> I have had much trouble with this OS. Both on my desktop and on a laptop,
> the OS will crash anywhere from 0-10 minutes after startup every time
> without incident.
This is unusual. I have installed Trisquel on many people's computers
and they have not had this problem.
> I doubt this is an
I have been using Trisquel for nearly 10 years without without that problem.
Indeed, Trisquel powers the servers for fsf.org and gnu.org (which handles
tons of traffic each day from people all over the world for the entire GNU
Project) without any problems. Perhaps it's better if you focus on
ethancris...@gmail.com wrote ..
> I have had much trouble with this OS.
I have not. It's just as bad as Debian Stable, no worse, and a little
better.
> Both on my desktop and on a laptop, the
> OS will crash anywhere from 0-10 minutes after startup every time
without
> incident.
I have had Trisq
@chaosmonk
> This is unusual. I have installed Trisquel on many people's computers
and they have not had this problem.
Then it appears I have been ambushed by a glint of poor fortune, since my
success rate with this OS is 0%.
> Maybe a hardware issue then?
Could be... I doubt it. The lapto
>> Maybe a hardware issue then?
He might be talking that the hardware you have is defective, rather than
incompatible with Trisquel. I experience an issue with one of my computers
and found out one of the RAM sticks was bad, this caused my computer to
reboot at any time.
>If the compariso
Sr. You have my respects for your patient reply
> Could be... I doubt it. The laptop I bought from Technoethical was
> specifically sold with this OS installed. So, unless they are foolish
> enough to sell their stock on hardware components that are incompatible
> with Trisquel, the answer is no.
I don't mean incompatible with Trisquel. I mean
Trisquel panel's indicator applet (scrolling the volume) crashes sometimes
but it can be relaunched. Other than that, I've had virtually zero issues
with Trisqyuel 8 on my HP Probook 6460b laptop.
I'd put it down to "rush to conclusions".
http://catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html#idm460
systemd stuff aside, what do you think his problem is via the log he
attached? just curious.
As much as I dislike systemd and its questionable ways, I somehow doubt it
would work incorrectly like the way you mentioned. All you have to do to know
that I dislike systemd is do a search in my history on here.
That aside, I use trisquel 8 on my kororapenguin and it works fine even with
Dunno myself, but you probably know more about hardware than me so yeah.
>In my opinion, the biggest obstacles to adoption of free operating
systems are social ones.
I would have agreed with you say a year ago but my late experience made me
change my mind: the reason is they already know Windows and they do not want
to spend time and energy on learning something n
I agree 1% bundling/forcing an os onto a computer should be illegal.
Though I also think hardware should be libre by default, not just software,
and as for why I say by default, give the user the choice... if you don't,
and people get upset, we will be back to square one, etc, etc...
An
My case lasts since 6 Months. I had also received a bad laptop from
Technoethical and have sent it back, no response nor money back so far (>3
Months). This was the reason why I had wrote them many E-Mails before - first
response a few Months after due to I published their unethical behaviour
14 matches
Mail list logo
