1., below, is
myth
(it's not possible
now, for anyone in Am.; there are too many historic roots and political and
economic parallels solidified betw all church/es and
state/s--e.g., in christianity, the amorphous Cath. ch. 'effectively' adaptd to
Hitlerism; it adapts to America (named for
time will
tell
On Fri, 22 Oct 2004 15:56:51 -0400 "David Miller"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:>Numbers don't lie
Fri, 22 Oct 2004 17:47:14 -0400,
DavidM
>>.. as you can see, Paul's style was to quote
sayings and proverbs which do>>not have an origin in
Scripture..
when did King James become a radical
conservative?
In a message dated 10/24/2004 8:21:38 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
makes me happy (assuming you don't eat the bun) BUT did you have to say In and Out Burger? We don't have them here and my son went to CA and came back raving about them. Now you made me hungry!!! Laura
In a message dated 10/24/2004 8:12:26 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On the cross John. Christ was made to be sin for us who knew no sin. He took our place IOW he did not know sin before the cross. He was not born with a sin nature and he did not succumb to any temptation dur
In a message dated 10/24/2004 7:50:29 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, 24 Oct 2004 19:09:15 EDT [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In a message dated 10/24/2004 10:18:49 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
How does God fellowship with the sinner and avoid fell
In a message dated 10/24/2004 9:30:46 PM Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
i have called my wife and told
her to bring me an In and Out Burger --- I hope you all are
happy. John
Yeah That makes me happy (assuming you don't eat the bun)
BUT did you have to say In
Exactly. And so simple to understand
for those with minds uncluttered by untruths. Izzy
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Terry Clifton
Sent: Sunday, October 24, 2004
7:20 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] What is
sin?
Judy T
From: Todd &
Shirley Zumbehl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, October 24, 2004
12:08 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: For Linda: FW:
[TruthTalk] The Kryptonite Theory of Sin
John, Where is your response to SSS? Or is the speelling
wrong? :-) Izzy
--
Meaning what, exactly? Iz
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Sunday, October 24, 2004
4:10 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The
Kryptonite Theory of Sin
Slade is outlining something (gnosticism) very import
I don't get it either, Judy. Why Primarily Spirit? Izzy
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, October 24, 2004
1:24 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The
Kryptonite Theory of Sin
In a message dated
Meaning whizzing past your ears again, John? Those who state
that Christ was a sinner because he came in the likeness of Man do not realize
that He was not IDENTICAL with us because He was the Manifestation of God in
the flesh: a perfect Lamb who came to take away our sins. Izzy
Let me restate it: those who insisted on killing Paul were
not Believers in messiah Yeshua. Izzy
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, October 24, 2004
1:05 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] 4th
Comma
On Sun, 24 Oct 2004 19:09:15 EDT [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In a message dated 10/24/2004 10:18:49 AM
Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:How does God fellowship with the sinner and avoid fellowship
with sin?
Judyt: I wrote the above in
response to a statement e
In a message dated 10/24/2004 7:02:43 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hey John You can have the whole thing!!! No carbs and no fat!! LOL Laura
i have called my wife and told her to bring me an In and Out Burger --- I hope you all are happy.
John
In a message dated 10/24/2004 6:55:06 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
They're my favorite.
-- slade
Your ability to cause deep pain rises to the level of a professional -:)
John
Hey John You can have the whole thing!!! No carbs
and no fat!! LOL Laura
--- Begin Message ---
I hope
you like cherry...
They're my favorite.
--
slade
<>
--- End Message ---
Your friend is to be respected for standing up and being counted in such a
gathering. Laura
I hope
you like cherry...
They're my favorite.
--
slade
<>
In a message dated 10/24/2004 6:41:07 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Do you want one?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, 24 October, 2004 21.32
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk
Do you
want one?
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Sunday, 24 October, 2004
21.32To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re:
[TruthTalk] What is sin?In a message dated
10/24/2004 6:18:25 PM Pacific Daylight
The point of the writing (that I can determine) is that the lines between
women and men should not be blurred to the point where it's difficult to
determine who is male and who is female within a culture's context.
But to answer your question, there is no command from Moshe in regard to the
length
In a message dated 10/24/2004 6:18:25 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I fully expect those of this persuasion to be contradictory in their essay(s) because they are wrong in their general and primary assumptions.
Ok. Have a nice day.
There is not a single piece of pie in t
In a message dated 10/24/2004 6:08:15 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ok. I am going to carry this doctrine to its logical conclusion.
All things were accomplished with the death, burial, and resurrection of Messiah. We (well, actually, no one) falls under the Mosaic Covena
I fully expect those of this persuasion to
be contradictory in their essay(s) because they are wrong in their general and
primary assumptions.
Ok. Have a nice day.
A
friend of mine wrote me an email. I thought you might enjoy/hate it, depending
upon your perspective.
--
slade
It was a chilling experience a couple of weeks ago when I attended
a dinner to announce statewide awards in Wisconsin at the the Univ. of
Wisconsin Arboretum for ecol
Ok. I
am going to carry this doctrine to its logical
conclusion.
All
things were accomplished with the death, burial, and resurrection of Messiah. We
(well, actually, no one) falls under the Mosaic Covenant; in fact, the
Avrahamic Covenant is nixed as well because Messiah accomplished all
Aye Slade. Thank you. However,
you made a good point in your post to Judy. None of us are impervious to
foreign pagan thought entering our beliefs. We all have to be conscious
and help each other become aware of how anti-Christian thought has slipped in without
us knowing. As I see it
In a message dated 10/24/2004 5:38:59 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
D.Stern gave four example of how the passage can be interpreted. He said the fourth, in his opinion, was the correct one. Therefore, someone would be able to quote something from numbers 1, 2, or 3, and clai
I have a question that possibly Jeff or Slade or someone else familiar
with the Mosaic law might be able to answer.
Paul states in the NT that men should have short hair and women should
have long hair. My question is this: Is there any place in the OT
where this was ordered by God? If not, w
D.Stern gave four example of how the passage can be
interpreted. He said the fourth, in his opinion, was the correct one. Therefore,
someone would be able to quote something from numbers 1, 2, or 3, and claim he
wrote it... which he did... but it still is not his opinion. By doing so (or
add
Judy’s article brings up Hitler,
wondering how he ever came to power. The following article compares
George Bush with Adolph Hitler, not in an outrageous way but in the use of fear,
hypnotism and other techniques pioneered by Hitler. Over and over I have
pointed out how Bush (and in some
In a message dated 10/24/2004 2:46:20 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The defeat of President Bush will send a chilling message to future presidents who may need to make difficult, yet unpopular decisions. America has always been a nation that rises to the demands of history r
Thank
you Jonathan. You've done my work for me. I can mark the posts I was going to
answer and read!
-
slade
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Jonathan
HughesSent: Sunday, 24 October, 2004 16.08To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject
Here is an article from The American
Conservative, an important and highly respected right-wing journal. Guess
what? They don’t endorse Bush. Now this brings up something interesting.
Many in the conservative right do not view Bush as a conservative. Rather, he
is viewed as a neo-conse
There
is a simple explanation to the hair-splitting, Lance. People forget the Hebrew
language and mindset is one geared toward action not the innate nature of
something. Does God weigh the spirit (the essence of a man) or does He judge the
spirits (the motivations of a man)?
--
slade
-
Let’s look at Judy’s blatant attempt at
partisan politics. Is there any preamble for TT to discuss? Of course not.
Just more spam for your inbox.
The columnist states that there will be no
sarcasm. I cannot make the same claim.
First he makes this election out to be the
most i
In a message dated 10/24/2004 2:37:19 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
John, when you are on, you are really on. Thank you. When I read stuff like this I actually believe that God can visit even this forum.
Jonathan
Appreciated. Nice to know that once in a whil
In a message dated 10/24/2004 2:17:15 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It is not God who changes not, it is Judy.
-:)
j
In a message dated 10/24/2004 10:24:04 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Do you know what set me off?
John
No.
slade
Slade says:
Your last comment, "Whether this contradicts his statement in another part of the book is of no concern to me" is a typical response fr
In a message dated 10/24/2004 10:23:17 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Scripture tells us Avraham believed YHVH and it was accounted to him as righteousness. Scripture tells us the commandments of God are righteous and to perform them will be righteousness to us.
But to ans
In a message dated 10/24/2004 10:18:49 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
How does God fellowship with the sinner and avoid fellowship with sin?
You should know - you are one of them (me too). Don't you see that, logically, you are saying that God has nothing to do with us i
You may have already voted,
but thought you would like to see this. One
lone voice Before dawn this
morning I awoke with a sense of impending doom and
panic. At first I thought I had been awaken
And this from a Texan
cousin...
If any
of this worries you , I encourage you to send this to as many people as you can
before the election. This truly is one of the most important elections in
our history. Even the Houston Chronicle today (10/24) got it
right.
John, when you are on, you are really on.
Thank you. When I read stuff like this I actually believe that God can visit
even this forum.
Jonathan
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, October 24, 2004
10:56 AM
To: [EM
Jonathan in blue.
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Judy Taylor
Sent: Sunday, October 24, 2004
4:51 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The
Kryptonite Theory of Sin
On Sun, 24 Oct 2004 16:11:48 -0400
Pride would be saying that I can easily
outlink, outtalk, outthink, and outsense anyone on this forum. What I did
say was that I could do that to any of the silly articles Judy and Izzy post
here in their Christian Kerry bashing. The point is that I will no longer
stand for blatant Kerry
If Judy was to actually stand corrected it
would mean a turning around on her position. Of course she does not do this.
After ‘standing corrected’ she spends the next four sentences regarding how she
is still correct. She uses invective (when said she wasn’t being honest she
translates t
Jonathan Hughes wrote:
Laugh, the
garbage you spew forth on this
forum is humorous. Bush’s own hometown newspaper doesn’t even
support him! Want more? http://explog.com/
By the way,
if you want to get into a
conservative versus liberal propaganda war here on TT you are only
On Sun, 24 Oct 2004 16:11:48 -0400 "Jonathan Hughes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>writes:Judy,
Were the disciples sinners? Did they not continue to sin while they were
His disciples?
Judyt:
They had a covenant with God through Moses and were
born under the law which was effective before the cr
In a message dated 10/24/2004 9:48:13 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But be sure to ignore the additional verses in my quote. That way you still have a chance at making your point. Adam was the phsyical, Christ was the spiritual. That is waht the text says. You are
Judy,
Were the disciples sinners? Did they
not continue to sin while they were His disciples? Was not Judas Iscariot
a close friend of Jesus? Did Christ fellowship with the disciples?
Did Christ eat with prostitutes and sinners like the Pharisee’s accused
Him of? You keep quoting,
To sum it up for you:
I call your brand of Christianity Gnostic
for two reasons:
1) You place primacy on the
spiritual portion of the human. You claim Adam and Eve were primarily
spirit beings. This is pure unadulterated Gnosticism. It is not the
Hebrew nor Christian way of view
By the way, note the incredible quality difference
between the two papers. One (that favours Bush) is completely based upon fear;
hey look guys, no one has attacked us on American soil since! Bush must be
doing a great job!. The other (the one that favours Kerry) is based not upon
the re
Look Jonathan, I've just gone through a week of
NLTR (not listening to Rush) and, I'm experiencing withdrawal symptoms so, if
you Canadians are going to spew that liberal X&$# do it somewhere
else. OK?
- Original Message -
From:
Jonathan Hughes
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Laugh, the garbage you spew forth on this
forum is humorous. Bush’s own hometown newspaper doesn’t even
support him! Want more? http://explog.com/
By the way, if you want to get into a
conservative versus liberal propaganda war here on TT you are only setting
yourself up for a loss. I
Sure! 'Foolish Westerners! You have time for
all this?'
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: October 24, 2004 13:57
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The Kryptonite
Theory of Sin
On Sun, 24 Oct 2004
It's tough when
the Democrat leaning newspaper in a Democrat town in a Democrat state won't
support its hometown candidate. When you read this you can see why. Kerry can't
fool the people he's been around for the last 32 years!Lowell Sun
Endorsement: George W. Bush for president Sunday, Octob
On Sun, 24 Oct 2004 13:47:48 -0400 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I heard a story this morning: A woman in China
heard from God that she was to go the front of the Police Station where she
was to preach the gospel. She did. She was arrested and, imprisoned for 6
months.
I heard a story this morning: A woman in China
heard from God that she was to go the front of the Police Station where she was
to preach the gospel. She did. She was arrested and, imprisoned for 6 months.
800 persons were saved therein.
I wonder what this dear, faithful woman would make
of
Do you know
what set me off?John
No.
slade
Scripture tells us Avraham believed YHVH and it was
accounted to him as righteousness. Scripture tells us the commandments of
God are righteous and to perform them will be righteousness to
us.
But to
answer your question, no. Faith and Righteousness are not exactly the
same.
--
slade
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Sunday, 24 October, 2004
02.51To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re:
[TruthTalk] What is sin?In a message dated
10/22/2004 2:43:20 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PRO
On Sun, 24 Oct 2004 12:13:53 EDT [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In a message dated 10/24/2004 2:01:00 AM
Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Judy writes: God's nature is to love and He does love us but it is mostly
from afar because
He can not
look upon, let alone fe
All 'she' has is a body with breath in it 'til
there ain't no breath left in it then, dust ensues. The rest is gobbledy-gook
for sure. Now, doncha all go quotin' them there tripartate inferences (y'all
call 'em verses I know" back at me 'cause y'er just confused as to understandin'
'em. OK?
On Sun, 24 Oct 2004 12:29:02 EDT [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In a message dated 10/24/2004 9:11:08 AM
Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:So also it is written, "The first man, Adam, became a living soul." The last
Adam became a life-giving spirit. However, the spiritua
Yes, I'll forward details.
L
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: October 24, 2004 12:17
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The Kryptonite
Theory of Sin
In a message dated 10/24/2004 3:10:02 AM
Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECT
On Sun, 24 Oct 2004 10:56:09 EDT [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So also it is written, "The
first man, Adam, became a living soul." The
last Adam became a life-giving spirit.
However, the spiritual is not first, but the natural, then the
spiritual. The first man is from the ear
In a message dated 10/24/2004 9:11:08 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So also it is written, "The first man, Adam, became a living soul." The last Adam became a life-giving spirit. However, the spiritual is not first, but the natural, then the spiritual. The first man is f
In a message dated 10/24/2004 3:10:02 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
PS: Anyone in the market from some of Lance's heretical books?
By the way -- is there anything out there, still in print, by Oscar Culman. The speelling on the last name may not be correct.
John
On Sun, 24 Oct 2004 10:56:09 EDT [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You asked for a scripture. I am
going to give you a scripture that is specific to the
question of whether Adam was a "spirit being" or not.
You have read it many times, I am sure; So also it is written, "The first m
In a message dated 10/24/2004 2:01:00 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Judy writes: God's nature is to love and He does love us but it is mostly from afar because He can not look upon, let alone fellowship with sin.
He does not fellowship sin -- but He does the sinner.
Jo
In a message dated 10/24/2004 1:01:47 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On the cross John. Christ was made to be sin for us who knew no sin. He took our place IOW he did not know sin before the cross. He was not born with a sin nature and he did not succumb to any temptation dur
From:
Slade
Henson
It is the spiritual part of us
that died the day A&E fell away in the garden because of sin. Their
souls still existed and they did not die physically until many decades later
according to the scriptures
Man's abili
In a message dated 10/24/2004 12:52:31 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In a message dated 10/23/2004 10:57:58 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
They were primarily spirit beings with the same nature and character at the beginning, that is, before the fall
N
Judy Taylor wrote:
On Sun, 24 Oct 2004 02:45:59 EDT [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
\
Judyt:
On the cross
John. Christ was made to be sin for us who knew
no sin. He took our place IOW he did not know sin before the
cross. He was not born with a sin nature and he did
Slade,
This is one for the refrigerator, A real
keeper!!
- Original Message -
From:
Slade
Henson
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, October 23, 2004
22:35
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] The Kryptonite
Theory of Sin
It is the spiritual part of us that
And, that I'm as 'disjointed' as ever! Perhaps
someone, like myself, who also thinks (?) in a stream of consciousness kinda'
way will sort this out for you. Judith, ya got da 'bug.
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: October 24, 2004
Lance writes:
A missionary friend has just flown over to
Indonesia to visit the Yali. Over some 20 years he worked, along with a team, to
create a written language then, translate the Bible. One of the issues he wishes to address is that of the 'western
gospel' (read gnostic, dualistic) h
Yikes!! A gnostic among us! We're being shot at by
a human counterpart to tritheism (body, soul, and spirit). Where's the cavalry?
Wait, here they come now with Capt. Slade leading the charge.
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: October
Your Bible (read: your interpretation of 'your
Bible') IS wrong. One of my favorite opening lines: 'according to MY Bible'
(not).
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: October 24, 2004 03:50
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The Kryptonite
The
Slade is outlining something (gnosticism) very
important here. It's truly worth looking into. The Hebrew understanding is
correct while the Greek understanding (that which prevails in much Christian
thought/writing) is errant.
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To:
Lances (sp) Lance's (correctamundo) In reality they
are not Lance's books at all. They are books written by a variety of authors
which were mailed from this location. I don't own it. I just work here as a
humble (?) seller of books.
PS: Anyone in the market from some of Lance's
heretical
A missionary friend has just flown over to
Indonesia to visit the Yali. Over some 20 years he worked, along with a team, to
create a written language then, translate the Bible. One of the issues he
wishes to address is that of the 'western gospel' (read gnostic, dualistic) he
preached some y
al Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: October 24, 2004 03:33
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Lance a question
about Bill T
My wife and I are going to take the
truck and tools back to our daughter in Colorado. We ill be gone from
Wed this w
On Sun, 24 Oct 2004 03:10:08 EDT [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In a message dated 10/22/2004 8:02:36 PM
Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:Judy writes: God's nature
is to love and He does love us but it is mostly from afar because He can not
look upon, let alone fellowsh
On Sat, 23 Oct 2004 22:16:48 -0400 "Slade Henson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
I
know you're not Gnostic, but Gnostic influences appear in our doctrine in
various places. Most Christians are far more Gnostic than anyone here on
TruthTalk. Surprisingly, people take "flesh and bloo
On Sun, 24 Oct 2004 02:50:31 EDT [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
John -- I just know that God exchanges faith
for righteousness because He has
to.
jt: Why does he have to? I wouldn't think
that God would have to do anything other than keep His own
Word.
Slade -- Faith was the b
On Sun, 24 Oct 2004 02:45:59 EDT [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In a message dated 10/22/2004 12:07:42 PM
Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:David Miller wrote:
Jesus Christ had sin, but he was not a sinner. Would you agree with this
statement?John: Perhaps I am being too
On Sun, 24 Oct 2004 03:23:42 EDT [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In a
message dated 10/23/2004 10:57:58 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:They were primarily spirit
beings with the same nature and character at the beginning, that is, before
the fall
No scripture f
In a message dated 10/22/2004 8:50:20 AM Pacific
Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:of course not, jt(!) let's think: i suspect that consciousness of sin is an
original concept of the Ap Paul, spiritually, rediscovrd periodically by, e.g.
MLuthr,
jt: Consciousness
of sin hasn't go
My wife and I are going to take the truck and tools back to our daughter in Colorado. We ill be gone from Wed this week through the following week. Does Bill Taylor live in Colorado or do I remember this poorly?
Also, Lance send me your address and I will send you some money. (Yes, e
In a message dated 10/23/2004 10:57:58 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
They were primarily spirit beings with the same nature and character at the beginning, that is, before the fall
No scripture for this -- wondering why.
John
In a message dated 10/23/2004 10:43:57 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Weren't Adam and Eve created in the image (likeness) of God? Doesn't mean
they were identical in every way. Izzy
Is this a serious question.
In a message dated 10/22/2004 8:02:36 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Judy writes: God's nature is to love and He does love us but it is mostly from afar because He can not look upon, let alone fellowship with sin.
Jonathans response is great -- but i ask "what of the in
In a message dated 10/22/2004 6:30:34 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
John, Perhaps it takes a fundamental Bible thumper to understand that the Jews who persecuted Paul were NOT Christians, and therefore were not any part of any CHURCH. Izzy
Those outside the church are no
In a message dated 10/22/2004 6:09:26 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Let me ask you a pointed question, John. I hope you choose not to ignore me as I deserve. You are not of my descent (doctrinally) but let me ask if I understand your interpretation of Matthew 5:17-18. Verse 1
97 matches
Mail list logo
