[Trisquel-users] issues with encrypted installation

2016-04-15 Thread dguthrie
Hi, I am having a number of problems regarding installing Trisquel encrypted. Firstly, I attempted to install Trisquel using the net installation CD. It all went fine (allowing me to install everything except /boot encrypted using the useful 'guided partitioning with encrypted LVM' option) unt

Re: [Trisquel-users] issues with encrypted installation

2016-04-15 Thread dguthrie
Thanks for your reply. I am comfortable with partitioning and installing, what I am really trying to say is that the Trisquel net installer automatically treats itself as the drive /dev/sda, rather than the first disk, which is clearly an example of misbehaviour. If you have no other OS ins

Re: [Trisquel-users] issues with encrypted installation

2016-04-15 Thread codyhofstetter
Using the install as you've been doing and taking Magic Banana's suggestion to target the GRUB install to /dev/sdc is probably the easiest way to fix your problem. I've personally not run into this issue but if you feel that it isn't installing properly because your target disk isn't /dev/sda

Re: [Trisquel-users] issues with encrypted installation

2016-04-15 Thread dguthrie
I got it mixed up with the update-grub command, but I definitely used grub-install in the shell, and it said that it didn't exist in /bin/bash. It is confusing the inconsistency of the naming of these commands, but I know I tried the right command.

Re: [Trisquel-users] issues with encrypted installation

2016-04-15 Thread dguthrie
Has anyone else had this problem? In fact, installing GRUB from the net install fails whether I'm using encrypted partitions or not. Does anyone actually use the net installer?

Re: [Trisquel-users] issues with encrypted installation

2016-04-15 Thread mcz
I've had my share of issues with the netinstall, but after a few attempts, it worked. Never had any issue with Grub though. My drive is encrypted and I have Libreboot. Also md5 isn't as reliable as gpg, from what I've read. Last but hopefully not least, this might maybe help (but I might be

Re: [Trisquel-users] issues with encrypted installation

2016-04-15 Thread dguthrie
>Also md5 isn't as reliable as gpg, from what I've read. The download page provides an md5sum and an ASCII-armoured GPG signature. MD5 is fine for verifying that the download did not corrupt along the way. MD5 is vulnerable to certain attacks that makes it unsuitable for storing passwords. The

Re: [Trisquel-users] issues with encrypted installation

2016-04-15 Thread dguthrie
While attempting to install GRUB, it seemed to have corrupted the original installation, meaning I was not able to boot my computer into anything other than the net installer. There is a shell included but 'install-grub' does not exist as a command, so I can't run it after installation or boo

Re: [Trisquel-users] issues with encrypted installation

2016-04-15 Thread dguthrie
Thanks for your reply. I repeated the steps with the netinstall CD, verifying the cryptographic signatures and md5 sums of the disk image, and attempted to install. I get the same GRUB error, so I install without the bootloader. This is clearly a bug: it expects /dev/sda to be target disk.

Re: [Trisquel-users] issues with encrypted installation

2016-04-28 Thread enduzzer
I have the same issue. The solution is brutally removing the USB stick so that the device configuration is reviewed and the hard disk will be treated as /dev/sda, not the USB. http://www.rants.org/2014/09/09/debian_install_solving_grub_error/ "This post is for people who install Debian GNU/L

Re: [Trisquel-users] issues with encrypted installation

2016-04-29 Thread dguthrie
Thanks!

Re: [Trisquel-users] issues with encrypted installation

2016-04-29 Thread jason
Another option: When the installer gets to the point where it asks to install GRUB, say no. It then asks for where to install it. Tell it /dev/sdb. GRUB is then installed to the correct device and it boots just fine.