Re: [Trisquel-users] Acer C7 Chromebook updates

2013-06-07 Thread chris
Assuming there is nothing special about it and Trisquel works like any other x86 system there shouldn't be a problem upgrading. I don't know if its fully supported now though. There may be bugs here or there pertaining to this system.

Re: [Trisquel-users] Is there any interest in privacy free software friendly services?

2013-06-07 Thread mikko . viinamaki
Lets say a corporation, individual, or state wants access to John's data. Especially since the passing of the Patriot Act there is zero privacy from the state. And you will not be notified and a gag order is placed to prevent anybody from telling you.

Re: [Trisquel-users] Intstalling Virtualbox in Trisquel 6 Howto (solved, if you need it)

2013-06-07 Thread mikko . viinamaki
Did you try doing what it suggests?

Re: [Trisquel-users] Minitube Not Playing Videos

2013-06-07 Thread mikko . viinamaki
Any way to guarantee that a PPA is fully free/libre software? Peek in every single file. Unless the source code (is available! and) displays a FSF approved license, it's not free. Here are the most common free licenses http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html

Re: [Trisquel-users] Default Music App

2013-06-07 Thread christian
Wow, thanks! One thing though - This is pretty picky, but I have a couple different music folders that I'd like to keep the way they are, but have them intermingle in the tree view. What I mean by this is, if I have a folder for downloads and one for rips, and I have an Elend folder in

Re: [Trisquel-users] Remove Add / Remove Applications

2013-06-07 Thread mikko . viinamaki
Right click the blue swirl Trisquel logo edit menus

Re: [Trisquel-users] Remove Add / Remove Applications

2013-06-07 Thread antarta
There's no such option. I am on trisquel mini.

Re: [Trisquel-users] Is there any interest in privacy free software friendly services?

2013-06-07 Thread shiretoko
Unfortunately, I can't afford this amount of money, though I'm interested. I think privacy should be available to poor people, too. Perhaps a more flexible solution will be found.

Re: [Trisquel-users] Is there any interest in privacy free software friendly services?

2013-06-07 Thread Stefano
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 11:21 AM, Stefano pietran...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 3:36 AM, ch...@thinkpenguin.com wrote: I'm curious if people would pay for a set of services that had: 1. clearly defined privacy policies 2. based on free software 3. developed and maintained by a

Re: [Trisquel-users] Remove Add / Remove Applications

2013-06-07 Thread mikko . viinamaki
http://wiki.lxde.org/en/LXDE:Questions#How_do_I_add_custom_sub-menu_and.2For_launcher_to_LXDE.27s_main_menu.3F

Re: [Trisquel-users] Intstalling Virtualbox in Trisquel 6 Howto (solved, if you need it)

2013-06-07 Thread lloyd
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi, I followed the instructions on the wiki page linked here, but I'm still having problems installing virtualbox-ose on Trisquel 6.0. I'm using a nonstandard kernel from the fsfla repository - currently 3.9.4-gnu. When I try to install, I

Re: [Trisquel-users] Acer C7 Chromebook updates

2013-06-07 Thread gameboyab
This chromebook uses Coreboot, which can't boot off media in the normal way, because it doesn't use SeaBIOS. mYself pointed out that the way to install Trisquel was to put Chrubuntu on the Chromebook, then turn it into Trisquel with the 'Trisquelizer' script. I have been assuming that the

Re: [Trisquel-users] ath9k_htc WiFi Update

2013-06-07 Thread tegskywalker
I sent a bug report last night, so let's see if it gets ignored or not: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-firmware/+bug/1188459

[Trisquel-users] Dependency broken in Trisquel 6.0

2013-06-07 Thread tct
Suddenly, I cannot install software (updates) packages any more in Trisquel. Tested on two computers, with two different mirrors (one official). What just happened? Thanks! tct@triscel1:~$ sudo apt-get upgrade Citire liste de pachete... Terminat Se construiește arborele de dependență Se

Re: [Trisquel-users] gNewSense 3.0 beta 1

2013-06-07 Thread onpon4
BLAG is way too far behind Fedora to be even remotely useful. The current version is based on Fedora 14, which reached end-of-life over a year ago. I tried BLAG some time ago and found the software to be horribly outdated (IceCat, in particular, was at version 5 and couldn't use any

Re: [Trisquel-users] Acer C7 Chromebook updates

2013-06-07 Thread chris
The wifi card might be an issue. I don't know if that is replaceable. I tend to suspect it is although I haven't disassembled such a system to see what corners might be cut or design changes done to get things cheaper/smaller/etc.

Re: [Trisquel-users] Minitube Not Playing Videos

2013-06-07 Thread Michael Mehrazar
alonivt...@gmail.com wrote: You can update to the latest version by using this PPA: sudo add-apt-repository ppa:ferramroberto/minitube sudo aptitude update sudo aptitude upgrade Thank you for the PPA instructions; it worked like a charm and Minitube is playing videos perfectly now.

Re: [Trisquel-users] Default Music App

2013-06-07 Thread gustavo_cm
You are welcome. I understood what you want, but not exactly: that sorting goes on by the folders' names only, or by audio metadata? I know e.g. Rockbox can rearrange the viewing by the metadata, but never saw that on VLC.

Re: [Trisquel-users] Dependency broken in Trisquel 6.0

2013-06-07 Thread gustavo_cm
(Re)move the file /etc/dpkg/dpkg.cfg.d/multiarch ; remove every *:i386 package and try again.

Re: [Trisquel-users] Directory 'jetpack': Permission Denied.

2013-06-07 Thread gustavo_cm
Here, they are not those, but drwxr-sr-x. If you are not the owner, it would not be productive to chmod u+r; you could do a chmod o+r. Why are you using 7-zip in Wine? It's much smarter to use a native GUI archive manager (in GNOME, the default is file-roller) or even the CLI (packages:

Re: [Trisquel-users] Is there any interest in privacy free software friendly services?

2013-06-07 Thread fernando . negro
(Independently of all the security measures such an organization would take...) Unless it would be endorsed by a (good) secret service that I know is not controlled by the same interests that control the Western secret services (and one that would make an extensive background check on

Re: [Trisquel-users] Is there any interest in privacy free software friendly services?

2013-06-07 Thread fernando . negro
Well said.

Re: [Trisquel-users] Is there any interest in privacy free software friendly services?

2013-06-07 Thread fernando . negro
US laws are already irrelevant... Since, the laws that are being passed violate the US supreme set of laws, called the Constitution. (And, all laws are not truly obeyed, when they are not convenient to follow.) What the US government can't do legally, it will do illegaly.

Re: [Trisquel-users] Major changes in the next Trisquel release

2013-06-07 Thread Julius22
Le Fri, 7 Jun 2013 22:19:34 +0200 (CEST), tegskywal...@hotmail.com a écrit : Trisquel 7 (or 6.5) will be based on Ubuntu 14.04 LTS and hopefully released a few months after. It was smart for the Trisquel team to bring stability by being LTS only and ensuring a rock solid libre distribution.

Re: [Trisquel-users] Is there any interest in privacy free software friendly services?

2013-06-07 Thread shiretoko
Yes, I really understand all the economical issues. I'm thinking of the very basic stuff: mail, search engine, very restricted syncing storage; advertising is nothing bad as long as it's not improved with my personal data, so maybe this would be a solution.

Re: [Trisquel-users] Is there any interest in privacy free software friendly services?

2013-06-07 Thread trisqit
Regarding the free vs. evil freeloaders problem: If you want to keep it screened yet anonymous, there are ways. Money orders in a very small amount, for example, might be sufficient to rid yourself of the drive-by spammer types, at least. Or you could use the riseup model of write me an

Re: [Trisquel-users] Is there any interest in privacy free software friendly services?

2013-06-07 Thread noordinaryspider
I am in the same boat as quantumgravity, unfortunately, and have a minor child to think about, but would definitely be interested in subscribing if my circumstances change or donating what I can to the project if they don't. I currently use my riseup.net address for activism and personal

Re: [Trisquel-users] Major changes in the next Trisquel release

2013-06-07 Thread gnufreeme
Hey t3g. As a Fluxbox and Openbox user, I may not have as much experience as you do on these desktops. May I please ask a few questions? Cinnamon: I believe Cinnamon is GTK3/Gnome3-based. Doesn't Cinnamon use 3D rendering? If so, isn't that the same problem as Gnome-Shell for those

Re: [Trisquel-users] Default Music App

2013-06-07 Thread christian
By the folders' names only - if I have two folders in my media library with the same name, they get merged into one, and similarly for subfolders.

Re: [Trisquel-users] Is there any interest in privacy free software friendly services?

2013-06-07 Thread trisqit
D'accord. Yes, limiting yourself to hiding is ultimately pointless and self-defeating. And complete transparency in one's struggle is generally only possible for true saints. Most of us occupy some point in between, and this is where I'm hoping that Chris's efforts will be useful.

Re: [Trisquel-users] Major changes in the next Trisquel release

2013-06-07 Thread Dave Hunt
Any system I use must have a working Orca screen reader. The GNOME Fallback, as hacked by Rubin et al, works very well with Orca (at least as well as does the un-hacked Fallback); I prefer Trisquel's layout to Ubuntu's. If customizing Fallback is really the cause of some delays in getting

Re: [Trisquel-users] Is there any interest in privacy free software friendly services?

2013-06-07 Thread fernando . negro
And, as for evidence that soon laws will be passed, that will end the Internet as we know it, (and not mentioning credible sources that I know of, but of which I doubt everyone else, in here, has ever heard of, knows who they are, and what their reputation is) you just have to connect the

Re: [Trisquel-users] gNewSense 3.0 beta 1

2013-06-07 Thread Andrew Roffey
On 08/06/13 03:38, onpon4 wrote: that the problem is some major contributor died Jeff Moe is still alive, if that's who you're talking about. :-) He started the company that creates the FSF-approved LulzBot 3D printer. BLAG seems to be dead (at least at the moment), but at least Freed-ora is

Re: [Trisquel-users] Major changes in the next Trisquel release

2013-06-07 Thread icarolongo
Trisquel LTS 4 6 8 - release in 2014 or 2015. I prefer GNOME 3.10 or 3.12 (4.0) release in March 2014. And fallback can be Consort with GTK 3. Trisquel Mini is for old computers or with small resources. It can run with 128MB of RAM. LXDE is better for this - but we have others options like

Re: [Trisquel-users] Directory 'jetpack': Permission Denied.

2013-06-07 Thread gameboyab
The command 'sudo chmod o+r -R jetpack' changed it to d-wxrwxr-t 3 (note the added 'r' near the end), but I still don't have access permissions.

Re: [Trisquel-users] Is there any interest in privacy free software friendly services?

2013-06-07 Thread fernando . negro
And, to finish this point I was making... For those of you who don't know what I'm talking about, when I say that the US government is doing things illegaly... The 4th Amendment to the United States Constitution forbids the government from doing this type of surveillance, without a thing

[Trisquel-users] Trisquel 6 Mini- Black border on AMD Raedon/Limited Resolution

2013-06-07 Thread maccaches
Are there any FOSS drivers that I can use to correct this issue? Also- the Mini edition of trisquel still has all of the lubuntu logos and trademarks everywhere.

Re: [Trisquel-users] Major changes in the next Trisquel release

2013-06-07 Thread Dave Hunt
Let's go with whatever GNOME is latest by March 2014 for those who can run the shell; Consort for the 2-d desktop.

Re: [Trisquel-users] Is there any interest in privacy free software friendly services?

2013-06-07 Thread chris
You only need to be better than the rest to make it worthwhile. The goal is not to subvert the law. The goal is to ensure users retain as much privacy/anonymity/freedom within what the law will allow even or despite the fact no one else is. There are other people working on projects which