Re: [Trisquel-users] Allow switching between kernels in GRUB

2014-09-03 Thread jabjabs
That is true, was somewhat of a knee jerk reaction by myself. It is more I fear that it has the potential to be a slippery slope where blobs will slowly creeep back in. So long as it is kept entirely in the users control it isn't really an issue. It's like free speech in that while I don't

Re: [Trisquel-users] Allow switching between kernels in GRUB

2014-09-03 Thread jabjabs
The fact that it does not recommend the blobs does solve this issue.

Re: [Trisquel-users] Install TOR Browser

2014-09-03 Thread santiago . lorente
Thank you all, very much. Clear explanations. Haven't had time yet to give it a go but I guess I will tonight. But, if that easy way at https://www.torproject.org/download/download-easy.html.en#linux works, why torproject.org and trisquel.info recommends for Debian/Ubuntu/Trisquel the

Re: [Trisquel-users] Allow switching between kernels in GRUB

2014-09-03 Thread onpon4
Not all Nvidia cards have 3-D acceleration in Nouveau. It's much more common than AMD GPUs, but it's not universal.

Re: [Trisquel-users] Install TOR Browser

2014-09-03 Thread onpon4
I think you're misunderstanding. Those links you mention tell you how to install Tor. The Tor Browser Bundle is a web browser bundled with and configured to use Tor. For example, the Tor Browser Bundle doesn't include an email client connected via Tor, or a feed reader connected via Tor. To

Re: [Trisquel-users] finding particular pages within PDFs

2014-09-03 Thread adel . afzal
Oh, I understand now -- When I read pipe grep earlier, I thought that pipe referred to script instruction or terminal command that I didn't know yet. You're right; no need to separate out the pages. I just have to pipe grep with a second set of words to achieve and.

[Trisquel-users] When is proprietary software bad?

2014-09-03 Thread riftyful
Hello! I talked to some people recently, about how Skype is bad because it's spyware. But they said that the people who use Skype agree to being tracked, so it's okay. I do not think this case must be exactly true, but it was still interesting to think about. As R. M. Stallman said many

Re: [Trisquel-users] When is proprietary software bad?

2014-09-03 Thread onpon4
riftyful said: What if being in control of the software is not important to the user? The problem with proprietary software is that you don't have that choice. With libre software, you do. If you don't feel the need to control it, you can just run it as is. Personally, I don't very often

Re: [Trisquel-users] When is proprietary software bad?

2014-09-03 Thread debianlinux
it's ok because they don't understand what's all about, if they see the postman snoop in their envelope, read the content and then put in the mailbox for sure they will be mad of him, it a matter of perception.

Re: [Trisquel-users] When is proprietary software bad?

2014-09-03 Thread lloyd
^ This. So much this. I've spoken to people who've read all about the Snowden NSA stuff, and don't really care. It infuriates me actually. They would be livid if someone read their snail mail, yet in the digital realm, suddenly it's a-ok? Bizzare.

Re: [Trisquel-users] When is proprietary software bad?

2014-09-03 Thread nux
If it does not do harm to the user, is it okay? Depends on your definition of harm. The libre argument would possibly be along the lines that it's not harm that registers with the user, but is still harm none the less. Those who live by the market can be manipulated by the market. In other

Re: [Trisquel-users] Install TOR Browser

2014-09-03 Thread santiago . lorente
Thanks. Now I am trying to download the Tor Browser from https://www.torproject.org/download/download-easy.html.en as you recommended, but when I try to get https://www.torproject.org/dist/torbrowser/3.6.4/tor-browser-linux64-3.6.4_en-US.tar.xz I just get a page from the Apache Server saying Not

Re: [Trisquel-users] When is proprietary software bad?

2014-09-03 Thread franparpe
Proprietary software is always bad, there is no context which can show us the contrary. As R. M. Stallman said many times, proprietary software is bad because the user does not control it; instead, the software controls the user. But is that always true? What if being in control of the

Re: [Trisquel-users] When is proprietary software bad?

2014-09-03 Thread onpon4
Whereby usage is fine. Not a word I personally tend to use, though; I had to look it up in a dictionary to be sure of what it meant.

Re: [Trisquel-users] When is proprietary software bad?

2014-09-03 Thread franparpe
Thank you a lot, onpon4, for checking. :-) Perhaps by which would have been better suited but I had to try.

Re: [Trisquel-users] finding particular pages within PDFs

2014-09-03 Thread adel . afzal
The script writes the basename-matches.pdf file to the same folder where the script and PDFs are, right? I can't find that matches file. Is it a problem if my PDFs have spaces in the name? (Particularly the last PDF, that the script uses to create the matches.pdf file name)

Re: [Trisquel-users] Update Manager Not Working

2014-09-03 Thread xnchgyqk
I've been having this problem for a few weeks now in 6.0.1. I'm concerned about my system not being up to date. Attached is an image of the update manager. The screenshot program actually failed to capture one detail accurately: the curser in reality is the round spinning curser, not the

Re: [Trisquel-users] When is proprietary software bad?

2014-09-03 Thread Andrew Roffey
Modification of another quote I know: Software freedom doesn't matter until it does With regards to Skype, for many years it continued to be a useful, P2P VoIP network, despite being proprietary software. At the start its encrypted connections attracted use by people who couldn't use phone

Re: [Trisquel-users] Learning self-defense

2014-09-03 Thread anthonypineiro
Thanks for sharing this info on BadUSB jxself. Is there a site you'd recommend to learn more about this BadUSB? Thanks

Re: [Trisquel-users] Update Manager Not Working

2014-09-03 Thread xnchgyqk
I ran sudo apt-get upgrade as suggested by Magic Banana and this fixed the problem *for me*. Thank you Magic Banana :) Please don't anyone close the bug report on the basis of SVTony's and my experience! There are lots of non-technical users who don't know any other way to update

[Trisquel-users] Diaspora*

2014-09-03 Thread blade . vp2020
hi Are Here Any person Have an account on Diaspora*??

Re: [Trisquel-users] Diaspora*

2014-09-03 Thread onpon4
Yep, a few of us are. I'm onp...@nerdpol.ch.

[Trisquel-users] Re : Diaspora*

2014-09-03 Thread mtlben
Diaspora* is a cool gathering place for us free-software lovers. I am mtl...@joindiaspora.com.

Re: [Trisquel-users] When is proprietary software bad?

2014-09-03 Thread xnchgyqk
I'd like to point out that Skype users did *NOT* agree to being tracked. Let's explicitly state a fact that in our hearts pretty much all of us already know: Having clicked I agree or whatever to 50 pages or however much dense legalese in order to use a free program does not validly

Re: [Trisquel-users] Where are all the security updates?

2014-09-03 Thread xnchgyqk
Thanks to everyone who works on Trisquel! Some feedback: The most important priority for any operating system should be security. I think it's pretty obvious that no one wants their system remotely tampered with by bad people. If a supported Trisquel release is not getting all the

[Trisquel-users] Re : finding particular pages within PDFs

2014-09-03 Thread magicbanana
The script writes the output PDF in the working directory (i.e., the directory where you are). Notice that you can have, in argument, PDFs that are in different directories. For instance to process all PDFs in the sub-directories dir1 and dir2 of the working directory: $ pdf-page-grep

Re: [Trisquel-users] Learning self-defense

2014-09-03 Thread Andrew Roffey
gnuser wrote: I would say that a keyboard's firmware could be dangerous (maybe logging your keystrokes and sending it somewhere over the internet) but is it true for any firmware? Or is a matter simply of freedom, not so much of security? Also, Intel's proprietary Wi-Fi firmware stops a

[Trisquel-users] Re : When is proprietary software bad?

2014-09-03 Thread magicbanana
Many good points were made. However, in my opinion, one important point is missing. Skype is a communication software, communication involves at least two users, and Skype can only talk to Skype. Forcing the interlocutor to give up her freedoms so that she can talk with you is being a bad

Re: [Trisquel-users] Learning self-defense

2014-09-03 Thread Andrew Roffey
Also, Intel's proprietary Wi-Fi firmware stops a user from being able to change their MAC address Er, maybe driver actually, I'm not too sure. The GNU/Linux drivers for Intel Wi-Fi cards are apparently free but the firmware is not: https://wiki.debian.org/iwlwifi The quote from Intel that it

Re: [Trisquel-users] Re : When is proprietary software bad?

2014-09-03 Thread J.B. Nicholson-Owens
magicban...@gmail.com wrote: The whole community is harmed: users of Skype reinforce Microsft's monopoly and impede the rest of the group from switching to free software. And the problem propagates down to the operating system because, as far as I understood, Skype for GNU/Linux is technically

Re: [Trisquel-users] Allow switching between kernels in GRUB

2014-09-03 Thread cd1207
Look guys, I'm aware and have thought of all the individual solutions for individual pieces of hardware, but I specifically chose not to mention a particular system because I don't know ahead of time what It will be using it on. I am just looking for a solution I can use in a redistributable

Re: [Trisquel-users] Allow switching between kernels in GRUB

2014-09-03 Thread cd1207
I'm aware you can update the installation manually. I would like, obviously, for it to be up to date as of the time I install it, like usual, not the last time I got around to manually downloading packages. The updates were just an example - there are infinitely more reasons to need the

Re: [Trisquel-users] Allow switching between kernels in GRUB

2014-09-03 Thread cd1207
If you read the OP, you would see that I already have linux. Please read the question before answering.

Re: [Trisquel-users] Allow switching between kernels in GRUB

2014-09-03 Thread cd1207
Couldn't have said it better myself. Thank you for clarifying this for the others on the thread - I'm keeping this in mind when I make my custom version but find it tedious to explain to every participant that comes in. Actually, I'm a big fan of your essays.

Re: [Trisquel-users] Allow switching between kernels in GRUB

2014-09-03 Thread cd1207
Would that not install linux in the same way my method did (albeit a later version)? My problem is not getting the kernel but having it hot-swappable with linux-libre in GRUB. It would be nice to not have to use Ubuntu repos - where are these official Linux PPAs?

Re: [Trisquel-users] Allow switching between kernels in GRUB

2014-09-03 Thread cd1207
What he said. Also, I can't use trisquel 7 because it's not out yet and I want to redistribute only a stable version to friends and family. However, it's tempting to try, I just fear a clean install would be required once it does officially release.

Re: [Trisquel-users] Allow switching between kernels in GRUB

2014-09-03 Thread cd1207
...Or installing the binary blobs so you can reverse-engineer them and make a free variant :)

Re: [Trisquel-users] Allow switching between kernels in GRUB

2014-09-03 Thread cd1207
Just curious, in what way would blobs “creep” back in? The users may put some back in, but A. That's on them, and B. You (or the devs) would never know. By your statements I'm guessing you originally assumed it might not be in the user's control. What other way could it be? I'm not asking if it

Re: [Trisquel-users] Allow switching between kernels in GRUB

2014-09-03 Thread cd1207
user friendly is debatable on who you interpret the user to be perhaps, but it's unequivocally more user-friendly than the lack of this feature. “comprises a purely free system and adds restrictions to the system as well” I disagree. Adding this feature (Bring Your Own Blob, if you will)

[Trisquel-users] Compilation terminates, likely due to missing library

2014-09-03 Thread LDrumbler
I'm trying to compile Captcoin, a free software fork of Bitcoin. I installed the dependencies listed in the ReadMe file and got a good way into the compilation, but compilation stops with this error: cd /home/linus/CaptCoin; /bin/sh share/genbuild.sh /home/linus/CaptCoin/build/build.h

Re: [Trisquel-users] Compilation terminates, likely due to missing library

2014-09-03 Thread LDrumbler
Literally right after I posted this I found the fix. I installed the wrong version of Boost; you need 1.48.

Re: [Trisquel-users] Compilation terminates, likely due to missing library

2014-09-03 Thread LDrumbler
Okay, new problem. I got almost everything compiled with that library, but right when it comes to combining the generated binaries, this happens: g++ -m64 -fstack-protector-all --param ssp-buffer-size=1 -Wl,-O1 -o CAPTcoin-qt build/bitcoin.o build/bitcoingui.o build/transactiontablemodel.o