Hi I still have issue to update to trisquel with same error.
Here error I got:
Preparing to unpack .../base-files_1%3a9.4ubuntu4.2+8.0trisquel1_amd64.deb
...
Unpacking base-files (1:9.4ubuntu4.2+8.0trisquel1) over
(1:7.2ubuntu5+7.0trisquel3) ...
dpkg: unrecoverable fatal error, aborting:
What a clear-headed gentleman. Jason Self for President!
<>
On 09/18/2019 07:37 AM, d...@trudgian.net wrote:
> I will also be leaving Trisquel at this point. This thread is playing
> out in a similar way to the Purism ones, with it being inferred that
> anyone not in the majority position on this forum hasn't read the source
> material etc. If the goal is
Fortunately his latest one there shows he is growing as a person. "I am
grateful for the conversations that enabled me to understand why."
> I take back what I said of hate propaganda. You were just
recollecting RMS's messages up to the most recent one.
Thank you for retracting your statement. I regret that the message is so
long, but I purposely wanted to be as comprehensive and fair as I could in
answering the question.
El 18/9/19 a les 15:22, kopole...@riseup.net ha escrit:
>> That is hate propaganda.
>
> No, I was merely answering J.B. Nicholson-Owens question namely: "but
> I'd like to know if anyone here has any idea what they're referring to?"
>
> I merely gave a verbatim list of Stallman's statements on
El 18/9/19 a les 11:35, Ignacio Agulló ha escrit:
>
> The way I see it, you are lost from the very moment you try to
> defend someone's innocence - haters will inevitably profit from the
> occasion to claim everybody is guilty, even you who did nothing more to
> try to defend someone's
On 18/09/19 15:22, wrote:
> I even included Stallman's most recent statement, which importantly
> only came four days ago, a day after the Vice and Daily Dot stories
> were originally published.
I reckon you did. But for the most of people don't bother to read
to the end of such a long text
> What are you going to do, stop using Free Software altogether? Like "I
> don't use it because RMS said mean things"? Makes no sense. But to
> each his own.
Although I supported the FSF moving forward with a new president this is
not why I am leaving Trisquel, and I did not say that. I know that
> That is hate propaganda.
No, I was merely answering J.B. Nicholson-Owens question namely: "but I'd
like to know if anyone here has any idea what they're referring to?"
I merely gave a verbatim list of Stallman's statements on pedophilia, not
misquoting him or taking it out of context. I
Agreed. There should be some sort of limit to disassociating oneself from
RMS; otherwise the logical conclusion seems to be to remove oneself from
anything he ever had anything to do with at all which would seem to mean that
one has to stop using any free software at all and go use 100%
That makes no sense. RMS was not even involved in Trisquel, so any political
opinions of his are in no way affecting the development of Trisquel, the
choice of packages included in the distro, the themes (wallpapers, icons,
etc). I see NO REASON that I should stop using an OS that has no
Exactly, what is needed in these times is tolerance and willingness to work
together even beyond differences. Politics, belief-based views may change
like the wind, but with a steady heart we can all just focus on the prize of
a particular goal. I don't agree with everything any one person
> What the heck is going on here?
What's going on here is that software does not exist in a vacuum. It is
created by groups of people, it is used by groups of people. We are
political, and software is political due to that.
> WTF?? How does any RMS opinion affect the way a GNU/Linux distro
On 18/09/19 13:15, wrote:
>
> Richard Stallman comments regarding pedophilia:
Stallman says, and you can check it out on his own website, that he
no longer thinks that way. What you are doing is to dig out Stallman's
most controversial statements from his past and presenting them as if
they
>> As a result I don't know what they're talking about... I've asked name at
domain what these comments are, since they wrote that post to their own blog,
but I'd like to know if anyone here has any idea what they're referring to?
Richard Stallman comments regarding pedophilia:
"Dubya has
What the heck is going on here?
I actually read people suggesting that RMS thoughts on some non-technological
matter are enough of a reason to abandon a GNU/Linux distro... WTF?? How does
any RMS opinion affect the way a GNU/Linux distro works? It's software one is
talking about here, not
The way I see it, you are lost from the very moment you try to
defend someone's innocence - haters will inevitably profit from the
occasion to claim everybody is guilty, even you who did nothing more to
try to defend someone's innocence. That is a form of censorship, and
people defending
Well, he can't do that – he's now put into writing that he defends RMS, so
they'll just go after him.
El 18/9/19 a les 1:18, onp...@riseup.net ha escrit:
> I just want to point out that this didn't come out of thin air:
>
> https://medium.com/@selamie/remove-richard-stallman-fec6ec210794
>
> RMS has been saying things like this for years, and only now he's being
> held accountable. It's about
20 matches
Mail list logo
