu, 2008-11-27 at 19:36 +, Martyn Russell wrote:
It is better to release now. We have been focusing on bug fixing quite a
lot recently and reluctantly adding features due to the current Maemo
platform. This doesn't mean we have to do the same upstream, but I would
suggest releasing
1 - 100 of 519 matches
Mail list logo
