[translate-pootle] Glossary stuff (was: Re: Frequncy list)

2009-01-22 Thread Samuel Murray (Groenkloof)
Leandro Regueiro wrote: Another thing is that in a good glossary doesn't appear words. A good glossary has only concepts as entries, and several entries could have the same word (because words could have several meanings). That is fine, from an academic point of view, but the fact is that a

Re: [translate-pootle] Glossary stuff (was: Re: Frequncy list)

2009-01-22 Thread Leandro Regueiro
Another thing is that in a good glossary doesn't appear words. A good glossary has only concepts as entries, and several entries could have the same word (because words could have several meanings). That is fine, from an academic point of view, but the fact is that a glossary function must

Re: [translate-pootle] Glossary stuff

2009-01-22 Thread Samuel Murray (Groenkloof)
Leandro Regueiro wrote: Samuel wrote: That is fine, from an academic point of view, but the fact is that a glossary function must have the ability to recognise items from the source text that are in the glossary. No program can recognise concepts. Only words can be matched. Therefore,

Re: [translate-pootle] Glossary stuff (was: Re: Frequncy list)

2009-01-22 Thread Marce Villarino
O Xoves 22 Xaneiro 2009 18:13, Samuel Murray (Groenkloof) escribiu: Another thing is that in a good glossary doesn't appear words. A good glossary has only concepts as entries, and several entries could have the same word (because words could have several meanings). That is fine, from an