Re: [Trisquel-users] Let's talk upgrading, lifecycles, and Trisquel 4.5

2012-03-28 Thread 2585004677
Hermes Group hermes scraf CEO Patrick michael kors handbags - Thomas said, hermes beltif inventory Louis Vuitton Handbagsshortage, the hermes handbagsGroup's michael kors outletsales last ray ban wayfarer year, may Louis Vuitton Bags exceed 3 michael kors bags billion euros hermes birkin bag

Re: [Trisquel-users] Let's talk upgrading, lifecycles, and Trisquel 4.5

2012-03-15 Thread chris
I think you have this confused in your head. Trisquel 4.0.1 is the long term support release and it is based on Ubuntu 10.04 not 10.10. You should have continued upgrading to each new version if you installed 4.5. Which means you will need to upgrade to 5, 5.5, and then 6. Once you are on

Re: [Trisquel-users] Let's talk upgrading, lifecycles, and Trisquel 4.5

2012-03-15 Thread teodorescup
Personally, I dropped the concept of distribution upgrade in favor of package upgrade, and by that, I mean that I manually edit the sources.list with the repositories that I see fit (taranis=dagda) and I let synaptic upgrade the packages; as long as the new versions are coming from a

Re: [Trisquel-users] Let's talk upgrading, lifecycles, and Trisquel 4.5

2012-03-15 Thread tegskywalker
I'm not confused. The point of an LTS is a long term release which means I get 3-5 years of support instead of the 18 months of the standard release. People especially use an LTS for their web servers and many use them for their desktop to get a stable release for their home or work

Re: [Trisquel-users] Let's talk upgrading, lifecycles, and Trisquel 4.5

2012-03-15 Thread teodorescup
Well, all thou I haven't tested with the latest Trisquel's, as t3g pointed out earlier, there were/are (at least with other distro's) problems when one tries both upgrading and skipping one or more releases, with the 'proper tools'. I'm not saying that the normal way is bad or anything,